Public Schools - Child Abuse American Style

[Guest guest]

http://www.sierratimes.com/05/05/06/24_209_102_203_89965.htm

 

 

Public Schools - Child Abuse American Style

 

 

Nancy Levant

 

 

 

American schools have nothing to do with educating children. They have nothing to do with preparing children for higher education. American schools are now under the auspices of the United Nations and their New World Citizen campaign. American children are being reprogrammed, and any American parent who can’t see it is too stupid to be a parent.

Let’s start from the top. The first fact is that the United Nations has called for “rational tolerance” in schools, universities, homes, and in the workplace. The definition of rational tolerance is primarily this – no Christianity, no morals or ethics based upon Christian traditions and doctrine, and no imparting of Christian beliefs to children.

Our government, the world’s primary financial supporter of the U.N., agreed to implement the U.N. Agenda 21 plan for global governance – this thanks Clinton, Gore, and Bush – Democrats and Republicans mind you. In doing so, the federal government agreed to enforce the U.N. agenda for schools, education, and its Socialism doctrine and indoctrination plan.

Goals 2000, No Child Left Behind, New Freedom Initiative and Commission, the compulsory mental health screening scam coupled with the U.N. partnership-stakeholding-non-profit bureaucracy then invaded the American public school system using a Communist-based army called the NEA and AFT (National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers), who are both listed on the Communist Party USA’s website. All federal and state funding sources of public schools now mandate the use of curricula that teaches “rational tolerance” to our children. Let it also be noted that most states and school districts require NEA membership of public school teachers. Let it also be noted that the NEA is the most powerful lobby and labor union in the United States though it is directly linked to the Communist Party.

In schools, the belief in God is now referred to as a “traditional tale” in language arts. The belief in “Gaia or Gaea” is now taught as the belief in Earth and a more “rational” ideology versus the irrationality of God. Now the trail of removing prayer, Christmas, and Easter from schools makes sense – finally. The U.N. mandates global citizens who are rational atheists.

The U.N. also called for a tracking and monitoring mechanism to track the progress of reprogramming American children - hence, the compulsory mental health screening initiative. This we need to clearly understand.

You will notice how every American classroom now has children divided into groups via group seating and group tables – approximately 6 children to a desk. You will also notice how teachers now place their desks off to a corner and out of the central visual spectrum of students. You notice that there are several other adults in today’s classrooms – classroom mothers, aids, and student teachers.

You’ve, no doubt, heard the term “group work” that is now required of all school children. According to the U.N., “consensus” and “solidarity” are to be taught to children as a basis for global citizenship. Loyalty to, and the ability to function in a group, is the basis of learning consensus-based government. This is the same system used by partnerships and stakeholding groups who come into our communities, invite us to a group gathering, and manipulate us into agreeing with pre-planned missions to, for example, take our private property for nature’s (or Gaia’s) sake.

Consensus government is the opposite of democratic government. Consensus government plays upon the fear of being the outsider in the group. And Socialist-Communist governments, which have all failed miserably, have been consistent in two trains of thought – no religious faith, and go along with the government in every way, shape, and form, or be an enemy of the government, be arrested and removed from the general population, and/or be permanently eliminated. If in doubt, read 20th Century Russian or Chinese history. You will notice how children who do not function well in today’s grouped classrooms are sent out of the classrooms to “special-ed” groups. That is because individuality is isolated, punished, documented, and labeled with an IEP (Individual Education Plan). In truth, these children are sent to smaller groups or problem-child education “specialists.” In Communist Russia, removal from the group was called Siberia.

American schools are also teaching rational tolerance for homosexuality. Why? Because any intolerance from the masses is capable of producing dissention. Therefore, to create a compliant global citizenry, moral ethics have to be lowered. Acceptance, consensus, and solidarity are the name of the reprogramming game. And in order to ensure that children are coming along nicely in their social re-engineering, proficiency tests, aptitude, and cognitive tests have been mandated by our federal government to track the progress of the change-over from the independent American citizen to the dependent, group-needy and atheist Socialist citizen.

Teachers, who once taught children to read, write, and perform mathematical calculations, now assign group work to children who self-teach via consensus and group agreements. Teachers, who are now governmental agents, document each child’s progress in his or her group. They document their group behaviors, their compliancy to the group goals and missions, and they also document the behaviors of their students’ parents and their acceptance of the New School Order.

