Fwd: [openmindopencodenews] -MORE Than You Ever WANTA Know - Paul is DEAD! - Paul is DEAD! - Paul is DEAD!

[Guest guest]

Start på videresendt besked:

 

> Fra: kenn johnsen <kennj

> Dato: søn 13 jan 2008 01:27:10 Europe/Stockholm

> Til: openmindopencodenews

> Emne: Vedr.: [openmindopencodenews] -<MORE Than You Ever " WANTA Know "

> - Paul is DEAD! - Paul is DEAD! - Paul is DEAD!

> Svar til:: openmindopencodenews

>

> You got to be kidding.

>

>

> lørdag 12. jan 2008 kl. 22:46 skrev Useful Idiot:

>

>> [EMPIRE VAMPIRE Tattler]

>>

>> =========

>> MORE Than You Ever  " WANTA Know " :

>> Leo_Wanta/message/923

>> PAULSON

>> DIVERSION                                                             

>>                  MASKED THEFT OF $44+ TRILLION

>>

>> TREASURY SHOOTINGS AND DC 'CIVIL WAR' CONFIRMED

>>

>> Wednesday 9 January 2008 03:54

>>

>> THE STATE DEPARTMENT CONFIRMED THAT PAULSON DIED:

>> BUSH CONTRADICTED THEM

>>

>> CITIBANK ORDERED TO SETTLE TODAY,

>> OR ITS ASSETS WILL BE SEIZED AND FROZEN

>>

>> WASHINGTON BLOODBATH WILL CONTINUE

>> IF SETTLEMENTS KEEP BEING FRUSTRATED

>>

>> SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE CENSORED FROM THIS REPORT,

>> PENDING SETTLEMENT TODAY

>>

>> • SEE 26TH DECEMBER REPORT FOR FINANCIAL FRAUDS

>> BEHIND THE 'SUBPRIME' CRISIS

>>

>> • SEE 5TH JANUARY REPORT FOR DATA

>> AND IDENTITY THEFT SCAMMING CRISIS

>>

>> • PLEASE READ THE VERY IMPORTANT

>> INTRODUCTION APPENDED TO THIS REPORT

>>

>> By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher,

>>  International Currency Review, World Reports Limited,

>> London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS

>> and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org

>> Home Page for 'Wantagate' reports since April 2006.

>>  [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications

>> as they are made available, has been added].

>>

>> • Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story's

>> ongoing financial global corruption investigations.

>> Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make

>> a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution

>> of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in

>> history.

>> This website has been calling the shots,

>> because of the hijacking of Wanta's Settlement.

>> =

>>

>> INTRODUCTION: THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT

>> The Editor prepared the report below in order to expose

>> the background to the entire Paulson episode and to place it

>> in the context of what was really going on behind the scenes.

>>  

>>  In a case moving as rapidly as this one, a report prepared

>> yesterday is overtaken by events today, and vice versa.

>>  

>> Luckily, the Editor was too tired at 5.00am British time

>> to complete the posting of this report, because it became clear

>> on the morning of 9th January that the absolute end of the line

>>  had been reached. Because of this understanding,

>> we were in a much better position to deconstruct

>> what that Paulson matter was all about.

>>  

>> We summarise the position here in the context of today's news.

>>

>> Paulson, Kimmitt and one further high US Treasury official

>> WERE SHOT:that is CONFIRMED (see below).

>> Then, on the back of these horrible facts,

>>  

>> Cheney's desperate disinformation apparat built a 'Black Ops' 'sting',

>> to the effect that Paulson was dead. (We don't really know,

>> despite 'postmortem appearances', whether he is or not:

>> but this is now a diversion: see what follows).

>>  

>> Why, given that the shootings took place,

>> was it 'necessary' to build a 'sting' (a possible 'lie'

>> that Paulson was dead) on the back of that fact?

>>  

>> The answer to this has now become clear. It is this:

>>

>> • Post-settlement, THERE IS TO BE ENDLESS SILENCE.

