Sterility chemical put in WHO tetanus vaccine for Mexico, Nigeria, Nigaragua, Philippines and Tanzania,

[Guest guest]

Thu Sep 5, 2002 1:21 am

Sterility chemical put in WHO tetanus vaccine for Mexico, Nigeria,

Nigaragua, Philippines and Tanzania,

 

AltWritersFiles/message/3439

See also

AltWritersFiles/message/3771

For more on the depopulation prog

 

(from Cutting Edge: Research on population control, preventing future

births, is now being

carried out secretly by biotech companies ... During a presentation about

his case, Chapela revealed that a spermicidal corn developed by a U.S.

company is now being tested in Mexico. Males who unknowingly eat the corn

produce non-viable sperm and are unable to reproduce.)

 

From LLNews at

 

TAP TURNS ON THE WATER

 

Monsanto is also interested in controlling global fresh water supplies, as

the

following abridged article reveals: " Global consumption of water is doubling

every 20 years. Multinational corporations recognize these trends and are

trying to monopolize water supplies around the world. Monsanto, Bechtel,

Enron

and other global multinationals are seeking control of world water systems

and

supplies. The World Bank recently adopted a policy of water privatization

and

full-cost water pricing. This policy is causing great distress in many Third

World countries, which fear that their citizens will not be able to afford

for-profit water.Maude Barlow, chairperson of the Council of Canadians,

Canada's largest public advocacy group, states, " Governments around the

world

must act now to declare water a fundamental human right and prevent efforts

to

privatize, export, and sell for profit a substance essential to all life.

Research has shown that selling water on the open market only delivers it to

wealthy cities and individuals. The finite sources of fresh water are being

diverted, depleted, and polluted so fast that, by the year 2025, two-thirds

of

the world's population will be living in a state of serious water

deprivation.

Governments are signing away their control over domestic water supplies by

participating in trade treaties such as the North American Free Trade

Agreement

(NAFTA) and institutions such as the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Monsanto

plans to earn revenues of $420 million and a net income of $63 million by

2008

from its water business in India and Mexico. Monsanto estimates that water

will

become a multibillion-dollar market in the coming decades. "

 

[26]SEE THE WATER FLOW?Monsanto will then not only be able to control who

receives seed, but also who receives the means to grow it. And Monsanto's

close

links to the major institutes espousing population control philosophies,

such

as the World Health Organisation, World Bank and IMF, force us to ask what

unsavoury plans might be birthed as a result of these conglomerates being in

control of both food and water.More on Monsanto later.SOME VERY BIG

MARAUDERS

NOW COMBINING FORCESWhile on an individual basis, these chemical and

pharmaceutical giants compete over specific products, they are cooperating

very

closely in other ways. Novartis, for example, is one of the 39 multinational

biotech corporations (made up of about 600 companies like DeKalb, DuPont,

Monsanto, and Zeneca) and 14 national research associations that have joined

together into EuropaBio, an umbrella organisation formed to represent the

industries' genetically modified interests in Europe. According to the

EuropaBio website, their mission is: " To establish an encouraging climate

for

biotechnology [formerly known as genetic engineering] in Europe, and thereby

promote the creation of wealth and skilled employment. "

 

[27] Because of humanity's overall marked resistance to genetically modified

and

engineered products, EuropaBio have hired public relations firm

Burson-Marsteller, the PR arm of the well-known advertising firm Young &

Rubicam, to smooth the way for the future acceptance of genetically

engineered

foods. As an indication of their ability to 'get the job done', Young &

Rubicam's partial client-list speaks for itself: AT & T, Colgate/Palmolive,

DuPont, Sears, Ford, Phillip Morris, and the US Army.But in the PR game,

'Perception Management' is the key corporate mission phrase down at

Burson-Marsteller. Their website states boldly, " Perceptions are real. They

colour what we see . . . what we believe . . . how we behave. They can be

managed . . . to motivate behaviour . . . to create positive business

results. "

 

 

[28]The agency ensures that the perceptions surrounding a client are

consistent

with the client's desired business objectives. Monsanto stated in one 1998

report: " There are clearly large forces at work that are making public

acceptance of genetically engineered foods problematic. "

 

