Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

FBI Keeping Lengthy Files on Groups Opposed to Bush's Policies

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

MedicalConspiracies (AT) googl (DOT) com

____________

 

FBI Keeping Lengthy Files on Groups Opposed to Bush's Policies

 

 

Abid Aslam

OneWorld US

 

http://tinyurl.com/dto4m

 

WASHINGTON, D.C., Jul 19 (OneWorld) - The Federal Bureau of

Investigation (FBI) has amassed at least 3,500 pages of internal

documents from political protest groups in what the targets say

amounts to political surveillance of some of President George W.

Bush's leading critics.

 

The FBI has obtained 1,173 pages of internal documents on the American

Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) since 2001, the rights watchdog and

prominent administration critic said Monday. Federal agents also have

collected some 2,383 pages from environmental group Greenpeace, a

leading voice of anti-Bush protest, the ACLU added.

 

The figures have emerged as part of a lawsuit under the Freedom of

Information Act (FOIA) brought by the ACLU and other groups alleging

that the FBI is engaging in politically motivated spying against

law-biding organizations.

 

''We now know that the government is keeping documents about the ACLU

and other peaceful groups,'' said Anthony Romero, the ACLU's executive

director. ''The question is why.''

 

The ACLU, in court documents, has contended that joint terrorism task

forces set up across the country and led by the FBI are structured and

funded in ways that facilitate violations of groups' and individuals'

rights to assemble and speak freely.

 

The organization said it filed its FOIA requests in response to

widespread complaints from students and political activists who said

FBI agents were questioning them in the months leading up to the 2004

political conventions.

 

The FBI and Justice Department have said that any such

intelligence-gathering was aimed at preventing criminal activity, not

silencing speech.

 

Documents obtained through lawsuits also showed the FBI was monitoring

groups' Web sites and had prepared an internal report on at least one

anti-war protest organization, United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ),

and its efforts to organize a demonstration in the run up to the 2004

Republican National Convention, the ACLU said.

 

''The UFPJ report underscores our concern that the FBI is violating

Americans' right to peacefully assemble and oppose government policies

without being branded as terrorist threats,'' said Ann Beeson, the

ACLU's associate legal director. ''There is no need to open a

counterterrorism file when people are simply exercising their First

Amendment rights.''

 

The ACLU is seeking FBI surveillance files on itself, Greenpeace,

UFPJ, Code Pink, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals,

American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, and Muslim Public Affairs

Council.

 

The Justice Department has said it will take up to a year to review

the material the ACLU seeks. The civil rights group has accused the

government of stalling and has asked a judge to order federal agents

to turn over the documents sooner.

 

The FBI's ability to monitor political protest groups had been

curtailed since the 1970s amid outrage over a decade's worth of abuses

under then-agency director J. Edgar Hoover.

 

Many of the restrictions were lifted or relaxed after the Sep. 11,

2001 terrorist attacks, however, despite some lawmakers' stated

concerns that the expanded police powers granted under the USA Patriot

Act, in particular, could prompt civil rights violations and result in

the targeting of legitimate and legal dissent.

 

Key Patriot Act provisions are scheduled to expire on Dec. 31. Bush

was scheduled to speak about the law in Baltimore, Maryland,

Wednesday, as part of a sustained White House campaign to make

permanent the law's expanded powers.

 

Critics have said the powers infringe on citizens' civil liberties but

Bush has described the Patriot Act as ''one of the important tools

federal agents have used to protect America.''

 

New provisions would allow federal authorities to subpoena records

from businesses, hospitals, and libraries.

 

A novel coalition of conservatives and liberals normally at each

other's throats over the nature of government and free speech have

made common cause to oppose key parts of the antiterrorism law.

 

The ACLU, long vilified by conservatives, has joined forces with

right-wing groups the American Conservative Union, Americans for Tax

Reform, and the Free Congress Foundation to spearhead the ''Patriots

to Restore Checks and Balances'' coalition.

 

The coalition, formed in March, has lobbied Congress to roll back

provisions allowing law enforcement agents to look at library users'

records and to conduct unannounced searches of homes and private

offices.

 

Short for the ''Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing

Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of

2001,'' the USA Patriot Act originally passed by 357-66 in the House

of Representatives and 98-1 in the Senate.

 

The Bush administration proposed the law, shepherded it through

Congress, and enacted it in the immediate aftermath of the Sep. 11,

2001 terrorist attacks and the U.S. Senate's evacuation because of

anthrax.

 

The measure passed with neither chamber issuing the usual reviews of

proposed legislation. ''As a result, it lacks background legislative

history that often retrospectively provides necessary statutory

interpretation,'' according to a detailed analysis of the law prepared

by the Washington, D.C.-based Electronic Privacy Information Center.

 

Grassroots opposition to the law has grown, according to the ACLU.

Some 375 local and state governments representing more than 56 million

Americans have passed resolutions opposing the measure or some of its

provisions.

 

While many of these resolutions have no practical effect, proponents

have said the measures serve to notify federal policymakers and

agencies of public disapproval. Most of the resolutions called upon

Congress to bring the Patriot Act back in line with the U.S.

constitution.

 

2005 OneWorld.net.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...