ranting as usual...

[Guest guest]

1. Re: pH " ykcul_ritsym "

> <ykcul_ritsym

 

The problem isn't knowing the solutions is it?

Everyone has been talking about the western approach

of just jump in and fix it being too short sighted...

So, aside from convincing people that have money it is

in their best interest to do what is healthy. And

that they things they are doing are devaluing their

own economy.

We also have to decide what truly healthy is....

If blood is too acidic you add some base to neurtalize

it. Would it be the same with the world? I imagine

we have enough room on the planet that everyone could

spread out, building farms underwater or on land, but

then we're destroying even more... not to mention the

whole property ownership thing.

What I find sadly amusing is that so many

Capitalists are afraid of free trade and competition

that they try to regulate everything. In some ways

they are actually correct in this regulation because

people act stupid and sell things they know to be

harmful to themselves and their enviroment...

(Unfortunately that is also where the Minos factor

comes in... ie drug war in this case CIA and Mafia

being used to regulate criminal culture. Reflects

Mino's how? When a king or leader puts himself or his

tribe above the hive you create a maze and a monster).

 

Yet for capitalism (and this is where at it's

highest state it and communism are like twins) to be

healthy more people making things is better. If many

people are producing a great variety of things then

money has more value to the populace. .

And in some cases the economy should be

devalued... (Keeping food afordable can be done with

that wonderful socialist ideal of price capping.

minimum wage is a socialist ideal, but is useless

without rent, and price caps on basic necessities)

The world bank keeps loaning people money for crap

they don't need so they get into such debt that the

only way to pay it off is massive cutting of the

rainforest. (ie problem in South America). That dam in

Egypt was kinda useless too when you look at it, for

what it did to the country, but... this is how many

countries are generating power. China is in fact the

leader in it's use of hydroelectric power, but it is

good?

Of course credit is another problem in itself,

but part of perpetuating our level of knowledge is

constant production, and where as we could lower

prices then we have too many people consuming (reason

vehicles in south America can be purchased for $3000

there and $15,000 in the states). Only how do you keep

people from buying for status? How do you keep people

from buying cause they have an emotional lack and

spending helps them... feel better.

but here's another question... with all the CO2

in the air plant life grows faster right... If we were

to do a massive reforestation project, what would the

effect be on the enviroment (since the world is alreay

trying to compesate for the damage we're doing). Since

the greenhouse effect has caused a warming, would it

in turn cause a cooling? We could build machines to

create ozone, but what is the effect? What reason did

the eviroment build to this hole? TO release something

it felt it didn't need?

 

 

M C Markman

 

 

 

The New with improved product search

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Prince,

 

Chinese Medicine , eric morlin <

princeofautumn> wrote:

>

> 1. Re: pH " ykcul_ritsym "

> > <ykcul_ritsym>

>

> The problem isn't knowing the solutions is it?

 

That's what I think. I think the problem is

the solution. That is to say, that I think the

problems we are solving today are the

solutions to yesterday's problems.

 

Ken

[Guest guest]

I guess the begining of autumn is when the sap runs a few more times before the

sentimental holing up for winter. Almost too much to comment on. The

manipulating of people and the world for desperate advantage is probably the

hardest impulse to curb. In western media we use psychology to create or pander

to needs and not quite fill them, or create more need while pretendind to

fulfill others (give guns while knowing they will need bullets and parts, and

soon traditional hunting is forgotten; same for agriculture, laundry machines

etc.). Communism had 'blaht' ( I give you a gallon of paint, you give me a

gallon of gas, I sneak your daughter into an apartment in Moscow, You get mine

into Harvard). Natural self-interest. Ok, but knowledge is being withheld. I

believe true market forces would not create the disparity we have now, but there

really is just manipulation and insider speculation. For example a fuel cell co.

in canada goes into production and can't renew their lease next

year, and is bought and closed. People (majority)would do the best but the big

dogs(minority) want to hide the options. Look at the electrical power failures,

all identical scenarios in that the cause is not too little generation, but, 'we

need more money'

TCM and other gentle therapies can help most people but insurance wants to wait

until the illness is far advanced. Some providers up on the lists do ok with the

way things are and pretend that there's lots of room at the top. We are on

merchant time. Any kid is shocked to learn how hard some people have it, but we

break them of that golden rule (treat others as you yourself would like it)

asap.

Gotta run, will drop this thread and hopefully contribute something mor

worthwhile soon. peace

 

eric morlin <princeofautumn wrote:

 

1. Re: pH " ykcul_ritsym "

> <ykcul_ritsym

 

The problem isn't knowing the solutions is it?

Everyone has been talking about the western approach

of just jump in and fix it being too short sighted...

So, aside from convincing people that have money it is

in their best interest to do what is healthy. And

that they things they are doing are devaluing their

own economy.

We also have to decide what truly healthy is....

If blood is too acidic you add some base to neurtalize

it. Would it be the same with the world? I imagine

we have enough room on the planet that everyone could

spread out, building farms underwater or on land, but

then we're destroying even more... not to mention the

whole property ownership thing.

What I find sadly amusing is that so many

Capitalists are afraid of free trade and competition

that they try to regulate everything. In some ways

they are actually correct in this regulation because

people act stupid and sell things they know to be

harmful to themselves and their enviroment...

(Unfortunately that is also where the Minos factor

comes in... ie drug war in this case CIA and Mafia

being used to regulate criminal culture. Reflects

Mino's how? When a king or leader puts himself or his

tribe above the hive you create a maze and a monster).

 

Yet for capitalism (and this is where at it's

highest state it and communism are like twins) to be

healthy more people making things is better. If many

people are producing a great variety of things then

money has more value to the populace. .

And in some cases the economy should be

devalued... (Keeping food afordable can be done with

that wonderful socialist ideal of price capping.

minimum wage is a socialist ideal, but is useless

without rent, and price caps on basic necessities)

The world bank keeps loaning people money for crap

they don't need so they get into such debt that the

only way to pay it off is massive cutting of the

rainforest. (ie problem in South America). That dam in

Egypt was kinda useless too when you look at it, for

what it did to the country, but... this is how many

countries are generating power. China is in fact the

leader in it's use of hydroelectric power, but it is

good?

Of course credit is another problem in itself,

but part of perpetuating our level of knowledge is

constant production, and where as we could lower

prices then we have too many people consuming (reason

vehicles in south America can be purchased for $3000

there and $15,000 in the states). Only how do you keep

people from buying for status? How do you keep people

from buying cause they have an emotional lack and

spending helps them... feel better.

but here's another question... with all the CO2

in the air plant life grows faster right... If we were

to do a massive reforestation project, what would the

effect be on the enviroment (since the world is alreay

trying to compesate for the damage we're doing). Since

the greenhouse effect has caused a warming, would it

in turn cause a cooling? We could build machines to

create ozone, but what is the effect? What reason did

the eviroment build to this hole? TO release something

it felt it didn't need?

 

 

M C Markman

 

 

 

The New with improved product search