[29] EVER SO GENTLY MASSAGING THE PUBLIC PSYCHEThe following example of

calculated, western-led psychological warfare is excerpted from our book

World

Without AIDS. The information reveals the level of detail which goes into

planning how one might effect a subtle change of direction in the minds of a

given populace. The following tactics are frequently used by the World

Health

Organisation, World Bank, IMF and related organisations to coerce nations

into

adopting western ideals not necessarily suited to the indigenous culture. In

this instance, the western ideal being introduced is population control - in

other words, the target nation is being coerced into limiting the size of

its

families. The terms 'audience identification' and 'message design' are of

particular interest to this study.CHILDREN A BLESSING, NOT A CURSE!In

November

1990, the World Bank launched a US $27 million population control project

for

Ghana with the goal of cutting the size of the next generation of Ghanaians

in

half, from approximately 45 million to only 25 million by the year 2020.

Aware

of the fact that Ghanaians do not wish the size of their country to be

manipulated by outsiders, the bank commissioned Opia Mensah Kumah, senior

program officer for the US government's population communication campaign in

Africa, to produce a 'procedural' report. The report stated that deeply held

traditional beliefs and values would hinder population control efforts,

making

persuasion more difficult. Indeed, in many parts of the continent, cultural

prohibitions exist against even counting one's children, believing them to

be a

blessing, not a curse.

 

[30]Based on Kumah's research, both the World Bank and USAID implemented

programs designed to overcome resistance to population reduction and bring

about drastic changes in public attitudes and personal conduct. Involving

coercion and deception, their tactics conform exactly to the strategies

outlined by Colonel Michael Dewar, in his book The Art of Deception in

Warfare,

a study on psychological warfare and covert actions. Dewar is a former army

intelligence officer who now runs his own public relations agency in London.

He

outlines six basic principles:The operation must be well planned and

centrally

co-ordinated, so as to be consistent and sustained. Preparation is

essential.

Those conducting the campaign must be thoroughly familiar with their

audience,

and be able to gauge its probable reaction to the campaign. False

information

must be made to appear absolutely logical, seeming neither out of harmony

with

current events nor in any way suspicious. The greater variety of sources

that

can be used to plant false information, the more believable it becomes.

Timing

is critical; people generally notice marked events, but are very poor at

perceiving gradual change. The operation and its purpose must be concealed

from

the enemy.

 

[31]With almost military precision, the WHO population control strategy for

Ghana incorporates each of these six principles:The activities of the World

Bank, USAID and other donors are carefully co-ordinated, and strict

monitoring

procedures are in place to enforce the terms of the agreement at every

stage.

Extensive background research was carried out in Ghana. Surveys were

conducted

to determine how best to sell the idea of family planning, gradually

exposing

the populace to subtle messages, allowing new contraceptive ideology to take

root slowly, without arousing suspicion. In all campaigns such as these,

messages are discreet and shy away from the controversial. They are kept at

a

muted, persuasive level, repeated exposure to the message influencing the

people to accept birth control to such an extent that they eventually

identify

with the message.WHO and relevant associates held approximately 80 special

conferences and presentations during the first three years of operations in

Ghana. These included presentations to traditional chiefs, private meetings

with top government officials, dozens of seminars for journalists and

government ministers, special briefings for private sector leaders, and a

variety of special events. More than 100 pre-packaged radio broadcasts,

numerous television productions and hundreds of propaganda packets were

carefully prepared and distributed.Foreign policy had now been successfully

incorporated into indigenous broadcasting systems. As such, the campaign has

progressed from raising the level of awareness to influencing attitudes,

opinions, and beliefs favourable towards WHO ideas on birth control, those

ideas now being promoted within and by the targeted populace. The existence

of

this western orchestrated, western-led Ghanaian population control program

remains largely unknown to the public.

 

[32] TETANUS/STERILITY VACCINEJames Miller, a correspondent for Human Life

International, brings us the following report on an equally inhumane,

equally

covert attempt at human population control, this time carried out in

Tanzania,

Nigeria, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. Quite shockingly, this

particular campaign was creatively disguised as a 'deeply caring' World

Health

Organisation tetanus vaccination campaign. During the early 1990's, the

World

Health Organization conducted an extensive vaccination campaign against

tetanus

in a number of countries. In October 1994, Human Life International became

suspicious of the campaign protocols. They obtained several phials of the

vaccine and had them analysed by chemists. Some of the phials were found to

contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone

essential for maintaining a pregnancy.When introduced into the body, coupled

with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies are formed not only against

tetanus

but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a

friend

and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent

pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy. When a

woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered

incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.HLI reported the sketchy facts

regarding

the Mexican tetanus vaccines to its affiliates in more than 60 countries.

