Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Calif. Court Sets Aside Genentech Verdict

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

washingtonpost.com /* start correction */.correction { margin-top:8px;

border-top:1px solid #CCCCCC; padding-top:10px; margin-bottom:8px;

border-bottom:1px solid #CCCCCC; padding-bottom:10px;

font-family:arial,sans-serif; font-size:11px; color:#5A5A5A;}.correction strong

{ color:#CC0000; text-transform:uppercase;}/* end correction */

Calif. Court Sets Aside Genentech Verdict

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A58609-2005Feb2.html

The Associated Press

Wednesday, February 2, 2005; 8:07 PM

 

SAN FRANCISCO - The California Supreme Court on Wednesday set aside a $500

million jury verdict against biotechnology company Genentech Inc. for failing to

pay royalties on some drugs manufactured under a 1976 agreement with the City of

Hope Medical Center.

 

Without comment, the justices said they would review an appeal by the South San

Francisco-based biotechnology giant that jurors misinterpreted the contract

between the company and medical center, and that the award was excessive. The

court did not set a time when it would hear the case, but Wednesday's action

puts the award in legal limbo until the justices resolve the dispute.

 

A state appeals court in October upheld the judgment, saying there was

" substantial evidence of fraud and malice " by Genentech, which failed to pay a 2

percent royalty on drugs based on patents developed by two City of Hope

physicians.

 

City of Hope of Duarte sued Genentech in 1999, claiming Genentech concealed

licensed sales of protein products, such as hepatitis vaccines, over a 15-year

period. City of Hope, which made the protein manufacturing discovery, contended

it was owed $457 million in royalties and interest.

 

 

 

http://www.blueaction.org

" Better to have one freedom too many than to have one freedom too few. "

http://www.sharedvoice.org/unamerican/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...