>> The few despised 'alternative media' outlets that have tried

>> to expose this historically unprecedented financial criminality

>> are to be left out to dry.

>>  

>> Now, in the cases of several outlets based in the United States,

>> the relevant 'forces' can do any number of things:

>> cease payments, withdraw handlers, harrassment, threats, whatever.

>>  

>> But what can they do to silence us (within reason,

>> and given our background and connections)?

>> The answer is: NOT A LOT.

>> So, as usual, 'they' resort to the only game 'they' know:

>> DIRTY TRICKS.

>>

>> • Since 'they' want total silence to reign for ever, and a veil

>> to be drawn across this evil, stinking theatre of criminality,

>> the ideal solution for them would be to try to discredit the only

>> sources that have led this hideous information into the public domain.

>> So they tried it on, by elaborating on the shootings

>> and possibly lying that Paulson had died.

>>  (We still don't know what happened to Kimmitt, by the way:

>> see hard evidence of something very nasty, below).

>>

>> As you will see from the report below, this 'sting' operation

>> has not succeeded. Furthermore, post-settlement,

>> the question remains: what are they going to do about

>> Mr Christopher Story?

>>  

>> Here is a suggestion: RELY ON HIS GOODWILL.

>> No, we won't be silenced. But, as you will also see below,

>> we DO try to be helpful whenever we can.

>> We will govern our responses in accordance with the future behaviour

>> of the 'forces' who would like to shut us down without a cause.

>> All we have ever done is, pro bono publico, to publish the truth

>> about hidden criminality at the intergovernmental level

>> that stinks in the nostrils of every normal human being

>> who is not sitting on his or her brains.

>>

>> NOW, please take note of THIS. In the text below,

>> you will see that a section, which was to contain

>> extremely sensitive intelligence, HAS BEEN CENSORED.

>>

>> This has happened because the Editor and Mr Cottrell

>> were discussing this article yesterday and incorporated

>> certain sensitive information which needs to be delivered

>> into the public domain, and which will have devastatingly

>> severe consequences behind the scenes were it to be publicised.

>>

>> • The eavesdroppers overheard what we had planned,

>> and telephoned Mr Cottrell this morning to ask him

>> to prevail upon the Editor for the intelligence to be withheld.

>> The Editor has COMPLIED, but ONLY on the clear,

>> strict understanding that the Wanta Settlement,

>> which we believe may well be on the verge of implementation,

>> is indeed effected TODAY, 9TH JANUARY 2008.

>>

>> THEREFORE,

>> should it transpire later today that we have been deceived,

>> the intelligence that has been censored from this report

>> will be reinserted without further ado, since we will not be bound

>> by any undertaking if other parties have reneged on theirs,

>> or double-crossed payees yet again.

>>

>> DECONSTRUCTING THE PAULSON DIVERSION

>>

>> On January 8th 2008 a figure appearing to be Henry M. Paulson Jr.,

>> Secretary of the US Treasury, appeared on CNBC

>> talking about the economy and related matters.

>>

>> The voice appeared to correspond closely

>> to Paulson's known voice.

>>  

>> Whether this individual was Paulson or not is not confirmed,

>> especially in the light of forensic examination of video footage

>> of the event, and of earlier `postmortem appearances'

>> not dealt with here; but the TV show purported to be broadcast live.

>>  

>> Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President

>> and Treasurer of Ambassador Wanta's AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc,

>> therefore telephoned the Editor to ask him whether

>> he would publicise the sources of the information

>> that Paulson was shot and gravely wounded

>> on 28th or 29th Dec, and that he died shortly thereafter.

>>

>> This is done below.

>>

>> Peculiar to the United States, a mini-industry of `doubles' exists

>> who hire themselves out to stand in for prominent people

>> who have either been killed or who, for various pressing reasons,

>> need to be `absent' when they are supposed to be `performing'.