Equally, school counselors and “advocates,” that now occupy offices in our public schools, call your children out of their classrooms to “talk.” These counselors and advocates ask children about how they feel, what their home lives are like, whether or not they attend churches, play sports, what electronic devices they have in their homes, where they vacation, how they get along with their parents, and other non-education issues. And they document students’ answers. This, in the eco-conservation stakeholding world is called “envisioning,” and your children are also being “envisioned” by trained Socialist advocates and counselors in their meetings behind closed doors.

To date, parents have the option of opting-out of such intrusions into their children and home lives, but according to one local school principal in my neck of the woods, that right is soon to be eliminated via legislation and, no doubt, hidden legislation. I have also read recent accounts of parents being arrested for not complying with school curriculum requirements such as R-rated movies and homosexuality acceptance training.

The compulsory mental health screening of school children has one and only one function – that of the federal government and the U.N. profiling the progress of the new global citizenship and the ability to pull off global Socialist governance in the United States. They are looking for time frames, trouble-makers, trouble-making families, future corporate employees, and specifically, they are looking for the children who will be successful and compliant Socialists and families who they believe will not take to the transition. Now, add to all this RFID technology, its coming uses, and the current attempts to bring this technology into our public schools.

I say to you the following – you are at risk of losing your children due to your belief in God and democracy. I have read articles from think tanks, such as the Brookings Institute and the Aspen Institute, that claim that the teaching religion is child abuse and subversive behavior. These think tanks are the advisors to our government and they are absolutely dedicated to global governance.

We cannot stop what has been set into place in our public school system. The only way to even attempt to stop what is happening to our children is to take them out of public schools and to home school. Unless there is a mass, and I mean mass, exodus of children out of the U.N. school system in America, children will rapidly continue to lose their American identity and Judeo-Christian value systems. There is no other answer and no other way to protest the unconscionable acts of our government but to crash the public school system in America.

Any parent who is not removing their children from today’s public schools is in agreement with the U.N. take-over of our nation. It’s just that simple and just that factual. You are going to have to decide, today, whether you stand for America or whether you stand for Socialism, Gaia, sexual re-education, and the U.N. recreation of our nation. There is no middle ground.

Websites for Wisdoms:

www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennis20.htm

www.beverlye.com/200410131912.html

www.crossroad.to/text/articles/ConformingChurch1-00.html

www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/Tolerance.htm

www.kirken.no/engelsk/engelsk_oslo.html

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

So, obviously your answer to all the world's problems is that

everybody be programmed to be " Christian " , just like you... Here's a

news flash - it's been tried before, but " unfortunately " , most people

don't react well to being told how to think and believe, and there ya

go with yet another religious war. The way it's supposed to be in this

great US of A is that everybody can believe what they want without

anybody else telling them (*especially* by force of Law!) that they're

wrong. Imagine that.

 

, " Kathy " <vanokat@m...>

wrote:

> http://www.sierratimes.com/05/05/06/24_209_102_203_89965.htm

> Public Schools - Child Abuse American Style

> Nancy Levant

>

> American schools have nothing to do with educating children. They

have

> nothing to do with preparing children for higher education. American

schools

> are now under the auspices of the United Nations and their New World

Citizen

> campaign. American children are being reprogrammed, and any American

parent

> who can't see it is too stupid to be a parent.

> Let's start from the top. The first fact is that the United

Nations has

> called for " rational tolerance " in schools, universities,

homes, and

in the

> workplace. The definition of rational tolerance is primarily this

– no

> Christianity, no morals or ethics based upon Christian traditions

and

> doctrine, and no imparting of Christian beliefs to children.

................

[Guest guest]

Perhaps that is your opinion but there are many of us

who are Christian who think differently. If someone

submits an article on a subject I disagree with, I

think the polite thing to do is delete the message.

What may interest you may not interest me and visa

versa. I have seen no criticism of other belief

systems that are mentioned or assumed in certain

articles. In fairness, its easier to delete. Or are

we Christians free game in this good ole USA now!!!

 

 

lynn

 

--- joyinthewoods <peessnic wrote:

> So, obviously your answer to all the world's

> problems is that

> everybody be programmed to be " Christian " , just like

> you... Here's a

> news flash - it's been tried before, but

> " unfortunately " , most people

> don't react well to being told how to think and

> believe, and there ya

> go with yet another religious war. The way it's

> supposed to be in this

> great US of A is that everybody can believe what

> they want without

> anybody else telling them (*especially* by force of

> Law!) that they're

> wrong. Imagine that.

