Guest guest Posted July 13, 2004 Report Share Posted July 13, 2004 > Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:34:12 -0700 > Progress Report: Troy's Drug Industry Ploy > " Center for American Progress " > <progress > Center for American Progress - Progress Report by David Sirota, Christy Harvey, Judd Legum and Jonathan Baskin July 13, 2004 MEDIAFox AttacksHEALTH CARETroy's Drug Industry PloyIRAQRevisionist-In-Chief UNDER THE RADAR MEDIA Fox Attacks With the much-anticipated premiere of the movie " Outfoxed " set for tonight in New York City, Fox News went on the attack, trying to intimidate other media outlets into not covering the story. Instead of responding to the well-documented charges made in " Outfoxed, " Fox claimed the whistleblowers featured in the film were only " low-level " employees, even though at least one was a former West Coast anchorman for the network. As Outfoxed director Robert Greenwald said, " They're doing their standard technique, which is name-calling and bullying. Whether the [job] title was booker or staff booker in no way affects the fact that Fox is a partisan network. And what I've done in the film is objectively proven the case. " NEW STUDY - BRIT HUME IS A RIGHT-WING MOUTHPIECE: A new report by the nonpartisan Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR) found a serious conservative bias in Brit Hume's " Special Report " program on Fox. In a 25-week study, FAIR found " 57 percent of Special Report's one-on-one guests were ideological conservatives, 12 percent were centrists and 11 percent were progressives. " Additionally, Special Report " rarely features women or non-white guests in these prominent newsmaker interview spots. " For more, see Hume pushing the Bush administration's WMD myths, and spinning for the Bush campaign. RIGHT-WING MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ADMITS FOX'S BIAS: Facing overwhelming evidence of Fox News's conservative bias, at least one conservative operation was forced to admit the obvious. Rich Noyes, of the right-wing Media Research Center, acknowledged Fox's " commentary tends to move toward the right. " FOX SAYS CASUALTIES 'NOT RELEVANT' TO WAR CONSIDERATIONS: According to the conservative Washington Times, in downplaying Fox News memos instructing reporters not to dwell on Iraq casualties, Fox's top news executive John Moody claimed " casualties are part of war " in Iraq and " should not be described as relevant to 'the political question...should we be there? " With more than 900 American soldiers killed in Iraq, polls show increasing casualties are causing more Americans to question Bush administration policy #8211; a question apparently not allowed on Fox News. MORE PROOF FOX FLACKS BUSH MYTHS: Fox News has been a major media force in parroting various unsubstantiated claims to buttress the Bush White House. On tax cuts, for instance, Fox News anchor Brian Wilson claimed on 3/5/04 that Americans were " seeing the benefits of [the Bush] tax cuts that's in the system, " even though Fox News's own poll from a few months earlier showed 61 percent of Americans believed the tax cuts had not helped them. On energy policy, despite the White House meeting with Enron CEO Ken Lay during the energy crisis, Fox anchor Brit Hume said on 1/16/02 that Enron " is not a scandal about the Bush energy policy. " Even though as a presidential candidate Bush said he was planning to propose private school vouchers (and has since reiterated that position), Fox correspondent Jim Angle claimed on 1/15/01 that calling it a pro-voucher plan " is a mischaracterization, obviously, of his education plan. " At a time when Fox's own polls showed 69 percent of Americans thought the economy under Bush was either " fair " or " poor " and an NBC poll showed 62 percent of Americans believed the Bush tax cuts did nothing or hurt the economy, Fox correspondent Carl Cameron said on 1/18/02 that " polls show that the public prefers the Republican economic approach over that of Democrats. " And despite burgeoning violence in Iraq, Fox News Sunday host Snow claimed Bush's Iraq policy " has created peaceful conditions in more than 90 percent of Iraq " #8211; a fact he offered no documentation to support. See a backgrounder for more Fox distortions. HEALTH CARE Troy's Drug Industry Ploy A sworn affidavit filed in a Texas court case against Pfizer Inc. reveals President Bush's top appointee at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) counseled pharmaceutical industry insiders on how to escape oversight from his own agency. FDA Chief Counsel Daniel Troy, a former drug lobbyist best known for preventing the FDA from regulating big tobacco, headed a " roundtable discussion " in December 2003 with pharmaceutical firms and their defense lawyers. According to the affidavit, at the meetings he " made it abundantly clear that the FDA would exercise its intervention powers to protect [drug industry] defendants from liability in state and federal courts throughout the nation. " Troy advised conference attendees, remarkably, to invest in research that would prove liability issues were keeping " good products off the shelf, " even while admitting the FDA currently had " no good evidence " to support such a claim. " You guys really shoot yourself in the foot by not funding research to this effect, " he said. " I'll even take anecdotal evidence and stories if you have them. " Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) today will hold