>>  

>> In an email received by the Editor from an informed US source

>> at 4:41pm UK time on 4th January 2008, on the subject of doubles,

>> the source wrote:

>> `It would be interesting to see if there is more than one Paulson

>> running around. Lookalikes are used a great deal for people

>> in sensitive situations, because they get murdered a lot,

>> so they keep a spare, or use the spare in sensitive situations'.

>>

>> Forensic deconstruction of earlier still photographs, video and

>> alleged `appearances' raised serious doubts about the reliability

>> of some of the images, according to several experts

>> who have shared their analyses with us. However let us assume

>> for that Paulson himself was interviewed on CNBC

>> at around 8.00am on 8th January. This presentation assumes,

>> subject to issues raised in the sources cited below, that the

>> `real' Paulson had suddenly materialised for public consumption.

>>

>> Furthermore, we had a contact who deliberately attended the

>>  `Paulson' event at the Westin Hotel in New York City on 7th January,

>> having paid $20 entry fee. Although he sat at the back of the room,

>> he thought that the person speaking was indeed Henry M. Paulson.

>>

>> WHY DID THE U.S. TREASURY

>> NOT DEMAND A RETRACTION?

>>

>> If this was indeed the case, why did the US Treasury not demand

>> from the Editor of this service an immediate retraction of our report

>> that Paulson had been shot, and had subsequently died?

>>  

>> One would have thought that Paulson's office

>> would have seen to it that the report was denied.

>> Why did Paulson's office not issue a denial of the report?

>>

>> At no time has the report been officially denied.

>> How very odd!

>>

>> Thus it would seem that the US Treasury was in no way

>> `phased' by the fact that Paulson had been reported

>> to have been shot and had died.

>> WHY ON EARTH WAS THAT?

>>

>> FACT:

>> Treasury Compliance specifically confirmed that the following

>> official was shot by Special Forces operatives on 28/29th January:

>>

>> • Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary.

>>

>> At 01:08 UK time on 3rd January 2008,

>> a source who is special to this service emailed the Editor

>> as follows:

>> `I was told that an Undersecretary of Treasury

>> was also eliminated' [sic].

>> We have separate confirmation of this, reviewed below.

>> This email is of course held on file.

>>

>> SHOOTING OF PAULSON CONFIRMED

>> BY TREASURY COMPLIANCE

>>

>> At 2.30pm UK time on 8th January 2008, Michael C. Cottrell M.S.,

>> speaking on an open transatlantic line that was immediately

>> tapped into by inquisitive intelligence eavesdroppers

>> and so that these eavesdroppers would hear what he had to say,

>> specifically and emphatically reiterated that

>> US Treasury Compliance had definitively confirmed the shootings

>> (which were expert `pass-through' shootings – see below

>> – at least, in the case of Paulson, assuming he `is alive':

>> we have had no reports at this date

>> of Kimmitt having been seen since the shootings).

>>  

>> Mr Cottrell repeated this information with great emphasis

>> for the benefit of the eavesdroppers. Mr Cottrell then added

>> that `what we could not confirm was that Paulson had died later'.

>>

>> However the Editor had been separately informed by a source

>> citing the US State Department that he had died (see below).

>> If the `fact' that Paulson had died was a lie, it was perpetrated

>> deliberately by the US disinformation apparat,

>> in order to `sting' the Editor

>> and to try to compromise our exposures.

>>  

>> This desperate ruse has not worked.

>>

>> On the contrary, it has compounded the perpetrators' terminal

>> problems, as you will see if you read what we have to say now.

>>

>> Why, too, did the Paulson family

>> NOT Protest at the Editor's report?

>> Was Merritt Paulson, Mr Paulson's son, resident at Lake Oswego,

>> Oregon, not disturbed by this report? Apparently not.

>>

>> Was the report not officially denied by the Treasury,

>> let alone the Paulson family, because the US Government

>> despises what its cynical officials call `the alternative media'

>> to such an extent that it refuses to recognise its existence?

>>

>> Put another way: since the report appeared in the so-called

>> `alternative media', was it not worth denying simply because,

>> by definition, it could not be true?

>>

>> If so, what is the problem? Why all the concern?

