Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 Seductive medicines http://www.telegraphindia.com/1060130/asp/knowhow/story_5771231.asp It’s clear that prescribing patterns of most doctors are “informed” not by “evidence-based” science, but by market forces --\ ---------- Potential recruits: Drug firms are hiring beauty queens Heard about the latest coup in the world of pharmaceutical marketing? Probably not, because the latest drug promotion strategy of hiring wannabe beauty queens and cheerleaders is undergoing a trial run in the US. And once it clicks (early reports say it’s already a hit!), doctors all over the world will be enticed by nimble females to prescribe branded drugs with abandon — never mind the adverse effects on patients. It began with a report in the New York Times last November, which claimed in a front page story that drug companies are recruiting women who are alluring, rather than those academically sound. Research, quoted in the report, claimed that seductive charms of sexy representatives have indeed boosted sagging sales figures for many companies. Quite expectedly, readers — but not the medical community — were shocked by the story which shed light on yet another shady strategy by pharmaceutical companies. It blew into a controversy, calling into question the ethics of a $15.7 billion marketing business, and causing patients to worry about prescriptions. The medical community didn’t react to the news because they view sexy-drug reps as simply a variation on seductive inducements like expensive gifts, lavish dinners and speaking fees that pharma firms have dangled to sway doctors to their brands. Until recently, drug promotion begun with an innocuous-looking pen or a coffee mug. Then it graduated to sponsored meets and paid holiday trips. And now the aggressive marketeers have no qualms in pushing sexual favours to doctors. According to the NYT report, a big drug company is fighting lawsuit filed by a saleswoman who has alleged that her bosses encourage her to exploit personal relationship with doctors to increase sales. Another survey in the report found that 12 out of 13 medical saleswomen had been sexually harassed by physicians. Three years ago, the British Medical Journal published a special issue on the links between doctors and drug companies in which the cover had shown pigs in white coats lunching with weasel drug reps. At the time, it seemed strong stuff and there was a murmur of protests from the medical fraternity. But now new revelations suggest that the reality is even worse. The power of the drug companies to buy influence over the health care industry has crossed all limits. Thanks to their lavish spending on shady marketing, little is invested on research and development of new drugs. Furthermore, high-pitch sales tactics can turn dangerous drugs like Vioxx into blockbusters. It’s clear that prescribing patterns of most doctors are “informed” not by “evidence-based” science, but by market forces. So why bother with doctors as middlemen? Why not just license pretty young ladies prescribe directly to patients? PRASUN CHAUDHURI " Our ideal is not the spirituality that withdraws from life but the conquest of life by the power of the spirit. " - Aurobindo. With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.