Shhh!!! What If It Was Reported That They Are Spraying Aluminum?

[Guest guest]

I hope you are all on a good detox maintenance, always. It's absolutely

necessary in our time.

Liz

 

 

 

Elizabeth Brandegee

Classical Homeopath

 

 

----- Forwarded Message ----

Viviane Lerner <vivlerner

 

 

 

>>Shockwaves were sent around the globe after the AAAS meeting because of

reports that led many to believe that the destruction of eco-systems and the

massive amounts of aluminum found in the snow, rain and soil are in fact from

SAG programs that have already been deployed. As a result of these reports, many

around the world are asking questions about the current deployment and the

dangers of using aluminum in these programs. And finally, journalists are

restricted from reporting certain facts from this conference that could be

damaging to the SAG agenda.<<

=======http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy060410.htm

Shhh!!! What If It Was Reported That They Are Spraying Aluminum?

By Michael J. Murphy

06 April, 2010

Countercurrents.org

Could a Ban of Transparent Reporting at the Asilomar Conference be an Attempt to

Cover-Up World-Wide Contamination From Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-Engineering

Programs?

Geo-engineers gathered once again near Monterey California at the Asilomar

International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies meeting to develop

norms and guidelines for what they say will be “controlled experimentationâ€

on geo-engineering the planet. While many claim that stratospheric aerosol

geo-engineering (SAG), aka chemtrail programs are in full-scale deployment,

organizers of this meeting showed a lack of transparency by either denying or

holding reporters to a high set of rules which limited what information was

brought to the attention of the public. While we might never know how much

information from the conference was suppressed in articles and reports, we do

know some of the information that was not included. The issue of current SAG

deployment and the use of aluminum in these programs seemed to be missing from

reports and articles that came out of the conference.

Mauro Oliveira, webmaster of http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ said that

aluminum became a concern to many after the American Association for the

Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting when independent journalists sent

shockwaves around the world after breaking the story of scientists discussing

the plausibility of spraying 10 to 20 mega-tons of aluminum into the sky in SAG

campaigns. Francis Mangels, a retired USDA/USFS Biologist commented on the use

of aluminum by saying, “although aluminum is an abundant element, it does not

exist naturally in the environment in free form. Dispersing massive amounts of

ultra-fine aluminum particulates as proposed by geo-engineers into the

stratosphere would have unquantifiable human health and environmental

impactsâ€. When scientists were asked about the risks associated with the use

of aluminum sprayed as an aerosol in SAG programs, they admitted that they have

only begun to research aluminum and have published

nothing. They also admitted that something terrible could be found in the

future that they don’t know about. Also, when asked about deployment of

current programs, scientists denied that any SAG programs have been deployed.

This contradicted the findings of many who claim that SAG programs are well

under-way and that high amounts of aluminum and other harmful substances from

these programs are being found resulting in the devastation of eco-systems and

the health of people around the world.

Like the AAAS meeting, the Asilomar geo-engineering conference hosted some of

the world’s leading geo-engineers, environmental groups and scientists who

gathered to discuss various issues relating to SAG. Unlike the AAAS meeting,

reporters were either denied attendance or set to a high standard of rules which

included a ban on daily reporting, quoting, and recording anything from the

meeting without the consent of presenters. Stewart Howe was one of the reporters

denied access into the conference. Howe helped break the story about aluminum

when he was sent to the AAAS meeting in San Diego to report for Infowars. He

feels that he was denied access because of this and his reporting of evidence

that suggests SAG programs are in full-scale deployment. Howe said, “due to

the devastating effects of aluminum and world-wide claims of current deployment,

transparent reporting of this could devastate the entire SAG agenda compromising

billions of dollars in

contracts.†He went on to say that it was apparent that this meeting had no

intentions of being transparent.

Whereas many reporters were denied access to this event, some “privilegedâ€

journalists did have the opportunity to attend. Although some of the articles

about the conference appeared to be critical of geo-engineering, they largely

ignored the use of aluminum and other serious issues that could have impacted or

changed the damaging components of the SAG agenda. Due to their agreement to the

strict, non-transparent guidelines of the conference, the reporting journalists

not only helped keep some of the meeting secret, they also helped hide the fact

that geo-engineers are “planning†to use aluminum in SAG programs. Some

articles were also falsely written stating that geo-engineers are planning on

using sulfur in the various SAG campaigns. This contradicts articles written by

some reporters who attended the AAAS meeting and quoted scientists as stating

that they initially considered using sulfur for the program; however, aluminum

is more effective

and will be the ingredient considered for use. To date, scientists have not

corrected the journalists who falsely reported the use of less damaging sulfur

instead of harmful aluminum as being an ingredient for SAG programs.