Soon

additional reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormone were received from the

Philippines, where more than 3.4 million women were recently vaccinated.

Similar reports came from Nicaragua, which had conducted its own vaccination

campaign in 1993. " The Known Facts concerning the WHO tetanus vaccination

campaigns in Tanzania, Nigeria, Mexico and the Philippines. Only women were

vaccinated, and only women between the ages of 15 and 45. Why? Aren't men at

least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what

of

the children? Why were they excluded? Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG)

hormone was found in the vaccines. WHO has been actively involved for more

than

20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied

to

tetanus toxoid as a carrier - the exact same coupling as has been found in

these vaccines. "

 

[33]THE BIG BOYSThe population control agenda includes some very big boys

indeed. Allied with the WHO in the development of this particular

anti-fertility vaccine have been UNFPA, the United Nations Development

Program

(UNDP), the World Bank, the Population Council, and the Rockefeller

Foundation.

The US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development was the

supplier of the hCG hormone in some of the vaccine experiments.

 

[34] These incidents are by no means isolated. In the same way that Ghana,

Tanzania, Nigeria and various South American countries are being influenced,

subliminally or otherwise, into accepting various population control

measures

by big multinational corporations and governments, we can be sure that if we

have particular resistances to whatever Big Pharma has decided is good for

us,

then those resistances will be worked on and diminished. by all means

necessary.Our resistance to genetically modified/engineered products has

been

identified and is now being targeted for change.

 

[35] Olsen finishes her 'Terminator Unleashed' essay thus: " Greed is a human

trait, we probably all have some. But do you get the feeling that these

people

have somehow slipped over the edge into madness? "

OVER THE EDGE?And indeed, returning to Monsanto, there are ominous signs

that

marketing greed has 'slipped over the edge into madness'. It seems that

covert

population control measures are being woven into the Monsanto import/export

seed market. Judge for yourselves in this next item, dubbed by The Ecologist

Magazine as... THE GREAT MUSTARD OIL CONSPIRACY

On the 27th August 1998 and in the name of 'public health protection', the

Indian government banned the sale of mustard oil. In many states, mustard

oil

is an essential constituent of the diet. It is also used widely as a

multi-functional medicinal oil, and as a life-saving mosquito repellent. So

why

exactly did the Indian government ban this invaluable, natural substance?

According to the Indian government, the pretext of banning mustard oil was

that

it was unhygienic and therefore unsafe. And the populace had to be protected

from this 'dangerous menace'. Vandana Shiva, the Director the Foundation for

Science, Technology and Ecology in New Delhi says: " It's nice to know that

our

government is so concerned about the health of the people who elected it to

power. But why has it shown so little interest in this issue before? It has

never taken any action to limit the use of carcinogenic pesticides or

radioactive pollution. Why the sudden concern? "

 

[36]The first hint that there was more to this story than meets the eye was

when, in July 1998, the Indian government announced plans to import as much

as

one million tons of soyabean as oil seed. On the same day that mustard oil

was

banned, all import restrictions were lifted on what is predominantly a GM

multinational corporation product. Indian opposition party concerns were

raised

over the fact that mustard oil was perfectly satisfactory, that imported

soyabean was not necessary and that imported soyabean seed might well

include

genetically modified varieties, leading to widespread cross-contamination.

Resistance to the soyabean import ruling was steadfast. The arguments put

forward by the Indian government so far were not convincing enough. Says

Shiva,

" In the face of this opposition, the government needed to find a more

convincing justification for their action. "

 

[37] And almost immediately, a terrible tragedy unfolded. Reported as a

dropsy

epidemic, India witnessed a horrible 'outbreak' of something in which 41

people

died and some 2,300 people were affected by symptoms including nausea,

vomiting, kidney damage, fluid on the lungs and heart failure. The source of

the mysterious 'outbreak' was soon traced to a very large batch of mustard

oil

that had somehow been adulterated with argemone - a poisonous black seed

that

grows alongside the mustard plant, diesel oil and waste industrial oil.

Argemone has been found as a contaminant before in mustard oil, but never,

according to Shiva, in more than 0.1% of the mustard oil on the market. In

this

case, 10 to 30% of the oil had been adulterated. India's health minister at

the

time admitted that this could only have been the result of some sort of

conspiracy, so extensive was the contamination.

