Guest guest Posted August 4, 2004 Report Share Posted August 4, 2004 > Tue, 03 Aug 2004 09:06:20 -0700 > Progress Report: Bush Rejects Key > Components > " American Progress Action Fund " > <progress > Center for American Progress - Progress Report by David Sirota, Christy Harvey, Judd Legum and Jonathan Baskin August 3, 2004 9/11 COMMISSION Bush Rejects Key Components HOMELAND SECURITY The Loss of Credibility NUCLEAR SECURITY When Lip Service Isn't Enough UNDER THE RADAR 9/11 COMMISSION Bush Rejects Key Components The 9/11 Commission proposed a bold restructuring of the nation's intelligence apparatus to prevent future terrorist attacks, but President Bush made clear yesterday he was prepared to support only cosmetic changes. One of the key recommendations of the 9/11 Commission is to create a new intelligence chief who would oversee the nation's sprawling intelligence infrastructure. Yesterday, Bush proposed creating the position, but refused to empower the post with the authority necessary for it to be effective. Similarly, Bush accepted the commission's recommendation to create a new counterterrorism center, but refused to empower the body with the authority it needs. According to the New York Times, " White House and Bush campaign officials have long said that the details matter far less than the pictures and sounds of Mr. Bush talking in any way about his campaign against terrorism. " DIRECTOR HAS NO POWER OVER BUDGETS: The bi-partisan 9/11 Commission unanimously concluded that the only way that a new intelligence chief could gain control over the nation's 15 separate intelligence agencies is to empower the position with full budgetary control. But instead of giving the new post that power, the president proposes #8211; in the words of his Chief of Staff Andrew Card #8211; giving the new intelligence director " an awful lot of input " in the intelligence budgets. The move appears to be an effort to appease current administration officials #8211; especially Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld #8211; who have strenuously resisted ceding budgetary control over the intelligence agencies housed in the Pentagon. But the president's craven refusal to end the turf wars that have plagued the intelligence community does not come without a cost. Philip D. Zelikow, executive director of the 9/11 commission and member of the Bush/Cheney transition team, said last week if the new intelligence chief was not given budgetary control " he would oppose any change in the current system. " The two chairs of the commission, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, released a joint statement that warned, " The fate of these reform ideas turns vitally on the specifics. " DIRECTOR HAS NO POWER OVER PERSONNEL: The president further weakened the authority of the new intelligence director by not giving the position control over personnel. Card said that, instead, the new post would have a " coordinating role in the selection of people. " The 9/11 Commission recommended giving the intelligence director such authority for the sake of national security. But apparently, Card was more interested in preserving " 'the chain of command and the responsibilities that accrue to the Cabinet officials in charge of departments that house the intelligence agencies, such as the Department of Defense. " COUNTERTERRORISM CENTER HAS NO POWER TO DIRECT INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS: At the recommendation of the commission, Bush also proposed creating a new national counterterrorism center. But Bush rejected the 9/11 Commission's unanimous recommendation to give the center " the power to order clandestine operations and collections. " Instead Bush proposed giving the new body " only the authority to gather intelligence from other agencies and prepare coordinated threat information. " NO URGENCY: It's been almost three years since the 9/11 attacks and the 9/11 Commission has stressed the necessity to act quickly on its recommendations. But yesterday, Bush " gave no specific timetable for when he might name someone to the [intelligence chief] position, and the White House did not answer questions on whether the legislation creating the job could be completed before November. " Bush also refused to call Congress back for a special session to consider reforms before Labor Day, saying " they can think about them [the reforms] over August. " HOMELAND SECURITY The Loss of Credibility Just one day after issuing a major terror warning that was supposedly prompted by new information, the New York Times and Washington Post report that the decision, in fact, was based on old information from before 9/11. Specifically, the Bush administration acknowledged " they had not yet found concrete evidence that a terrorist plot or preparatory surveillance operations were still under way. " While the LA Times does point out that " it appears the