Guest guest Posted September 13, 2004 Report Share Posted September 13, 2004 > R > > Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:41:36 -0700 (PDT) > FORCES AT WORK TO BUILD A U.S.POLICE STATE > > > Additional Titles > > FORCES AT WORK TO BUILD A U.S. POLICE STATE > > Patrick Briley > September 7, 2004 > http://www.NewsWithViews.com > > Porter Goss served as chairman of the House > Intelligence Committee during hearings on Chinese > espionage (Chinagate) and on the 9-11 attacks. Prior > to that Goss worked ten years for the CIA as a > clandestine services officer. President GW Bush has > nominated Goss to be the next director of the CIA. > One has to wonder why Bush nominated Goss for CIA > when earlier this year Goss himself said he was not > qualified to work at CIA: > " I couldn't get a job with CIA today. I am not > qualified. I don't have the language skills. I don't > have the cultural background probably. And I > certainly don't have the technical skills¡ Uh, so, > the things that you need to have, I don't have. " > For some reason Goss chose to make all these remarks > in a taped interview March 3, 2004 with the producer > of the movie " Farenheit 9/11 " as reported by Reuters > " Filmmaker Moore Quotes Goss on Lack of CIA > Credentials " on August 11, 2004 " > Goss even sponsored legislation that would have made > deep cuts in intelligence personnel by 20 percent in > the late 1990s. See " Goss Backed '95 Bill To Slash > Intelligence " . > The recent report by the commission probing the > Sept. 11, 2001 attacks found US human intelligence > profoundly lacking as a result of these cuts and the > commission called for more spending on human > intelligence. Although the CIA needs reform, why > would Bush want to nominate Goss for CIA when Bush > knows it was Goss's poor judgment on cutting back on > human intelligence that helped cripple the US from > being able to head off 9-11? > Yet, in June 2004 Goss introduced legislation to > give GW Bush new authority to direct CIA agents to > conduct law-enforcement operations inside the United > States - including arresting American citizens. > Newsweek reported this recently on August 12, 2004 > in an article, " Goss's Wish List. " > In effect, the Goss bill would enable the president > to issue secret findings allowing the CIA and the > CIA Director (who Mr. Goss wants to now become!) to > conduct covert operations inside the United States > (that have heretofore been taboo)-without ANY > notification to Congress. > > However, if Goss gets his way, Goss will become the > CIA director having the special powers given to him > as CIA director by GW Bush created by the very law > that Goss wrote to conduct law enforcement > operations, spying and arrests in the US with CIA > resources and methods and techniques. Is that not a > conflict of interest that smacks of police state > politics? > In late Sept 2001 former President HW Bush publicly > called for new laws to permit the CIA to operate > inside the US and do criminal acts in the name of > national security in order to get on the inside of > terror cells and stop terrorism. It looks as if HW > and GW Bush found a willing participant in Goss to > create the very laws that HW Bush publicly demanded. > > If Bush becomes elected President for a second term > he will be a " lame duck " President, no longer > accountable to the American electorate and no longer > accountable for the permission he would give Goss, > in secret, without safeguards, to conduct CIA > domestic operations against US. The opportunity and > conditions for abuse of lawful US citizens by Bush > and Goss will be overwhelming if Goss is CIA > director under a second term of GW Bush with the new > laws and powers for CIA domestic operations sought > by the Goss introduced legislation. > Goss seems to be the front man for the Bush > onslaught on civil rights in the name of fighting > terrorism as Goss has also sponsored the notorious > Patriot II Act known as HR3179, which authorizes the > secret arrest of US citizens. Goss sponsored > legislation for Patriot Act II, new CIA powers and > possibly as the next CIA director are all > ingredients for a police state. > Even if Goss's legislative attempts fail and Goss is > not confirmed, the very fact that Goss and Bush > would attempt this does not speak well for their > lack of respect for the American citizen or the Bill > of Rights. > Goss will still be around to do more questionable > deeds in Congress to politically block > accountability for counter terrorism failures and > corrupt Bush policies with China and Pakistan. > As Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, > Goss helped GW Bush cover-up facts behind 9-11 that > were incriminating to GW Bush, but that Goss helped > deliberately keep out of the 9-11 Congressional > Report, a report produced after holding a year of > hearings over which Goss presided. > Remember the 28 missing pages that were removed from > the 9-11 Congressional Report? Goss and his staff > did that for GW Bush because Bush did not want > details to come out about Bush foreknowledge of > Saudi and mastermind Khalid Mohammed (who once > worked for the CIA and Iraq besides Al Qaeda and Bin > Laden) attack planning and involvement in the 9-11 > attacks and forewarnings Bush received from other > governments. > > > > More- FORCES AT WORK TO BUILD > A U.S. POLICE STATE > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.