 

MORE WHEELS WITHIN WHEELS

Meanwhile, back in America, at the same time as all of this was taking

place,

Monsanto Corporation was in the embarrassing position of sitting on almost

18

million acres of an increasingly unsaleable 'Round-up Ready' soyabean crop.

Bad

publicity surrounding Monsanto's latest 'Round-up' formula meant their 18

million acres-worth were not exactly flying out of the door. How and where

on

earth were they going to get rid of it? Could the answer lie in dumping it

upon

a Third World nation, where the public were yet to be more fully alerted to

the

possible dangers of GM crops? And if this were a viable option, then how

would

Monsanto go about achieving its objective? Vandana Shiva believes there is a

 

strong possibility that the sabotage of the mustard oil and Monsanto's own

particular business predicament are all very much interconnected. " By

encouraging the Indian government to ban the sale of mustard oil, the

multi-nationals were provided with a perfect market opening for their

products.

This would enable them on a permanent basis to dominate the market in that

country for vegetable oil. This would then lead to the extinction of a crop

that is central to India's farming system and we would remain dependent on

soyabean for our edible oil. There is a precedent for this phenomenon. In

Indonesia, the recent food riots were largely caused by massive imports of

soyabean oil, upon which the Indonesian people had become cripplingly

dependent. When the currency collapsed, the price of soya escalated, making

the

cooking oil far too expensive for the bulk of people to afford. India would

be

put in a similarly vulnerable position if we were to become dependent on

imported soya for cooking oil.. "

 

[38] THE POPULATION CONTROL LINKVandana Shiva's Ecologist report then goes

on to

discuss the chemical properties of the soyabean: " Soyabeans contain acids

which

can reduce bioavailability of essential minerals, and contain phytoestrogens

above the levels required, and are established carcinogens. They can have an

impact on the foetus which can lead to abnormal formation of reproductive

organs, to sterility and to the inhibition of sexual maturation.

Calculations

have shown that an infant fed with soyabean-based formula is ingesting

oestrogen equivalent to that obtained from 8 to 12 contraceptive pills a

day. "

 

 

[39]Given the underhand, focused manner in which these multinational

corporations are attempting to a) control worldwide food distribution and b)

implement worldwide population control measures, can we really believe it is

mere chance that mass tonnage of essential foodstuffs, high in oestrogen

levels, is now flooding into the poorer nations of the world? As if these

activities weren't distasteful enough, Monsanto coupled their soyabean drive

with a public relations exercise under the banner of 'Monsanto's care and

concern' for the poor. They launched a global campaign in the major

newspapers

of the world, imploring its citizenry to trust Monsanto to develop

genetically

engineered crops to feed the starving millions. Beginning their $1.6 billion

advertising campaign two days before World Food Day and using emotive

pictures

of starving African children, their 'Let The Harvest Begin' campaign opened

thus: " We all share the same planet - and the same needs. In agriculture,

many

of our needs have an ally in biotechnology and the promising advances it

offers

for our future. Healthier, more abundant yields. Reduced reliance on

pesticides

and fossil fuels. A cleaner environment... As we stand on the edge of a new

millennium, we dream of a tomorrow without hunger. etc., etc. "

 

[40]Monsanto's syrupy 'save the world' rhetoric was swiftly countered, not

least

in this part-statement issued by the African delegates of The Food and

Agriculture Organisation: " We, the undersigned delegates of African

countries

strongly object that the image of the poor and hungry from our countries are

being used by giant multinational corporations to push a technology that is

neither safe, environment friendly, nor economically beneficial to us. We do

not believe that such companies or gene technologies will help our farmers

to

produce the food that is needed in the 21st century. On the contrary, we

think

it will destroy the diversity, the local knowledge and the sustainable

agricultural systems that our farmers have developed for millennia and that

it

will thus undermine our capacity to feed ourselves. "

IS SOYA SAFE ANYWAY?