a Capitol Hill press conference with families who have been affected by Troy and the Bush administration's intervention on behalf of the drug industry. TROY TOUTS LIMITED INFORMATION: According to the sworn affidavit, Troy told the drug industry conference it was the FDA's goal to " control the flow of risk info regarding these [drug and medical device] products " to the public. This directly contradicts the FDA's mission: to help " the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medicines and foods to improve their health. " The affidavit states Troy made " no mention#8230;of the FDA's real mandate, which is to regulate manufacturers on behalf of consumers. " Instead, despite heading an agency meant to protect consumers, Troy promoted the Bush administration's tort reform agenda to the industry's representatives, making " numerous derogatory remarks about plaintiffs, 'runaway juries,' and even " calling some attorneys representing plaintiffs against drug companies " bounty hunters. " A TROY IN THE HENHOUSE: Like many other Bush appointees, Troy is now overseeing an industry which he used to represent. The Boston Globe reports, " During the Clinton years, Troy was best known for suing the FDA. It was Troy who worked for the tobacco industry on the landmark Supreme Court case that prevented the agency from regulating tobacco. And he fought for years to allow pharmaceutical companies to promote drugs for unapproved uses. " Now, as FDA counsel, Troy has made " unprecedented offer to drug companies#8230;likely to protect their profits and potentially hurt consumers. " Since arriving at the FDA in 2001, " Troy's most aggressive efforts have come on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry, " including the unprecedented intervention in select court cases on behalf of defendants, and the loosening of off-label rules which health advocates say could " 'deal a body blow' to the government's ability to defend the public from unproven and unsafe treatments. " TROY TAKES STAND FOR PHARMACEUTICAL GIANTS: Troy's pro-industry stance goes way beyond words: the former industry representative has engaged in an " open-door policy " with industry. Early in his tenure, he " held at least 50 meetings with representatives from the industries FDA regulates. " Journalists have requested records of those meetings, but were " informed by Troy's office that there are 'no minutes, no memos, no nothing.' " In addition, " Troy's office, which dispatches warning letters to drug companies about potentially false advertising, has cut the rate by which the FDA issues those warnings by two-thirds in the past year. " Such letters used to be sent out by a branch within FDA, but Troy, has " arranged for all warnings to go through his office. " TROY'S PFIZER CONNECTION: When the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer faced a lawsuit in 2002 alleging the company's top selling antidepressant, Zoloft, had caused a patient to commit suicide, the drug company turned to its old friend Daniel Troy for help: The Boston Globe reported, " Troy was quite familiar with the company, having served as a Pfizer attorney in legal combat with the FDA until just months before he joined the agency last year. Shortly after the one-year federal restriction on action involving his former clients expired, Troy filed a government brief that backed up Pfizer's case. " When FDA was asked by the House Appropriations Committee about Troy's connection to Pfizer, the administration claimed he worked less than 80 hours per year for the drug company. They did not say that, according to Troy's financial disclosure form, Pfizer had paid Troy's firm nearly $360,000 for services " provided directly by " Troy in less than six months. TROY'S FDA - A NEW FRIEND FOR THE DRUG INDUSTRY: Under Troy's leadership, the FDA's oversight role in the drug industry has changed dramatically. Since President Bush took office, the FDA or Department of Justice has intervened in at least four major cases on behalf of pharmaceutical company defendants, each time claiming the FDA's own judgment would " implicitly preempt " any ruling against the industry. Each time, FDA statements submitted to the courts have sought to limit information available to consumers about potentially dangerous drugs. One DOJ " Statement of Interest " argued against requiring the manufacturer of Paxil to remove from its advertisements the statement the drug was " non-habit forming, " even though testimony indicated users experienced traumatic withdrawal symptoms. IRAQ Revisionist-In-Chief In an attempt to re-write his own administration's history, President Bush yesterday insisted the war in Iraq was justified, even as evidence emerges that his two central justifications #8211; WMD and an Iraq-al Qaeda link #8211; were false. Bush insisted on a Saddam-al Qaeda link in his speech only 24 hours after the New York Times reported the 9/11 Commission is likely to produce a unanimous report that " largely dismisses White House theories both about a close working relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda. " It also comes as well-documented evidence shows the White House was warned its WMD case for war was weak, yet ignored intelligence to pursue a pre-determined ideological agenda. THE CHANGING RATIONALE: Bush claimed the war was justified because Iraq had the " capability of producing weapons of mass murder. " This echoed his 2004 State of the Union claim that Iraq had " weapons of mass destruction-related program activities. " Both statements are clear departures from the far more stark ( " mushroom cloud " ) and definitive ( " no doubt Saddam Hussein now has WMD " ) language the President used to scare Americans before the war. ARE WE SAFER? Even while acknowledging the failure to find the WMD the administration said made Iraq an imminent threat, Bush claimed the war in Iraq made America safer. His statement stood in stark contrast to a report from the U.S. Army War College calling the Iraq war " unnecessary " and a " detour " that has diverted attention and resources from the threat posed by Al Qaeda. Former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke was more blunt: he said the focus on Iraq " delivered to al Qaeda the greatest recruitment propaganda imaginable. " A report by the International Institute for Strategic Studies similarly concluded that " In counter-terrorism terms, the intervention has arguably focused the energies and resources of al-Qaeda and its followers. " THE WHITE HOUSE'S REVISIONIST HISTORIAN: President Bush has chastised " revisionist historians " on Iraq, yet even now he continues to perpetuate myths. He claims he has a record of " working with friends and allies and international institutions. " But only last year, he disparaged the United Nations and was unable to build a real international coalition to confront Iraq in an effective way. He also alienated allies by terminating negotiations on the Kyoto and Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaties, brushing off key international AIDS conferences and working on behalf of the tobacco industry to undermine international efforts to reduce smoking. And unilateralism has its costs: the war will have cost U.S. taxpayers more than $150 billion by this fall. REFUSING TO CONFRONT TERRORISTS: Bush touted his record " confront[ing] terrorists, " yet offered no explanation why, in 2002, he transferred troops hunting Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda in Afghanistan and moved them to Iraq. With only 14,000 troops in Afghanistan (as opposed to almost 140,000 in Iraq), the administration last week acknowledged that bin Laden and his chief lieutenants continue to operate along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, and " are directing al Qaeda effort to launch an attack in the United States sometime this year. " Similarly, while Bush was bragging about his terrorism record, he offered no explanation as to why " the Bush administration had several chances to wipe out " top terrorist target Abu Musab Zarqawi, " but never pulled the trigger. " After repeatedly refusing to hit Zarqawi, the White House " set its course for war with Iraq. " As former Bush counterterrorism adviser Roger Cressey said, " People were more obsessed with developing the coalition to overthrow Saddam than to execute the president's policy of preemption against terrorists. " In all, at least 20 of the FBI's 22 most wanted terrorists are still at large. CHENEY'S CONVENIENT CASE OF AMNESIA: Cheney accused Capitol Hill critics of the war with having " a convenient case of campaign amnesia. " But as this American Progress backgrounder shows, it was top administration officials who displayed amnesia in assessing the threat of Iraq. Cheney also claimed those that voted for the war but now oppose it were " looking at the same information [the White House] did and coming to the same conclusion. " But as the New Republic pointed out, both Congress and the public were deliberately misled by the White House about that information. In 2002, Congress was given an analysis of the Iraq threat " that highlighted the Bush administration's claims and consigned skepticism to footnotes " #8211; a departure from previous, more objective CIA reports. Similarly, Knight-Ridder reports that the White House-approved public version of the " intelligence community's key prewar assessment of Iraq's illicit arms programs was stripped of dissenting opinions, warnings of insufficient information and doubts about deposed dictator Saddam Hussein's intentions. " ENVIRO #8211; WHITE HOUSE WANTS TO PAVE PARADISE AND PUT UP A PARKING LOT: The White House wants to throw protections for U.S. #160;forests into reverse. The Washington Post reports, the Bush administration is trying to " overturn a Clinton-era rule that made nearly 60 million acres of national forest off-limits to road-building and logging, setting aside one of the most sweeping land preservation measures in decades. " And according to the Los Angeles Times, this " could lead to logging, mining and oil and gas development in remote country " that had been previously been protected. #160;Currently, " twelve Western states are home to 97 percent of all roadless areas, some of which provide drinking water to local communities as well as wildlife habitat. " #160;#160; ENVIRO #8211; NO, OZONE; YES, PROSTATE CANCER: Believe it or not, the White House is fighting to protect the use of a controversial pesticide that destroys the ozone layer while giving farmers prostate cancer. The Washington Post #160;reports, " The United States plans to seek a waiver in international talks this week that would allow American farmers to continue using methyl bromide, a pesticide slated to be banned in 2005 because it contributes to destruction of Earth's protective ozone layer.