Guest guest Posted March 11, 2006 Report Share Posted March 11, 2006 http://www.organicconsumers.org/foodsafety/passed060309.cfm " Bought & Sold' House Passes Federal Measure to Kill 200 State Food Safety Labeling Laws Web Note: Ignoring 50,000 letters and phone calls from members of the Organic Consumers Association (as well as an equal number of calls and letters from other public interest organizations), Congress voted yesterday to ban local and state laws requiring food safety labels. OCA and our allies have vowed to stop this law from being passed in the U.S. Senate. Environment News Service <www.ens-newswire.com> National Uniform Food Act Would Kill State Protections WASHINGTON, DC, March 8, 2006 (ENS) The U.S. House of Representatives today passed controversial legislation that would eliminate more than 200 state food safety and public health protections. The National Uniformity for Food Act, H.R. 4167, is opposed by environmental groups, Democratic legislators and a majority of state attorneys general. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that H.R. 4167, introduced by Congressman Mike Rogers, a Michigan Republican, last October, would cost taxpayers $100 million over the next five years, with unknown additional costs on the federal government and state and local governments. Democratic Congressman Henry Waxman of California said no Congressional hearings were held on this bill. " Dozens of public health and environmental groups, 39 state attorneys general, the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, and the Association of Food and Drug Officials have all expressed their strong opposition to this legislation, but they have never been given an opportunity to explain their concerns to Congress, " Waxman said. Today, Congressman Tom Udall, a New Mexico Democrat, said, " This legislation is vaguely written and jeopardizes consumer protections. The impact of certain provisions in this bill on state and local regulations is ambiguous at best and state and local governments - who are in charge of 80 percent of food inspections - will lose significant authority to protect their citizens. " H.R. 4167 would shift the balance of power between the states and federal government, critics say. They object that the bill would undermine states' ability to prepare for and respond to terrorist threats to the food supply; prevent states from requiring consumer notifications about health risks associated with certain foods; and create a new federal bureaucracy to review and, potentially disapprove, new state food safety laws. California Attorney General Bill Lockyer says the bill specifically targets California's voter-approved Proposition 65, a 1986 law requiring businesses to provide " clear and reasonable " warnings when they expose consumers to known reproductive toxins, such as mercury. Congressman Bart Stupak of Michigan, introduced an answering resolution that would allow for state notification regarding the treatment of meat, poultry, or fish with carbon monoxide. " The House is trampling crucial health safeguards in every state without so much as a single public hearing, " said Erik Olson, senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council. " This just proves the old adage money talks. The food industry spared no expense to assure its passage. " A new report released Tuesday by the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Center for Science in the Public Interest, " Shredding the Food Safety Net, " finds that the the proposed bill would preempt shellfish safety standard laws in at least 16 states, milk safety laws in all 50 states, and, restaurant and food service establishment safety laws in 50 states. " The bill also targets a law limiting levels of toxic lead in candies, a law requiring warnings to consumers about excessive levels of toxic chemicals in foods that cause cancer, birth defects, or developmental problems, and laws requiring labeling of fish as farm-raised or wild, " the report states. " Shredding the Food Safety Net " can be found at: http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/factsheets/leg_06030701a.pdf. Share your thoughts at OCA's web forum! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.