Guest guest Posted September 30, 2003 Report Share Posted September 30, 2003 Outcome of Vit.C/ascorbic acid studies- I read an article the other day that really explained the negative controversy over vit. C & ascorbic acid in the Pure Planet newsletter. I couldn't find the article on their site at www.pureplanet.com and thought I'd share some of it with you. .......Thousands of bottles of ascorbic acid are purchased everyday under the misguided assumption that ascorbic acid is the same as Vitamin C. In reality, ascorbic acid is an isolated nutrient that is part of vitamin C but it is not the whole Vitamin C. So you are getting cheated if you buy ascorbic acid thinking it is Vitamin C. But that might be the least of the consequences you may suffer. Studies over the last several years have demonstrated that people who take high doses of ascorbic acid actually put themselves at risk for a number of health challenges. One study demonstrates that doses of 500 mg a day or more of ascorbic acid increases the incidence of arterial plaque buildup. another study indicates that gallstones are more likely to appear in those taking large doses of ascorbic acid. Are these backlash studies against the health food industry? No, they are legitimate studies. Wait a minute, you may be thinking. What about all the studies done by Linus Pauling and a multitude of other reputable researchers who have proven the health promoting benefits of Vitamin C and ascorbic acid? Let us put a little perspective on the subject. Back in the 1930's ascorbic acid was isolated out of little red peppers. The man who first performed this experiment was Dr. Albert Szent-Gyorgyi who won a Nobel Prize for this work. What he also found, which has mostly been ignored until recently, was that ascorbic acid was far more biologically available and active, while it was still in the red pepper. Scientists of the era of " Better Living Through Chemistry and Science " (which we have been experiencing for the last fifty years) decided to take the discoveries about Vitamin C and " improve " on Mother Nature. First they found that extracting ascorbic acid from foods, such as red peppers is expensive. Ascorbic acid can be created in the laboratory much less expensively (and of course much more profitably). Scientists discovered that they could take corn syrup, mix it with hydrochloric acid, and voila: ascorbic acid! (By the way, the corn is more likely than ever to be genetically modified.) Later, scientists discovered what Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi had discovered about ascorbic acid, it is not as effective when detached from the whole food matrix! So they went about trying to determine what other factors could be in the whole food that would make the ascorbic acid work better. First they discovered the importance of bioflavoinoids, so they figured out how to produce these synthetically in the laboratory, to be added to the ascorbic acid. Then they found that fat-soluble ascorbic acid was superior, because it went directly to the liver vs. water-soluble ascorbic acid. In fact if you put 100 mg of ascorbic acid in the body, within a few hours at least 90% of it will be excreted in the urine. If you put 10 times more into the body to account for 90% loss it may cause diarrhea. Scientists experimented with various things and concluded that if the ascorbic acid molecule was attached to a metabolite, the ascorbic acid would stay in the body longer (they didn't seem to care why it stayed in the body longer, but it stayed in the body longer and hopefully that was a good thing). Today there is a broad verity of ascorbic acid products with various things attached to them. With all this research, time, thought and dollars being put into creating a synthetic Vitamin C, the fact remains that no scientist can even come close to the potentials of what Mother Nature created. One important factor that science has been unable to duplicate is the special kind of energy that holds living food together. Whether this energy is found in the enzymes or in the energy patterns of whole food structure, it is unlikely that science will ever be able to reproduce it in a laboratory. This may be on of several reasons why studies have shown that the body will absorb close to 100% of the Vitamin C that is consumed as part of whole food, whereas barely 10% of the " stripped down " ascorbic acid is absorbed. Then the article goes on-- Ascorbic acid is an acid and acids stress the body setting the stage for all kinds of malfunctions and disease. I thought this article explained in simple terms why we hear such conflict in the Vitamin C studies! Thought you may have been as interested as I was. Hugs, Katherine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.