Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Twilight's Last Gleaming?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

> " HSI - Jenny Thompson "

> <HSIResearch

 

> Twilight's Last Gleaming?

> Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:42:31 -0400

>

> Twilight's Last Gleaming?

>

> Health Sciences Institute e-Alert

>

> Tuesday July 13, 2004

>

>

**************************************************************

 

> Dear Reader,

>

> Is your government doing enough to protect you from

> the dangers

> of vitamin supplements? The absurdity of that

> question would be

> comical if it weren't the basis of an international

> drive to severely

> limit our access to dietary supplements.

>

> In yesterday's e-Alert I gave you some background on

> the

> " European Union Directive on Dietary Supplements "

> that will

> become law in August of 2005. Among the 25 European

> Union

> (EU) nations (representing more than 450 million

> people), this

> directive reclassifies vitamin supplements as

> " medical drugs, "

> mandates low dosage levels, and outlaws many

> supplement

> ingredients that are currently widely available.

> Created to " protect "

> consumers, the directive will do exactly the

> opposite by denying

> consumers access to natural therapeutic supplements.

>

>

> But don't think you're off the hook if you live

> outside the EU.

> Plans are already underway to bring these extreme

> regulations to

> the U.S. and many other countries.

>

>

------

> Trying to stay positive

>

------

>

> Under the EU directive, a " positive list " has been

> created to

> mandate which dietary supplements will be allowed

> for sale. The

> list does not include about 350 supplement

> ingredients, such as

> boron, a mineral that helps manage symptoms of

> menopause.

>

> So if you're a supplement manufacturer in an EU

> country, and you

> produce a supplement that contains boron, you'll be

> required to

> remove it from the supplement by August 2005. But

> there is

> another option. You can submit a " technical dossier "

> to argue the

> case that a particular ingredient (such as boron)

> should be included

> on the positive list. Ah, but there's a catch: The

> European

> Commission has made this process so expensive and

> time

> consuming that many manufacturers simply can't

> afford the costs

> involved. As a result, many safe formulas and

> nutrients that have

> been on the market for decades will soon be banned.

>

>

-------

> But wait... it gets worse

>

-------

>

> The positive list isn't really as positive as it

> sounds.

>

> For instance: Vitamin E made it on the positive

> list. Sort of. As

> HSI Panelist Allan Spreen, M.D., has made clear in

> several e-

> Alerts, there are a number of different vitamin E

> forms, and the

> synthetic form should be avoided for internal use.

> But according to

> Euromonitor International, the ONLY form of vitamin

> E on the

> positive list is the synthetic form.

>

> And then there's selenium. Besides the fact that

> selenium has

> excellent antioxidant properties that have been

> shown to help

> increase insulin efficiency, selenium also enhances

> the effect of

> vitamin E, making it a perfect match for any vitamin

> E regimen.

> But the only two forms of selenium that made the

> positive list are –

> yep – synthetic forms.

>

> Wondering why the positive list emphasizes

> synthetics? I'll answer

> that question with another question: What sort of

> company

> specializes in manufacturing synthetic forms of

> natural treatments?

> You already saw it coming, didn't you? The answer:

> pharmaceutical companies. Large drug companies can

> easily

> produce synthetic ingredients at low cost. So the

> positive list will

> certainly be positive for drug companies, while many

> small

> manufacturers of natural supplements will be forced

> out of

> business.

>

>

-------

> Decoding Codex

>

-------

>

> The outlook for the future of dietary supplements in

> Europe is

> decidedly gloomy. But if you're a U.S. citizen you

> might be

> wondering how all of this will affect you. In fact,

> the 2005

> implementation of the EU directive won't directly

> affect

> consumers outside the EU. But the U.S. and the EU

> are both

> members of a much larger club.

