Guest guest Posted March 23, 2005 Report Share Posted March 23, 2005 Wed, 22 Mar 2005 08:50:36 -0800 Values " American Progress Action Fund " <progress AMERICAN PROGRESS ACTION FUND The Progress Report by Christy Harvey, Judd Legum and Jonathan Baskin with Nico Pitney and Mipe Okunseinde www.progressreport.org 3/22/2005 For news and updates throughout the day, check out our new blog at ThinkProgress.org. VALUES 'Defending Life for All Americans' President Bush said that he intervened in the Terri Schiavo case yesterday morning because he believes in " defending life for all Americans, including those with disabilities. " Supporting life, however, takes more than political grandstanding. Time and again the Bush administration has pursued policies that undermine the lives and health of the American people. While the Schiavo case is being considered by the federal courts, President Bush has an opportunity to show his commitment to " defending life for all Americans " by reconsidering his policies that affect millions of Americans. ELIMINATING HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR: According to the Institute of Medicine, lack of health insurance already " causes roughly 18,000 unnecessary deaths every year in the United States. " Since President Bush took office the number of Americans who are uninsured has swelled by more than 5 million people. Now he's poised to make the situation worse. President Bush is proposing significant funding cuts to Medicaid and the related State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). Bush's 2006 budget slashes funding for the programs – which provide vital health coverage to 1 in 6 Americans and 1 in 4 children – by more than $20 billion over five years. According to Heather Boushey, an economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, " the cut would make 1.2 million children unable to access the system. " Gov. Mike Huckabee (R-AR) said of Bush's proposed Medicaid cuts: " [P]eople need to remember that to balance the federal budget on the backs of the poorest people in the country is simply unacceptable.... You don't pull the wheelchair out from under the child with muscular dystrophy. " EXPOSING CHILDREN TO TOXIC MERCURY: Mercury is a powerful toxin that can have serious neurological effects, especially in kids. It is known to directly harm the nervous systems of children, causing birth defects and other maladies. Currently, 600,000 babies born in the United States every year " may be exposed to dangerous levels of mercury in the womb. " Yet, the Bush administration recently issued rules which would allow some power plants to " increase [mercury] pollution, while others turn a profit selling unused pollution allowances. " The new " cap-and-trade " policy rolls back a plan created by the EPA in 2000 which " would have mandated curtailing emissions at every plant by the maximum amount possible, which proponents said could bring a 90% reduction in three years using existing technology. " UNDERMINING PROPER NUTRITION FOR BABIES: Bush's proposed budget significantly reduces funding for the Women, Children and Infants (WIC) program – " a major preventative against low-weight babies. " In 2010, for example, Bush's budget would cut funding for the program by $658 million, which would require eliminating coverage for 660,000 women. LEAVING THE DISABLED ON THE STREET: Bush's statement about his intervention in the Schiavo case implies that he is a champion for the well-being of the disabled. Not quite. He is proposing " to stop financing the construction of new housing for the mentally ill and physically handicapped. " The program has existed for three decades. UNITED NATIONS A Blueprint for Reform United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan unveiled a bold plan on Monday designed to overhaul the world's largest international organization so it is more responsive to world crises, better able to combat human rights violations and harder on terrorism. Annan's proposals " include enlarging the Security Council; creating rules on when it can authorize military force; creating a new human rights agency; writing a clear definition of terrorism and condemning terrorism in all its forms. It would also establish a radical program to combat poverty. " Presenting his proposal to the 191-member General Assembly – which he called on to ratify the plan at a summit in September – Annan argued for " the idea that development, security and human rights go hand in hand. " At a time when the Bush administration is seeking to undermine the United Nations by appointing a representative who has publicly advocated its demolition, Annan's proposal represents an attempt to respond to criticism and remold the institution as an " effective instrument [for the] cause of larger freedom. " COMMITTING TO HUMAN RIGHTS: Human rights groups are welcoming Annan's proposed revamp of the U.N.'s " much-criticized human rights commission, so that it would no longer include habitual human rights violators which used commission membership to protect themselves from criticism. " In the past, the U.S. has been among the critics of the Commission, which included rights abusers like Libya, Cuba, Sudan and Zimbabwe. Annan recommended replacing the 53-member Commission with a smaller, more active Human Rights Council, whose member states " should undertake to abide by the highest human rights standards. " Amnesty International said Annan's proposed commission would be a " 'huge step forward' for promoting human rights around the world. " Human Rights Watch Executive Director Kenneth Roth called it a " courageous proposal. " COMBATING TERRORISM: Annan's proposed changes seek to clarify and bolster the U.N.'s response to terrorism. The proposal calls for the General Assembly to unite behind a " comprehensive convention on terrorism … which would make it clear that … any action constitutes terrorism if it is intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants with the purpose of intimidating a population or compelling a Government or an international organization to do or abstain from doing any act. " Significantly, that definition would " outlaw terrorism as a tool for national resistance. " Annan also reiterated his five step strategy for confronting terrorism, including: " dissuading the disaffected from choosing terrorist tactics; denying terrorists the means to carry out attacks; deterring state support of terrorism; developing state preventive capacity; and defending human rights in the struggle against the scourge of terror. " BUILDING PEACE: Annan cited a " gaping hole in the United Nations institutional machinery, " acknowledging there is no mechanism for " helping countries with the transition from war to lasting peace. " According to Annan, that gap led directly to some of the " devastating failures " of the early 1990s, " for instance in Angola in 1993 and in Rwanda in 1994. " Learning from those tragedies, Annan has proposed " an intergovernmental Peacebuilding Commission, as well as a Peacebuilding Support Office within the United Nations Secretariat. " Among other things, the Commission would improve the