information was updated as late as 2004 " one senior official told the New York Times, " You could say that the bulk of this information is old. " The key issue is not whether the threat is real #8211; no one argues that al Qaeda still wants to do great harm to us, and credible intelligence must be acted upon to protect America. But politicizing intelligence and threat reports undermines the government's credibility and blurs the line between protecting the homeland and promoting fear for political gain. POLITICAL MESSAGES IN ANNOUNCING THE ALERT: The politicization of homeland security perhaps was no better highlighted than in Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge's press conference on Sunday. As the New York Times reports, Ridge used the solemn announcement to " repeatedly praise President Bush's leadership " #8211; as if the press conference was some sort of campaign event. Instead of focusing his praise on law enforcement, Ridge claimed " We must understand that the kind of information available to us today is the result of the president's leadership in the war against terror. " CREDIBILITY DAMAGED IN MAY: In the last terror warning, the Bush administration damaged its credibility and raised questions of politicization. In the same week President Bush's polls dropped to their lowest point ever, Attorney General John Ashcroft held a dramatic press conference about an urgent terrorist threat. But he had no new information at all, and instead simply told Americans to be on the lookout for European-looking people who may be al Qaeda. The administration's political move was so transparent, that Ridge was forced to admit " there is absolutely nothing specific enough " to warrant a change in the threat level. A senior administration official agreed, saying, " There really is no significant change that would require us to change the alert level of the country. " POLITICAL QUESTIONS RAISED LAST WEEK: Last week during the Democratic National Convention, Pakistan announced it had captured a top al Qaeda suspect. The news was welcome by all, but raised intense questions about the political nature of its timing. According to a New Republic article three weeks before, a White House aide told a Pakistani official last spring that " it would be best if the arrest or killing " of any high value terrorist occurred during the Convention, ostensibly to steal attention from the President's opponents. Even more interesting, Pakistani officials admitted that the al Qaeda suspect they captured was actually caught five days before the announcement was made, meaning they held the announcement to come just hours before Sen. John Kerry's speech. WHITE HOUSE HAS ADMITTED IT WANTS TO POLITICIZE: As the Progress Report has previously documented, the White House has essentially admitted its desire to politicize homeland security and the fight against terrorism. Nineteen weeks after 9/11, White House political adviser Karl Rove implored Republican candidates to use the fight against terrorism for political gain, saying conservatives can " go to the country " and run campaigns on national security. In May of 2002, the Republican National Committee began selling White House pictures of the president on 9/11 at campaign fundraisers. On 6/13/02, the Associated Press reported the White House began urging conservatives to push " messages highlighting the war on terrorism. " And the list goes on. NUCLEAR SECURITY When Lip Service Isn't Enough The recently released 9/11 Commission Report makes clear one of the gravest dangers faced by the United States is a " catastrophic attack " by terrorists armed with weapons of mass destruction. There is evidence terrorists are after nuclear weapon capabilities: Osama bin Laden has attempted to buy uranium, and two dozen other terrorist organizations are " pursing chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear materials. " And the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace found that, " unlike countries which may fear retaliation, terrorist groups could be undeterred about using nuclear weapons. " In a press conference yesterday, President Bush paid lip service to this concern, saying, " Given the growing threat of weapons and missile proliferation in our world, " new steps must be taken to " track and prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction. " Empty words. In action, the Bush administration has undertaken a policy course which is counterproductive to nonproliferation efforts and undermines the global struggle to keep deadly WMD out of the hands of terrorist enemies. (For more, read this column by American Progress's Andy Grotto on the lack of U.S. leadership on nonproliferation as well as A Nuclear Non-Proliferation Strategy for the 21st Century by Madeleine Albright and Robin Cook.) FISSILE MATERIALS TREATY FIZZLES: Last week, on July 29, the White House decided to oppose