#160; The pesticide, which has also been linked to prostate cancer in farm workers and neurological problems in people exposed to large quantities, was scheduled to be phased out in 2005 under the Montreal Protocol, the 1987 treaty struck under the Reagan administration to restrict the use of ozone-destroying chemicals. " #160;The current pact the Bush administration wants to dodge was " signed by more than 160 nations [and] is widely considered the most successful international environmental treaty in history. " EDUCATION #8211; DON'T BELIEVE THE HYPE: A new report coming out of Rep. George Miller's office (D-CA) shows how conservatives " are using accounting gimmicks to mislead the public into believing that states are 'flooded' with unspent funds for elementary and secondary education programs. " Conservatives have tried to use " a bookkeeping gimmick to justify billions of dollars in education underfunding. " However, just because money isn't spent doesn't mean it isn't allocated. " Counting unexpended balances as available money is no different than counting all the money in your checkbook on payday #8211; money committed to mortgages, rent, food, medical care, and clothing. " The bottom line? President Bush has consistently failed to invest in education by underfunding NCLB by $9.4 billion next year, for a total funding shortfall of $27 billion [and]#8230;proposing to cut vocational education programs by more than $300 million. " GOVERNMENT #8211; THE WHITE HOUSE HAS A GLASS CEILING: It pays to be one of the president's men. For women, though, it's another story. The Washington Post has a list of the top paid people in the Bush White House, and found " men in the Bush White House earn an average of $76,624 a year. Women earn $59,917 on average. That means Bush women earn about 78 percent of what Bush men earn. " As the WP points, out, that's " a good bit below the 88 percent for the nearly 1 million professional and administrative employees in the federal workforce. Also, the White House has the advantage of making all its hires from scratch after the 2000 election. " AFGHANISTAN #8211; IMPERILED VOTE: The Wall Street Journal reports that Taliban violence and ongoing instability with warlords have put the Afghan elections in jeopardy. " Last week, the joint U.N.-Afghan body running the elections announced that because of security problems voting for parliament, planned for September, will be postponed until next April or May. Voting for president, initially planned for June, will take place on Oct. 9. " (Part of the problem: The Bush Administration drained resources from Afghanistan to wage a voluntary war in Iraq. There are only about 17,000 American troops in Afghanistan compared with 140,000 in Iraq.) Also, " the U.S.-backed incumbent, Hamid Karzai, is expected to win, but it's unclear whether enough people will vote to provide him with democratic legitimacy. " Why not wait until more of the country is stabilized and registered? The Christian Science Monitor reports many analysts think pressure to schedule an election before U.S. elections in November is to blame. " Given the turmoil in Iraq, there is a strong desire to see the [Afghan] elections this year and [give the Bush administration] one foreign-policy success, " says Vikram Parekh, an analyst in Kabul with the International Crisis Group. GOVERNMENT #8211; DATA QUALITY REPORT, HEAL THYSELF: Irony, thy name is OMB. According to a new study by OMB Watch, a recent report by the Office of Management and Budget about challenges to the quality of data in government reports was riddled with errors. Some mistakes were factual: For example, while OMB claims that agencies only had 35 information quality challenges last year, the actual number is 98 #8211; " nearly triple the number in the report. " And although the OMB report claims " most " information quality challenges " that were denied were appealed, " in reality, only 28 percent of denied challenges were appealed -- clearly not " most. " Some mistakes were misleading: critics feared information quality challenges would be dominated by interested industries. OMB accurately points out that a wide range of stakeholders have filed information quality challenges. What they failed to disclose, however, was that " 72 percent of the challenges - nearly three-quarters - were from industry. " #160;Don't Miss DAILY TALKING POINTS: Revisionist-in-Chief TERRORISM: The General Accounting Office yesterday issued a report stating that the " federal government's color-coded threat system is too vague and confusing to help many local and state law enforcement officials prepare for possible terrorist attacks. " FOREIGN POLICY: Embattled neocons fight mainstream conservatives over foreign policy strategy. RELIGION: Oped in Boston Globe calls for progressives to rescue hijacked religious faith from the right. Contact The Progress Report: pr. #160;Daily Grill " We know there were ties between Iraq and terrorists, including al-Qaida. " - Scott McClellan, 7/12/04 " The Sept. 11 commission reported...it has found no 'collaborative relationship' between Iraq and al Qaeda. " - Washington Post, 6/17/04 #160;Daily Outrage " For us to be different by $140 billion is nothing. " #160;Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin " dismissing the controversial discrepancy between his estimate of the prescription drug benefit's cost and Medicare actuaries' figure. " #160;Archives Progress Report Columns Cartoons Sign up for e-mail delivery of The Progress Report Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.