Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 " HSI - Jenny Thompson " <HSIResearch HSI e-Alert - Form Rides With Function Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:59:00 -0400 HSI e-Alert - Form Rides With Function Health Sciences Institute e-Alert **************************************************** April 20, 2005 Dear Reader, A single study proves nothing, no matter how well designed and executed it may be. But a single study with a key element missing manages to prove less than nothing. You may have heard the news last week (it was widely reported by the TV networks) that a Johns Hopkins study in the New England Journal of Medicine found vitamin E to have no effect on patients with mild cognitive impairment. Given the scope of the study, this is a significant finding. Over three years, nearly 770 subjects received daily doses of 10mg of donepezil (a drug for cognitive impairment), or 2,000 IU of vitamin E, or a placebo. Pretty conclusive, right? Three years - 2,000 IU of vitamin E daily (a particularly high dose) - and no effect on mild cognitive impairment. But there was one element missing in this study. And it's a glaring omission that calls the validity of the research into question. ----------- What's wrong with this picture? ----------- ANY time you see a placebo-controlled study about vitamin E, this question MUST be answered: What form of the vitamin was used? I read the Hopkins study. Again and again vitamin E is referred to without ever stating the form. This is significant because some studies have used the synthetic dl-alpha tocopherol form of vitamin E with poor results. Here's how HSI Panelist Allan Spreen, M.D., describes this form: " This is a molecule shape that the body is not designed to handle, whereas the 'd' form alone is the one the body is able to use. It is important to use the 'dl' form only topically. " But the form question doesn't end there because vitamin E also comes in beta, delta and gamma forms. When these forms are combined with d-alpha you have mixed tocopherols. The d-alpha form is often used alone, and that's fine, but in a study when you're putting the reputation of vitamin E to the test - at 2,000 IUs per day for three years, no less! - you've got to use the mixed tocopherols. Got to. In the end, the validity of the Hopkins study rests on whether or not a mix of tocopherols was used, or if dl-alpha was used, or if d-alpha was used alone. But we simply don't know. If I was the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, I'd hand this study back to the researchers and say, " Come on, guys, this is bush league. You need to fill in all the details before I consider it for publication. " ----------- Sum of the parts ----------- To get a better idea of the effect that vitamin E might have on cognitive impairment, let's look at two previous Johns Hopkins studies. Note that the first study concerns dietary intake - no supplements - and the second concerns interviews about supplement intake. In other words, unlike the new study, neither of these were placebo-controlled. In study number one (reported in 2002), nearly 580 subjects, aged 60 or older, were followed for more than seven years. After adjusting for gender, education, and age (all factors that come into play with AD risk), a diet high in vitamin E was strongly associated with a significant reduction of Alzheimer's risk. Intake of dietary vitamin C was somewhat useful in reducing AD risk, but not nearly as effective as vitamin E. Nearly two years later, another Johns Hopkins team interviewed more than 4,700 subjects (aged 65 or older) in Cache County, Utah. Supplement intake was assessed, as well as the prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease, from 1995 to 1997, and again from 1998 to 2000. The collected data showed that in the first phase, those who took supplements of vitamins C and E combined had a 78 percent lower risk of AD. In the second phase, the percentage dropped to 64, but still indicated a significant level of protection. In addition, subjects who took a vitamin E supplement along with a multivitamin that contained vitamin C, had a lower AD risk. But researchers found no evidence of protection among subjects who took vitamin C or E supplements alone (with no multivitamins), or among subjects who took multivitamins alone, or multivitamins with B-complex supplements (with no additional C or E). What's significant here is the recognition that multivitamins are useful, but key vitamins such as C and E may deserve additional supplementation. ----------- ....and another thing Pure gold. Pure as the driven snow. Pure water. There was a time when the word " pure " meant something. But these days " pure " is often pure hogwash. For instance, if you've got a water bottle in the house, check the label. Almost certainly you'll find the word " pure " prominently displayed. Unfortunately, there's a good chance that it's pure tap water. According to a four-year study released by the environmental advocacy group National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), bottled water sold in the U.S. may be no purer than ordinary tap water. Because according to industry estimates, about 25 percent of all bottled water actually IS tap water - and some estimates place that percentage much higher. The rest of the bottled waters - the non-tap waters - don't fare much better because the FDA allows water that's pumped from wells and treated with chemicals to be called " spring water. " It's a wonder they don't try to market it as " Spring Water Plus! " Obviously, not all spring water or tap water is created equal. In fact, tap water that's filtered through a first-rate filter will probably be freer of contaminants than pure spring water - even if it comes from an actual spring. The NRDC study tested 103 brands of bottled water and found that about one-third had contaminants that exceeded allowable limits of bacteria, synthetic chemicals, and even arsenic! So your chance of getting a little something extra in your bottle of pure water may be approximately one in three. Those aren't really the odds I'm looking for when I pick out a bottle that says " pure " on the label. So to be completely certain that your water is free of killer chemicals, your best bet may be to use a tap filtration system. But like different sources of water, not all systems are created equal. William Campbell Douglass, II, M.D., has personally selected a filtration system that he recommends to his readers. For information about this system, you can use the link below to read about the Doulton Water Filter; an easy-to-install, easy-to-clean, ceramic filter. It's permeated with silver to trap and eliminate bacteria, and even removes fluoride from your tap water. http://www1.youreletters.com/t/133376/2413923/775191/0/ To Your Good Health, Jenny Thompson Health Sciences Institute **************************************************** Sources: " Vitamin E and Donepezil for the Treatment of Mild Cognitive Impairment " The New England Journal of Medicine, published online 4/13/05, scheduled for publication in the June 9, 2005, issue of NEJM, content.nejm.org " Reduced Risk of Alzheimer Disease in Users of Antioxidant Vitamin Supplements: The Cache County Study " Archives of Neurology, Vol. 61, No. 1, January 2004, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov " Study: High Doses of Vitamins Ward Off Alzheimer's " Reuters Health, 1/19/04, naturaplus.com " Bottled Water: Pure Drink or Pure Hype? " National Resources Defense Council, nrdc.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.