Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fw: Too many voting 'irregularities' to be coincidence

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

-

 

To:

Friday, November 05, 2004 8:52 PM

Too many voting 'irregularities' to be coincidence

 

 

Friday 5th November 2004 :

Too many voting 'irregularities' to be coincidence

1 comment(s).

 

 

 

Right now there is no hard proof, but the circumstantial evidence is a mile

high. Looking at all of these 'irregularities' it's hard to imagine how one

could conclude that this election was clean.

 

1. There were complaints in several states about the touchscreen voting machines

not working properly.

 

Roberta Harvey, 57, of Clearwater, Fla., said she had tried at least a half

dozen times to select Kerry-Edwards when she voted Tuesday at Northwood

Presbyterian Church.

 

After 10 minutes trying to change her selection, the Pinellas County resident

said she called a poll worker and got a wet-wipe napkin to clean the touch

screen as well as a pencil so she could use its eraser-end instead of her

finger. Harvey said it took about 10 attempts to select Kerry before and a

summary screen confirmed her intended selection.

 

 

 

 

The e-voting spokesman called this a glitch, the touchscreen needed to be

'recalibrated'- of course that's what the review screen is for. I wonder how

many voters use these brand new touchscreen voting machines and just assume that

when they touch Kerry that's what the computer registers. Of course a certain

percentage of voters won't bother to closely check the review screen, thus

allowing the computer 'glitch' to vote for them?

 

2. Stryguy on the DemocraticUnderground.com found a huge anomaly in Franklin

County Ohio. One polling location registered a Bush victory 4258-260. Wow-

impressive Bush support eh? Funny how the vote (in this precinct) on all the

other races was like 350-250. It seems like 4,000 Bush lovers came to the polls

to vote for Bush and nothing else.

 

In case the DU thread is down- here is the pdf file of elections results from

Franklin County.

 

Check page 23 Gahanna 1B for the unbelievable Bush victory, page 285 prop 1 is

the Gay Marriage Ban- which you'd think at least some of the 4,258 rabid Bush

voters would have also supported, but amazingly all 4,000 of them forgot.

 

3. Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell is this year's Katherine Harris.

Co-chair of the Bush campaign in Ohio, his blatant partisanship had many calling

for his resignation. He bought e-voting machines for Ohio even after Diebold CEO

wrote, " I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the

president next year. " Several experts testify on the vote suppression in Ohio

here.

 

" A poll worker told me this morning that there were no tapes of the results

posted on some machines; on other machines the posted count was zero "

 

 

 

 

4. The amazing 'coincidence' that exit polls were accurate in non-swing states,

but were way off in key states like Ohio and Florida. I can understand that

exit polls may be flawed, but how odd that they're only flawed in swing states

that Bush needed to win... and of course the final results are always skewed

towards Bush.. which is exactly what would happen if Bush were losing, then a

repub vote thief dialed in to the central tabulators and activated a script that

would fix the count. How easy it is to steal an election with modern

technology.... no need to haul ballot boxes to the lake- all you need is the

secret phone number and the election could be fixed from a home computer.

(Election officials 'unknowingly' gave out the secret phone # in a stack of

requested papers)

 

5. Earl at the DU forum took some screen shots of CNN's exit polls and caught

them altering their exit polls to match the reported vote. Funny how this

'mistake' by CNN fits in so nicely with #4.

 

 

 

 

Graphs split off of this single (too large for bellaciao) image

 

Isn't it strange that all of these 'anomalies' in the exit polls and touchscreen

machines always seem to favor Bush? There were many similar reports after the

2002 congressional elections, when the Republicans took control of Congress

(which the evil cabal needed to prevent a real 911 investigation and to start

the war free of consequences).

 

So if you were a detective and this was the circumstantial evidence... would you

conclude that absolutely, positively beyond doubt there was no fraud in this

election? Of course not, there's definitely some funny business going on

here.... so why did Mr. 'Help is on the way' Kerry give up so quickly?

 

Greg Palast notes that Kerry was down by 136,000 votes with 247,000 ballots

still uncounted. Consider that most of these provisional ballots and undervotes

are from minority precincts where Republicans sent their 'vote challengers'.

Supposedly they were trying to prevent unregistered voters from voting, but they

actually just caused huge delays in poor neighborhoods. People were waiting in

line for 5-6 hours, in pouring rain just to vote... I wonder how many left after

two or three hours.

 

I recall Kerry frequently saying that this was the most important election of

our lifetime. What happened to make him change his mind and just give up like

that? We _know_ Bush is a liar, and now we're supposed to just trust Diebold and

the Republican henchman Blackwell were honest? No, they haven't earned any

trust.

 

Why didn't Kerry put up a fight? That in my mind is the most damning evidence

proving this was staged election. Why wasn't Kerry concerned about the Diebold

CEO 'committed to delivering' votes to Bush? Why wasn't he demanding a fair and

transparent election process all year long? Why wasn't he concerned with the

private corporations controlling our voting process? Millions of regular

Americans knew of the potential for fraud, computer security experts have

testified that this system is so open to fraud it's insane that anyone would

even suggest it's secure, but Kerry and the Democrats never considered demanding

a paper trail? What are they, stupid? Or corrupt?

 

Wouldn't it be nice to get beyond this circumstantial evidence and into some

hard proof that this election was rigged? That what Bev Harris is doing at

blackboxvoting.org

she's filed Freedom of Information Act requests for vote records in over 3,000

counties with more to follow. If you care about our Democracy, the future of our

children, and that of children in Iraq and other countries about to be invaded,

please go to blackboxvoting.org and get informed, do what you can to pass this

info on. We cannot accept another stolen election- either we rise up now or

America as we knew it is dead- replaced by 21st century fascism and the most

idiotic puppet dictator the world has ever seen. Is that what you want to leave

to your children?

 

Nov 4, 2004 Dubya: " I've earned some political capital... and I intend to use

it. "

Lord help us

 

 

by : Ben Frank

Friday 5th November 2004

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...