Guest guest Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 I just wanted to share the views of Robert Ebert of this movie about Big Pharma. The Constant Gardener *BY ROGER EBERT / *September 1, 2005 Do drug companies really do this? The recent verdict against the makers of Vioxx indicates that a jury thought Merck sold a drug it knew was dangerous. Facts are the bones beneath the skin of a Le Carre novel. Either he knows what he's talking about, or he is uncommonly persuasive in seeming to. " The Constant Gardener " plays at times like a movie that will result in indictments. What makes the film extraordinary is that it also plays as a love story, and as an examination of the mysteries of the heart. " The Constant Gardener " begins with a strong, angry story, and peoples it with actors who let it happen to them, instead of rushing ahead to check off the surprises. It seems solidly grounded in its Kenyan locations; like " City of God<http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/classifieds?category=REVIEWS01 & \ TITLESearch=City%20of%20God & ToDate=20051231>, " it feels organically rooted. Like many Le Carre stories, it begins with grief and proceeds with sadness toward horror. Its closing scenes are as cynical about international politics and commerce as I can imagine. I would like to believe they are an exaggeration, but I fear they are not. This is one of the year's best films. http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050901/REVIEWS/50826\ 001/1023 Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.