U.N.'s planning for sustained recovery, focus early efforts to establish the necessary institutions, help to ensure financing, improve post-conflict coordination, and provide a forum for productive information sharing from past post-conflict experiences. Such a body could have been helpful, for instance, in Iraq. USE OF FORCE: Annan also sought to address the lack of " basic consensus and implementation " on issues of force and security, which led to confusion over Iraq and has hindered action in Sudan. Annan urged the Assembly to seek a formal " agreement on when and how force can be used to defend international peace and security. " In cases of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, " Annan urged all states to accept that there is a 'responsibility to protect' those being killed, which requires collective action. " UNDER THE RADAR EPA – HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL: Last week the Environmental Protection Agency released the Clean Air Mercury Rule, limiting harmful mercury emissions from U.S. power plants, but officials shied away from making the controls any more stringent, stressing that further limitations would have an averse effect on industry that " far exceeded the public health payoff. " Such a conclusion is easy to make when one chooses to ignore the data to the contrary; although the EPA paid for a Harvard University study " co-authored by an EPA scientist and peer-reviewed by two other EPA scientists, " the agency's top officials " ordered the finding stripped from public documents. " Dealing with the study, which includes an analysis that " estimated health benefits 100 times as great as the EPA did, " would have forced reconsideration of the pro-industry rules favored by the Bush administration and industry groups. When a top EPA official was questioned on the omission, he blamed the late submission of the study and flaws in its analysis; however, " interviews and documents " dispute both of those critiques. The ultimate question is, " Are you saving the industry a billion dollars but taking away $10 billion worth of benefits for the general public? " SOCIAL SECURITY – RHETORIC DOESN'T MATCH REALITY: In promoting President Bush's struggling Social Security plan, Vice President Cheney meant to be encouraging when he said, " we are going to tie your future as you retire to the overall health and function of the American economy. " But the latest study on retirement accounts, conducted by " a prominent finance economist, " will have people thinking twice before they jump on this administration's privatization bandwagon: nearly 75 percent of " workers who opt for Social Security personal accounts under President Bush's 'default' investment option are likely to earn less in benefits than those who stay with the traditional Social Security system. " Conducted by Yale economist Robert Shiller, the study uses global rather than domestic rates of return, " which Shiller says more closely track future conditions, " to estimate life-cycle portfolios, and reveals " a disappointing outlook for investors in the personal accounts relative to the rhetoric of their promoters. " If anyone wants to question how well Shiller knows the stock market, this is the same economist heralded as " a leading researcher in stock market volatility who gained fame in the late 1990s for his warnings of a stock market bubble. " TORTURE – NO LONGER JUST MORALLY SUSPECT: Apologists for the Bush administration's lax stance on detainee abuse have clung to claims that such techniques were vital to U.S. intelligence aims, regardless of other drawbacks. Not so, according to U.S. law enforcement agents employed at Guantanamo Bay. FBI memos released yesterday by Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) state that intelligence acquired from aggressive interrogation techniques was " suspect at best " and that such practices " could undermine future military trials for terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay. " The FBI memos in question were originally released in December to the ACLU – so why are we only hearing about these particular critiques now? Because the Justice Department (acting on advice from the Pentagon) initially redacted those portions, citing bogus " national security " concerns. As Sen. Levin noted, " the previously withheld information had nothing to do with protecting intelligence sources and methods, and everything to do with protecting the DOD from embarrassment. " BOLTON – ARCH-UNILATERALIST MAY ALSO BE PARTISAN HACK: Did U.N. Ambassador nominee John Bolton play a role in a 1994 outfit that illegally funneled money from a Hong Kong businessman to the Republican National Committee? According to American Prospect editor Michael Tomasky, it's a question worth asking. In the 1990s, Bolton worked for a nonprofit research institute called the National Policy Forum (NPF) that happened to be headed by Haley Barbour, then chairman of the Republican National Committee. In 1994, the NPF received a $2.1 million loan from a Hong Kong businessman and Taiwanese citizen which may have ended up in the coffers of the RNC, to which the NPF owed $1.6 million. The story got even murkier, and eventually was investigated by the Senate, but Bolton never explained his role in the affair. Though several senators wanted him to appear, Bolton " reported an important business meeting in Europe the week he was scheduled to appear, and he canceled at the last minute. " (Remember – you still have time to write your senators and urge them to oppose Bolton's nomination.) DON'T MISS DAILY TALKING POINTS: A Genuine Commitment to Vulnerable Requires More than Political Grandstanding. SCHIAVO: Federal Judge Declines to Order Reinsertion of Feeding Tube. CORRUPTION: David Brooks on the new sleazemasters. STEROIDS: Big Mac, no longer America's favorite slugger. HOMELAND SECURITY: Is DHS going too far in keeping secrets? DAILY GRILL " The legislation he [bush] signed is consistent with his views.... The legislation was there to help ensure that actions were being taken that were in accordance with the wishes of the patient or the patient's family. " – Scott McClellan, 3/21/05 VERSUS If the patient or the person responsible for the health care decisions of the patient is requesting life-sustaining treatment that the attending physician has decided and the review process has affirmed is inappropriate treatment.... The physician and the health care facility are not obligated to provide life-sustaining treatment after the 10th day. – Texas Law, Section 166.046, Subsection (e) DAILY OUTRAGE House Majority Leader Tom DeLay is manipulating the tragic case of Terri Schiavo to justify his own ethical lapses. He told a conference organized by the Family Research Council, " [o]ne thing that God has brought to us is Terri Schiavo, to help elevate the visibility of what is going on in America.... This is exactly the issue that is going on in America, of attacks against the conservative movement, against me and against many others. " © Copyright 2005 by American Progress Action Fund. All rights reserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.