any inspections or verification as part of the Fissile Materials Cut Off Treaty, the international treaty designed to ban production of nuclear weapons materials. Experts charge this is a blow to nuclear arms control: " The change in U.S. position will dramatically weaken any treaty and make it harder to prevent nuclear materials from falling into the hands of terrorists. The announcement, they said, also virtually kills a 10-year international effort to lure countries such as Pakistan, India and Israel into accepting some oversight of their nuclear production programs. " COMPREHENSIVE TEST BAN CRUMBLED: The Bush administration has also openly opposed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. According to Daryl G. Kimball, executive director of the Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers, this " leaves the door open to a global chain reaction of nuclear testing, instability and confrontation in the future. " NUNN-LUGAR UNDERFUNDED: A decade ago, Sens. Sam Nunn (D-GA) and Dick Lugar (R-IN) created the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program, designed to help former Soviet countries destroy nuclear, chemical and biological weapons before they fell into the hands of criminals, terrorists or rogue nations. According to Charles B. Curtis of the Nuclear Threat Initiative in the 5/7/04 Congressional Quarterly Weekly, " Very, very little progress has taken place#8230;There is an inertia that simply must be overcome with presidential leadership in all the participant countries. " Matthew Bunn, a nuclear-terrorism expert at the Belfer Center, concurs: " Amazingly, " despite the new terrorist threats throughout the world, U.S. funding for the CTR programs " hasn't increased noticeably since Sept. 11. " GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP NEEDS LEADERSHIP: Two years ago, the United States joined other G-8 countries in creating the Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction, an international effort to fight the threat of WMD. The White House pledged $10 billion, to be matched by the other seven nations. Since then, only a fraction of the pledged funds have been allocated. KEEP AWAY FROM TERRORISTS: According to a recent Harvard University report titled " Securing the Bomb: An Agenda for Action, " the report says " less fissile materials were secured in the two years after Sept 11 than in the two years before. " #160; BUNKER BUSTERS AND MINI-NUKES: The Bush administration, rather than curbing nuclear weapons, has actually been trying to develop new, deadlier ones. (Director of the International Atomic Energy Agency El Baradei said countries continuing to develop new weapons is akin to having a cigarette dangling from your lips while admonishing other nations not to smoke.) The White House has sought funding for " bunker busters, " nuclear weapons that could penetrate deep into the earth, and " mini-nukes, " for smaller nuclear attacks. Both of these are considered " usable, " first-use weapons, increasing the likelihood of preemptive nuclear strikes, which in turn prods other nations to accelerate their nuclear programs. AXIS OF EVIL: In his 2002 State of the Union, President Bush warned the nation against the Axis of Evil: Iraq, Iran and North Korea: " The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the worlds' most destructive weapons. " National Journal's Stuart Taylor looks at the axis of evil today: Iran is a greater nuclear threat than it was three years ago, " racing toward bomb-making capability while thumbing its nose at Europe and the United States. " The Bush administration no real policy for dealing with North Korea. Today, North Korea may already have eight nuclear weapons and could be on its way to " making about a dozen a year, with every intention of selling them to terrorists and other willing bidders. " Iraq, it turns out, had no weapons program, " so Bush appears to have exhausted his 'pre-emption' doctrine on a regime with no weapons to pre-empt. " IRAQ #8211; PENTAGON WITHHOLDING PRISON DOCUMENTS: Rolling Stone reports that newly-revealed Pentagon documents show how far up the food chain the Iraq prison abuse scandal goes. The documents, withheld by the Pentagon from Gen. Antonio Taguba's report, " make clear that responsibility for...abuses extends to several high-ranking officers still serving in command positions. " For instance, Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, " who is now in charge of all military prisons in Iraq, " was dispatched to Abu Ghraib by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld last August. In a report marked " secret, " Miller recommended that military police at the prison be " actively engaged in setting the conditions for successful exploitation of the internees. " After his plan was adopted, guards began depriving prisoners of sleep and food, subjecting them to painful " stress positions, " and terrorizing them with dogs.