Skewed studies, the EPA and colloidal silver

[Guest guest]

I read the entire " study " and here is my take. Like many studies which

are not really study, this one really just reviewed other studies and

then did a cut an paste job to support the conclusion it wanted to

convey in the first place. In the process, much like other studies

which may have ulterior motives, there was a lot of apples and oranges

comparisons used to try to paint a picture of dangers from the use of

colloidal silver.

 

We have seen no end to similar studies warning us about the dangers of

taking vitamins and minerals - particularly after a genuine study or

other evidence becomes known that tell us of the benefits which might

endanger drug company profits by helping people avoid the trap of

mainstream managed illness and a lifetime of increasing drug use and

side effects.

 

The " study " or review or whatever you want to call it, actually begins

innocently enough and the beginning is where I found the only useful

information, including:

 

Only now has silver arrived as the natural immune system assistant it

was in the early days of mankind when it was plentiful in its metallic

form in ground water.

 

Silver is a naturally occuring precious metal.

 

Silver metal and silver dressings, when used in reasonable amounts, has

no negative effects on the human body and it has a natural antimicrobial

activity on many pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, yeast, etc.

 

After that it deterioriates into a mishmash of facts which try to

conclude that nano-particles of silver may be dangerous to the

environment and the body itself.

 

For example, it quotes studys about silver toxicity on fish gills

conducted in the Bay of San Francisco. Never mind that the silver

contamination found in the Bay of San Francisco is from industrial

silver compounds and NOT from nano-particles of pure silver.

 

It also refers to CSP silver, which is the abbreviation for Colloidal

Silver Protein, which is not true colloidal nano-silver at all, but is

rather silver particles that are so large that they have to be suspended

in animal protein - protein which the skin has an affinity for and which

could indeed lead to the blue skin condition of argyria that the study

tries to warn about.

 

In much the same way, one of the two " blue people " that have been

paraded before the mainstream media, no doubt with considerable help

from mainstream medicine, is Rosemary Jacobs - who was prescribed silver

NITRATE nose drops years ago by a mainstream MD and proceeded to take

them in such quantity and over a long enough period of time that she

turned greyish blue. The other blue star is of course Papa Smurf Paul

Karason who claims to be shy but has travelled coast to coast for the

past year enjoying the publicity of being blue as a result of making

home-made ionic silver which he contaminated with salt and drank in

quantities of over a quart a day for what has now been years.

 

No one has probably consumed more silver, and not even the right kind,

than Karason. He is also one of the best refutations of all the

propaganda and innuendo about silver. He was given a complete physical

at Mount Sinai Hospital and, despite his blue skin, was given a clean

bill of health. So much for any physical dangers from silver!

 

I find all the negative publicity, EPA petitions, harassment of Utopia

Silver (which is specifically mentioned as one of the offenders in the

EPA petition, by the way), parade of blue people, stated intentions of

the EPA to classify silver generators as pesticides, etc. to be too much

to consider as coincidental - especially since they have come on the

heels of the FDA's stated intention to make silver a target.

 

Follow the money and what do you find? You find that those who have the

most to lose or gain are none other than our friendly world pharma

folks. who has billions of dollars in profits at risk from their lab

created drugs that kill hundreds of thousands of us each year.

 

If silver is a pesticide because it kills bacteria, fungi, viruses,

yeast, mold, etc., then what about germicidal soaps and cleansers,

bleach, alcohol, disinfectants, and yes, antibiotics?

 

And if a silver generator is a pesticide maker because it reduces a

basic mineral to nano-sized particles, then what about plants - as in

veggies and fruits? They do the same thing when they ingest minerals,

including silver.

 

If there really is a danger of argyris, by the way, why is it that with

tens of millions of people around the world using colloidal and ionic

silver we do not see entire tribes of smurfs running around?

 

Silver has been ingested and used by mankind for thousands of years. It

has been in our environment for millions of years while plants, animals,

aquatic life and mankind has flourished. Reducing .999 pure silver to

nano-sized particles merely returns it to a form closer to the most

basic of all forms, the silver atom. Unless it is contaminated into

some kind of chemical compound by an industrial process, there should be

no danger whatsoever from re-introducing it to the ecosphere from whence

it came.

 

I probably will not leave that file posted for long - it gives a

completely distorted view of true colloidal silver.

 

In the meanwhile I urge everyone to send their emails and post their

comments to the EPA about the purely rediculous petition!

 

 

 

oleander soup , " simonflynn22 " <simon041082

wrote:

>

>

> Just wondering if anyone has seen this review on silver and its

effects

> on health/environment?

>

> https://www.zsf.jcu.cz/jab/6_3/havel.pdf/

>

> There's a lot of talk about argyria (which we know can occur from

> inferior, poor quality c.s.) but there's also a few other bits and

> pieces that would lead most people to the conclusion that nano silver

> can potentially be quite damaging.

> I'm assuming that the majority of the info is B.S. Is there any truth

> here at all?

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks for that Tony. I now have a response for people if they try and

use studies such as that as the basis of their argument against

colloidal silver. I like to be able to give hard facts rather than just

tell people they're being lied to. File has been deleted and sent back

to where it came from!

 

Thanks,

 

Simon