Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

for US list members universal smallpox vaccinations and homeland security bill

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

>

>Every US citizen should info themselves well on the freedoms

>about to be lost thru the Homeland Security Bill.

>

>Title III sec. 304 c is mandory vax NO exemptions....

>please contact your Senator (below) Kit

>

>>>>

>>> security bill

>>>

>>>

>>> > THE HOME LAND SECURITY BILL

>>> > SMALLPOX AND FORCED VACCINATION:

>>> > WHAT EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > It is crucial that everyone know exactly what the passing of this bill

>>in

>>> its entirety will mean to every citizen of the United States of America.

>>> >

>>> > One new insertion that was never debated or considered in a hearing

>>(Title

>>> III section 304 c) gives the authority to the Secretary of HHS to call for

>>> universal - absent of informed consent - smallpox vaccination and other

>>> broad categorizations of smallpox interventions with no personal,

>>religious

>>> or medical exemptions. In addition, there are no guarantees for humane

>>> quarantine laws.

>>> >

>>> > People Who Should Not Get The Smallpox Vaccine

>>> >

>>> > Persons who experience anaphylactic reactions to polymyxin B sulfate,

>>> streptomycin sulfate, chlortetracycline hydrochloride and neomycin sulfate

>>> should not be vaccinated with Dryvax

>>> >

>>> > Persons with eczema or other skin conditions: Vaccinia vaccine should

>>not

>>> be administered to persons with eczema of any degree, those with a past

>>> history of eczema, those whose household contacts have active eczema, or

>>> whose household contacts have a history of eczema.

>>> >

>>> > Persons with other acute, chronic or exfoliative skin conditions (e.g.,

>>> atopic dermatitis, burns, impetigo or varicella zoster) might also be at

>>> higher risk for eczema vaccinatum and should not be vaccinated until the

>>> condition resolves.

>>> >

>>> > Persons Infected with HIV.

>>> >

>>> > Persons with immunosuppression (leukemia, lymphoma, generalized

>>> malignancy, solid organ transplantation, cellular or humoral immunity

>>> disorders, therapy with akylating agents, antimetabolites, radiation or

>>> high-dose corticosteroid therapy);

>>> >

>>> > Infants and Children under age 18.

>>> >

>>> > Pregnant Women: Vaccinia virus has been reported to cause fetal

>>infection

>>> on rare occasions, almost always after primary vaccination of the mother.

>>> Cases have been reported as recently as 1978. When fetal vaccinia does

>>> occur, it usually results in stillbirth or death of the infant soon after

>>> delivery.

>>> >

>>> > If this is mandated, you will not have a choice. You must comply...

 

>>> > We only have this weekend to send, fax, e-mail as the Senate will vote

>>on

>>> Monday.

>>> >

>>> > Contact your Senators:

>>> > http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

>>> >

>>> > Vice-president Dick Cheney:

>>> > vice.president

>>> >

 

>>> > President Bush:

>>> > president

>>> >

>>> > For more information go to:

>>> >

> >>> > http://www.909shot.com/Newsletters/spsmallpox.htm

>>> >

>>> > http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_02/hlsb0819.htm

>>> >

>>> > http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/dpanel/dryvax.pdf

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Kit.

 

> >>> > THE HOME LAND SECURITY BILL

> >>> > SMALLPOX AND FORCED VACCINATION:

> >>> > WHAT EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW

 

 

Actually this bill is a lot more dangerous than what is outlined in

this post. For one thing, there are provisions that the vaccines'

manufacturers cannot be sued no matter what they use in the vaccines

as long as the FDA approves the ingredients. The FDA has a long and

sorry history of guarding the pharmaceutical industry instead of the

American public. Witness the number of drugs which the FDA has

approved (in spite of evidence they were dangerous) and the deaths

which resulted afterwards.

 

Why be concerned about this bill? For one thing, look at the history

of the anthrax vaccinations that service personnel are forced to take

even though the vaccinations are of dubious safety and

effectiveness. Quite a few individuals have quit the military, even

resigning commissions and even being court martialed, rather than

risk their health. What has been the response of the Pentagon? To

claim that these service personnel can not handle stress and are

suffering from psychological conditions which are causing their

health problems. BTW, a former member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

sits on the board of directors for this compnay and is making a lot

of money off this vaccine of questionable effectiveness and safety.

The company has been involved in one complaint after another, yet the

U.S. government refuses to allow another company to try to develop an

anthrax vaccination.

 

What I am going to talk about in this post is not going to sit very

well with some members. But this is a major healing issue. This

bill is also about forcing Americans to buy goods and services they

not only may not want and may even be harmed by. This is not a new

problem in the U.S., but it is one which rapidly is escalating under

the current administration. For some years now some states have had

laws which force parents to put their children on psychiatric drugs.

