President Edwards??

[Guest guest]

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/29/opinion/29marmon.htmlOctober 29, 2004

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

President Edwards?

By STEPHEN J. MARMON

 

 

hiladelphia

 

It's Jan. 20, 2005, and a stunned America watches as John Edwards is sworn in as

both vice president and acting president of the United States. Impossible? No,

nor is a Bush-Edwards administration.

 

There are just a few upsets needed in states where the presidential race is very

close. Even if President Bush wins Wisconsin and Minnesota - two states he lost

in 2000 - Senator John Kerry would force a 269-269 Electoral College tie if he

carries Colorado, Missouri, Nevada and New Hampshire, and Al Gore's states.

 

But Colorado's ballot initiative to divide its electoral votes by popular

ballot, rather than have them be winner take all, could change all that. If it's

approved, and voting in that state splits as it did in 2000, Mr. Bush would pick

up four votes, and win 273-265.

 

If recounts, challenges to provisional ballots and other legal actions don't

overturn that result, the Supreme Court could again be called upon to decide the

election. Imagine a ruling that applies the results of the Colorado initiative

only to future presidential elections, not the 2004 contest. That would

reinstate the Electoral College 269-269 deadlock, and send the tied contests to

Congress; the House would choose the president and the Senate the vice

president.

 

In the Senate, at least 51 votes would be required to elect a vice president.

Given current polls, the Democrats can gain control of the Senate by picking up

seats in Alaska, Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky and Oklahoma, while losing seats

in Florida, Georgia and South Carolina. Senator Edwards would be elected as vice

president.

 

The House, however, votes for president by state, with 26 delegations required

for election. If members of the House then voted as their states did, President

Bush, in this scenario, would carry 28 states, thus leading to a Bush-Edwards

administration.

 

Both Minnesota and Wisconsin, however, have House delegations that are evenly

divided and are expected to remain that way. Members in those two states could

decide to vote in line with the results of their districts, not the statewide

result, thus their states would not be able to cast a vote because they

deadlocked. If the Congressional delegation in one other state that also voted

for Mr. Bush happened to deadlock, or defied the state result and voted for

Senator Kerry, President Bush would get only 25 states.

 

The Constitution provides that the vice president becomes president if the

president dies, resigns or is removed from office. But the 20th Amendment states

that: " If a president shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the

beginning of his term, or if the president-elect shall have failed to qualify,

then the vice president-elect shall act as president until a president shall

have qualified. "

 

The House could remain deadlocked for two years, and perhaps even four,

depending on the results of the 2006 Congressional elections. And until the

House reaches a decision, Acting President John Edwards would occupy the Oval

Office.

 

 

 

Stephen J. Marmon, who reported on the House of Representatives for The Times

from 1971 to 1973, is an investment banker.

 

 

 

 

 

http://pets.care2.com/

 

" The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. " --

Plato

" Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy. Providing

health care to all Americans is socialism. " -- anon