Fwd: Eaten any food lately?

[Guest guest]

http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/34807/

 

Special Favors for Special Interests

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet

Posted on April 11, 2006, Printed on April 11, 2006

http://www.alternet.org/story/34807/

 

We need to keep up with the daily drip, that endless succession of special

favors for special interests performed by Congress, or we'll never figure

out how we got so far behind the eight ball. While the top Bushies lunge

about test-driving new wars (great idea -- the one we're having is a

bummer, so let's start another!), Congress just keeps right on cranking

out those corporate goodies.

 

Earlier this month, the House effectively repealed more than 200 state

food safety and public health protections. Say, when was the last time you

enjoyed a little touch of food poisoning? Coming soon to a stomach near

you. What was really impressive about HR 4167, the " National Uniformity

for Food Act, " is that it was passed without a public hearing.

 

" The House is trampling crucial health safeguards in every state without

so much as a single public hearing, " said Erik Olson, attorney for the

Natural Resources Defense Council. " This just proves the old adage, 'Money

talks.' The food industry spared no expense to ensure passage. "

 

Thirty-nine attorneys general, plus health, consumer and environmental

groups, are opposing the law. According to the Center for Responsive

Politics, the food industry has spent more than $81 million on campaign

contributions to members of Congress since 2000.

 

The bill would automatically override any state measure that is stronger

than federal law, the opposite of what a sensible law would do. The NRDC

says state laws protecting consumers from chemical additives, bacteria and

ingredients that can trigger allergic reactions would be barred, and that

includes alerts about chemical contamination in fish, health protection

standards for milk and eggs, and warnings about chemicals or toxins such

as arsenic, mercury and lead.

 

Happy eating, all.

 

Here's another little gem, one of those " it was after midnight and

everyone wanted to go home " deals. Just a no-cost sweetener to encourage

oil and gas companies to drill in the Gulf of Mexico -- and who needs more

encouragement these days than the oil companies? The poor things are

making hardly any money at all. Just have the federal government waive the

royalty rights for drilling in the publicly owned waters. Turns out this

waiver will cost the government at least $7 billion over the next five

years.

 

I roared with laughter upon reading that Texas Rep. Joe Barton had assured

his colleagues the provision of the energy bill was " so non-controversial "

that senior House and Senate negotiators had not even discussed it. That's

one of the oldest ploys in the Texas handbook of sneaky tricks and has

been successfully used to pass many a sweet deal for the oil industry.

 

" The big lie about this whole program is that it doesn't cost anything, "

Massachusetts Rep. Edward Markey told The New York Times. " Taxpayers are

being asked to provide huge subsidies to oil companies to produce oil --

it's like subsidizing a fish to swim. "

 

Then there are daily drips so strange it's hard to tell if members of

Congress are clear on what they're doing. You may have heard that more and

more corporations are backing out of their pension obligations and dumping

the responsibility on an under-funded federal agency.

 

So the push is on to get companies to pony up for the pension agency.

According to the Financial Times: " Employers will be able to slash their

contributions to under-funded pension schemes by tens of billions of

dollars over the next five years under proposed legislation before

Congress that was expected to have the opposite effect. The legislation

was proposed by the White House last year to lessen the risk of a taxpayer

bailout of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., a federal safety net for

pension schemes. "

 

Brilliant. Anyone know how the White House went from protecting the

Benefit Guaranty Corp. to slashing corporate contributions by tens of

billions? Did they send Michael " Brownie " Brown to do the job?

 

Long ago, Abraham Lincoln wrote, " Corporations have been enthroned and an

era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money-power of the

country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices

of the people until all wealth is aggregated in few hands and the republic

is destroyed. "