Sneak attack on Alternative Health Care

[Guest guest]

ROCK WASHINGTON, DC NOW: FDA, SUPPLEMENTS AND SO-CALLED HATE CRIME BILL

 

http://newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd265.htm

 

 

 

By: Devvy

April 26, 2007

 

© 2007 - NewsWithViews.com

 

I'm going to cut to the chase here on the latest efforts by non elected

government bureaucrats and Congress to further destroy our natural rights.

First, our right to natural health care and supplements, which cuts into the

mega billions of dollars in profit to the big pharmaceutical companies, see

Tom DeWeese's recent column:

 

" The Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has launched another sneak-attack,

trying to regulate your health freedom into oblivion. Through FDA's unholy

partnerships with Big Pharma and the Codex Alimentarius Commission (an

offshoot of the UN), we are very close to losing alternative health care in

America. This is a crisis, and needs your immediate action. "

 

The loons behind this new world order nightmare where every aspect of our

life is controlled, include water to be regulated! Think I'm blowing some

conspiracy junk? " The website noted that among likely developments if the

FDA has its way: Growing and selling common garden herbs will get you

arrested as a drug dealer. Massage oils and handheld massagers will be

regulated as " medical devices. " Vegetable juice will be regulated as a drug.

Weight machines will be regulated as " medical devices " and require FDA

approval before being sold or used. Raw sprouts and other anti-cancer foods

will be regulated as drugs. Bottled water that " treats " dehydration will be

regulated as a drug..... " Read the rest of this factual column here.

 

Anyone who has done even a minimal amount of research is fully aware that

the FDA is nothing more than a pimping operation for the big pharma houses.

The question is this: does the FDA have any authority to regulate natural

food supplements and vitamins, never mind water? First one has to understand

jurisdiction and treaties. Let me quote constitutional attorney, Larry

Becraft:

 

" Control over the possession and sale of any item within the states is not a

power possessed by Congress. This was so held in United States v. DeWitt, 76

U.S. 41, 45 (1870), which tested the constitutionality of a federal revenue

act making it illegal to sell illuminating oil of a certain flammability.

Here, the Court held Congress did not have the power to penalize these

sales:

 

" As a police regulation, relating exclusively to the internal trade of the

States, it can only have effect where the legislative authority of Congress

excludes, territorially, all state legislation, as, for example, in the

District of Columbia. Within state limits, it can have no constitutional

operation. "

 

" More than 40 years later, Congress enacted a federal drug law designed to

make criminal the possession of contraband drugs like opium. Based upon the

decision in DeWitt, the Supreme Court held in United States v. Jim Fuey Moy,

241 U.S. 394 (1916), that Congress did not have power to make penal mere

possession of drugs within the states. These two cases have never been

reversed, so how did we get the DEA? Like the Fish & Wildlife Service, the

origins of this federal agency is also in treaties.

 

" In 1912, the Senate adopted the International Opium Convention - see 38

Stat. 1912. Later, this convention was supplemented by a similar convention

of 1913, the Multilateral Narcotics Drugs Convention, ratified on March 31,

1932, 48 Stat. 1543, which was thereafter implemented by appropriate federal

legislation designed to control poppy production within this country. In

Stutz v. Bureau of Narcotics, 56 F.Supp. 810, 813 (N.D.Cal. 1944), some

poppy growers sought an injunction to enforcement against them of the

provisions of the act implementing the convention, their argument being the

act invaded the reserved powers of the Tenth Amendment. In rejecting this

argument and holding that the act applied within the jurisdiction of

California, the Court declared:

 

" The competency of the United States to enter into treaty stipulations with

foreign powers designed to establish, through appropriate legislation, an

internationally effective system of control over the production and

distribution of habit forming drugs is not questioned. The obligations of

the United States incurred as a party to the two Conventions heretofore

mentioned were lawfully undertaken in the proper exercise of its treaty

making power. And Congress is constitutionally empowered to enact whatever

legislation is necessary and proper for carrying into execution the treaty

making power of the United States. "

 

" Other cases have also noted that control over drugs by the federal

government arises from these treaties - see United States v.