Alternatives (choice) is not allowed. If the parents refuse, they

lose custody of their children. Nevermind the fact that children

often are reacting to these drugs or that some doctors and school

counselors are receiving kickbacks for every patient put on certain

drugs. Laws like those and the current misnamed " Homeland Security

Bill " is not about safeguarding the health of Americans. It is about

safeguarding the profits of the pharmaceutical industry by forcing

people to buy its products. It's also about the equally misnamed

tort " reform " which protects companies that make destructive and

deadly products from having to accept responsibility for the

companies irresponsible decisions and actions. Except this bill

doesn't just seek to cap damage awards; it will eliminate them

completely! This bill is about Quid Pro Quo for big campaign

contributors.

 

This bill also is not about safeguarding the American people from

terrorism. If this administration really wanted to do that it would

be going after bin Laden instead of declaring war on a country that

bin Laden hates (because Iraq is a secular Arab state). This

administration also would stop blocking the attempts to clean up

international money laundrying. This is the source of so much of the

money used in terrorism. Also, the risk from some of these

vaccinations is far greater than the risk of being targeted by

terrorists.

 

Unfortunately, most of the American public does not know about this

because most of the " news " reporting in the U.S. is controlled by 6

companies, and the news is heavily censored in the U.S. What we get

in place of news is corporate and White House spin and propaganda.

If one really wants to learn what is really going on in the U.S. as

well as in the rest of the world, check out foreign newspapers, the

BBC, and alternative news sites like buzzflash and

MediaWhoresOnline. Readers of newspapers in other countries as well

as alternative news sites know that several countries gave rather

detailed warnings of a 9-11-type attacks weeks in advance. One

British newspaper even printed an interview in July with a terrorist

in which he bragged of a big attack against the U.S. And the current

administration wants to do away with the rights of Americans

supposedly to protect us when it ignored intelligence like this?!?!?

 

What does this mean in TCM terms. For one thing, start reading up on

Kidney imbalance because the Kidneys are very vulnerable to fear, and

this is an administration which repeatedly uses fear to advance its

agenda. I can hear the protests now. But this administration didn't

attack the towers or the Pentagon. Al Quada did that! But this

administration let it happen, and this administration has failed to

capture bin Laden. Instead of concentrating on getting bin Laden or

even on getting the domestic anthrax terrorist who mailed anthrax

letters to Democrat politicians (you'll note no Republicans got any)

and to media outlets, this administration diverts our attention from

concerns about this and the tanking economy by telling us that we

also have to fear and take on Iraq, problems in the Phillipines,

etc. Read the book 1984 for insights into a regime that uses

constant war and threat of war to retain its stranglehold over

citizens.

 

Fear is an often-used abuse and brainwashing tactic. People who are

afraid are off center and more easily manipulated. If any healers on

this list have experience in working with victims of constant fear,

please share it because this information is going to be greatly

needed in the days to come.

 

But eventually many people get tired of being afraid all the time,

and they start to get angry about how they have been manipulated and

exploited. This is a good kind of anger and one which will not

damage as long as the person accepts it, accepts how right it is, and

accepts that anger often can be used to power the push for changes

that benefit a lot of people.

 

And if I and this group happen to get censored for going this far,

I'll simply move the group to another list. There always are

alternatives. This " our way or the highway " administration does not

want us to know this not less have alternatives in anything, but it's

true.

 

Victoria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I see what you forwarded in as having interest not only for

U.S. list members but for people in other countries as well. Given

the way that U.S. companies constantly are meddling in the affairs of

other countries in attempts to gain new markets. One big topic that

crops up a lot on the rightwing talk shows (which is just about every

one of them these days except for a couple)is how the Canadian

healthcare system is so inferior to the U.S. healthcare system, how

Canadians want our healthcare system, etc. Don't believe it for a

moment. Instead check out the following link if you want to see what

awaits you if you go to our system of corporate controlled medicine:

 

Full text from the BMJ is at

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7373/1132/c?etoc

 

" But in terms of life expectancy the United States lags behind most

other

comparable nations. And the country ranks 28th in infant mortality

among 39

industrialised nations. Compared with 30 other countries, the United

States

has the highest incidence of all cancers. In the World Health

Organization's

assessment of health systems around the world the United States is

ranked

37th. "

 

And BTW, no Canadians are losing their homes because of healthcare

bills. A lot of people in the U.S. have and are being subjected to

this. I know because back in the 1980s it happened to me.

 

Victoria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...