>> Since the report appeared in the `alternative media',

>> it supposedly cannot be true – the reverse of the lie

>> that if a report has not been published in the so-called `mainstream'

>> (a.k.a., `sidestream', or `latestream') media, it cannot be true

>> either.

>>  

>> Welcome to Operation Mockingbird.

>>

>> 'OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD'

>> BLOCKS COVERAGE IN THE `MAINSTREAM'

>>

>> Those correspondents who have flooded the Editor

>> with emails complaining that the report cannot be true

>> because it hasn't appeared in the `mainstream'

>> need to look up Operation Mockingbird

>> – the US criminal counterintelligence community's

>> long-established media control programme,

>> which has been running for decades.

>>  

>> Just type Operation Mockingbird into your browser or Google

>> and read all about it. This programme has for decades

>> successfully denied the American people the truth

>> about issues that the criminal intelligence community,

>> which controls the US Govt., wishes to disguise or to obfuscate.

>>

>> Therefore, rather than shoot the true messenger with the usual

>> knee-jerk response that `the report hasn't been confirmed

>> in the mainstream, so it cannot be true',

>> serious students of the Dark Forces engaged in destroying America

>> should equip themselves with this background, if only to spare

>> the Editor and others who are trying to prevent the collapse

>> at the hands of these criminals, from being inundated

>> by emailers who haven't done their homework.

>>

>> Of course, the preceding observations do not address

>> the `post-mortem appearances' of Paulson,

>> which is a separate issue, dealt with below.

>>

>> REPORT COULD NOT BE DENIED

>> BECAUSE THE SHOOTINGS TOOK PLACE

>>

>> As it turns out,

>> THE TREASURY COULD NOT DENY OUR REPORT

>> OF THE SHOOTINGS, EVEN IF IT HAD BEEN SO INCLINED,

>> BECAUSE IT WAS TRUE (as we always knew to be the case).

>>

>> What then happened was that the (supposedly)

>> FALSE report that Paulson had died, was used in a deliberate

>> Cheney-directed `Black operation' or `sting' ordered by Bush 41

>> through Bush 43 and Cheney, to discredit the Editor of this service

>> and the Principals, with the following motives:

>>

>> • To stall our ongoing successful exposures of the financial

>> criminality,

>> money-laundering, drug-trafficking and drug distribution operations

>> of the criminal cadres, which have triggered the ensuing

>> investigations

>> (backed by law enforcement, extensive ongoing investigations,

>> Grand Jury hearings, DOD Internal Affairs and other relevant parties)

>> of the continuing thefts, thereby enabling the criminalists to

>> continue

>> `business as usual' behind the smokescreen of Paulson's death.

>>

>> • To provide cover for the stealing of $44 trillion plus

>> that Mr Cottrell has confirmed to the Editor took place

>> behind the hysteria of the Paulson death.

>>

>> REASON THE GOVERNMENT WAS HAPPY

>> WITH THE PAULSON DIVERSION

>>

>> Obviously, since the US Treasury did not DENY the shootings

>> (because it couldn't, as they DID TAKE PLACE, as elaborated

>> further below), the Treasury WAS CONTENT FOR THE

>> PAULSON FRENZY TO FEED ON ITSELF, for some reason.

>>

>> What was that reason?

>>

>> It suited the criminal elements in the US Government for the reports

>> to remain `out there', diverting everyone's attention

>> from what was actually going on behind the scenes, namely

>>  FURTHER GROSS THEFT AND LARCENY perpetrated under

>> the control of Bush 41, Bush 43, and Cheney – who, you will recall,

>> is the master disinformation and US Psy-Ops operative

>> who `formerly' controlled the MK-Ultra and related programmes

>> based upon Himmlerian `Black Operations' techniques

>> imported lock stock and barrel by what soon became the (criminal)

>> Central Intelligence Agency from `former' Nazi Germany

>> (the qualification `former' being superfluous, given what is being

>> exposed).