Rodriguez-Camacho, 468 F2d. 1220 (9th Cir. 1972); and NORML v. Ingersoll,

497 F2d 654 (D.C.Cir. 1974), later opinion at 559 F2d. 735 (D.C.Cir. 1977).

The jurisdiction of the DEA is therefore based upon these drug treaties and

it thus has an international jurisdiction. Henry Hudson, Randy Weaver's

defendant and the former head of the Marshal's Service, stated as much on

his Sunday afternoon radio show in the D.C. area back in March of this year.

 

" The power of the DEA to control " bad " drugs such as opium and cocaine is

constitutionally indistinguishable from the similar power of the FDA to

control other " drugs " such as Vitamin B and shark cartilage. If the DEA is a

treaty-based federal agency, is it not possible that so is the FDA? As you

might expect, the authority of the FDA arises from a 1906 international

Agreement for Unification of Pharmacopeial Formulas for Potent Drugs. "

 

The FDA has conducted massive 'destroy the healer' tactics for decades,

prosecuting, persecuting and harassing natural health care providers while

Congress turns a blind eye and sits on their worthless backsides. The real

criminals are those who run the FDA and the Federal Department of Injustice

for prosecuting good, decent natural health care providers who teach

Americans how to naturally maintain good health and cure diseases naturally,

which cuts into the huge profits of the pharmaceutical companies who buy the

favors of Congress. Natural products such as B-17 and many others are not

" habit forming drugs. " It is long past time to stop this Nazi persecution by

the FDA and their latest efforts to take away our right to treat ourselves

and our bodies. It's time the people told Congress once and for all: we the

people DEMAND our right to consume natural health care products, supplements

and you people had better stop the FDA from their agenda to take away our

right to naturally prevent and cure cancer. Stop this Nazi style persecution

of natural health care providers and get U.S. out of the insidious CODEX

because we intend to fight you every step of the way, period.

 

Under the U.S. Constitution, there are only FOUR types of conduct criminal

in offense: treason, piracies and felonies on the high seas, counterfeiting,

and offenses against the laws of nations. NO WHERE does our right to consume

B-17 or other natural health care supplements, vitamins or minerals fall

within those categories of criminal offenses. Where is there some crime

against nations under any treaty by me consuming natural health care

products and supplements? None, zero, zip. Byron Richards has also put

together an excellent column on another bill which will give the FDA

unprecedented power that MUST BE STOPPED:

 

" A new attack against health freedom, drug safety, and dietary supplements

was launched last week by Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) with major support

from Michael Enzi (R-WY). It is called the Food and Drug Administration

Revitalization Act (S.1082). This legislation was planned over the past few

years working hand-in-glove with the FDA's dysfunctional management and

legal team - meaning this legislation was written for the profits of Big

Pharma and Big Biotech at the expense of safety and human health. "

 

Hate crime legislation: Again, it all boils down to jurisdiction by

Congress. H.R. 1592 was scheduled for a last hearing on April 24, 2007, but

you can still demand your congress critter vote NO. As you will see by the

links below, this unconstitutional Nazi style legislation has nothing to do

with hate, it is simply another gigantic step by mother government to please

certain hot button special interest groups like the wrongly named

'Anti-Defamation League,' sexual deviant organizations and many others. A

crime is a crime, period. These craven poltroons in Congress are once again

attempting to use interstate commerce as their excuse to legitimize certain

PREFERRED sexual behavior and attach a bias to a crime committed by one race

against another or against sexual deviants. A crime is a crime and should be

punished, period. Should this junk become " law, " I firmly believe that with

the proper legal challenge, it would be reversed, but we need to stop it

from even becoming law. Americans are being bankrupted fighting these

unconstitutional laws and it is flat out wrong. Let me once again refer you

to Lopez v U.S. and Printz v. U.S. and Richard Mack, two cases which went

all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, who for once, actually got it right.

