Fwd: More Suppressed Cancer Cures

[Guest guest]

See what I mean. Frank

_______________________

 

Is it possible to obtain HS in todays world?

 

Ken

-

Frank

alternative_medicine_forum

Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:49 AM

Fwd: More

Suppressed Cancer Cures

 

 

Most cancer is very hard to cure no matter what you use.

 

If you want further information do a search of our archives, our links page,

and search the web with google.com.

 

There is a lot of information on cancer in our archives and on our links page.

Frank

 

 

health_and_healing

" mistyrainbow3 "

Thu, 04 Dec 2003 22:03:59 -0000

More Suppressed Cancer Cures

 

the_octopus , Tom Mooney <frnthlthg> wrote:

I'd heard of Royal Rife but not these two:

 

SUPPRESSED KOCH TREATMENT

 

DECEMBER 3. A few words about the suppressed work of Dr. William

Frederick Koch, who treated cancer and other diseases in the early to

middle portion of the 20th century. His medicine was called

GLYOXILIDE, AKA GLYOXYLIDE.

 

Here are some choice quotes from the US Congressional Record of June

7, 1948, entered by Senator William Langer of North Dakota.

" Fortunately for Canadian farmers...uch ailments as Bang's

disease, Johne's disease, and other fatal diseases that customarily

make devastating demands upon dairy herds are no longer fatal in

British Columbia. Thanks to the integrity and foresight of Canadian

physicians, veterinarians, and Government experts who recently

completed a series of successful experiments with the Koch system for

treating virulent diseases. But, be it known as a further warning

against trying to suppress the truth, that farmers in various parts

of the United States are rising up in indignation, demanding to enjoy

the same advantages as their Canadian brethren. "

" Suffice to say that Michigan farmers are not letting their herds die

while waiting for bureaucrats to lift an injunction [against treating

animals with Koch's medicine] that should never have been imposed [by

the US government]. They are using Koch therapy anyway, thereby

saving themselves and the public substantial sums of money in terms

of cattle, beef, and dairy products. "

A farmer revolt.

As to a different version of the Koch medicine glyoxilide, for the

treatment for human cancers: " Dr. Albert L Wahl, a New York physician

of enviable attainments, says in his book, A Least Common Denominator

in Antibiotics: 'In the philosophy of medicine, the last word has not

been said...this new thing (the Koch treatment) is substantiated by

extensive clinical observation...' Dr. William Hale of the Dow

Chemical Co. says, 'Dr. William Frederick Koch is the modern

Pasteur.' Prof. Joseph Maisin of Louvain University, Belgium, stated

to the Canadian Cancer Commission in 1940: 'The Koch formula should

not be called MERELY a cancer cure. it is a very important step in

medicine and is apt to change the whole picture of medicine and

pathology...' "

" Dr. Koch began the treatment of cancer in 1918 and other diseases

later. He soon discovered interests existing in the United States

that did not welcome recoveries from these deadly enemies of society

to reach the public. Since that time he has had to constantly beat

down the opposition [e.g., two innocent verdicts in court trials in

the 1940s] in order to continue his work for the relief of suffering

humanity. "

Finally, Senator Langer reads into the record the testimonial of the

above-mentioned Dr. Wahl: " Over a year ago, my sister was dying of

lymphosarcoma...The case was far advanced at the time...The masses of

lymphoid tissue...stood out on the sides of her neck and in her

axillae and groin like bunches of grapes mixed with

walnuts...Everyone who examined her thought she would be dead within

a few weeks....I refused to listen to my father's recommendation that

my sister be treated with a substance built up from the conjugated

systems of carbonyl and ethylene linkages [the Koch medicine].

Because of American Medical Association propaganda, I believed that

the results previously reported with this therapy approached the acme

of quackery. However, my father did have my sister treated, since he

personally knew of cases of cancer which were cured and remained

cured after its use...She recovered after one dose in characteristic

fashion. Then and there, I decided to undertake an independent

investigation of this treatment. I have been irrevocably convinced

of the great value of this treatment. The American Medical

Association is not yet convinced after 25 years. But that is an old

story. "

Why doesn't a US Congressman or Senator stand up and read into the

record (C-Span routinely televises these statements) the suppressed

truth about one of any number of these UNUSED remarkable treatments

for human disease? NO GUTS??