>

 

 

Lynn

[Guest guest]

Forgive me for butting in there, but your remark, that "...we Christians are free game..." couldn't be more inappropriate. In fact Christians are at the forefront of groups that consider the entire world to be "fair game" for attack. Christians (of a certain stripe; many Christians practice their faith without imposing it on others), are constantly sticking their noses into everyone else's business, constantly telling us what to do and how to do it; promoting limits on our liberties and punishments for a growing body of what they imagine are "sins." Why the hell can't you leave people alone? It's bad enough that many of us consider your beliefs to be nothing more than hysteria and superstition; but it's quite another thing when you take your superstitions and try to force them on us.

JP

 

-

lynn sheer

Monday, May 09, 2005 3:10 PM

Re: Re: Public Schools - Child Abuse American Style

Perhaps that is your opinion but there are many of uswho are Christian who think differently. If someonesubmits an article on a subject I disagree with, Ithink the polite thing to do is delete the message. What may interest you may not interest me and visaversa. I have seen no criticism of other beliefsystems that are mentioned or assumed in certainarticles. In fairness, its easier to delete. Or arewe Christians free game in this good ole USA now!!! lynn--- joyinthewoods <peessnic wrote:> So, obviously your answer to all the world's> problems is that> everybody be programmed to be "Christian", just like> you... Here's a> news flash - it's been tried before, but> "unfortunately", most people> don't react well to being told how to think and> believe, and there ya> go with yet another religious war. The way it's> supposed to be in this> great US of A is that everybody can believe what> they want without> anybody else telling them (*especially* by force of> Law!) that they're> wrong. Imagine that.> Lynn«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

 

Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.7 - Release 5/9/2005

 

 

 

 

Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.7 - Release 5/9/2005

[Guest guest]

On Monday 09 May 2005 4:10 pm, lynn sheer wrote:

> Perhaps that is your opinion but there are many of us

> who are Christian who think differently. If someone

> submits an article on a subject I disagree with, I

> think the polite thing to do is delete the message.

 

That's an appropriate choice for some, but it has nothing to do with doing the

polite thing. The presupposition there is that to speak up and let your

voice be heard is unpolite. Not so. One may not have the time, or

inclination, or desire, or energy, etc., to respond, but speaking out and

being heard isn't the unpolite thing to do. Speaking meekly, or with

passion, are both also appropriate choices.

 

> What may interest you may not interest me and visa

> versa.

 

Absolutely.

 

> I have seen no criticism of other belief

> systems that are mentioned or assumed in certain

> articles. In fairness, its easier to delete.

 

Perhaps. To reply on any issus exposes one to the risk of being disagreed

with sometimes politely and sometimes agressively. It is, I believe, a risk

we all out to take from time to time.

 

> Or are

> we Christians free game in this good ole USA now!!!

 

As a Christian I was not offended. God can take care of himself, one would

hope.

 

The public schools need a lot of work and are pulled and stretched by the

philosophies of people of all varieties. Few seem to really want to teach

children how to put their mind to use but seem to want to teach them to fit

in the box of what one " ought " to think. Kick your way out of the box and

all it's presuppositions. Heal your mind from it's binding assumptions.

 

--

 

Steve - dudescholar1

 

" A man with a new idea is a crank until he succeeds. "

--Mark Twain

[Guest guest]

I do not wish to debate the whole religion thing on this list - that was not my intent when I posted the original but in defense of the author -who I admire for having the balls to tell it like it is ...

If one chooses to be Christian then who do the school people think they are to forbid this now after all these years. The UN is not our friend but are dictating and changing the rules. I think that was her point.

 

Don't get all bent - like Lynn said DELETE if you are not interested -

 

Kathy

 

 

 

 

 

----

 

 

joyinthewoods

05/10/05 12:38:39

 