#160; The Rolling Stone report adds more evidence to an earlier Newsweek report that said President Bush, " along with Defense Secretary Rumsfeld and Attorney General John Ashcroft, signed off on [the] secret system of detention and interrogation that opened the door " to the prison abuse scandal in the first place. HEALTH CARE #8211; COLLAPSING COVERAGE: USA Today reports, " The percentage of people who get health insurance through employers fell sharply from 2001 to 2003, resulting in 9 million fewer people with employer coverage after accounting for population growth, researchers said Tuesday. " Unemployment and skyrocketing insurance costs were to blame: " Job losses caused by the sluggish economy were the main reason for the drop in people covered by employer health plans. But insurance premiums that increased 28 percent during the period also contributed to the decline, as some employers stopped offering coverage, while at some firms workers decided not to enroll because their share of the cost rose. " And that means more Americans in government-sponsored programs or without insurance altogether. DEFICIT #8211; DEBT SOARING TO NEW HEIGHTS: With the Bush administration forecasting a record $639 billion budget deficit in 2003-04, BBC reports, " US Treasury Secretary John Snow has urged Congress to raise the government's debt ceiling, or face a cash crunch in the autumn. He warned that Washington was on track to breach the current limit of $7.4 trillion in late September. " The U.S. national debt - the sum of previous annual budget deficits - currently stands at nearly $7.3 trillion and the ceiling has already been raised twice since Bush took office in 2000. The administration likes to blame the fight against terrorism and the war in Iraq for the deficits, but the Boston Globe points out $290 billion of the current deficit is directly attributable to the Bush tax cuts. " Just 3 1/2 years ago, the Office of Management and Budget was projecting a surplus of $387 billion for the 2004 fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30. " MILITARY #8211; BUSH AWOL AFTER ALL: A four month investigation by a Philadelphia researcher, independently confirmed by a RAW story, " finally proves that President George W. Bush did not successfully complete his service with the Texas Air National Guard. The president's own payroll records #8211; recently released by the White House in an effort to discredit claims that the president had failed to meet Guard requirements #8211; instead indicate that he was absent without leave (AWOL) in 1972, and should have been placed on active duty for nearly four months. " American Progress's Larry Korb, former assistant secretary of defense under President Reagan, has reached a similar conclusion. Asked if he thought Bush was AWOL, Korb said, " Based on these payroll records, unless he had permission, it would be. " MEDIA #8211; FRANKEN GETS TV SHOW: AP reports Progressive radio is hitting the small screen: " The Al Franken Show, " heard live each weekday from noon to 3 p.m. on Air America Radio, " will be presented in a one-hour edition on Sundance each night at 11:30 and again at 2:30 a.m. " Air America, launched in March as a response to the mostly conservative world of talk radio, now has stations in 17 markets including New York, Miami, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Anchorage and, starting next week, San Diego. It can also be heard over the internet. #160;Don't Miss DAILY TALKING POINTS: President's Terrorism Czar Lacks Real Power IRAQ: Rolling Stone uncovers documents withheld by the Pentagon that shed more light on the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal. MEDIA: NYT columnist Paul Krugman examines the Fox effect at the Democratic National Convention. MEDIA: Al Franken's radio show will now be broadcast on cable television. Contact The Progress Report. #160;Daily Grill " In his statement [about the terror threat], Mr. Ridge stayed away from politics. " - WP, 8/3/04 VERSUS " The kind of information available to us today is the result of the president's leadership in the war against terror. " - Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, 8/1/04 #160;Daily Outrage Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT), ignoring the White House's clear record of politicizing homeland security, claimed yesterday, " I don't think anybody who has any fairness or is in their right mind would think the president or the secretary of homeland security would raise an alert level and scare people for political reasons. " There is no indication Lieberman will issue a retraction of his statements considering the NYT and WP stories this morning. #160;Archives Progress Report #160;Opportunity The Center for American Progress is now accepting intern applications for the fall semester. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.