Researchers Daniel Doerge and Daniel Sheehan, two of the Food and Drug

Administration's experts on soy, signed a letter of protest, pointing to

studies that show a link between soy and health problems in certain animals,

which they projected would also have an adverse effect on humans. Doerge and

Sheehan say they tried to stop the FDA approval of soy, but their efforts

were

in vain. Their full and frank report bears out everything written by Vandana

Shiva with regard to infertility and can be obtained at

http://www.darifree.com/fdasoy.htm. Should the FDA report subsequently be

withdrawn, it has been copied to file and is available upon request.In a

paper

entitled 'Where is the safety testing of GM soya?' a sceptical author

summarises the scientific papers to date, which attempt to establish the

safety

of Monsanto's soyabean. The complete listing (which the reader will find at

http://www.connectotel.com/ gmfood/soyarefs.html) is headed by the following

interesting statement: " Below is the 'evidence' presented by scientists when

asked to show studies which 'prove' the safety of GM soya. Two problems are

immediately apparent:

1) Not one of these studies proves the safety of GM soya.

2) Every study is either carried out by Monsanto, by teams containing

Monsanto

staff, or by an organisation funded by Monsanto.So, the eternal question

remains... Where is the independent safety testing which proves the safety

of

the GM soya currently being sold worldwide today? Answer: There is

NONE. " This,

quite unbelievably, is the level of science currently supporting what is

potentially going to be one of the largest available food crops across the

globe. Who is actually in control here? This final comment on the

Monsanto/Mustard oil issue is from India's Health Tribune. It serves as a

reasonable summary of events: " Even while greed and the desire to attain

riches

rapidly at all costs is a universal driving force for the perpetrators of

such

crimes, it requires much more than greed to execute such diabolical

programs.

The most outstanding is utter insensitivity towards fellow human beings. It

is

the height of egocentricity to attempt to gain riches at the expense of

other

people's lives. Yet, that is precisely what has happened in this

instance.Although failure of the executive and their political bosses is

writ

large on the face of every corpse that has fallen to this man-made disaster,

as

well as the survivors, who may have to suffer for God knows how long,

corrective action has been tardy and the attempts at a cover-up blatant.

While

bureaucrats will predictably try to shift responsibility, industrialists are

apparently pleading ignorance. Industry is clearly guilty of failure to

maintain even elementary quality control and must be held accountable for

such

horrendous disregard for human life in this country. There cannot be any

mitigating circumstances for such heinous crimes; the dead are crying for

justice. "

[41]

CORPORATE CONTROL OVER FOOD

'Bringing the Food Economy Home' is a document examining the detrimental

implications for society should there be a globally controlled food chain.

" One

of the biggest threats to food security today stems from the increasing

control

of handfuls of corporations have over the world's food supply. For example,

four companies now control 87% of American beef, another four control 84% of

American cereal, and just two companies, Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland,

control 70-80% of the world's grain trade. Five agri-businesses

(Astra-Zeneca,

DuPont, Monsanto, Novartis and Aventis) account for nearly two thirds of the

global pesticide market, almost one quarter of the global seed market, and

virtually 100% of the transgenic seed market.. If mergers and takeovers

already

under consideration are approved, the nine companies now dominating the seed

market will be amalgamated into just five. "

 

[42]The document goes on to examine the traditional US Thanksgiving Day

meal: " But for most Americans, the turkey is not from Uncle Ray's farm, nor

the

potatoes from Aunt Jean, nor the biscuits from Mum's oven. Most will find a

turkey from Butterball TM, a joint of ham from Cook Family Foods TM , their

long grain rice from Jack Rabbit TM, their potatoes from Golden Valley Foods

TM, their bread from Peavey Grain TM, cheese from Miss Winsconsin TM, salad

oil

from Wesson TM, tomato or apple juice from Motts TM, the pudding from Swiss

Miss TM or Healthy Choice TM, and a nice topping from Reddi Whip TM. In the

land of freedom of choice, the fact is that all those products and brands

actually come from just one company - ConAgra Inc. Each of the company's 25

branded foods has annual retail sales exceeding $100m, giving 6 cents out of

every food dollar spent in the US to ConAgra. But that isn't enough to put

it

at the top of the corporate food heap. The nation's largest food business,

Phillip Morris, takes 10 cents. "

 

[43]For further details on the giant food corporations and on various

population

control measures being implemented through 'medicine' and 'food', readers

are

encouraged to obtain the above-mentioned publication and also World Without

AIDS, the details of which can be found at the back of this book. Please

also

obtain copies of two Ecologist Reports, the first entitled 'Condemned? How

Hygiene Regulations Are Killing Real Food'

 

[44] and 'The Monsanto Files. Can We Survive Genetic Engineering?'

http://www.whatareweswallowing.freeserve.co.uk/withoutbars.htm

 

 

God Bless the Original Republic, Death to the new world order! Long live the

Fighters!

-