Re: Public Schools - Child Abuse American Style

The end of the first paragraph of the original post is where I foundthe problem: "The first fact is that the UnitedNations has> called for "rational tolerance" in schools, universities,homes, andin the> workplace. The definition of rational tolerance is primarily this– no> Christianity, no morals or ethics based upon Christian traditionsand> doctrine, and no imparting of Christian beliefs to children.This obviously comes from a verrrrry narrow mind, which only seesthings as "Christian" or "non-Christian". There are many ways thatpeople are different from each other, and tolerance of thesedifferences is the only way we will ever have any hope of not being ateach other's throats all the time. I don't take kindly to anybodytelling me that I have to be exactly like them. Unfortunately, humannature being what it is, the smallest (and so often the most angry andviolent) minds think that their own particular way of being human isthe only correct way to be human, and everyone who is not exactly likethem should either be forced to conform, or obliterated. , lynn sheer<bigotterwv> wrote:> Perhaps that is your opinion but there are many of us> who are Christian who think differently. If someone> submits an article on a subject I disagree with, I> think the polite thing to do is delete the message. > What may interest you may not interest me and visa> versa. I have seen no criticism of other belief> systems that are mentioned or assumed in certain> articles. In fairness, its easier to delete. Or are> we Christians free game in this good ole USA now!!!> > > lynn> > --- joyinthewoods <peessnic@a...> wrote:> > So, obviously your answer to all the world's> > problems is that> > everybody be programmed to be "Christian", just like> > you... Here's a> > news flash - it's been tried before, but> > "unfortunately", most people> > don't react well to being told how to think and> > believe, and there ya> > go with yet another religious war. The way it's> > supposed to be in this> > great US of A is that everybody can believe what> > they want without> > anybody else telling them (*especially* by force of> > Law!) that they're> > wrong. Imagine that.> > > > > Lynn«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kays Stationeryhttp://www.kaysplace.net

[Guest guest]

The end of the first paragraph of the original post is where I found

the problem:

 

" The first fact is that the United

Nations has

> called for " rational tolerance " in schools, universities,

homes, and

in the

> workplace. The definition of rational tolerance is primarily this

– no

> Christianity, no morals or ethics based upon Christian traditions

and

> doctrine, and no imparting of Christian beliefs to children.

 

This obviously comes from a verrrrry narrow mind, which only sees

things as " Christian " or " non-Christian " . There are many ways that

people are different from each other, and tolerance of these

differences is the only way we will ever have any hope of not being at

each other's throats all the time. I don't take kindly to anybody

telling me that I have to be exactly like them. Unfortunately, human

nature being what it is, the smallest (and so often the most angry and

violent) minds think that their own particular way of being human is

the only correct way to be human, and everyone who is not exactly like

them should either be forced to conform, or obliterated.

 

 

, lynn sheer

<bigotterwv> wrote:

> Perhaps that is your opinion but there are many of us

> who are Christian who think differently. If someone

> submits an article on a subject I disagree with, I

> think the polite thing to do is delete the message.

> What may interest you may not interest me and visa

> versa. I have seen no criticism of other belief

> systems that are mentioned or assumed in certain

> articles. In fairness, its easier to delete. Or are

> we Christians free game in this good ole USA now!!!

>

>

> lynn

>

> --- joyinthewoods <peessnic@a...> wrote:

> > So, obviously your answer to all the world's

> > problems is that

> > everybody be programmed to be " Christian " , just like

> > you... Here's a

> > news flash - it's been tried before, but

> > " unfortunately " , most people

> > don't react well to being told how to think and

> > believe, and there ya

> > go with yet another religious war. The way it's

> > supposed to be in this

> > great US of A is that everybody can believe what

> > they want without

> > anybody else telling them (*especially* by force of

> > Law!) that they're

> > wrong. Imagine that.

> >

>

>

> Lynn

[Guest guest]

I don't want to get into a religious debate and get

kicked off the list so I will refrain from further

response except to say that I agree with the last

paragraph that the NWO is trying to wipe Christianity

off the face of the earth. This is my ONLY comment.

lynn

 

--- joyinthewoods <peessnic wrote:

> The end of the first paragraph of the original post

> is where I found

> the problem:

>

> " The first fact is that the United

> Nations has

> > called for " rational tolerance " in schools,

> universities,

> homes, and

> in the

> > workplace. The definition of rational tolerance is

> primarily this

> – no

> > Christianity, no morals or ethics based upon

> Christian traditions

> and

> > doctrine, and no imparting of Christian beliefs to

> children.

>

> This obviously comes from a verrrrry narrow mind,

> which only sees

> things as " Christian " or " non-Christian " . There are

> many ways that

> people are different from each other, and tolerance

> of these

> differences is the only way we will ever have any

> hope of not being at

> each other's throats all the time. I don't take

> kindly to anybody

> telling me that I have to be exactly like them.

> Unfortunately, human

> nature being what it is, the smallest (and so often

> the most angry and

> violent) minds think that their own particular way

> of being human is

> the only correct way to be human, and everyone who

> is not exactly like

> them should either be forced to conform, or

> obliterated.

