Negative info on Colloidal Silver is bunk

[Guest guest]

Yes there are flaws in it - it comes from Memorial Sloan Kettering, one of the biggest mainstream tools in the universe whose existence depends on failed cancer treatments and mainstream drugs.Sloan Kettering is the same hospital that fired Ralph Moss after he exposed them for covering up the truth and trying to get their researchers to perjure themselves about trials they conducted on laetrile.Their head of oncology has stated that there has never been one single case of cancer that has been cured by alternative treatment methods.In short, they disgust me thoroughly!Anytime you see mainstream studies that are negative towards a popular alternative that represents competition to their hundreds of billions in profits, like silver is, you can pretty will figure that it probably works.In FDA studies, the minimum amount of silver one must take to reach a toxic effect is a mere 65,000 tablespoons of 20 ppm silver like Utopia Silver's product. The volume of liquid alone would kill you long before you had any toxic effects from silver.People do NOT turn blue from tiny particle true colloidal silver. They turn blue from huge amounts of improperly made large particle ionic silver that has been contaminated by salt and/or animal protein to form silver chloride in particle sizes and amounts too large for the liver to properly eliminate before they venture into sunlight and get a reaction from the sunlight and the silver chloride. It won't happen with quality colloidal silver.Meanwhile, studies have shown that human nervous tissue has silver receptors on it - meaning that silver is actually a vital trace element for all humans, and helping explain how silver actually regenerates nerves the same as it does bones, skin and other tissue.Tony

interesting. It's what helps keeps us and our forums going! For more

info see --- In oleander soup , "lillisilly" <evangelnet wrote:>> I know there must be flaws in this. > > http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/69189.cfm>