The one thing you must know about cancer

February 9, 2009

Here is a subscription teaser from WDDTY - however, I believe lack of mammograms in the unscreened group might be the factor in the fewer cancers. What makes me very upset is that this inefficient, diagnostic and expensive tool contributes to cancer.

The most mysterious thing about cancer. . .

Most of us accept the standard medical view that cancer is a disease that will prove fatal if it's left untreated.

But what happens in the very few cases when it is not treated? It's an unthinkable thought, but researchers in Oslo found out by accident when they tracked two groups of women - similar in every regard - for breast cancer.

One had the standard screening of regular mammograms, and the other just had one mammogram at the end of a six-year period.

The results astonished the researchers. The women who had not been screened had 22 per cent fewer cases of breast cancer than the screened group - but why, when everything else was equal?

There was only one conclusion. During those six years, the unscreened group developed breast cancers that went away of their own accord.

This extraordinary story - and its implications - is told in the very latest issue of 'What Doctors Don't Tell You', the health journal for intelligent readers. It's available only to those of you who take out a full subscription. You can start yours today - and get the special cancer report - by following this link.

Examples of spontaneous regression, as medicine calls the phenomenon, are not as rare as you might think. Cancers often naturally disappear in children under the age of 12 months, while 23 per cent of cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma have also spontaneously regressed.

The problem is that cancer, once diagnosed, is almost always treated, as it would be unethical to do otherwise, unless the patient was too near death for therapy to have any benefit.

This is exactly what happened to one man in New York who was sent home to die. But three weeks later, he was fully recovered and was completely cancer free - without any treatment of any sort.

So what had happened to him in the days after he went home? He told his story to one doctor from New York - and it started the doctor on a new path, and a better understanding of what cancer is.

You can find out what happened to him - which will give you new insight into cancer - when you to 'What Doctors Don't Tell You'. The special cancer report is ready to be mailed to all new rs, and you can begin yours today by following this link.

In health

Bryan Hubbard

Publisher

PS: Every new r also receives - with our compliments - a CD of our health research spanning 16 years of investigation. This rich resource normally retails for £200 ($280) but we offer it as a 'thank you' gift for subscribing, and supporting our work.

PPS: The cancer report is available only to those who take out a full subscription. It is not available to those who try the trial £4.99 subscription offer - although you are very welcome to do so.

This message has been brought to you by: What Doctors Don't Tell You is a trading name of Wddty Ltd.

Company registration No. 3065168. Registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Unit 10 Woodman Works, 204 Durnsford Road, London, SW19 8DR. Vat Number 833 0913 46

WDDTY Limited, Unit 10 Woodman Works, 204 Durnsford Road, London, B8 SW19 8DR, UNITED KINGDOM

To or change r options visit:

http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?bJxMzKwMtCxM7OysnKyctEa0LMyszOzMzA==

February 9, 2009

I never understood how they came to the conclusion that the ONLY explanation of why there were 22% fewer of the unscreened women who had cancer had to be spontaneous remissions. One could easily look at the data and say that since all things were supposedly equal other than mammograms, the mammograms themselves would be prime suspects as causal agents in either causing the cancers or causing cancers to not spontaneously remit - or both.

I like WDDTY, but presenting their "conclusion" as the only explanation seems too much of a sales pitch to me

oleander soup , Maracuja <howdurdago wrote:>> > Here is a subscription teaser from WDDTY - however, I believe lack of mammograms in the unscreened group might be the factor in the fewer cancers. What makes me very upset is that this inefficient, diagnostic and expensive tool contributes to cancer.