Miami Bomb Incident Starts to Look Suspicious

[Guest guest]

CCW

Friday, December 09, 2005 7:09 AM

Miami Bomb Incident Starts to Look Suspicious

 

CCW On-Target!

Eyewitness says Alpizar never mentioned bomb, passengers were more

afraid of Air Marshals putting guns to their heads

 

American Airlines FLT #924

 

Miami Bomb Incident Starts to Look Suspicious

 

Paul Joseph Watson | December 9 2005

 

 

 

The shooting of Rigoberto Alpizar at Miami International Airport

stinks like a giant festering rat just two days after it happened.

Alpizar never screamed that he had a bomb and passengers relate that

they were more frightened of Air Marshals putting guns to their head

and threatening them not to look at what was taking place on board

American Airlines Flight 924. For those of us who researched the

brutal murder of Charles De Menezes in London, striking parallels have

begun to emerge.

 

We live in an age where government deception about everything under

the sun is a matter of course and no major event can take place

without us automatically being suspicious about whether there were

underlying motives involved.

 

The incident seemed straightforward enough when the official version

of what happened was released.

 

A mentally unstable man runs off a plane with a backpack screaming

that he has a bomb and he is shuffling around in his bag apparently

attempting to detonate it. Most people agree that to shoot him dead as

the Air Marshals did was an extreme but necessary course of action to

take.

 

Wait.

 

Let's take a step back here.

 

Is a real suicide bomber going to announce that he is trying to

detonate a bomb? How many Palestinians have you heard about who

explain what they are about to do and risk being apprehended before

being able to do it?

 

Furthermore, we have eyewitnesses confirming that Rigoberto Alpizar's

wife was hysterical in trying to get the message across that the man

was mentally ill and did not have a bomb.

 

OK, so even considering these questions, many people would still

maintain that if they were on the plane and this happened they would

still want the guy filled with bullets, better to be safe than sorry.

 

This is where the waters begin to muddy.

 

Time Magazine reported the comments of one of the passengers on board

American Airlines Flight 924. This is what he had to say,

 

" I never heard the word 'bomb' on the plane, " McAlhany told TIME in a

telephone interview. " I never heard the word bomb until the FBI asked

me did you hear the word bomb. That is ridiculous. "

 

So if we are to believe this eyewitness, the 'madman' Alpizar never

claimed to have a bomb, therefore his only crime was running on a

grounded plane.

 

If he didn't announce that he had a bomb then why was it necessary to

shoot him dead?

 

McAlhany's account of the drama takes on an even more intriguing turn

when we consider the following from Time Magazine,

 

When the incident began McAlhany was in seat 24C, in the middle of the

plane. " [Alpizar] was in the back, " McAlhany says, " a few seats from

the back bathroom. He sat down. " Then, McAlhany says, " I heard an

argument with his wife. He was saying 'I have to get off the plane.'

She said, 'Calm down.' "

 

Alpizar took off running down the aisle, with his wife close behind

him. " She was running behind him saying, 'He's sick. He's sick. He's

ill. He's got a disorder, " McAlhany recalls. " I don't know if she said

bipolar disorder [as one witness has alleged]. She was trying to

explain to the marshals that he was ill. He just wanted to get off the

plane. "

 

McAlhany described Alpizar as carrying a big backpack and wearing a

fanny pack in front. He says it would have been impossible for Alpizar

to lie flat on the floor of the plane, as marshals ordered him to do,

with the fanny pack on. " You can't get on the ground with a fanny

pack, " he says. " You have to move it to the side. "

 

By the time Alpizar made it to the front of the airplane, the crew had

ordered the rest of the passengers to get down between the seats. " I

didn't see him get shot, " he says. " They kept telling me to get down.

I heard about five shots. "

 

McAlhany says he tried to see what was happening just in case he

needed to take evasive action. " I wanted to make sure if anything was

coming toward me and they were killing passengers I would have a

chance to break somebody's neck, " he says. " I was looking through the

seats because I wanted to see what was coming.

