HOW MUCH DID BUSH KNOW?

[Guest guest]

S

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:09:33 -0800 (PST)

HOW MUCH DID BUSH KNOW?

 

 

 

HOW MUCH DID BUSH KNOW?

 

Condoleezza Rice testified at the 9/11 hearings that shortly before

9/11 she reported to Bush that Osama Bin Laden was planning on

high-jacking planes and flying them into buildings.

 

We can conclude that Bush was very much aware of the possibility of

the kind of attack that occurred on 9/11.

 

On 9/11 Bush was in a Florida school when the attack occurred.

Reporters were present. So the world was aware of his location. It

would be an expected assumption that the President of the United

States would likely be on a list of prime targets. On learning of the

plane striking the North tower the natural response would be for the

President to get out of the school as fast as possible, and also order

an immediate evacuation. Bush did not leave the school till 27 minutes

later (and no evacuation order).

 

Bush knew he was safe. Just how much did he know?

 

 

 

 

Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax

 

Scholars for 9/11 Truth call for verification and publication by

an international consortium.

 

Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished

experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer,

Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow,

have concluded that senior government officials have covered up

crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.

 

They have joined with others in common cause as members of

" Scholars for 9/11 Truth " (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based

on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the

nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.

 

These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by

elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into

supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned

absent " another Pearl Harbor. "

 

They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating

itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an

unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or

wishful thinking.

 

They are encouraging news services around the world to secure

scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to

verify or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they

believe, require extraordinary measures.

 

If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of

history would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its

perpetrators would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for

saving this nation from ever greater abuse.

 

They hope this might include The New York Times, which, in their

opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expecedt

from our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable

lapses. It has failed to vigorously investigate tainted elections,

lies leading to the war in Iraq, or illegal NSA spying on the American

people, major unconstitutional events. In their view, The Times might

compensate for its loss of stature by helping to reveal the truth

about one of the great turning-point events of modern history.

 

Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government

has brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of

their knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or

dereliction of duty. The official conspiracy theory--that nineteen

Arab hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan

brought this about--is unsupportable by the evidential data, which

they have studied. They even believe there are good reasons for

suspecting that video tapes officially attributed to Osama bin Laden

are not genuine.

 

They have found the government's own investigiation to be severely

flawed. The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was

directed by Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the

NSA sector and the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush

supporter and director of national security affairs, he could hardly

be expected to conduct an objective and impartial investigation.

 

They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete

with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray

Griffin has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report:

Omissions and Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely

ignores the collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no

airplanes, was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours

after the attack.

 

Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts

and scholar find profoundly troubling:

 

* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise

buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or

since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How

is this possible?

 

* The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged

" hijackers " have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet

according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How

is this possible?

 

* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the

buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to

withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like

" puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil. " Yet they completely

collapsed. How is this possible?

 

* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the

temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal

conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours,

the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is

this possible?

 

* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar

screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to " reappear "

in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is

this possible?

 

* Foreign " terrorists " who were clever enough to coordinate

hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the

least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing.

How is this possible?

 

* Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground

bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a

young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the

Pentagon, " Do the orders still stand? " The order cannot have been to

shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?

 

* A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that

Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left

debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but

it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this

possible?

 

* A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on

duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and

distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is

this possible?

 

* The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called " MASCAL "

simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October

2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted

that " no one ever imagined " a domestic airplane could be used as a

weapon. How is this possible?

 

Their own physics research has established that only controlled

demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and

virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings.

While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down

into their own footprints.

 

These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to

conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the

approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's

closest adviser--of " creating our own reality. "

 

http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/1/emw339303.htm

 

Mail