Guest guest Posted January 27, 2004 Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 28 Jan 2004 06:00:00 -0000 spin The Weekly Spin, Wednesday, January 28, 2004 THE WEEKLY SPIN, Wednesday, January 28, 2004 --- sponsored by PR WATCH (www.prwatch.org) --- The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to further information about current public relations campaigns. It is emailed free each Wednesday to rs. SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS) Who do you know who might want to receive Spin of the Week? Help us grow our r list! Just forward this message to people you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link: http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/_sotd.html --- THIS WEEK'S NEWS 1. USDA Hides Behind the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis 2. Bush Administration Protects Chemical Industy 3. Mad Cow is Good for Industry Front Groups 4. B-M's Biotech Front Group Exposed in the UK 6. Drug Researcher Continues To Challenge Industry Claims 8. US Obesity Expands PR Budgets 9. 'Corporate Social Resposibility' Masks Corporate Damage 10. Auto Industry Front Group Gets New Head ---- 1. USDA HIDES BEHIND THE HARVARD CENTER FOR RISK ANALYSIS http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/front_page/107520811917\ 0910.xml " When Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman met a House panel last week to defend her response to mad cow disease, she cited a Harvard University study concluding the risk to public health is minimal. .... The Harvard study, released two years ago, has become a universal defense for Bush administration officials as they have responded to the first cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Canada and then in the United States. But in their rush to embrace 'sound science,' Veneman and others at times mischaracterized the study's purpose, recommendations or conclusions, according to a review by The Oregonian. " The USDA paid the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis $800,000 to produce a computer modeling study designed to deny and downplay mad cow risks in the US. Far from being an academic institution, the Harvard Center is an industry-funded front group specializing in producing risk assessments that favor its Fortune 500 supporters. Director George Gray is on the board of the industry-funded right-wing Foundation for Research and the Environment (FREE), and he and the Center's David Reopik recently penned a piece for FREE ridiculing concerns over mad cow disease. SOURCE: Oregonian, January 27, 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/January_2004.html#1075179600 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1075179600 2. BUSH ADMINISTRATION PROTECTS CHEMICAL INDUSTY http://www.bushgreenwatch.org/mt_archives/000035.php " Last year the Bush Administration encouraged American chemical companies to lobby against European efforts to strengthen the regulation of thousands of chemicals contained in household, industrial and personal products, " BushGreenWash.org writes. " When the chemical industry was slow to respond, Administration officials took it upon themselves to launch 'an unusually aggressive campaign' to pressure the European Union into watering down its comprehensive reform efforts. Documents uncovered by the Environmental Health Fund, using the Freedom of Information Act, showed the U.S. State and Commerce departments, Environmental Protection Agency and office of the U.S. Trade Representative, formed an alliance with Dow Chemical Co. and others to ward off regulations they feared would raise the cost of doing business in Europe. " Meanwhile, the environmental group Earthjustice recently filed suit against the Bush Administration, asserting that it had allowed a special task force from the chemical industry to lobby secretly and illegally inside the EPA. According to internal documents obtained through FOIA, the chemical industry is seeking to cut U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries biologists out of the oversight process that determines whether or not a pesticide is safe for wildlife. SOURCE: BushGreenWash.org, January 26, 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/January_2004.html#1075093201 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1075093201 3. MAD COW IS GOOD FOR INDUSTRY FRONT GROUPS http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=102-01262004 Corporate-funded think tanks and food industry front groups are rushing into the debate over mad cow disease. This Wednesday, January 28th, the George C. Marshall Institute is hosting a presentation by Harvard Center for Risk Analysis director George Gray, hyping him as " the nation's foremost mad cow expert, " although his expertise is in getting money from government agencies and Fortune 500 companies to produce risk studies that favor their positions. Along with the Harvard Center and the Marshall Institute, other groups receiving industry funding and fronting for them on mad cow disease include Elizabeth Whelan's American Council on Science and Health; father and son combo Dennis and Alex Avery of the Hudson Institute; self-named 'Junkman' Steve Milloy of the Cato Institute; and tobacco, booze and fat-food lobbyist Richard Berman and his latest enterprise the Center for Consumer Freedom. Late today, in a major victory for our work here at the Center for Media & Democracy, the Food and Drug Administration agreed with us and banned cattle blood as feed for US cattle. UPI quotes Mad Cow USA co-author John Stauber as saying " The steps announced today ... still fall far short of what is needed. The United States should follow the lead of the EU nations by banning all feeding of slaughterhouse waste to livestock, and testing millions of U.S. cattle for mad cow disease. " SOURCE: US Newswire Press Release, January 26, 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/January_2004.html#1075093200 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1075093200 4. B-M'S BIOTECH FRONT GROUP EXPOSED IN THE UK http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1130785,00.html " Few could question the sentiment behind the campaign: a fight against cervical cancer. A clutch of famous women, including Liz Hurley, Caprice and Carol Vorderman, signed up to support a crusade to introduce a new NHS screening test that could save the lives of thousands of women. The campaign is due to reach the House of Commons on Wednesday, when MPs will be lobbied on the issue. But an Observer investigation has uncovered how the celebrities have been duped into supporting a sophisticated lobbying campaign secretly orchestrated from Brussels by one of the world's largest public relations firms, Burson-Marsteller. Celebrities contacted by The