Guest guest Posted November 16, 2002 Report Share Posted November 16, 2002 > >Every US citizen should info themselves well on the freedoms >about to be lost thru the Homeland Security Bill. > >Title III sec. 304 c is mandory vax NO exemptions.... >please contact your Senator (below) Kit > >>>> >>> security bill >>> >>> >>> > THE HOME LAND SECURITY BILL >>> > SMALLPOX AND FORCED VACCINATION: >>> > WHAT EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW >>> > >>> > >>> > It is crucial that everyone know exactly what the passing of this bill >>in >>> its entirety will mean to every citizen of the United States of America. >>> > >>> > One new insertion that was never debated or considered in a hearing >>(Title >>> III section 304 c) gives the authority to the Secretary of HHS to call for >>> universal - absent of informed consent - smallpox vaccination and other >>> broad categorizations of smallpox interventions with no personal, >>religious >>> or medical exemptions. In addition, there are no guarantees for humane >>> quarantine laws. >>> > >>> > People Who Should Not Get The Smallpox Vaccine >>> > >>> > Persons who experience anaphylactic reactions to polymyxin B sulfate, >>> streptomycin sulfate, chlortetracycline hydrochloride and neomycin sulfate >>> should not be vaccinated with Dryvax >>> > >>> > Persons with eczema or other skin conditions: Vaccinia vaccine should >>not >>> be administered to persons with eczema of any degree, those with a past >>> history of eczema, those whose household contacts have active eczema, or >>> whose household contacts have a history of eczema. >>> > >>> > Persons with other acute, chronic or exfoliative skin conditions (e.g., >>> atopic dermatitis, burns, impetigo or varicella zoster) might also be at >>> higher risk for eczema vaccinatum and should not be vaccinated until the >>> condition resolves. >>> > >>> > Persons Infected with HIV. >>> > >>> > Persons with immunosuppression (leukemia, lymphoma, generalized >>> malignancy, solid organ transplantation, cellular or humoral immunity >>> disorders, therapy with akylating agents, antimetabolites, radiation or >>> high-dose corticosteroid therapy); >>> > >>> > Infants and Children under age 18. >>> > >>> > Pregnant Women: Vaccinia virus has been reported to cause fetal >>infection >>> on rare occasions, almost always after primary vaccination of the mother. >>> Cases have been reported as recently as 1978. When fetal vaccinia does >>> occur, it usually results in stillbirth or death of the infant soon after >>> delivery. >>> > >>> > If this is mandated, you will not have a choice. You must comply... >>> > We only have this weekend to send, fax, e-mail as the Senate will vote >>on >>> Monday. >>> > >>> > Contact your Senators: >>> > http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm >>> > >>> > Vice-president Dick Cheney: >>> > vice.president >>> > >>> > President Bush: >>> > president >>> > >>> > For more information go to: >>> > > >>> > http://www.909shot.com/Newsletters/spsmallpox.htm >>> > >>> > http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_02/hlsb0819.htm >>> > >>> > http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/dpanel/dryvax.pdf >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2002 Report Share Posted November 16, 2002 Thanks, Kit. > >>> > THE HOME LAND SECURITY BILL > >>> > SMALLPOX AND FORCED VACCINATION: > >>> > WHAT EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW Actually this bill is a lot more dangerous than what is outlined in this post. For one thing, there are provisions that the vaccines' manufacturers cannot be sued no matter what they use in the vaccines as long as the FDA approves the ingredients. The FDA has a long and sorry history of guarding the pharmaceutical industry instead of the American public. Witness the number of drugs which the FDA has approved (in spite of evidence they were dangerous) and the deaths which resulted afterwards. Why be concerned about this bill? For one thing, look at the history of the anthrax vaccinations that service personnel are forced to take even though the vaccinations are of dubious safety and effectiveness. Quite a few individuals have quit the military, even resigning commissions and even being court martialed, rather than risk their health. What has been the response of the Pentagon? To claim that these service personnel can not handle stress and are suffering from psychological conditions which are causing their health problems. BTW, a former member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff sits on the board of directors for this compnay and is making a lot of money off this vaccine of questionable effectiveness and safety. The company has been involved in one complaint after another, yet the U.S. government refuses to allow another company to try to develop an anthrax vaccination. What I am going to talk about in this post is not going to sit very well with some members. But this is a major healing issue. This bill is also about forcing Americans to buy goods and services they not only may not want and may even be harmed by. This is not a new problem in the U.S., but it is one which rapidly is escalating under the current administration. For some years now some states have had laws which force parents to put their children on psychiatric drugs. Alternatives (choice) is not allowed. If the parents refuse, they lose custody of their children. Nevermind the fact that children often are reacting to these drugs or that some doctors and