Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL & fn=/2005/05/27/142643.html FDA Looking Into Blindness-ED Drug Link By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 55 minutes agoUPDATED -3 HOURS -14 MINUTES AGO In a file photo Viagra tablets are seen at ... WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines. The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan. This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and thus lead to Viagra use. The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug. "We take this seriously," said FDA's Cruzan. The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels. Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. "These are not all the side effects of Cialis," it says on its Web site. Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: "Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time." That language had been available before the current inquiry. Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness. Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer AG. Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate. Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year. There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said Michael Flemming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. "We are confident about the safety of our product," said Flemming. Levitra, Cialis and Viagra all work in the same fashion, but Flemming said that doesn't mean they all have the same side effects. "Every drug is different. Every drug is unique," he said. Analyst Jason Napodano of Zacks Investment Research Inc. said he doesn't think Viagra sales will stumble because of the new reports because the number of cases is so small. "It is too early to say that Viagra is causing this (the blindness) and look how small the numbers are," he said. Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure. The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems. Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share. Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects. Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion. Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors. Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discovering side effects once drugs hit the market. For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much harm. Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states. --- On the Web: http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp http://www.fda.gov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 I want to put out an opinion on this stuff and all the other junk like it....how many older men will this kill cause he wants to be young again? now I mean older men lol...cause this problem can be many things, like for yrs my husband had a blockage in his legs, groan area until he got 12 inchs of tubeing for new blood flow and he had one doctor say he was really healthy not seeing his problem that stemed back to when he was very young....so this stuff could kill....also I hate their stupid commercials here your children and grandchildren or setting with you and you see this junk plum embarrassing to me, also have it on nas-car.....brendaSiouxB <SiouxB wrote: http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL & fn=/2005/05/27/142643.html FDA Looking Into Blindness-ED Drug Link By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 55 minutes agoUPDATED -3 HOURS -14 MINUTES AGO In a file photo Viagra tablets are seen at ... WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines. The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan. This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and thus lead to Viagra use. The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug. "We take this seriously," said FDA's Cruzan. The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels. Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. "These are not all the side effects of Cialis," it says on its Web site. Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: "Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time." That language had been available before the current inquiry. Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness. Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer AG. Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate. Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year. There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said Michael Flemming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. "We are confident about the safety of our product," said Flemming. Levitra, Cialis and Viagra all work in the same fashion, but Flemming said that doesn't mean they all have the same side effects. "Every drug is different. Every drug is unique," he said. Analyst Jason Napodano of Zacks Investment Research Inc. said he doesn't think Viagra sales will stumble because of the new reports because the number of cases is so small. "It is too early to say that Viagra is causing this (the blindness) and look how small the numbers are," he said. Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure. The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems. Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share. Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects. Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion. Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors. Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discovering side effects once drugs hit the market. For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much harm. Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states. --- On the Web: http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp http://www.fda.gov«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 I couldn't agree more about the commercials. I don't even turn the thing on if there are kids in my house unless its on a safe channel. lynn --- Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote: >....also I hate their stupid > commercials here your children and grandchildren or > setting with you and you see this junk plum > embarrassing to me, also have it on > nas-car.....brenda Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 I seems any thing goes any more if it makes you feel good...one of satan's old tricks huh?.....brendalynn sheer <bigotterwv wrote: I couldn't agree more about the commercials. I don'teven turn the thing on if there are kids in my houseunless its on a safe channel. lynn--- Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote:>....also I hate their stupid> commercials here your children and grandchildren or> setting with you and you see this junk plum> embarrassing to me, also have it on> nas-car.....brendaLynn«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 It can't be healthy for men. The warning that should make alarm bells go off for any man is the one that advises them to see a doctor if they have an errection that lasts more than 3 hours! Sue B - lynn sheer Friday, May 27, 2005 11:59 AM Re: Viagra may cause blindness? I couldn't agree more about the commercials. I don'teven turn the thing on if there are kids in my houseunless its on a safe