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com

Here's the 2nd one:

BLOCKING A PROMISING CANCER TREATMENT

DECEMBER 3, 2003. MURDER AT THE US NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (NCI).

Daniel Haley's brilliant book, Politics in Healing, recounts how

NCI's 1991 clinical trial of the innovative and " alternative " cancer

medicine, hydrazine sulfate (HS), was rigged.

Rigged to fail.

A spectacularly promising medicine, HS had shown good results in

trials at Harbor/UCLA hospital and in Russia. NCI felt obligated to

test the drug. But there was a catch.

The drug's discoverer, Dr. Joseph Gold, had found that HS reacted

badly if patients were taking other drugs, especially tranquilizers.

Several warnings were given to NCI before it began its test. The

warnings were explicit. Patients could DIE if they were taking

tranquilizers.

It turned out that none of the NCI patients were warned about this.

It turned out that 94% of those patients were in fact on

tranquilizers.

Barry Tice, an investigator for the US General Accounting Office

(GAO), looked into the NCI trial of hydrazine sulfate after it was

over. He called Dr. Gold and told him he had found a " smoking gun. "

There was an internal NCI memo which showed that NCI was well aware

of the problems involved in the drug combinations.

The GAO did not back up its own investigator. The final GAO report on

the NCI clinical trials of hydrazine sulfate simply accused NCI of

sloppy bookkeeping.

In the June 1995 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, a letter

from the NCI was published. The letter stated that NCI had omitted

mentioning, in its own published account of its cancer study, that

94% of the patients had been on tranquilizers. But, because this

letter did NOT mention how dangerous that situation was, it looked

like NCI was simply admitting to a technical and unimportant mistake.

A clerical error.

So what did happen to the patients in the NCI hydrazine sulfate

study?

They ALL DIED.

The drug, hydrazine sulfate, was judged to be totally ineffective,

and thus a competitor for chemotherapy dollars was eliminated.

Hydrazine sulfate is a cheap, widely available, unpatentable

substance. No profit there.

Was this story splashed across the front pages of major newspapers in

America? Did the " great men " of television, those holy anchors,

insist on covering it with the emphasis it deserved? Of course not.

The story was originally dug out and published in Penthouse, by

reporter Jeff Kamen, who should have won a Pulitzer for it, but won

nothing.

And NCI has a rule that none of its patients in clinical trials can

have their names revealed.

(THERE ARE OTHER SUBSTANCES AND FOODS WHICH ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH

HYDRAZINE SULFATE AND MAY CAUSE GREAT HARM AND DEATH. ONE SHOULD KNOW

ALL ABOUT THIS BEFORE DECIDING TO EXPERIMENT WITH THE DRUG.)

There is more to this incredible story. Penthouse publisher Bob

Guccione's wife, Kathy Keeton, who was the founder of Longevity, a

magazine that was part of the Guccione empire, was diagnosed with

" galloping breast cancer " in 1995. She was given 6 weeks to live.

She refused chemotherapy and became a VERY high-profile case of a

person taking hydrazine sulfate instead.

She also chose radiation to reduce one of her many tumors--a growth

around her bile duct. Dr. Gold said the dose of radiation should be

small, because hydrazine sulfate would enhance the effect of the

radiation. But the radiologist gave her the full dose instead, burned

her liver and caused later scarring.

Overall, Keeton recovered. In fact, a year after her predicted death

date, her cancer was in full remission. The hydrazine sulfate was a

remarkable success.

Guccione ran ads in Penthouse, asking for families of the dead

victims in the NCI experiment to come forward and join a class-action

suit against NCI.

Guccione estimated there had been 600 victims in the NCI clinical

test.

In October 1997, Kathy Keeton went into a major and well-respected NY

hospital for surgery. From all accounts, this operation had nothing

to do with cancer. Amazingly, complications occurred. She died.

Most of America assumed she had succumbed to cancer. Further " proof "

that hydrazine sulfate did not work.