 

In both of these cases regarding interstate commerce, the Supreme Court

ruled that Congress over stepped their authority to legislate and I submit

to you that these so called " hate crimes " also fall into the same category.

Despite endorsement of these special interest bills from factually

challenged media hacks like Bill O'Reilly, the Constitution is very specific

regarding legislative areas of jurisdiction for Congress. The fact that they

have gotten away with passing mountains of unconstitutional junk over the

decades to please the poisonous politically correct groups and organizations

in this country does not make it right or constitutional. Of course, if you

read this bill, the feds also sweeten the pot with federal grant money they

have no legal authority to offer. This has nothing whatsoever to do with

hate, it has everything to do with control. If you go to the link above

regarding interstate commerce, you will see that the sponsors of this

garbage are all pro-communism; they call themselves " progressives, " but in

fact, their political ideology is communism and that is the ultimate goal -

the sovietization of these united States of America.

 

What you must do today: Call (forget e-mail) your federal house member and

counterfeit U.S. Senator. Tell them (1) Stop the FDA from unlawfully trying

to take away our right to consume and use natural health care products and

remedies. We demand the ban against Vitamin B-17 be rescinded. I don't know

about you, but I am sick to death of seeing all the misery and death from

cancer when we know it can be prevented and successfully eradicated without

mutilation or dangerous treatments like chemotherapy and radiation. B-17 was

banned decades ago, but I take it every day. How? The natural way from

apricots because I refuse to be told by some bureaucrat in Washington, DC,

that I cannot take the one natural supplement that I know prevents cancer.

(See the column below on world without cancer.) Only the big pharma houses

and cancer charities benefit because there's no money in the cure, only the

treatment.

 

 

 

(2) Tell these cretins in Congress that H.R. 1592 is beyond their authority

to legislate. Demand they vote no. As far as I'm concerned, you can kick the

FDA to the curb and let the states handle drugs and natural supplements

within their jurisdiction. Demand FDA Commissar, Andrew C. von Eschenbach,

M.D., be fired. The FDA wants you to make your comments to them in writing:

Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630

Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. The hell with that, we're out

of time. Get on the phone: 1-888-463-6332, press 2.

 

 

 

(3) Tell your counterfeit U.S. Senator to vote NO on S.1082 because we the

people will refuse to participate and will fight them. The FDA and food

safety? What bunk! The FDA knew about the bad spinach situation, did nothing

about it and people died. How many drugs has the FDA approved as " safe "

which are now off the market because people have died or suffered massive

strokes? Dozens. They are never held responsible, but lawyers are making

billions from the lawsuits. Enough! has long since passed. Make those calls,

on your lunch hour or while sitting in commute traffic and ask everyone you

know to do the same thing. We are the people and we DO have the power to

stop these scoundrels, but it takes big numbers.

 

Important information:

 

1. Federal jurisdiction (scroll down for a legal analysis which includes

supreme court cases, circuit court and state on this critical issue)

2. National Health Federation

3. The Drugging of Our Children - free Internet video

 

4. Natural Solutions Foundation

 

 

5. TVC charges proposed hate crimes bill makes Jesus Christ and his

followers criminals

6, Pro-Homosexual/Drag Queen 'Hate Crimes' Bill Introduced

7, H.R. 1592 - Could Hate Crimes Bill Tie Hands of Border Patrol?

8, A world without cancer

9, House of Representatives contact

10, Counterfeit U.S. Senate contact

11, States must force 17th Amendment showdown

12, FDA Was Aware of Dangers To Food

 

© 2007 - NewsWithViews.com -

 

 

 

Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

 

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale

 

 

 

--

 

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty;

2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country,

ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy belongs

to no organization.

 

She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever

since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist

who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her

web site (www.devvy.com) contains a tremendous amount of information,

solutions and a vast Reading Room.

 

Devvy's website: www.devvy.com

 

Before you send Devvy e-mail, please take the time to check the FAQ section

on her web site. It is filled with answers to frequently asked questions and

links to reliable research sources.

 

E-mail is: devvyk

 

 

--