Let’s look at this issue a little more closely. People from around the world

are witnessing white trails behind airplanes and believe them to be a product of

SAG programs that scientists deny exist. People are also reporting test results

of high amounts of aluminum, barium and strontium in their snow, rain and soil

where the alleged spraying is occurring. These are the exact substances that

scientists are “considering†implementing into the various SAG programs

discussed at the AAAS meeting. Shockwaves were sent around the globe after the

AAAS meeting because of reports that led many to believe that the destruction of

eco-systems and the massive amounts of aluminum found in the snow, rain and soil

are in fact from SAG programs that have already been deployed. As a result of

these reports, many around the world are asking questions about the current

deployment and the dangers of using aluminum in these programs. And finally,

journalists are

restricted from reporting certain facts from this conference that could be

damaging to the SAG agenda.

Could transparent reporting of certain facts threaten the current and future

deployment of SAG programs around the world? Could denying independent reporters

the freedom to openly report on this meeting be an attempt to cover-up

allegations that SAG programs are in full-scale deployment and are also

destroying eco-systems around the world with the use of aluminum? Is it possible

that the reporters who were allowed into this meeting were invited for the

purpose of protecting the corporate and political interests of those involved

with SAG programs? What would the political and monetary implications be for

those who have vested interests in SAG if the larger public was made aware of

the multiple environmental and health effects of spraying mega-tons of aluminum

into our environment? Whatever the reason for this lack of transparency and

denial of information, we the public need to hold both reporters and scientists

to a higher degree of professionalism,

transparency and ethical consideration when it comes to these and other issues

of public interests. The future of our health and environment is dependent upon

it. More information and videos on the subject of geo-engineering/chemtrails can

be found on my blog at http://truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com/ . I can be

reached at whtagft.

------

Michael J. Murphy is a peaceful non-violent independent journalist and political

activist from the Los Angeles area whose work focuses on issues that go beyond

the interest of the Corporate mainstream media. Michael's interviews include; G.

Edward Griffin, Chelene Nightingale (California Governor candidate), Jim King

(California lieutenant Governor candidate), Mark Reed (California congressional

candidate), Bill Hunt (Orange County Sheriff candidate), Jenny Worman

(California congressional candidate), Stewart Rhodes (Oath Keepers, Founder) and

Ed Asner (Actor " Mary Tyler Moore " , " Lou Grant " and " UP " ). Michael has also made

a series of short films that address controversial political issues. Many of his

interviews and videos can be seen on his blog at

http://truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com/. He can be reached by e-mail at:

whtagft.

 

=====

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed

without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included information for research and educational purposes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

I hope you are all on a good detox maintenance, always. It's absolutely necessary in our time.LizElizabeth Brandegee Classical Homeopath ----- Forwarded Message

----Viviane Lerner

<vivlerner

>>Shockwaves were sent around the globe after the AAAS meeting because of reports that led many to believe that the destruction of eco-systems and the massive amounts of aluminum found in the snow, rain and soil are in fact from SAG programs that have already been deployed. As a result of these reports, many around the world are asking questions about the current deployment and the dangers of using aluminum in these programs. And finally, journalists are restricted from reporting certain facts from this conference that could be damaging to the SAG agenda.<<=======http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy060410.htmShhh!!! What If It Was Reported That They Are Spraying Aluminum?By Michael J. Murphy06 April, 2010 Countercurrents.orgCould a Ban of Transparent Reporting at the Asilomar Conference be an Attempt to Cover-Up World-Wide Contamination From Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-Engineering Programs?Geo-engineers gathered once again near Monterey California at the Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies meeting to develop norms and guidelines for what they

say will be “controlled experimentation†on geo-engineering the planet. While many claim that stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering (SAG), aka chemtrail programs are in full-scale deployment, organizers of this meeting showed a lack of transparency by either denying or holding reporters to a high set of rules which limited what information was brought to the attention of the public. While we might never know how much information from the conference was suppressed in articles and reports, we do know some of the information that was not included. The issue of current SAG deployment and the use of aluminum in these programs seemed to be missing from reports and articles that came out of the conference.Mauro Oliveira, webmaster of http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ said that aluminum became a concern to many after the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting when independent journalists sent shockwaves around the world after breaking the story of scientists discussing the plausibility of spraying 10 to 20 mega-tons of aluminum into the sky in SAG campaigns. Francis Mangels, a retired USDA/USFS Biologist commented on the use of aluminum by saying, “although aluminum is an abundant element, it does not exist naturally in the environment in free form. Dispersing massive amounts of ultra-fine aluminum particulates as proposed by geo-engineers into the stratosphere would have unquantifiable human health and environmental impactsâ€. When scientists were asked about the risks associated with the use of aluminum sprayed as an