 

 

Lynn

[Guest guest]

An absurd conclusion. I'm taking it for granted that the NWO would be as

unwilling to allow any other dogma to dominate schools and universities, as

it is unwilling to allow Christianity to do so. Those of us that consider

this off topic, need to take into account, that we're dealing here not with

religion per se, but with the matter of fairness. The point is, will we

allow one religion to dominate any debate in government, education, or

health, for that matter. This is similar to the one-sided debate still

going on in medicine. Where so called " mainstream " medicine demands that so

called " alternative " medicine be viewed as " evil " or " dangerous, "

" inadequate, " and generally not worthy of public consideration or support.

This is intolerance, pure and simple. This is bigotry, tyranny,

indoctrination, hiding behind Christianity; or in matters medical, the

pretense, the appearance of Science.

JP

 

 

-

" lynn sheer " <bigotterwv

 

Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:06 AM

Re: Re: Public Schools - Child Abuse American

Style

 

 

>I don't want to get into a religious debate and get

> kicked off the list so I will refrain from further

> response except to say that I agree with the last

> paragraph that the NWO is trying to wipe Christianity

> off the face of the earth. This is my ONLY comment.

> lynn

>

> --- joyinthewoods <peessnic wrote:

>> The end of the first paragraph of the original post

>> is where I found

>> the problem:

>>

>> " The first fact is that the United

>> Nations has

>> > called for " rational tolerance " in schools,

>> universities,

>> homes, and

>> in the

>> > workplace. The definition of rational tolerance is

>> primarily this

>> - no

>> > Christianity, no morals or ethics based upon

>> Christian traditions

>> and

>> > doctrine, and no imparting of Christian beliefs to

>> children.

>>

>> This obviously comes from a verrrrry narrow mind,

>> which only sees

>> things as " Christian " or " non-Christian " . There are

>> many ways that

>> people are different from each other, and tolerance

>> of these

>> differences is the only way we will ever have any

>> hope of not being at

>> each other's throats all the time. I don't take

>> kindly to anybody

>> telling me that I have to be exactly like them.

>> Unfortunately, human

>> nature being what it is, the smallest (and so often

>> the most angry and

>> violent) minds think that their own particular way

>> of being human is

>> the only correct way to be human, and everyone who

>> is not exactly like

>> them should either be forced to conform, or

>> obliterated.

>

>

> Lynn

>

>

>

>

> «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»

>

> § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §

>

> Subscribe:......... -

> To :.... -

>

> Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news

> related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a

> qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment,

> especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.

> **COPYRIGHT NOTICE**

> In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,

> any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without

> profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in

> receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational

> purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

>

>

[Guest guest]

Your so right Lynn it's an ungodly system that some day will be ruled by satan himself.....brendalynn sheer <bigotterwv wrote:

I don't want to get into a religious debate and getkicked off the list so I will refrain from furtherresponse except to say that I agree with the lastparagraph that the NWO is trying to wipe Christianityoff the face of the earth. This is my ONLY comment.lynn--- joyinthewoods wrote:> The end of the first paragraph of the original post> is where I found> the problem: > > "The first fact is that the United> Nations has> > called for "rational tolerance" in schools,> universities,> homes, and> in the> > workplace. The definition of rational tolerance is> primarily this> – no> > Christianity, no morals or ethics based upon> Christian traditions> and> > doctrine, and no imparting of Christian beliefs to>

children.> > This obviously comes from a verrrrry narrow mind,> which only sees> things as "Christian" or "non-Christian". There are> many ways that> people are different from each other, and tolerance> of these> differences is the only way we will ever have any> hope of not being at> each other's throats all the time. I don't take> kindly to anybody> telling me that I have to be exactly like them.> Unfortunately, human> nature being what it is, the smallest (and so often> the most angry and> violent) minds think that their own particular way> of being human is> the only correct way to be human, and everyone who> is not exactly like> them should either be forced to conform, or> obliterated.Lynn

[Guest guest]

Of course, those of us that simply don't believe in Satan, or any other of the truckload of demons and evil spirits you think exist, will have to continue to hear about this nonsense for the rest of our lives.

