Guest guest Posted July 22, 2004 Report Share Posted July 22, 2004 I hesitate to chime in here, and love the old classics to the point of almost worship, but my chinese training was ok w moxa with the 'general' caution in cases of true and false heat(meaning heat, period). I have read older material that sometimes recommended moxa for conditions including those involving damp and phlegm, and teachers from china I have had saw the subject as, sometimes the moxa's stimulating effect is seen as more than the heating effect, but as the patients often show both heat and cold signs, it seemed better to weigh each aspect of each case. Season,constitution and usual considerations also determine what action to take. So not being an authority, all I can say is I use it. (one for moxa in damp/phlegm.. ah... sometimes) >Fire is within any particle of phlegm, be it cold or damp > or stagnated. I took that to mean fire is a causative in making phlegm from damp, and a resultant in the lingering prescence of damp/phlegm, be it true fire, yin def fire, summer fire, or good old yin fires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.