Guest guest Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 Jan Slama wrote: >THE FLU SHOT INSANITY > >If you're expecting vaccines to protect you from the flu, think again. >A growing number of experts have come around to believe the perceived >cure -- vaccines -- are far more dangerous than the virus itself. Learn more >about the dangers of flu vaccines and why you need to protect your family >from them. > >It was a major blessing that Chiron's manufacturing facility in Britain >was closed because the British government suspended its manufacturing >license when contamination was found at a Liverpool factory. The snafu >that eliminated some 50 million vaccines probably was a lifesaver for >many men, women and children in the United States. > >Vaccines, like mega-billion drugs, actually do little to protect you > from the flu. Most people have been led to believe -- by the >pharmaceutical powers that dominate conventional medicine and really >like your money -- that viruses like the flu bug are the problem, but >they aren't. > >The real problem: Most people have weakened and impaired immune >systems that are unable to function as they're designed to because of >horrendous dietary habits (the same culprit behind the obesity epidemic >in this country). > >Many otherwise reasonable people believe the hype and government >propaganda and feel even more of a need to take the flu vaccine. > >It all got started when the FDA first announced that 4 million of the >approximately 48 million flu vaccines produced for the United States by >UK-based Chiron's manufacturing plant in Liverpool had been tainted. > >Very quickly, that 4 million turned into all 48 million vaccines on >Oct. 5. Soon all the talk of rationing flu vaccines and advisories from >governmental agencies urging only those in great need to get a flu >vaccine -- seniors and young children the " experts " say are most >vulnerable -- whipped the public into a needless panic. > >The " feeding frenzy " kicked into high gear a week ago, with a number of >well-publicized " reactions " to the flu vaccine. > >A number of states and the nation's capital have threatened doctors and >nurses with fines or even jail time if they give flu vaccines to >healthy people. > >In probably the most notorious spectacle of panic, one elderly woman >died after standing in line for a flu shot at a grocery store in >northern California for FIVE HOURS! With nowhere to sit, the >79-year-old woman fell as she walked to find shade, hitting her head on >the pavement and later died. > >The town of Bloomfield, N.J., will hold a lottery to find out who will >receive one of the city's estimated 300 flu vaccines. > >In some cases, physicians are even taking verbal threats from patients. >One particularly incensed patient blamed a Nebraska doctor for not be >able to get a flu shot, and hoped she'd be happy " when I get sick and >die because it will be your fault. " > >In one case, patients weren't the only ones who were irate. Some 600 >doses of vaccine were stolen from a pediatrician's office in Aurora, >Colorado. > >Subsequent price-gouging in Kansas has lifted the price of a 10-dose >vial from $80 to $600. > >Much of the credit or blame, in this case, goes to a broken health care >paradigm that has so thoroughly brainwashed governmental officials who >urge their constituents to do what the " experts " -- in this case CDC >and FDA -- advise blindly and without thinking. The existing paradigm >has called for everyone to get a flu shot -- whether they really need >it or not -- to stay healthy. Now, all those " experts " are singing a >different tune, and people are having a harder time understanding the >sudden change in direction. > >And who could blame them? > >It is difficult to think of more insane events than having parents and >children wait in long lines at shopping malls, supermarkets, hospitals >and clinics to get a flu vaccination, worrying that the supply might >run out before they step up to get the shot. Healthy people don't need >a flu shot. In fact, almost no person, old or young, needs one! > > >Truth Behind the Fear > >It is clear, at least to naturopathic doctors and thinking people, that >adults and young children die from the flu not because of the virus >itself but because they are already sick, are bearing heavy toxic >burdens, and have severely compromised immune systems. > >Doctors forget the most basic principles of health and disease because >they do not care to look into the realities of the patients they treat. >They do not want to take the time to understand weaknesses in patients >because they are eating too much sugar, are malnourished, are getting >inadequate rest or if they are suffering from intense emotional >trauma--to say nothing about smoking, alcohol, and other abuses. > >The " flu salesmen " doctors and the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) >multiply the danger and risk of viruses because without exaggerated >stories flu vaccines just would not sell when people understand that >the virus is not dangerous in and of itself. > >Understand that the CDC deals with diseases, not health. They would not >stop and think that patients who exercise would be better protected >from the dangers of flu then from patients who took vaccines. > >Jeffrey A. Woods, Ph.D., and graduate student Tom Lowder at the >Physical Fitness Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of >Illinois, Urbana, recently said just this, reporting that four >consecutive days of moderate exercise in mice after they were infected >with influenza protects them from dying, compared with mice that didn't >exercise. > >Ideology vs. Common Sense > >The CDC states that 135 children died during the 2003-2004 flu season. >Fifty-nine (59) of these children had received flu shots. > >It's just too much for the CDC to suggest that patients exercise and >eat right. They would rather promote vaccines that contain dangerous >chemicals and inject babies than promote health. > >Dr. Hugh Fundenburg, one of the most quoted biologists of our time, >says that if an individual has five consecutive flu shots his or her >chances of developing Alzheimer's Disease are 10 times greater than if >they had one, two or no shots. > >What it will do to babies who are given flu shots year after year is >anyone's guess. And that is exactly what it is: a guess, an experiment, >for no one knows, for there have been no tests. Clearly, no >longitudinal study has been made with babies on the effect of giving >annual flu shots starting from six months of age. > >With an already heavy childhood immunization schedule in place, and >children carrying heavy burdens of toxins, including mercury >administered through other vaccines, it's a gamble what will happen to >children under the CDC's rule with the addition of the flu vaccine that >contains thimerosal. > >The addition of the flu vaccine into the childhood immunization >schedule, loaded as it is with nasty chemicals like mercury, aluminum >and even formaldehyde is medically insane. > >Too many people in the medical establishment benefit directly or >indirectly from pharmaceutical profits. The vaccine department at the >CDC is breaking the Nuremberg Code by administering the flu vaccine to >6-month-old babies starting this year, and every year thereafter. > >If eminent doctors warn against the serious effect of consecutive flu >shots to adults, imagine a newborn baby getting one each year. What >will happen to them after 10 or 20 consecutive years of receiving a >vaccine to protect them from a virus when good nutrition, vitamin C and >exercise would be the best protection? > >The best news in medicine this year ends up being the Chiron story. >Approximately 50 million people and children will be spared 25 >micrograms of mercury in the form of thimerosal this year. That's 50 >million fewer crimes against humanity. That's 50 million fewer assaults >on the nervous system for certainly thimerosal is nerve toxic even at >concentrations well below 25 micrograms. > >Dr. Julie L. Gerberding, director of the CDC, speaking to congressional >representatives, said that, at best, the preservative may be eliminated > from the vaccine by 2009. Can we hope for similar disasters at the >Chiron plant for the next five years in a row? > >After all, by the CDC's own admission, the vaccine for the flu is not >effective against it. With 59 out of the 135 flu deaths this past year >stemming from vaccinated children, a case could be made to include the >vaccine itself in the etiology of influenza death. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.