Predictably, the FDA has gotten into the act. On April 23, 1998, that

criminal agency raided a distributor of hydrazine sulfate, Great

Lakes Metabolics, in Rochester, Minnesota. In 2000, the FDA shut down

the company that supplies hydrazine sulfate to Great Lakes, and Great

Lakes went out of business.

In 1996, when hydrazine sulfate (HS) was still very much in the

public spotlight, Dr. Gold states he received 20 phone calls in one

day from doctors at Sloan Kettering, the world's number one center

for toxic chemotherapy research and treatment. These doctors wanted

to obtain HS on the sly for their patients. Gold states that roughly

2/3 of the patients were from the doctors' families. And six of these

doctors had refused to give HS to other patients at Sloan Kettering.

The phrase, scum of the Earth, comes to mind.

Author Haley offers a dozen patient testimonials re HS. They are

anecdotes, to be sure, but they are remarkable.

Example: " Oncologist report in today. No cancer anywhere, after two

and a half months on HS and vitamins/minerals and supplements. They

have no idea where cancer went. "

Example: " Seven weeks on hydrazine sulfate. Brain and lung lesions

disappeared. "

Example: " I purchased some HS for my sister a few weeks ago. Too

early to tell, but she went from near death at the hospital on chemo

to a campground some place, with a fishing pole. "

I don't make recommendations for any medicine. HS studies at

Harbor/UCLA and in Russia did not cure everyone, not by a long shot.

Of course, there are questions about those protocols too, because

ordinary foods like raisins are incompatible with HS--and who knows

what the patients were fed. And, on top of that, no well-designed

studies have ever been done using HS on patients in early stages of

cancer, where the results might be even better.

HS has been defamed by monsters. " First do no harm " has been turned

into " destroy. " Those responsible for this terrible crime should be

arrested, shackled, and shown on national television on the steps at

NCI. NCI should be closed and fumigated.

More notes on HS (hydrazine sulfate)...

One session of conventional chemo costs enough to pay for 10 years of

treatment with HS.

In 1973, a doctor with a terminal Hodgkins patient approached Dr.

Gold for help. Gold recommended a dosage level. In a few weeks, the

patient was up and around, not dead. By October of 1973, 1000

patients in the US were on HS.

Dean Burke, head of cell chemistry at NCI, said in 1974 that HS was

" the most remarkable anticancer agent I have come across in my 45

years experience in cancer...this material is so cheap because it is

made by the trainload for industrial purposes. "

In September 1973, Sloan Kettering (SK), the most prestigious cancer

center in the world, started a study on terminal patients. The lead

physician, Dr. Manuel Ochoa, had agreed to give each patient 60 mg a

day for 3 days and then 60 mg 3 times a day after that---but Dr. Gold

learned Ochoa was changing the protocol drastically---he was giving 1

mg the first day, then 2 mg the next day, and so on, building up to a

top of 30 mg----except in some cases he actually gave patients 120-

190 mg a day---brutal overdoses.

In 1975 SK announced HS was worthless.

Dr. Gold then did a study for Calbiochem, a drug company. 70% of 84

patients gained weight and had less pain. HS was, in fact, designed

to alleviate wasting away in the first place. 17% of the patients

showed tumor regression or a stabilization of their condition for one

year.

In 1975, Russian researchers published two positive study findings on

HS.

In 1976, the American Cancer Society (ACS) put HS on its dreaded

blacklist of " unapproved " cancer treatments. ACS neglected to mention

it owned 50% of a competing and highly toxic cancer drug, 5FU.

By 1978, the FDA was cracking down on HS. 5000 patients in the US

were on the medicine. The FDA falsely stated that HS caused bone

marrow toxicity. In fact, conventional chemo---approved by the FDA---

destroys bone marrow.

Jeff Kamen, the reporter who got the HS story out in Penthouse? Here

is how he became interested in the first place. His mother Erna came

back from cancer with HS. She gained 23 pounds and was doing much

better. Then her doctor convinced her to stop HS and go on an

experimental chemo drug. In five days, she was dead.

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com

peace,

Tom

NEW WEB MESSAGE BOARDS - JOIN HERE.

Alternative Medicine Message Boards.Info

http://alternative-medicine-message-boards.info

New Photos - easier uploading and sharing