Guest guest Posted February 16, 2005 Report Share Posted February 16, 2005 Iraq Supplemental Appropriation & the Federal Budget FCNL Key Contacts Joe Volk What do you think about the following message?: " Please approve this additional $64 billion taxpayer dollars for the war in Iraq, but don’t ask me to count these costs in my budgeting process. " That’s basically the message from the White House this week. Here’s what President Bush did. Last week, he said that his budget request for the Pentagon in 2006 was $420 billion. Then this week he made a " emergency " supplemental appropriations request for additional military spending in 2005 of $64 billion dollars for Iraq, plus additional money for the war in Afghanistan and other programs. (The supplemental request in total comes to $81.9 billion.) The president does not want a real debate on the costs of the war in Iraq, either in human terms or in its consequences for the federal budget. The Congress has already approved more than $150 billion in spending for the war in Iraq and its direct consequences. When this new emergency supplemental is approved those costs will rise to more than $200 billion. One Congressional estimate suggests the Iraq invasion, occupation and subsequent costs could rise to between $460 billion and $645 billion in the next ten years. As the U.S. approaches the two year anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, the president is continuing to block any substantive Congressional role in planning for U.S. operations in Iraq. And Congress is accepting this arrangement. Do you agree? We don’t. We seek a world free of war and the threat of war. We oppose military spending, including the supplemental funding request for Iraq. But FCNL also believes this is not a truthful budget process. The " budget " is intended to be a document that implies a thought-out process of planning for the future. A " supplemental appropriation " should be used to obtain quick congressional approval to spend money on an urgent, unanticipated emergency. The President is misusing these terms to be a spendthrift on war but look like a belt-tightening conservative. Newspaper reports suggest that President Bush will also seek another supplemental appropriation for Iraq in the fall of 2005. He knows that now, but he doesn’t want Congress to suffer sticker shock. So rather than providing an estimate of future spending, the president asks for some money now, and then comes back to ask for more later. Congress is pretending not to notice. Voters need to convince their Members of Congress to face up to the money crunch now. What should Congress do? Congress should call President Bush on this budget deception. They should reserve " supplemental appropriations " requests only for true, unanticipated emergencies, like the tsumani which is estimated to have killed a quarter of million people and destroyed communities across a quarter of the planet. They should include in their budget resolution the anticipated costs of a continuing war and occupation. In short, Congress should put the Iraq war and occupation costs into its budget resolution and regular appropriations process. That’s the only way to tell the American taxpayer the truth about federal spending priorities. _____ The Next Step for Iraq: Join FCNL's Iraq Campaign, http://www.fcnl.org/iraq/index.htm Contact Congress and the Administration: http://capwiz.com/fconl/dbq/officials/. Order FCNL publications and " War is Not the Answer " campaign bumper stickers and yard signs: http://www.fcnl.org/newinfo/special_pub.htm http://www.fcnl.org/iraq-war.htm Contribute to FCNL: http://www.fcnl.org/suprt/indx.htm Subscribe or update your information to this list: http://capwiz.com/fconl/mlm/. To from this list, please see the end of this message. Subscribe to other FCNL legislative, policy, and action alert lists: http://www.fcnl.org/listserv/quaker_issues.php. ______ Friends Committee on National Legislation 245 Second St. NE, Washington, DC 20002-5795 fcnl * http://www.fcnl.org/ phone: (202)547-6000 * toll-free: (800)630-1330 We seek a world free of war and the threat of war We seek a society with equity and justice for all We seek a community where every person's potential may be fulfilled We seek an earth restored. http://www.blueaction.org " Better to have one freedom too many than to have one freedom too few. " http://www.sharedvoice.org/unamerican/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.