>>

>> LANGLEY HQ BEARS THE NAME

>> OF THE WORLD'S WORST CRIMINAL

>>

>> Several years ago now, Langley, the headquarters of the

>> Nazi-penetrated criminal enterprise that is devastating

>> the whole world called the Central Intelligence Agency,

>> was renamed the George Bush Center for Intelligence.

>> By this means, George Bush Sr., the world's biggest crook,

>> formalised the absolute control over the CIA that he had wielded

>> de facto since becoming President Reagan's Vice President in 1981.

>>

>> Think about it this way.

>> Suppose there is such a phenomenon as an intelligence

>> `white hat', and suppose that the `white hats'

>> were to have reached the collective conclusion that George Bush Sr.

>> is indeed the most dangerous and ruthless criminal operative alive.

>>  

>> What are they now going to do about it, given that their HQ

>> is named after the world's biggest crook himself?

>>

>> They are stuck – because, in seeking to distance the CIA

>> from this monster Godfather, they will have to acknowledge

>> before world public opinion that the CIA is itself the hideous

>> criminal enterprise that we all know it to be.

>>

>> So what do they do?

>> They decide that they cannot distance the CIA, and themselves,

>> from George Bush Sr. – the practical consequence of which

>> is that George Bush Sr. believes that he can do anything he likes,

>> with 100% assumed certainty of perpetual impunity.

>>

>> The CIA is the collective lackey, whether or not it has ever had

>> second thoughts, of George Herbert Walker Bush Sr., DVD.

>>

>> CIA `FURIOUS THAT IT HAS BEEN EXPOSED'

>>

>> At the same time, we were informed on 3rd January

>> that the CIA is furious because it has been exposed,

>> and doesn't know what to do.

>>  

>> This criminal enterprise never imagined that there would

>> ever come a time when it would have to deal with this problem.

>> But the ongoing exposure of the CIA consequent upon

>> the criminal cadres' grotesque mishandling of Wantagate

>> can only lead to calls for this dangerous, reprobate and

>> recalcitrant criminal enterprise, the headquarters of which

>> is named after the Godfather of criminal godfathers,

>> to be cut down to size or closed down.

>>

>> Permanent closure is actually the only way that the poison

>> seeping out from Langley can ever be contained,

>> and the world spared a truly hellish future.

>>

>> Why should the CIA be furious that it has been exposed,

>> when the exposure of its criminality has been achieved

>> by this Wantagate website, without any assistance at all

>> from the controlled and complacent `sidestream' media?

>>

>> Surely, the `alternative' media – to use the pejorative phrase

>> employed by a US Treasury official whose rudeness

>> to one of our correspondents when he telephoned

>> to establish Paulson's status, was horrendous

>> (1) – can have no relevance in such matters.

>>  It doesn't count.

>>

>> What counts is supposed to be what we read in the (controlled)

>> `mainstream'. The `alternative media', by definition, cannot possibly

>> ever know anything. Why pay attention to it, then, Langley?

>>

>> THE BASIC PAULSON FACTS

>>

>> So, to summarise on Paulson (further source details below):

>>

>> 1.

>> Paulson was shot in the timeframe specified. This was definitively

>> confirmed by Treasury Compliance and was reconfirmed

>> to the Editor of this service on 8th January 2008

>> by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., with all his extensive authority.

>> 2.

>> The shooting was undertaken by expert Special Forces marksmen

>> who are quite capable of `pass-through' shots in accordance

>> with their instructions.

>> Assuming that the intention was not to kill, its purpose was

>> to warn these operatives that their monstrous treason

>> against the United States and the American people

>> will no longer be tolerated.

>> 3.

>> The death of Paulson was a lie (on the assumption,

>> for the purposes of this presentation, that he is not dead)

>> which was then retailed on Bush 41's orders through a compliant

>> grapevine and via the State Department in order to discredit

>> the Editor of this service and to trash our reporting.

>> This `sting' operation has been a failure.

>> 4.

>> In other words a `BLACK OPERATION'. a.k.a. `a sting',

>> was piggybacked onto the actual shootings that indeed took place.

