Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: Getting Specific

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:01:12 -0500

HSI - Jenny Thompson

Getting Specific

 

Getting Specific

 

Health Sciences Institute e-Alert

 

March 2, 2004

 

**************************************************************

 

Dear Reader,

 

If you're a man who has reached his 50th birthday, chances

are your doctor has already checked your PSA level to

determine the potential for prostate cancer. If you're one

of the lucky ones, your PSA was normal. But if you're one of

the truly fortunate ones, you have a doctor who knows the

real value of the test and how to put it to its best use.

 

An editorial in the British Medical Journal last month sized

up the value of the PSA test with this comment: " At present

the one certainty about PSA testing is that it causes harm. "

 

It's not the test itself that causes harm, of course, it's

the reaction to the test. Because when PSA is elevated, in

most cases it's not time to act, it's time to be more

cautious than ever.

 

-----------------------------

Once is not enough

-----------------------------

 

PSA - or prostate-specific antigen - is a protein that's

naturally produced by the prostate gland. Prostate tumors

typically cause an over-production of PSA, so when a blood

test reveals an elevated level of the protein, it's a red

flag that warns of possible cancer. The next step most

doctors take is to recommend a biopsy. And this is where the

trouble starts. Prostate biopsies are painful procedures

that can result in bleeding and infection. But recent

evidence shows that a great number of these biopsies are

completely unnecessary.

 

In a 2003 study from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer

Center in New York City, researchers set out to determine if

fluctuations in PSA levels would reveal a single PSA test

result to be unreliable on its own.

 

Over a 4-year period, the Sloan-Kettering team collected

five blood samples each from nearly 1,000 men whose median

age was 62 years. More than 20 percent of the subjects were

found to have PSA levels high enough that many doctors would

have recommended a biopsy. Half of those men, however, had

follow-up tests with normal PSA levels.

 

The Sloan-Kettering team concluded that an isolated PSA

screening with an elevated level should be followed with an

additional screening several weeks later before proceeding

with further testing or a biopsy.

 

This research backs up another study I told you about in the

e-Alert " Under the Knife, Under the Gun " (7/23/02) in which

doctors at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

(FHCRC) in Seattle estimated that PSA screening may result

in an over-diagnosis rate of more than 40 percent.

 

-----------------------------

Testing... soup to nuts

-----------------------------

 

As I've mentioned in previous e-Alerts, William Campbell

Douglass, M.D., is no fan of PSA tests or their follow-up

biopsies. Dr. Douglass refers to this one-two punch as, " the

mainstream's slash-and-burn approach to prostate cancer. "

 

In a Daily Dose e-letter Dr. Douglass sent out last

September, he offered a more sensible and dependable way to

screen for prostate cancer: A blood test called the anti-

malignin antibody screen (AMAS). Anti-malignan antibody

levels become elevated when any cancer cells are present in

the body. Most importantly, these serum levels tend to rise

early in the course of the disease, which means that cancer

can sometimes be detected several months before other

clinical tests might find it.

 

With an accuracy rate of more than 95 percent, the AMAS test

is also much more reliable than the PSA test. So given that

PSA levels can fluctuate, the most prudent course for

detecting prostate cancer would be a series PSA tests (as

described in the Sloan-Kettering trial) taken in conjunction

with the AMAS test.

 

You can find out more about the AMAS test at

amascancertest.com. And although Dr. Douglass calls the

test " a remarkable breakthrough, " he also cautions that if

the test is positive, you shouldn't let your physician rush

you into surgery. He says, " Most cancers are slow-growing,

and you need not panic into treatment. (The unfortunate fact

is that if a tumor is fast-growing, mainstream therapies

like chemotherapy and radiation will most likely be useless

anyway.) "

 

-----------------------------

More to come

-----------------------------

 

Next week I'll follow up today's e-Alert with some

information about prostate cancer prevention, and I'll share

a remarkable e-mail from a member who was recently in

Argentina, undergoing an experimental treatment for prostate

cancer. This unique procedure just might be the future for

the treatment of this disease.

 

**************************************************************

To start receiving your own copy of the HSI e-Alert, visit:

http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/freecopy.html

Or forward this e-mail to a friend so they can sign-up to

receive their own copy of the HSI e-Alert.

 

**************************************************************

 

... and another thing

 

Should you zig? How about zag? Up? Down? Sideways?

 

After sending you the e-Alert " Same Story, Different Day "

(2/17/04) concerning the latest HRT study that was abruptly

shut down to protect the health of subjects enrolled in the

study, I came across two articles that demonstrate the

maddeningly mixed signals about HRT that women are receiving

from the mainstream medical community.

 

The first article was an Associated Press report that

covered this HRT milestone: The FDA now requires that

manufacturers of HRT drugs containing estrogen and progestin

list warnings that the combination may increase the risk of

Alzheimer's disease in older women. This is in addition to

the current required warning that the drug combo increases

the risk of breast cancer, stroke and heart attack.

 

Four strikes and you're out? Not quite.

 

The second article appeared less than one week later. It was

a BBC News item reporting on comments made by one of the

researchers who helped mount the 2002 Women's Health

Initiative study that was shut down early. Addressing a

conference in Seattle, she said that, in her opinion, HRT is

still a safe therapy. She added that because of the

controversy surrounding the use of the combined drugs, she's

found that it's difficult to convince women that they should

take HRT.

 

The BBC article points out that over the past 10 years,

about 20,000 cases of breast cancer diagnosed in the U.K.

alone have been linked to HRT use. Gee... you think that

might have something to do with women's reluctance to use

this drug?

 

The signals may be mixed, but as the list of known risk

factors continues to expand, the decision about using

synthetic HRT gets easier every day.

 

To Your Good Health,

 

Jenny Thompson

Health Sciences Institute

 

**************************************************************

 

Sources:

" Screening Without Evidence of Efficacy " Malcolm Law,

British Medical Journal, Vol. 328, 2/7/04,

bmj.bmjjournals.com

" Prostate Test 'Of Little Value' " BBC News, 2/6/04,

newsvote.bbc.co.uk

" Effect of Verification Bias on Screening for Prostate

Cancer by Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen " New

England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 349, No. 4, 7/24/03,

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

" Prostate Test Misses Tumors, Study Finds " Gene Emery,

Reuters Health, 7/23/03, preventdisease.com

" Variation of Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels "

Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 289, No.

20, 5/28/03, jama.ama-assn.org

" Study Recommends 2nd Test Before a Prostate Biopsy " Mary

Duenwald, The New York Times, 5/28/03, nytimes.com

" FDA: Hormone Therapy, Dementia Linked " Associated Press,

2/10/04, msnbc.com

" HRT 'Scare' Expert Plays Down Risk " BBC News, 2/16/04,

news.bbc.co.uk

 

Copyright ©1997-2004 by www.hsibaltimore.com, L.L.C.

The e-Alert may not be posted on commercial sites without

written permission.

 

Before you hit reply to send us a question or request,

please visit here

http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/questions.html

 

**************************************************************

If you'd like to participate in the HSI Forum, search past

e-Alerts and products or you're an HSI member and would like

to search past articles, visit http://www.hsibaltimore.com

 

**************************************************************

 

 

 

 

 

Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...