Guest guest Posted November 23, 2003 Report Share Posted November 23, 2003 Hi Emmanuel et al I have come a little further in Paul's new book " Was ist Medizin " and maybe I can now give you some more insight as to how I read his viewpoints about the bifurcation during the Han-period. As I wrote in my previous e-mail about this question, the Taoist were opposed to the new stance that the Confusianists took in explaning everything according to their newly discovered laws of nature, i.e. in-yang, 5-elements and systematic correspondence. The conficianists applied these laws also to the human body and their view of healthness and sickness. Meaning that the body had to be in a state of well ordered communication between all the body parts thereby ensuring that each parts contributes to the wellbeing of the whole. The causes for disease are found in too violent emotions that weaken the human body and causes it to be susceptible to the six external evils. The treatment by the confusianists consists of restoring balance (by acupuncture and bloodletting) in the body's communication and thereby causing it to be strong again. The taoists kept to their beliefs that main causes of disease are found in demons, spirits and 'smallest living creatures' threatening and invading the body. Their approach to treatment is protecting the body to threats by amulets and spells. And has the body still been invaded by these enemies then summoning them to leave by issuing threats using incantations. When the enemies of the body do not leave, they will administer a herbal treatment causing the patient to vomit, sweat or to drain the bowels and remove the invaded enemy or causing the enemy to be killed inside the body. Having already said that both sides could only make use of the same bodily signs of illness and I can only presume they will have had different methods of diagnosis given their vastly different views only health and sickness of the body. The taoists fought war with the enemies of the body and the confucianists restored the communication of the different body parts and thereby restored balance. Only much later was Chinese Herbal Medicine brought in line with the laws of nature like the 5-element, Yin-Ynag, systematic correspondence etc. Best wishes Alwin --- " Emmanuel Segmen " wrote: > Paul spoke on the topic of the " bifurcation of the Han in CM " > wherein Taoists were oriented to a medicine of herbs, nutrition, > qigong and the like. Confucianists represented the opposing pole > and were into using acupuncture as their therapy of choice. I > wasn't clear if each camp employed similar diagnostic methods and > only differed in their treatment modalities. Or if they also had > quite different approaches to diagnosis. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.