TeenScreen: THE INSIDIOUS 'MENTAL HEALTH' PLAN

[Guest guest]

SSRI-Research@

Mon, 05 Sep 2005 14:10:18 -0000

[sSRI-Research] TeenScreen: THE INSIDIOUS 'MENTAL HEALTH' PLAN

 

 

 

 

TeenScreen: THE INSIDIOUS 'MENTAL HEALTH' PLAN

By Paul Walter

 

August 24, 2004

 

NewsWithViews.com

 

 

 

http://www.newswithviews.com/paul/paul25.htm

 

Did you know that mental health is in every school today? In 1965,

the Joint Commission on Mental Health of Children was established. In

1969, the commission released its report, which stated, " As the home

and church decline in influence ... schools must begin to provide

adequately for the emotional and moral development of children ...

The school ... must assume a direct responsibility for the attitudes

and values of child development.

 

" The child advocate, psychologist, social technician and medical

technician should all reach aggressively into the community, send

workers out to children's homes, recreation facilities and schools.

They should assume full responsibility for all education, including

pre-primary education. "

 

How did the Joint Commission on Mental Health know back in 1969 that

in the future there would be a decline of influence in homes and

churches? Was the moral breakdown problem of today socially

engineered (deliberately created)?

 

In Oregon, the legislature passed in 2001 SB 965 and HB 3659 that was

signed by Governor Kitzhaber for state social workers to come into

homes and evaluate all first born. [read: Oregon state to evaluate

first born] This was all done under mental health. Unsuspecting young

parents would not be told before hand, that they have the right to

refuse the evaluation.

 

The state's hidden motive behind evaluating the first born was to

evaluate people as parents and the child's environment.

 

How in the dickens can a child, in a crib, be evaluated for mental

health, unless the state's true motive is indeed to evaluate the

child's environment, and of course, the parents. How could state

legislators be so blind and naïve as to pass something as insidious

as this (mandatory or voluntary), in the first place and not see

anything wrong with it?

 

Yes, there are those who are unfit and shouldn't have children, i.e.

alcoholics, drug users and those with AIDS, etc. If you honestly

believe that the state should have the power to determine who should

or should not be allowed to have children, then what makes you think

you're immune from becoming their next victim yourself?

 

Who's going to evaluate the insane evaluators? The church leadership

certainly isn't. They teach people the false doctrine that we must

obey government authority unconditionally.

 

The illlinoisleader.com recently reported [iL Launches Compulsory

Mental Health Screening for Children and Pregnant Women] that their

state legislature passed a compulsory (mandatory) mental health

screening for every pregnant woman and child up to 18 years. Is the

screening of pregnant women leading to forced serializations and

abortions? No doubt this draconian legislation will come to every

state, including yours. This is all part of Agenda 21 and Sustainable

Development.

 

The Illinois Leader quoted [read:IL Children's Mental Health Plan

Gives Legislators Headache] State Senator, Chris Lauzen (R-Aurora),

who said, " I believe that the last people who should be defining what

is normal and abnormal are Springfield politicians, including

myself! "

 

The Leader also quoted " The Children's Mental Health Act 2003 is the

tip of an insidious iceberg, " said Allen Jones, a former investigator

in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Office of Inspector General and

the Bureau of Special Investigations.

 

Jones went on to say, " The pharmaceutical industry is gaining a back

door access to all of our children by compromising key decision

makers and by gaining rubber stamped endorsements of groups like the

Illinois Children's Mental Health Partnership. "

 

This 'back door' attempt will not only give the drug manufacturers

access to our children, it will eventually lead to the licensing of

parents. The government will have the final say as to who can and

cannot have children. All this is part of population control. A

similar attempt to license parents was introduced in the Minnesota

state legislature and failed to pass.

 

Words of warning.

 

When social workers come to your home for an evaluation, you may not

want to open your door. An open door is a silent consent for them to

come in. Once they're in, it could lead to terminating of your

parental rights. Then, $250 per hour attorneys will relieve you of

all your savings in order to reclaim your children (if you're lucky).

As I have said before, there are those in public service who will

sell their soul for a paycheck.

 

This is a wake up call for everyone. Since most of your pastors are

not encouraging you to stand up to evil, it's up to you to act,

within the law.

 

Get involved in your local community. Attend city council, county

commissioner or board of supervisor meetings. Wake up your local

representatives or better yet, run for office yourself. Make them

aware, because some of them are good people who, unknowingly, may be

blindly passing legislation that will be harmful to your liberties.

We are all responsible for leaving behind a better world for our

children and grandchildren.

 

© 2004 Paul Walter -

 

 

 

----

 

Paul Walter was born in socialist Yugoslavia in 1945. He and his

family emigrated to America in 1959. He served 3 years in the U.S.

Armed Forces and became a U.S. citizen in 1963. Owner of Walter

Publishing & Research, he republished a 100 year old book titled The

Coming Battle, the true history of our national debt. The book is

currently in its 5th printing. E-mail walter18

 

 

----

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Drug-Free School Zone? Just Say NO to Prozac for Children.