aerosol in SAG programs, they admitted that they have only begun to research aluminum and have published nothing. They also admitted that something terrible could be found in the future that they don’t know about. Also, when asked about deployment of current programs, scientists denied that any SAG programs have been deployed. This contradicted the findings of many who claim that SAG programs are well under-way and that high amounts of aluminum and other harmful substances from these programs are being found resulting in the devastation of eco-systems and the health of people around the world.Like the AAAS meeting, the Asilomar geo-engineering conference hosted some of the world’s leading

geo-engineers, environmental groups and scientists who gathered to discuss various issues relating to SAG. Unlike the AAAS meeting, reporters were either denied attendance or set to a high standard of rules which included a ban on daily reporting, quoting, and recording anything from the meeting without the consent of presenters. Stewart Howe was one of the reporters denied access into the conference. Howe helped break the story about aluminum when he was sent to the AAAS meeting in San Diego to report for Infowars. He feels that he was denied access because of this and his reporting of evidence that suggests SAG programs are in full-scale deployment. Howe said, “due to the devastating effects of aluminum and world-wide claims of current deployment, transparent reporting of this could devastate the entire SAG agenda compromising billions of dollars in contracts.†He went on to say that it was apparent that this meeting had no intentions of being

transparent.Whereas many reporters were denied access to this event, some “privileged†journalists did have the opportunity to attend. Although some of the articles about the conference appeared to be critical of geo-engineering, they largely ignored the use of aluminum and other serious issues that could have impacted or changed the damaging components of the SAG agenda. Due to their agreement to the strict, non-transparent guidelines of the conference, the reporting journalists not only helped keep some of the meeting secret, they also helped hide the fact that geo-engineers are “planning†to use aluminum in SAG programs. Some articles were also falsely written stating that

geo-engineers are planning on using sulfur in the various SAG campaigns. This contradicts articles written by some reporters who attended the AAAS meeting and quoted scientists as stating that they initially considered using sulfur for the program; however, aluminum is more effective and will be the ingredient considered for use. To date, scientists have not corrected the journalists who falsely reported the use of less damaging sulfur instead of harmful aluminum as being an ingredient for SAG programs.Let’s look at this issue a little more closely. People from around the world are witnessing white trails behind airplanes and believe them to be a product of SAG programs that scientists deny

exist. People are also reporting test results of high amounts of aluminum, barium and strontium in their snow, rain and soil where the alleged spraying is occurring. These are the exact substances that scientists are “considering†implementing into the various SAG programs discussed at the AAAS meeting. Shockwaves were sent around the globe after the AAAS meeting because of reports that led many to believe that the destruction of eco-systems and the massive amounts of aluminum found in the snow, rain and soil are in fact from SAG programs that have already been deployed. As a result of these reports, many around the world are asking questions about the current deployment and the dangers of using aluminum in these programs. And finally, journalists are restricted from reporting certain facts from this conference that could be damaging to the SAG agenda.Could transparent reporting of certain facts threaten the current and future deployment of SAG programs around the world? Could denying independent reporters the freedom to openly report on this meeting be an attempt to cover-up allegations that SAG programs are in full-scale deployment and are also destroying eco-systems around the world with the use of aluminum? Is it possible that the reporters who were allowed into this meeting were invited for the purpose of protecting the corporate and political interests of those involved with SAG programs? What would the political and monetary implications be for those who have vested interests in SAG if the larger public was made aware of the multiple environmental and health effects of spraying mega-tons of aluminum into our environment?

Whatever the reason for this lack of transparency and denial of information, we the public need to hold both reporters and scientists to a higher degree of professionalism, transparency and ethical consideration when it comes to these and other issues of public interests. The future of our health and environment is dependent upon it. More information and videos on the subject of geo-engineering/chemtrails can be found on my blog at http://truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com/ . I can be reached at whtagft.------Michael J. Murphy is a peaceful non-violent independent journalist and political activist from the Los Angeles area whose work focuses on issues that go beyond the interest of the Corporate mainstream media. Michael's interviews include; G. Edward Griffin, Chelene Nightingale (California Governor candidate), Jim King (California lieutenant Governor candidate), Mark Reed (California congressional candidate), Bill Hunt (Orange County Sheriff candidate), Jenny Worman (California congressional candidate), Stewart Rhodes (Oath Keepers, Founder) and Ed Asner (Actor "Mary Tyler Moore", "Lou Grant" and "UP"). Michael has also made a series of short films that address controversial political issues. Many of his interviews and videos can be seen on

his blog at http://truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com/. He can be reached by e-mail at: whtagft. =====In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.