channel. lynn--- Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote:>....also I hate their stupid> commercials here your children and grandchildren or> setting with you and you see this junk plum> embarrassing to me, also have it on> nas-car.....brendaLynn«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 I thought it was 4 hrs lol....my husband had a laugh over that one lol.....brendaSiouxB <SiouxB wrote: It can't be healthy for men. The warning that should make alarm bells go off for any man is the one that advises them to see a doctor if they have an errection that lasts more than 3 hours! Sue B - lynn sheer Friday, May 27, 2005 11:59 AM Re: Viagra may cause blindness? I couldn't agree more about the commercials. I don'teven turn the thing on if there are kids in my houseunless its on a safe channel. lynn--- Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote:>....also I hate their stupid> commercials here your children and grandchildren or> setting with you and you see this junk plum> embarrassing to me, also have it on> nas-car.....brendaLynn«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 The funny part is that a man who is healthy and has loads of vim and vigor (vitality) could have an erection for 3 hours if he and his wife enjoyed their lovemaking in certain prolonged ways. But, with viagra, that would be a medical problem because of all the other associated side effects. I used to sell herbs at flea markets. All kinds of old men came up to me and asked what they could do to...... Viagra gives them all a quick solution. Its not a healthy solution, but most of these men do not necessarily want health. And, AND, there are a lot of young men who take this. Nor is it healthy for them. My own recommendation for men of this bent is to exercise and watch their diets. They can supplement with herbs for particular weaknesses that diet (normal, but good, diet) won't solve. Use the herbs as tonics. Energy will build, and what one will do with his wife will increase in pleasure (if she has all the normal desires for him as well). I remember that most of the men asking me about this were all pretty sick looking. Ed On May 27, 2005, at 1:22 PM, SiouxB wrote: > It can't be healthy for men. The warning that should make alarm bells > go off for any man is the one that advises them to see a doctor if > they have an errection that lasts more than 3 hours! > > Sue B > - > lynn sheer > > Friday, May 27, 2005 11:59 AM > Re: Viagra may cause blindness? > > I couldn't agree more about the commercials. I don't > even turn the thing on if there are kids in my house > unless its on a safe channel. > lynn > --- Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote: > > >....also I hate their stupid > > commercials here your children and grandchildren or > > setting with you and you see this junk plum > > embarrassing to me, also have it on > > nas-car.....brenda > > > Lynn > > > > «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§« > ¤»¥«¤» > > § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! § > > Subscribe:......... - > To :.... - > > Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be > news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult > with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of > treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. > **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** > In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest > in receiving the included information for non-profit research and > educational purposes only. > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > > > > > > «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§« > ¤»¥«¤» > > § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! § > > Subscribe:......... - > To :.... - > > Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be > news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult > with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of > treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. > **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** > In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest > in receiving the included information for non-profit research and > educational purposes only. > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 Eerection for 3 or 4 hours??? That's a sick joke, promoted by the Cialis, Viagra, etc. companies to persuade men to use their product. Many men would be delighted to have a 3 or 4 hour erection. A Black comedian on TV just recently was heard saying that "If I got an erection for 4 hours, I wouldn't call my doctor, I'd call a hooker." JP - Ed Siceloff Friday, May 27, 2005 11:27 AM Re: Viagra may cause blindness? The funny part is that a man who is healthy and has loads of vim and vigor (vitality) could have an erection for 3 hours if he and his wife enjoyed their lovemaking in certain prolonged ways. But, with viagra, that would be a medical problem because of all the other associated side effects. I used to sell herbs at flea markets. All kinds of old men came up to me and asked what they could do to......Viagra gives them all a quick solution. Its not a healthy solution, but most of these men do not necessarily want health. And, AND, there are a lot of young men who take this. Nor is it healthy for them. My own recommendation for men of this bent is to exercise and watch their diets. They can supplement with herbs for particular weaknesses that diet (normal, but good, diet) won't solve. Use the herbs as tonics. Energy will build, and what one will do with his wife will increase in pleasure (if she has all the normal desires for him as well). I remember that most of the men asking me about this were all pretty sick looking. EdOn May 27, 2005, at 1:22 PM, SiouxB wrote: It can't be healthy for men. The warning that should make alarm bells go off for any man is the one that advises them to see a doctor if they have an errection that lasts more than 3 hours! Sue B - lynn sheer Friday, May 27, 2005 11:59 AM Re: Viagra may cause blindness? I couldn't agree more about the commercials. I don'teven turn the thing on if there are kids in my houseunless its on a safe channel. lynn--- Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote:>....also I hate their stupid> commercials here your children and grandchildren or> setting with you and you see this junk plum> embarrassing to me, also have it on> nas-car.....brendaLynn«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 The problem is that men that have sexual dysfunction will continue to use these drugs, even in the face of fatal consequences, let alone an infinitesimally small likelyhood of blindness, as long as those consequences are statistically rare, and they "are" statistically extremely rare. In fact, I'll bet you 1000 to 1, that men would continue to use drugs of this kind, even if they were made illegal, and had to be obtained on the black-market. What needs to be done, is that the pharmaceutical companies need to continue to look for ways of producing such drugs, without these dangerous side effects; such as potentially fatal drops in blood pressure, or these newer reports of blindness. You can bet they're working feverishly in their labs, to produce as safe a erectile enhancing