>

> The U.S. is one of the 165 member countries of the

> Codex

> Alimentarius Commission – an international food

> standards

> program created by the Food and Agriculture

> Organization (FAO)

> and the World Health Organization (WHO). One of the

> purposes

> of the Codex Commission is to " harmonize "

> international food

> trade. And here are a few key elements of that

> harmonizing:

>

> * WHO regards all dietary supplements as " drugs "

> * The Codex Commission has made it clear that it

> wants to limit

> over-the-counter sales of dietary supplements

> while reclassifying

> others as pharmaceuticals, available only through

> a pharmacist

> * The U.S. has one vote on the Codex Commission. The

> European

> Union represents 27 votes on the commission: the

> 25 votes of its

> member countries and 2 votes of the 2 EU candidate

> countries

> * Under World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, Codex

> decisions

> override decisions of individual countries

> * Member countries (including the U.S.) that refuse

> to

> " harmonize " with WTO directives may be subject to

> restrictive

> trade sanctions

> * The European Union is the United States' largest

> trade and

> investment partner, with a yearly two-way trade in

> goods and

> services that is estimated to be nearly $600

> billion

>

> " Harmony " never sounded so awful.

>

>

--------

> Securing the Homeland

>

--------

>

> The remarkably harsh restrictions of the EU

> directive on Dietary

> Supplements have met with an enormous protest from

> people who

> correctly see this process as an infringement on

> their right to make

> their own health care choices. This past February,

> the High Court

> in London ruled that a case challenging the

> directive should be

> referred to the European Court – the only court with

> the authority

> to challenge EU directives. Exactly when that court

> will hand

> down a ruling is not known. What is known is that

> the decision

> will have a profound effect on the availability of

> dietary

> supplements in Europe and beyond.

>

> Meanwhile, back on the other side of the Atlantic,

> many

> congressmen and pro-pharmaceutical organizations

> have been

> calling for more restrictive regulations of

> supplements. So there's

> no time to waste in letting our legislators know

> that we don't want

> to see any form of the EU directive taking effect in

> the U.S.

>

> A complete list of government e-mail and postal

> addresses is

> available at a web site called Congress.org. Send a

> message to your

> congressmen and let them know that we want no part

> of

> international " harmonizing " that restricts our

> access to

> supplements. And most importantly, tell them that

> you don't need

> any government or international organizations to

> " protect " you

> from your personal health care choices.

>

>

**************************************************************

>

> ...and another thing

>

> If you're having trouble sleeping, one small

> adjustment might help.

>

> According to researchers at the Fred Hutchinson

> Cancer Research

> Center in Seattle, the time of day you do your

> exercises may affect

> your sleep-wake cycle.

>

> Using data collected from a study that examined the

> effects of

> exercise on breast cancer risk, researchers found

> that women who

> exercised in the morning reported getting better

> sleep than women

> who exercised in the evening.

>

> The study wasn't designed to answer why that might

> be so, but

> researchers speculate that morning exercise may

> prepare the body

> for a natural cycle of daytime activity and

> nighttime sleep, while

> evening exercise may reset that cycle at exactly the

> wrong time.

>

> Edward Stepanski (a Rush University expert in sleep

> disorders and

> research) offered another theory why exercise before

> bedtime

> might interfere with dozing off. He told the

> Associated Press that

> body temperature is raised during exercise, while a

> slight

> temperature drop accompanies sleep.

>

> So if you rise and shine and exercise, you might

> have more luck

> catching quality Zs.

>

> And this schedule has a hidden bonus: It allows you

> to enjoy some

> guilt-free couch-potato time in the evening.

>

> To Your Good Health,

>

> Jenny Thompson

> Health Sciences Institute

>

>

> To start receiving your own copy of the HSI e-Alert,

> visit:

> http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/freecopya.html

> Or forward this e-mail to a friend so they can

> sign-up to

> receive their own copy of the HSI e-Alert.

>

>

**************************************************************

>

> Sources:

> " Directive 2001, EC of the European Parliament and

> of the

> Council on the Approximation of the Laws of the

> Member States

> Relating to Food Supplements " European Parliament

> Session

> Document C5-0640/2001, 12/10/01

> " Food Supplements Directive Set to Overhaul Europe "

> Kathrin

> Jungbeck, Euromonitor International, 6/15/04,

> euromonitor.com

> " Morning Exercise May Make Sleep Easier " Associated

> Press,

> 11/24/03, usatoday.com

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...