Why The Patriot Act Is Intended To Fail?

[Guest guest]

S

Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:20:59 -0800 (PST)

Why The Patriot Act Is Intended To Fail

 

 

 

Next attack will give Globalists reason to blame 'Constitution

huggers,' NSA spying leak part of the disinfo

 

 

 

 

Why The Patriot Act Is Intended To Fail

 

Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson | December 20 2005

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/201205intendedtofail.htm

 

 

 

From all the indications we have studied it seems that the Patriot Act

is intentionally destined to fail so that when the Globalists carry

out a terror attack they can blame 'civil liberties advocates' for

preventing them from keeping the general public safe and then reject

out of hand criticism of all future police state legislation that they

pass.

 

Neo-Cons who have received their uniform talking points memo are all

over the radio bragging, 'you just wait until there's another attack,

you'll be in the forced labor camps'. We have heard this from Michael

Savage and many others of his ilk on numerous occasions.

 

Why do they need the Patriot Act to fail? Because if the Globalists

carry out another terror attack right now, people will be inclined to

say that the existing Patriot Act powers were in the hands of the

government and they failed to protect us, thus discrediting the police

state legislation.

 

 

 

This was the tone of a memo circulating amongst Republican elite last

month which voiced concern about how another terror attack would play

out. The authors of the memo feared that people's loss of faith in

their belief that the government could protect them would override

group think reactions of begging the state to ensure their safety once

again under any circumstances.

 

If for a few months the government can bemoan the fact that they don't

have Patriot Act powers to protect the American people, at that time

it would be expedient for them to set off the suitcase nuke or release

the biological.

 

The New World Order agenda is almost complete but right at the end of

the line they're encountering far more resistance than they ever

bargained for, which is why they may have to opt for a more

sophisticated shift in tactics rather than the simple formula of

staged terror and fearmongering.

 

 

 

The Senate is always more politically conniving than the House and the

Globalists have a far firmer grip over it than they do the House,

which is largely made up of a combination of people with misguided

good intentions and those who are just selfishly interested in

greasing up the power pole.

 

 

Click to join catapultthepropaganda

 

catapultthepropaganda/join

 

Click here to join openmindopencodenews

Click to join openmindopencodenews

 

openmindopencodenews/join

 

 

We have to consider the timing of the leak that Bush authorized the

NSA to spy on Americans. The limited nature of this so-called

revelation is a story within itself. The NSA has been spying on

Americans for decades and Echelon has had the capability to track

every communication in real time for at least ten years.

 

Newsmax admits that the Clinton administration used Echelon to spy on

Americans but then performs mental gymnastics and double think by

suggesting that this makes it OK for Republicans to spy on Americans

too. No it doesn't! When Clinton did it, it was bad, when Bush does

it, it's still bad!

 

Best-selling books like those of James Bamford written in the 90's

brought to light NSA declassified documents confirming the NSA were

spying on millions of Americans by keyword logging methods.

 

 

 

In stating that the NSA watches American citizens, the New York Times

was by no means breaking an exclusive story. This was merely an

attempt to spin what was already known and try to justify it by saying

that Bush wanted to stop the terrorists. Consequently the NSA spying

on Americans if it's 'to stop Al-Qaeda' is made palatable amongst

ordinary Americans.

 

Subsequently the routine daily use of such measures becomes the norm,

because the New York Times 'exclusive' was a means of announcing the

use of such measures, coming out in the open and legitimizing the

whole program. The New York Times is selling the story to the American

people by whitewashing it.

 

 

 

 

Therefore the duality of the Patriot Act not being renewed and the NSA

'revelations' will become intertwined in the minds of the public. So

when the next terror event takes place both can be trumpeted and those

that questioned them and stood up for the 'God damned piece of paper'

that is the Constitution will be castigated as the enemy.

 

The Echelon spying network and its operational infrastructure has been

publicly admitted for a long time. The five Echelon countries, The

United States, Canada, Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand all

work in tandem to spy on each other's citizens, with Echelon personnel

loaned out to each different country. This enables them to bypass laws

stating that a government cannot spy on its own citizens, which is why

Bush, Rice, Gonzales and others have been able to spin it by saying

that the spying is international and not domestic.

 

The architecture of world government and the global surveillance grid

is already is place and has been for years. This whole process is

simply a means of announcing its presence and slowly brow-beating

Americans to accept it without dissent with revolving slick media

disinformation campaigns and phony good cop bad cop false debates.

 

 

 

 

 

Click here to listen to Alex Jones' rant on this issue.

 

http://prisonplanet.com/audio/201205alex.mp3