Observer said they had no knowledge of the lobby group. ... The company, whose headquarters are in New York, has conducted a clandestine lobbying campaign on behalf of Digene, the US biotech firm that would make hundreds of millions of pounds if the tests were introduced in the UK and elsewhere. The idea was to set up a 'grass roots' group of celebrities and other high-profile women that would appear to be an independent body and pressure Ministers to introduce the new screening tests. " SOURCE: The Observer, January 25, 2004 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1075006800 6. DRUG RESEARCHER CONTINUES TO CHALLENGE INDUSTRY CLAIMS http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7433/187-c?etoc A Canadian professor of pediatrics and medicine vows to continue speaking out on the risk of a drug used to treat thalassemia, a hereditary blood disorder. Dr. Nancy Olivieri lost her attempt to get her research on the harmful side effects of deferiprone looked at by the committee for proprietary and medicinal products (CPMP) that regulates drugs in Europe. " This ruling guarantees that only a drug company attempting to sell a drug will control the content of the scientific data submitted or not submitted to the European CPMP, " she said. " It no longer matters whether drug companies tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, because it's unchallengeable now. " PR Watch First Quarter 2003 reported on Olivieri's fight for academic freedom when the drug company that funded her research blocked her from making her findings public. SOURCE: BMJ.com, January 24, 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/January_2004.html#1074920400 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1074920400 8. US OBESITY EXPANDS PR BUDGETS http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/nation/7765780.htm " The United States spent $75.1 billion last year on medical expenses, such as drugs, doctor visits and hospitalizations, related to obesity, according to a study published this month in the journal Obesity Research, " the Philadelphia Inquirer reports. The study, financed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, found that taxpayers paid half of the bill through Medicare and Medicaid programs. Obesity-related health problems added up to 5.7 percent of the nation's total medical expenses, according to the report. America's expanding waistline has meant more fast food and soft drink dollars being spent on PR. " New York-area McDonald's have kicked off a PR campaign designed to increase sales by telling customers how various McDonald's offering cans fit into their favorite diets, " PR Week reports. The industry front group Center for Consumer Freedom, which got $200,000 from Coca-Cola in 2001, wrote in an newspaper op-ed that opposition to soda machines in schools is " fueled by junk science and media frenzy " and that it is a " wild claim that soda consumption causes childhood obesity. " SOURCE: Philadelphia Inquirer, January 22, 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/January_2004.html#1074747600 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1074747600 9. 'CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPOSIBILITY' MASKS CORPORATE DAMAGE http://www.christian-aid.org.uk/news/media/pressrel/040121p.htm As the international business elite meet behind high fences in Davos, Switzerland, an international relief organization says corporate claims of good deeds often hide companies' efforts to undermine regulations and to elude responsibility for harm already done. " The image of companies working hard to make the world a better place is too often just that -- a carefully manufactured image, " Christian Aid says in its new report, " Behind the mask: the real face of corporate social responsibility. " The study targets " the burgeoning industry known as corporate social responsibility -- or CSR -- which is now seen as a vital tool in promoting and improving the public image of some of the world's largest companies and corporations. " The report examines campaigns carried out by Shell, British American Tobacco and Coca Cola. " Some of those shouting the loudest about their corporate virtues are also among those inflicting continuing damage on communities where they work -- particularly poor communities, " said Andrew Pendleton, senior policy officer at Christian Aid and author of the report. SOURCE: Christian Aid, January 21, 2004 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1074661201 10. AUTO INDUSTRY FRONT GROUP GETS NEW HEAD http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/0121mccahill.htm " Barry McCahill, a longtime transportation PR and public affairs exec, has taken over as president of the Sport Utility Vehicle Owners of America, a lobbying group which claims to represent the 24 million SUV owners in the U.S., " O'Dwyer's PR Daily Reports. " Jason Vines, former managing director of Strat@comm and ex-head of PR at Ford, left the post in December to return to DaimlerChrysler, where he began his career. McCahill is a senior consultant to Strat@comm and the group's communications director is a principal and founder at the firm. McCahill was a longtime spokesman for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and was on the team that put together its talking crash-test dummies and 'Friends Don't Let Friends Drive Drunk' campaigns. " SOURCE: O'Dwyer's PR Daily, January 21, 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/January_2004.html#1074661200 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1074661200 ---- The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at PR Watch. To or unsubcribe, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/_sotd.html Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found at the Spin of the Day " section of the PR Watch website: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/index.html Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at: http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues PR Watch, Spin of the Day and the Weekly Spin are projects of the Center for Media & Democracy, a nonprofit organization that offers investigative reporting on the public relations industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of secretive, little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that work to control political debates and public opinion. Please send any questions or suggestions about our publications to: editor Contributions to the Center for Media & Democracy are tax-deductible. Send checks to: CMD 520 University Ave. #310 Madison, WI 53703 To donate now online, visit: https://www.egrants.org/donate/index. _____________ Weekly-Spin mailing list Weekly-Spin SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.