JP

 

-

Brenda Joyce

Tuesday, May 10, 2005 1:11 PM

Re: Re: Public Schools - Child Abuse American Style

 

Your so right Lynn it's an ungodly system that some day will be ruled by satan himself.....brendalynn sheer <bigotterwv wrote: I don't want to get into a religious debate and getkicked off the list so I will refrain from furtherresponse except to say that I agree with the lastparagraph that the NWO is trying to wipe Christianityoff the face of the earth. This is my ONLY comment.lynn--- joyinthewoods wrote:> The end of the first paragraph of the original post> is where I found> the problem: > > "The first fact is that the United> Nations has> > called for "rational tolerance" in schools,> universities,> homes, and> in the> > workplace. The definition of rational tolerance is> primarily this> – no> > Christianity, no morals or ethics based upon> Christian traditions> and> > doctrine, and no imparting of Christian beliefs to> children.> > This obviously comes from a verrrrry narrow mind,> which only sees> things as "Christian" or "non-Christian". There are> many ways that> people are different from each other, and tolerance> of these> differences is the only way we will ever have any> hope of not being at> each other's throats all the time. I don't take> kindly to anybody> telling me that I have to be exactly like them.> Unfortunately, human> nature being what it is, the smallest (and so often> the most angry and> violent) minds think that their own particular way> of being human is> the only correct way to be human, and everyone who> is not exactly like> them should either be forced to conform, or> obliterated.Lynn

[Guest guest]

Huge difference between *forbidding* one belief, and *allowing* all

beliefs. Way too many times, " Christians " are the ones trying to

forbid someone else's beliefs, and then they say it's an " attack "

anytime anyone dares to disagree with them or refuse to be converted.

All this rhetoric about everybody trying to forbid Christianity is

just that much BS. That trick won't work; it doesn't make me

defensive.

 

Joy

 

, " Kathy " <vanokat@m...>

wrote:

...................

> If one chooses to be Christian then who do the school people think

they are

> to forbid this now after all these years. ............

>

[Guest guest]

---who sits in chair 666 at the UN?? hmmm!

the demons and spirits I know of are THE IMMORTAL CORPORATIONS et al

ROFL

well I guess tho that sinse I herd satan meant adversary

there'd be a bunch a dem critters rite bout now probbly whereas the

people be concerned

when's opening day?

do ah need a license?

Is thare a limit?

 

 

 

 

In , " John Polifronio "

<counterpnt@e...> wrote:

> Of course, those of us that simply don't believe in Satan, or any

other of the truckload of demons and evil spirits you think exist,

will have to continue to hear about this nonsense for the rest of

our lives.

> JP

> -

> Brenda Joyce

>

> Tuesday, May 10, 2005 1:11 PM

> Re: Re: Public Schools - Child

Abuse American Style

>

>

> Your so right Lynn it's an ungodly system that some day will be

ruled by satan himself.....brenda

>

> lynn sheer <bigotterwv> wrote:

> I don't want to get into a religious debate and get

> kicked off the list so I will refrain from further

> response except to say that I agree with the last

> paragraph that the NWO is trying to wipe Christianity

> off the face of the earth. This is my ONLY comment.

> lynn

>

> --- joyinthewoods wrote:

> > The end of the first paragraph of the original post

> > is where I found

> > the problem:

> >

> > " The first fact is that the United

> > Nations has

> > > called for " rational tolerance " in schools,

> > universities,

> > homes, and

> > in the

> > > workplace. The definition of rational tolerance is

> > primarily this

> > - no

> > > Christianity, no morals or ethics based upon

> > Christian traditions

> > and

> > > doctrine, and no imparting of Christian beliefs to

> > children.

> >

> > This obviously comes from a verrrrry narrow mind,

> > which only sees

> > things as " Christian " or " non-Christian " . There are

> > many ways that

> > people are different from each other, and tolerance

> > of these

> > differences is the only way we will ever have any

> > hope of not being at

> > each other's throats all the time. I don't take

> > kindly to anybody

> > telling me that I have to be exactly like them.

> > Unfortunately, human

> > nature being what it is, the smallest (and so often

> > the most angry and

> > violent) minds think that their own particular way

> > of being human is

> > the only correct way to be human, and everyone who

> > is not exactly like

> > them should either be forced to conform, or

> > obliterated.

>

>

> Lynn

>

>

>

>

> «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«

¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»

>

> § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §

>

> Subscribe:......... -

 

> To :.... -

 

>

> Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it

may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always

consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any

course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening

illnesses.

> **COPYRIGHT NOTICE**

> In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,

> any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair

use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior

interest in receiving the included information for non-profit

research and educational purposes only.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

>

>