Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 and this came off of Autism-Mercury. I apologize for its length but not for the passion that inspired sharing it with you. Penel ------ forward ------------------------- Lyn Redwood Autism-Mercury Saturday, November 16, 2002 7:57 PM [Autism-Mercury] Fw: URGENT Homeland Security Changes Dear Concerned Parents, Please contact your senators Monday morning and ask that they strike the amendments added to the Homeland Security Bill by Dick Armey that protect the pharmaeutical industry from liability arising from their use of a know neurotoxic product, MERCURY, in excess of Federal Safety Guidelines, for more than a decade. We have an epidemic of autism and leaning disabilities on our hands who have been harmed by mercury and no funds to care for and educate these children. Now the responsible parties, with their links to government, are seeking immunity for the damage their products have caused, which means the burden falls on the parents and taxpayers. Autism Spectrum Disorders along are estimated to currently affect 1 in every 150 children Nationwide with a lifetime cost of 2 million dollars per child! This not a Homeland Security issue but rather a last minute effort to protect special interest groups. We did not let the tobacco industry off the hook, why are we letting the pharmaceutical industry? Lyn Redwood Please feel free to distribute this document widely. U.S. Homeland Security Bill Faces New Hurdle Fri Nov 15, 5:48 PM ET By Andrew Clark WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Democrats on Friday moved to strip what they called " egregious special interest provisions " from a bill to create a U.S. Department of Homeland Security, complicating efforts to complete one of President Bush (news - web sites)'s top legislative priorities. The House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved the bill on Wednesday after Congress and the White House cut a deal to end months of haggling over the new department. But Democrats complained that House Republicans quietly added a slew of last-minute " riders " to the compromise, including provisions involving airport security screeners and limits on lawsuits against vaccine makers. And they scheduled a vote for Monday on whether to remove them. " If this is a homeland security bill, let's keep it homeland security-related and let's take out all this terrible special interest legislation, " said Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, a South Dakota Democrat. " I filed an amendment yesterday that deals with all of the egregious special interest provisions, " he added. If the Senate alters the bill, the measure will have to go back to the House, which wrapped up its work for the year on Thursday -- although it did not formally adjourn. " If the amendment is adopted, it will jeopardize the bill, because the House has passed the bill, " said Texas Republican Sen. Phil Gramm. " They've gone home. The legislation would trigger the biggest U.S. government reorganization in half a century by rolling into the new department all or parts of 22 federal agencies -- including the Coast Guard, Border Patrol and Secret Service. It was a key issue in this month's election, which saw the Republicans win back control of the Senate and expand their majority in the House. Bush had hammered Democrats for stalling the bill over a dispute about federal workers' rights. Daschle dismissed concerns about further slowing the homeland security drive by changing the legislation. 'IN A HEARTBEAT' " I am absolutely confident that if we send this bill back to the House with these provisions stripped out, they'll vote for it in a heartbeat, " Daschle said, adding he would likely still support the bill even if the effort to amend it failed. Democrats said the vaccine provisions in the bill appeared to be aimed at shielding major U.S. pharmaceutical companies -- which were among the biggest donors to Republican campaign coffers -- from a wave of lawsuits seeking to link a mercury-based vaccine preservative to childhood autism. California Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman on Friday asked Health and Human Services (news - web sites) Secretary Tommy Thompson and White House Budget Director Mitch Daniels to provide records of the Bush administration's input into the effort. " It now seems apparent the administration's priority has been legislation that protects manufacturers but not injured people, " Waxman said in a letter. Daniels is a former top executive at drug manufacturer Eli Lilly and Co., which is among the companies being sued. His spokesman, Trent Duffy, denied any connection and called Waxman's letter a " partisan cheap shot. " Republicans said the move was necessary in light of the possibility of terrorist attacks with bioweapons like anthrax or smallpox -- which might require millions of people to get vaccines that can have serious, sometimes fatal, side effects. " The urgency of it is the fact that we are a nation at risk from biological agents, " said Tennessee Republican Sen. Bill Frist. " We're talking about a huge issue that reflects back to the protection of our families and our nation. " Other targeted provisions in the bill include one extending for a year the deadline for airports to screen all checked luggage and another loosening a congressional ban on government contracts going to U.S. companies that move their headquarters overseas to duck corporate taxes. _ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.