school counselors are receiving kickbacks for every patient put on certain drugs. Laws like those and the current misnamed " Homeland Security Bill " is not about safeguarding the health of Americans. It is about safeguarding the profits of the pharmaceutical industry by forcing people to buy its products. It's also about the equally misnamed tort " reform " which protects companies that make destructive and deadly products from having to accept responsibility for the companies irresponsible decisions and actions. Except this bill doesn't just seek to cap damage awards; it will eliminate them completely! This bill is about Quid Pro Quo for big campaign contributors. This bill also is not about safeguarding the American people from terrorism. If this administration really wanted to do that it would be going after bin Laden instead of declaring war on a country that bin Laden hates (because Iraq is a secular Arab state). This administration also would stop blocking the attempts to clean up international money laundrying. This is the source of so much of the money used in terrorism. Also, the risk from some of these vaccinations is far greater than the risk of being targeted by terrorists. Unfortunately, most of the American public does not know about this because most of the " news " reporting in the U.S. is controlled by 6 companies, and the news is heavily censored in the U.S. What we get in place of news is corporate and White House spin and propaganda. If one really wants to learn what is really going on in the U.S. as well as in the rest of the world, check out foreign newspapers, the BBC, and alternative news sites like buzzflash and MediaWhoresOnline. Readers of newspapers in other countries as well as alternative news sites know that several countries gave rather detailed warnings of a 9-11-type attacks weeks in advance. One British newspaper even printed an interview in July with a terrorist in which he bragged of a big attack against the U.S. And the current administration wants to do away with the rights of Americans supposedly to protect us when it ignored intelligence like this?!?!? What does this mean in TCM terms. For one thing, start reading up on Kidney imbalance because the Kidneys are very vulnerable to fear, and this is an administration which repeatedly uses fear to advance its agenda. I can hear the protests now. But this administration didn't attack the towers or the Pentagon. Al Quada did that! But this administration let it happen, and this administration has failed to capture bin Laden. Instead of concentrating on getting bin Laden or even on getting the domestic anthrax terrorist who mailed anthrax letters to Democrat politicians (you'll note no Republicans got any) and to media outlets, this administration diverts our attention from concerns about this and the tanking economy by telling us that we also have to fear and take on Iraq, problems in the Phillipines, etc. Read the book 1984 for insights into a regime that uses constant war and threat of war to retain its stranglehold over citizens. Fear is an often-used abuse and brainwashing tactic. People who are afraid are off center and more easily manipulated. If any healers on this list have experience in working with victims of constant fear, please share it because this information is going to be greatly needed in the days to come. But eventually many people get tired of being afraid all the time, and they start to get angry about how they have been manipulated and exploited. This is a good kind of anger and one which will not damage as long as the person accepts it, accepts how right it is, and accepts that anger often can be used to power the push for changes that benefit a lot of people. And if I and this group happen to get censored for going this far, I'll simply move the group to another list. There always are alternatives. This " our way or the highway " administration does not want us to know this not less have alternatives in anything, but it's true. Victoria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 16, 2002 Report Share Posted November 16, 2002 Actually I see what you forwarded in as having interest not only for U.S. list members but for people in other countries as well. Given the way that U.S. companies constantly are meddling in the affairs of other countries in attempts to gain new markets. One big topic that crops up a lot on the rightwing talk shows (which is just about every one of them these days except for a couple)is how the Canadian healthcare system is so inferior to the U.S. healthcare system, how Canadians want our healthcare system, etc. Don't believe it for a moment. Instead check out the following link if you want to see what awaits you if you go to our system of corporate controlled medicine: Full text from the BMJ is at http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7373/1132/c?etoc " But in terms of life expectancy the United States lags behind most other comparable nations. And the country ranks 28th in infant mortality among 39 industrialised nations. Compared with 30 other countries, the United States has the highest incidence of all cancers. In the World Health Organization's assessment of health systems around the world the United States is ranked 37th. " And BTW, no Canadians are losing their homes because of healthcare bills. A lot of people in the U.S. have and are being subjected to this. I know because back in the 1980s it happened to me. Victoria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.