drug as they can. It means billions of dollars in profit. What is also needed, is a sex-enhancing drug specifically designed for women. That'll create some fireworks. JP - Brenda Joyce Friday, May 27, 2005 9:53 AM Re: Viagra may cause blindness? I want to put out an opinion on this stuff and all the other junk like it....how many older men will this kill cause he wants to be young again? now I mean older men lol...cause this problem can be many things, like for yrs my husband had a blockage in his legs, groan area until he got 12 inchs of tubeing for new blood flow and he had one doctor say he was really healthy not seeing his problem that stemed back to when he was very young....so this stuff could kill....also I hate their stupid commercials here your children and grandchildren or setting with you and you see this junk plum embarrassing to me, also have it on nas-car.....brendaSiouxB <SiouxB wrote: http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL & fn=/2005/05/27/142643.html FDA Looking Into Blindness-ED Drug Link By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 55 minutes agoUPDATED -3 HOURS -14 MINUTES AGO In a file photo Viagra tablets are seen at ... WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines. The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan. This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and thus lead to Viagra use. The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug. "We take this seriously," said FDA's Cruzan. The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels. Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. "These are not all the side effects of Cialis," it says on its Web site. Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: "Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time." That language had been available before the current inquiry. Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness. Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer AG. Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate. Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year. There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said Michael Flemming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. "We are confident about the safety of our product," said Flemming. Levitra, Cialis and Viagra all work in the same fashion, but Flemming said that doesn't mean they all have the same side effects. "Every drug is different. Every drug is unique," he said. Analyst Jason Napodano of Zacks Investment Research Inc. said he doesn't think Viagra sales will stumble because of the new reports because the number of cases is so small. "It is too early to say that Viagra is causing this (the blindness) and look how small the numbers are," he said. Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure. The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems. Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share. Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects. Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion. Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors. Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discovering side effects once drugs hit the market. For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much harm. Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states. --- On the Web: http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp http://www.fda.gov«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce ! «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.0.0 - Release 5/27/2005 Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.0.0 - Release 5/27/2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 This morning I heard the news and said that i did not have much sympathy becasue they should not be taking recreational drugs anyway. My boyfriend had a cow and acted like I was the biggest sinner there was and I was breaking the biggest commant -- you know the one that we are suppose to think good thoughs about people.....I informed him that was not in the bible but he was still pretty irked at me. He has no problem telling me things are my own falt when I do dumb things and bad things happen to me, but he sure did not like me saying I did not have any sympathy for a bunch of men taking drugs to get a stiffy.Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote: I want to put out an opinion on this stuff and all the other junk like it....how many older men will this kill cause he wants to be young again? now I mean older men lol...cause this problem can be many things, like for yrs my husband had a blockage in his legs, groan area until he got 12 inchs of tubeing for new blood flow and he had one doctor say he was really healthy not seeing his problem that stemed back to when he was very young....so this stuff could kill....also I hate their stupid commercials here your children and grandchildren or setting with you and you see this junk plum embarrassing to me, also have it on nas-car.....brendaSiouxB <SiouxB wrote: http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL & fn=/2005/05/27/142643.html FDA Looking Into Blindness-ED Drug Link By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 55 minutes agoUPDATED -3 HOURS -14 MINUTES AGO In a file photo Viagra tablets are seen at ... WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines. The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan. This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and thus lead to Viagra use. The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug. "We take this seriously," said FDA's Cruzan. The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels. Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. "These are not all the side effects of Cialis," it says on its Web site. Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: "Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time." That language had been available before the current inquiry. Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness. Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer AG. Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate. Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year. There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said Michael Flemming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. "We are confident about the safety of our product," said Flemming. Levitra, Cialis and Viagra all work in the same fashion, but Flemming said that doesn't mean they all have the same side effects. "Every drug is different. Every drug is unique," he said. Analyst Jason Napodano of Zacks Investment Research Inc. said he doesn't think Viagra sales will stumble because of the new reports because the number of cases is so small. "It is too early to say that Viagra is causing this (the blindness) and look how small the numbers are," he said. Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure. The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems. Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share. Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects. Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion. Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors. Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discovering side effects once drugs hit the market. For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much harm. Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states. --- On the Web: http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp http://www.fda.gov«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce ! «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 They can't find it in the dark?Cindy Porter <pgmr_64804 wrote: This morning I heard the news and said that i did not have much sympathy becasue they should not be taking recreational drugs anyway. My boyfriend had a cow and acted like I was the biggest sinner there was and I was breaking the biggest commant -- you know the one that we are suppose to think good thoughs about people.....I informed him that was not in the bible but he was still pretty irked at me. He has no problem telling me things are my own falt when I do dumb things and bad things happen to me, but he sure did not like me saying I did not have any sympathy for a bunch of men taking drugs to get a stiffy.Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote: I want to put out an opinion on this stuff and all the other junk like it....how many older men will this kill cause he wants to be young again? now I mean older men lol...cause this problem can be many things, like for yrs my husband had a blockage in his legs, groan area until he got 12 inchs of tubeing for new blood flow and he had one doctor say he was really healthy not seeing his problem that stemed back to when he was very young....so this stuff could kill....also I hate their stupid commercials here your children and grandchildren or setting with you and you see this junk plum embarrassing to me, also have it on nas-car.....brendaSiouxB <SiouxB wrote: http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL & fn=/2005/05/27/142643.html FDA Looking Into Blindness-ED Drug Link By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 55 minutes agoUPDATED -3 HOURS -14 MINUTES AGO In a file photo Viagra tablets are seen at ... WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines. The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan. This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and thus lead to Viagra use. The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug. "We take this seriously," said FDA's Cruzan. The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels. Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. "These are not all the side effects of Cialis," it says on its Web site. Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: "Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time." That language had been available before the current inquiry. Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness. Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer AG. Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate. Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year. There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said Michael Flemming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. "We are confident about the safety of our product," said Flemming. Levitra, Cialis and Viagra all work in the same fashion, but Flemming said that doesn't mean they all have the same side effects. "Every drug is different. Every drug is unique," he said. Analyst Jason Napodano of Zacks Investment Research Inc. said he doesn't think Viagra sales will stumble because of the new reports because the number of cases is so small. "It is too early to say that Viagra is causing this (the blindness) and look how small the numbers are," he said. Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure. The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems. Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share. Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects. Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion. Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors. Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discovering side effects once drugs hit the market. For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much harm. Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states. --- On the Web: http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp http://www.fda.gov«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce ! «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 I don't know if they can find it in the dark or not, but I don't approve of taking a bunch of drugs unless you are in cronic pain or they have convinced you you will die without it. Not just for recreation which is all those ED drugs are for.Bea Bernhausen <beabernhausen wrote: They can't find it in the dark?Cindy Porter <pgmr_64804 wrote: This morning I heard the news and said that i did not have much sympathy becasue they should not be taking recreational drugs anyway. My boyfriend had a cow and acted like I was the biggest sinner there was and I was breaking the biggest commant -- you know the one that we are suppose to think good thoughs about people.....I informed him that was not in the bible but he was still pretty irked at me. He has no problem telling me things are my own falt when I do dumb things and bad things happen to me, but he sure did not like me saying I did not have any sympathy for a bunch of men taking drugs to get a stiffy.Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote: I want to put out an opinion on this stuff and all the other junk like it....how many older men will this kill cause he wants to be young again? now I mean older men lol...cause this problem can be many things, like for yrs my husband had a blockage in his legs, groan area until he got 12 inchs of tubeing for new blood flow and he had one doctor say he was really healthy not seeing his problem that stemed back to when he was very young....so this stuff could kill....also I hate their stupid commercials here your children and grandchildren or setting with you and you see this junk plum embarrassing to me, also have it on nas-car.....brendaSiouxB <SiouxB wrote: http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL & fn=/2005/05/27/142643.html FDA Looking Into Blindness-ED Drug Link By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 55 minutes agoUPDATED -3 HOURS -14 MINUTES AGO In a file photo Viagra tablets are seen at ... WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines. The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan. This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and thus lead to Viagra use. The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug. "We take this seriously," said FDA's Cruzan. The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels. Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. "These are not all the side effects of Cialis," it says on its Web site. Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: "Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time." That language had been available before the current inquiry. Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness. Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer AG. Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate. Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year. There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said Michael Flemming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. "We are confident about the safety of our product," said Flemming. Levitra, Cialis and Viagra all work in the same fashion, but Flemming said that doesn't mean they all have the same side effects. "Every drug is different. Every drug is unique," he said. Analyst Jason Napodano of Zacks Investment Research Inc. said he doesn't think Viagra sales will stumble because of the new reports because the number of cases is so small. "It is too early to say that Viagra is causing this (the blindness) and look how small the numbers are," he said. Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure. The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems. Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share. Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects. Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion. Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors. Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discovering side effects once drugs hit the market. For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much harm. Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states. --- On the Web: http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp http://www.fda.gov«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce ! «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ! «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 Had anybody read or seen the TV news about registered sex offenders that were receiving viagra type drugs??? Insanity reigns. And to add insult to injury, the scripts were paid with our tax dollars. Sue B - Cindy Porter Friday, May 27, 2005 2:17 PM Re: Viagra may cause blindness? This morning I heard the news and said that i did not have much sympathy becasue they should not be taking recreational drugs anyway. My boyfriend had a cow and acted like I was the biggest sinner there was and I was breaking the biggest commant -- you know the one that we are suppose to think good thoughs about people.....I informed him that was not in the bible but he was still pretty irked at me. He has no problem telling me things are my own falt when I do dumb things and bad things happen to me, but he sure did not like me saying I did not have any sympathy for a bunch of men taking drugs to get a stiffy.Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote: I want to put out an opinion on this stuff and all the other junk like it....how many older men will this kill cause he wants to be young again? now I mean older men lol...cause this problem can be many things, like for yrs my husband had a blockage in his legs, groan area until he got 12 inchs of tubeing for new blood flow and he had one doctor say he was really healthy not seeing his problem that stemed back to when he was very young....so this stuff could kill....also I hate their stupid commercials here your children and grandchildren or setting with you and you see this junk plum embarrassing to me, also have it on nas-car.....brendaSiouxB <SiouxB wrote: http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL & fn=/2005/05/27/142643.html FDA Looking Into Blindness-ED Drug Link By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 55 minutes agoUPDATED -3 HOURS -14 MINUTES AGO In a file photo Viagra tablets are seen at ... WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines. The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan. This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and thus lead to Viagra use. The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug. "We take this seriously," said FDA's Cruzan. The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels. Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. "These are not all the side effects of Cialis," it says on its Web site. Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: "Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time." That language had been available before the current inquiry. Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness. Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer AG. Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate. Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year. There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said Michael Flemming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. "We are confident about the safety of our product," said Flemming. Levitra, Cialis and Viagra all work in the same fashion, but Flemming said that doesn't mean they all have the same side effects. "Every drug is different. Every drug is unique," he said. Analyst Jason Napodano of Zacks Investment Research Inc. said he doesn't think Viagra sales will stumble because of the new reports because the number of cases is so small. "It is too early to say that Viagra is causing this (the blindness) and look how small the numbers are," he said. Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure. The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems. Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share. Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects. Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion. Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors. Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discovering side effects once drugs hit the market. For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much harm. Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states. --- On the Web: http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp http://www.fda.gov«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce ! «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 Yep, I heard it for several days. Also, I guess medicare is suppose to start paying for medicare too. I heard that over the weekend I think. Several groups were upset because they will not pay for birth control pills and things but they will pay for mens recreational needs in old age.SiouxB <SiouxB wrote: Had anybody read or seen the TV news about registered sex offenders that were receiving viagra type drugs??? Insanity reigns. And to add insult to injury, the scripts were paid with our tax dollars. Sue B - Cindy Porter Friday, May 27, 2005 2:17 PM Re: Viagra may cause blindness? This morning I heard the news and said that i did not have much sympathy becasue they should not be taking recreational drugs anyway. My boyfriend had a cow and acted like I was the biggest sinner there was and I was breaking the biggest commant -- you know the one that we are suppose to think good thoughs about people.....I informed him that was not in the bible but he was still pretty irked at me. He has no problem telling me things are my own falt when I do dumb things and bad things happen to me, but he sure did not like me saying I did not have any sympathy for a bunch of men taking drugs to get a stiffy.Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote: I want to put out an opinion on this stuff and all the other junk like it....how many older men will this kill cause he wants to be young again? now I mean older men lol...cause this problem can be many things, like for yrs my husband had a blockage in his legs, groan area until he got 12 inchs of tubeing for new blood flow and he had one doctor say he was really healthy not seeing his problem that stemed back to when he was very young....so this stuff could kill....also I hate their stupid commercials here your children and grandchildren or setting with you and you see this junk plum embarrassing to me, also have it on nas-car.....brendaSiouxB <SiouxB wrote: http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL & fn=/2005/05/27/142643.html FDA Looking Into Blindness-ED Drug Link By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 55 minutes agoUPDATED -3 HOURS -14 MINUTES AGO In a file photo Viagra tablets are seen at ... WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines. The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan. This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and thus lead to Viagra use. The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug. "We take this seriously," said FDA's Cruzan. The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels. Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. "These are not all the side effects of Cialis," it says on its Web site. Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: "Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time." That language had been available before the current inquiry. Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness. Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer AG. Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate. Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year. There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said Michael Flemming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. "We are confident about the safety of our product," said Flemming. Levitra, Cialis and Viagra all work in the same fashion, but Flemming said that doesn't mean they all have the same side effects. "Every drug is different. Every drug is unique," he said. Analyst Jason Napodano of Zacks Investment Research Inc. said he doesn't think Viagra sales will stumble because of the new reports because the number of cases is so small. "It is too early to say that Viagra is causing this (the blindness) and look how small the numbers are," he said. Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure. The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems. Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share. Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects. Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion. Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors. Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discovering side effects once drugs hit the market. For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much harm. Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states. --- On the Web: http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp http://www.fda.gov«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce ! «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 They pay for old men's needs in old age, and, AND, they fund publicly the social group in which abortions happen. Abortion, one of the results of old men's recreation (as well as the recreation of others). Viagra to make the babies, abortion to fix them. Choices. lol. On May 27, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Cindy Porter wrote: > Yep, I heard it for several days. > > Also, I guess medicare is suppose to start paying for medicare too. I > heard that over the weekend I think. Several groups were upset > because they will not pay for birth control pills and things but they > will pay for mens recreational needs in old age. > > SiouxB <SiouxB wrote: > Had anybody read or seen the TV news about registered sex offenders > that were receiving viagra type drugs??? Insanity reigns. And to add > insult to injury, the scripts were paid with our tax dollars. > > Sue B > - > Cindy Porter > > Friday, May 27, 2005 2:17 PM > Re: Viagra may cause blindness? > > This morning I heard the news and said that i did not have much > sympathy becasue they should not be taking recreational drugs anyway. > My boyfriend had a cow and acted like I was the biggest sinner there > was and I was breaking the biggest commant -- you know the one that we > are suppose to think good thoughs about people.....I informed him that > was not in the bible but he was still pretty irked at me. > > He has no problem telling me things are my own falt when I do dumb > things and bad things happen to me, but he sure did not like me saying > I did not have any sympathy for a bunch of men taking drugs to get a > stiffy. > > Brenda Joyce <brendajoyce8 wrote: > I want to put out an opinion on this stuff and all the other junk like > it....how many older men will this kill cause he wants to be young > again? now I mean older men lol...cause this problem can be many > things, like for yrs my husband had a blockage in his legs, groan area > until he got 12 inchs of tubeing for new blood flow and he had one > doctor say he was really healthy not seeing his problem that stemed > back to when he was very young....so this stuff could kill....also I > hate their stupid commercials here your children and grandchildren or > setting with you and you see this junk plum embarrassing to me, also > have it on nas-car.....brenda > > SiouxB <SiouxB wrote: > > > http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL & fn=/2005/05/27/ > 142643.html > > > > FDA Looking Into Blindness-ED Drug Link > > By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer > > 55 minutes agoUPDATED -3 HOURS -14 MINUTES AGO > <bin27138.jpg> > > In a file photo Viagra tablets are seen at ... > > WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of > blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, > a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill > afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster > medicines. > > The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no > evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan. > > This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior > ischemic optic neuropathy. It can occur in men who are diabetic or > have heart disease, the same conditions that can cause impotence and > thus lead to Viagra use. > > The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and > four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users > of Levitra, the third impotence drug. > > " We take this seriously, " said FDA's Cruzan. > > The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the > manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the > class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their > labels. > > Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems > as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having > difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. " These are > not all the side effects of Cialis, " it says on its Web site. > > Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some > vision issues: " Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being > sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time. " That language > had been available before the current inquiry. > > Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts confirmed Friday that the drugmaker was > in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra's > label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed > blindness. However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the > blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood > pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the > conditions that can cause blindness. > > Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Bayer > AG. > > Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the > treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, > tests on animals indicate. > > Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that > year. > > There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said > Michael Flemming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. " We are > confident about the safety of our product, " said Flemming. > > Levitra, Cialis and Viagra all work in the same fashion, but Flemming > said that doesn't mean they all have the same side effects. " Every > drug is different. Every drug is unique, " he said. > > Analyst Jason Napodano of Zacks Investment Research Inc. said he > doesn't think Viagra sales will stumble because of the new reports > because the number of cases is so small. " It is too early to say that > Viagra is causing this (the blindness) and look how small the numbers > are, " he said. > > Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by > men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have > sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been > warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood > pressure. > > The drug's label also warns of erections lasting longer than four > hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, > flushed skin and vision problems. > > Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the > Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 > percent - to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer > also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market > share. > > Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and > Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion > from $1.88 billion. Pfizer shares fell in early trading on the New > York Stock Exchange. > > Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of > prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx > from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side > effects. > > Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts > have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion. > > Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market > because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug > Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a > category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors. > > Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more > post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discovering side > effects once drugs hit the market. > > For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker > approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases > as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines - a $200 > billion industry annually - are coming out too fast and doing too much > harm. > > Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid's payment > for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York > and other states. > > --- > > On the Web: > > http://www.viagra.com/getTheMost/index.asp > > http://www.fda.gov > > > «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§« > ¤»¥«¤» > > § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! § > > Subscribe:......... - > To :.... - > > Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be > news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult > with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of > treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. > **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** > In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest > in receiving the included information for non-profit research and > educational purposes only. > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > > > > > > Always in the service of our Father. Brenda Joyce > > > ! > > «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§« > ¤»¥«¤» > > § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! § > > Subscribe:......... - > To :.... - > > Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be > news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult > with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of > treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. > **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** > In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest > in receiving the included information for non-profit research and > educational purposes only. > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > > > > > > «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§« > ¤»¥«¤» > > § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! § > > Subscribe:......... - > To :.... - > > Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be > news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult > with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of > treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. > **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** > In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest > in receiving the included information for non-profit research and > educational purposes only. > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > > > > > > «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§« > ¤»¥«¤» > > § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! § > > Subscribe:......... - > To :.... - > > Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be > news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult > with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of > treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. > **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** > In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest > in receiving the included information for non-profit research and > educational purposes only. > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > > > > > > «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§« > ¤»¥«¤» > > § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! § > > Subscribe:......... - > To :.... - > > Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be > news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult > with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of > treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. > **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** > In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest > in receiving the included information for non-profit research and > educational purposes only. > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.