 

" I was on the phone with my brother. Somebody came down the aisle and

put a shotgun to the back of my head and said put your hands on the

seat in front of you. I got my cell phone karate chopped out of my

hand. Then I realized it was an official. "

 

In the ensuing events, many of the passengers began crying in fear, he

recalls. " They were pointing the guns directly at us instead of

pointing them to the ground, " he says " One little girl was crying.

There was a lady crying all the way to the hotel. "

 

McAlhany said he saw Alpizar before the flight and is absolutely

stunned by what unfolded on the airplane. He says he saw Alpizar

eating a sandwich in the boarding area before getting on the plane. He

looked normal at that time, McAlhany says. He thinks the whole thing

was a mistake: " I don't believe he should be dead right now. "

 

This account brings several facts into clearer view.

 

* The reason for Alpizar's rush to leave the plane would seem to

stem from his unstable emotional state and the row with his wife, and

had nothing to do with the potential of him having a bomb, as proven

by the fact that he never said he had a bomb and the subsequent

controlled explosions proved that he didn't have a bomb.

* If Alpizar did not have a bomb and gave no reason to make Air

Marshals think he had a bomb, then he was killed for another reason.

* The fact that Air Marshals were terrorizing passengers, putting

guns to their heads and karate kicking mobile phones out of their

hands proves that, whatever was taking place, they didn't want anyone

to have a consistent and clear view of what was going on.

* The eyewitnesses were more afraid of the gun wielding Air

Marshals than they were of Alpizar and felt their lives were more

endangered by the Marshals than Alpizar.

 

This evidence trends towards two possible explanations behind this

incident.

 

Either the government wanted Alpizar dead for their own reasons and

carried out a targeted assassination under the guise of an anti-terror

operation or this incident was staged to reinforce the myth that there

are real terrorists running around that the government needs to

protect us from by taking away our liberties.

 

This event will lead to even more choking airport security measures,

reversing more rational trends which began with the announcement that

small sharp objects would be allowed on planes again.

 

Whatever the case, this incident has uncanny parallels with the murder

of Charles de Menezes by British undercover police one day after the

supposed aborted second London bombings on July 22nd.

 

The official story seemed to justify the shooting. A man wearing a

large padded jacket at the height of summer with wires trailing out

jumps a barrier and runs for the nearest train in a manic fashion as

he is followed by plain clothed police who had tracked him from a

building under surveillance due to it potentially housing terrorists.

 

The official story of course turned out to be a complete lie fronted

by Met Head (or meat head) Sir Ian Blair, who pathetically clung onto

his job by endlessly repeating the same bullshit on British television

for weeks after the event.

 

De Menezes was wearing a light denim jacket, was playing chase with

his cousin, did not vault a barrier, did not have wires trailing from

his jacket and was not seen coming from said building due to the

policeman watching the building taking a piss at the time. CCTV tapes

of the incident were seized by police who then claimed that the tapes

didn't exist due to the cameras conveniently malfunctioning at that

exact time, something which the London Underground workers wholesale

denied.

 

This and many more startling inconsistencies prove that the police

knew for certain that De Menezes was no suicide bomber but they had

been ordered to kill him anyway.

 

De Menezes was a freelance electrician and potential knowledge of the

shady 'electrical surge' explanation that preceded the official story

of the London bombings could have sealed his fate.

 

The murder of Alpizar looks like it's in the same basket. No doubt the

official probe will bring to light more damning evidence but then the

establishment lackeys will just pardon their mob bosses anyway.

 

The Miami Police Department caught a lot of heat recently for their

Constitution gutting 'Miami Shield' program, where cops will randomly

lay siege to city buildings, ride buses and trains and demand to see ID's.

 

Were the events at the airport a response to that criticism? A message

sent that we need to shut up and show obidience to authority because

there are terrorist bombers out there that we need to be protected

from? The timing of the two stories is at the very least interesting

if not sinister.

 

This is a time of universal deceit, and any major event needs to be

scrutinized without haste because in nearly every case the evidence

points directly to government collusion and cover-up.

 

------