Guest guest Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 Hi Group - Baking soda seems to have been a hot topic while I was out trysting with nature. Some of you may recall that the topic actually began in May here on this forum. In the interim, I did a bit of checking and found that taking baking soda made sense, but that the initial reports, which have now become the stuff of instant legend, of 90 plus percent cure rates were far overblown. Plus, regardless of the success rates, the treatment may eliminate existing cancer, but does little to address the underlying causes that led to the cancer. And, in my opinion, there are better ways of oxygenating the cells and body and raising pH - such as liquid ionic cesium chloride. The " new " the baking soda treatment has been reported to have been pioneered by Dr. Tullio Simoncini of Italy, although baking soda has been used before to help raise pH and oxygenate. As far as I can tell, the " pioneer " part comes from Dr. Simoncini's contention that ALL cancer is caused by candida and his use of administering the baking soda in liquid from (5%) intravenously via strategically located catheters placed into the closest veins that feed the cancer. I am not sold on the Candida theory and the intravenous delivery method is not one you want to try at home. And, if you take a look at the descriptions of the actual cases (listed under " SOME OF THE MANY CASES TREATED " on the webpage of http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/) you will see that so-called cure rates, even the cases they decided to use as examples, fall far short of the reported success rates and all do involve the intravenous delivery - not at all the same of dissolving a tablespoon or two in water, or taking a baking soda or epsom salts bath. Regarding the maple syrup and baking soda " bomb " (aka The Jim Kelmun Protocol http://www.cancertutor.com/Cancer02/Kelmun.html), if one takes a look at the Cancertutor site, you will find that the protocol is not rated among the strongest treatments. The bottom line for me: I like it, and baking soda is no doubt a good tool to add into an overall protocol of anti-cancer and immune boosting supplements, diet and lifestyle choices - but would never be something I would choose as the only, or even as a primary, tool to beat cancer. Live long, live healthy, live happy! Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2007 Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 Welcome back Tony, without you here it was like school with no teacher. regards Mary - Tony oleander soup Thursday, September 06, 2007 8:03 AM A few words about baking soda Hi Group -Baking soda seems to have been a hot topic while I was out trystingwith nature. Some of you may recall that the topic actually began inMay here on this forum.In the interim, I did a bit of checking and found that taking bakingsoda made sense, but that the initial reports, which have now becomethe stuff of instant legend, of 90 plus percent cure rates were faroverblown.Plus, regardless of the success rates, the treatment may eliminateexisting cancer, but does little to address the underlying causes thatled to the cancer. And, in my opinion, there are better ways ofoxygenating the cells and body and raising pH - such as liquid ioniccesium chloride.The "new" the baking soda treatment has been reported to have beenpioneered by Dr. Tullio Simoncini of Italy, although baking soda hasbeen used before to help raise pH and oxygenate. As far as I cantell, the "pioneer" part comes from Dr. Simoncini's contention thatALL cancer is caused by candida and his use of administering thebaking soda in liquid from (5%) intravenously via strategicallylocated catheters placed into the closest veins that feed the cancer.I am not sold on the Candida theory and the intravenous deliverymethod is not one you want to try at home. And, if you take a look atthe descriptions of the actual cases (listed under "SOME OF THE MANYCASES TREATED" on the webpage of http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/)you will see that so-called cure rates, even the cases they decided touse as examples, fall far short of the reported success rates and alldo involve the intravenous delivery - not at all the same ofdissolving a tablespoon or two in water, or taking a baking soda orepsom salts bath.Regarding the maple syrup and baking soda "bomb" (aka The Jim KelmunProtocol http://www.cancertutor.com/Cancer02/Kelmun.html), if onetakes a look at the Cancertutor site, you will find that the protocolis not rated among the strongest treatments.The bottom line for me:I like it, and baking soda is no doubt a good tool to add into anoverall protocol of anti-cancer and immune boosting supplements, dietand lifestyle choices - but would never be something I would choose asthe only, or even as a primary, tool to beat cancer.Live long, live healthy, live happy!Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.