>> This of course has all the hallmarks of Cheney, a ruthless

>> and singularly evil (MK-Ultra) operative who has known links

>> with several crime families in Chicago,

>> and with at least one Judge in Cook County, Illinois.

>>

>> $44+ TRILLION STOLEN

>> WHILE THE PAULSON FRENZY CONTINUED

>>

>> Now, before reverting to the Paulson background and to our sources

>> apart from Treasury Compliance for the shootings report,

>> what has been going on while the distraction of the

>> Paulson `death' was consuming the minds of half the planet?

>>

>> Having completed the relevant investigations, Mr Cottrell informed

>> the Editor in the course of the telephone call timed at 2.30pm

>> on 8th January that the smokescreen of the Paulson `death' report

>> built on top of the actual shootings, was manipulated by Cheney

>> and his disinformation apparat for OBFUSCATION PURPOSES

>> and that:

>>

>> • $44+ trillion was stolen and moved to Europe

>> behind this smokescreen

>> (OR: an attempt to do this was perpetrated, which was partially

>> successful but which has since been frustrated).

>> The primary recipient institution involved was BNP

>> (Banque Nationale de Paris, Paribas).

>>  

>> This means that the 8 Paribas bankers who were arrested,

>> as we reported earlier, had corrupt accomplices who remained

>> in place, and whose services were activated in connection

>> with the illegal transfer of stolen funds being reported here.

>>

>> • The stolen funds represented $34 trillion held on C.H.I.P.S.

>> belonging to Chinese parties (see earlier Wantagate reports)

>> plus other monies including Ambassador Wanta's $4.5 trillion,

>> a scandal that has triggered G-8 and Chinese retaliation

>> against Citibank, the accounts and assets of which are reported

>> (as of late on 8th January) to have been or to be at risk

>> of being frozen, against the background of Citibank

>> being 'ORDERED' to pay Wanta et al IMMEDIATELY. See below.

>>

>> • Funds were being disbursed into bank accounts to pay off

>> domestic and foreign politicians and to set up more criminal

>> financial and other operations. In other words, corrupt

>> representatives of the payee `countries' are helping themselves

>>

>> • Channels in communication with the Principals and this service

>> were arguably lied to concerning all dimensions of these matters,

>> including the usual Greenspan-Bush `preparing to settle' routine

>> whereby prospective country and `Tier 1-6' recipients,

>> headed by Ambassador Wanta, were to be paid in accordance

>> with a constantly amended `manana, manana' timeframe:

>> the standard Bush 41 technique that has been deployed for years.

>>

>> • These manoeuvrings followed the usual, unchanging

>> model of financial deception developed by Dr Alan Greenspan

>> and Godfather Bush Sr., which we have called

>> the `never-pay' syndrome.

>> The way this works is simple in theory.

>> The model requires every outstanding payment

>> (of monies and funds leveraged from them, owed to

>>  financial scam victims and past investors, and of funds

>> owed to `countries' and of course all the funds

>> owned by Ambassador Lee Wanta as sole principal) to be

>> linked and `dependent' upon other transactions and remittances.

>>  

>> That way, sabotage perpetrated by corrupt bankers and operatives

>> at any level of the transactions gridlock, destabilises the entire

>> payments edifice, so that payments are repeatedly aborted.

>> This procedure is repeated indefinitely.

>>

>> It may be added that further `active investigations' have been

>> triggered by these and related events, about which

>> the Editor has not been informed.

>>

>> CITIBANK ON VERGE OF BEING SHUT DOWN

>> FOLLOWING THE LATEST GIGA-THEFTS

>>

>> Citibank in Hong Kong is virtually owned by the Chinese, who hold

>> approximately 90% of its so-called 'assets' (debt-backed assets).

>> Therefore the Chinese authorities would have no problem

>> actually causing the demise of Citibank, and were more than entitled

>>  to take whatever action they might deem appropriate

>> in the light of the outrageous and despicable last-minute

>> $44+ trillion (in the aggregate) theft that was perpetrated

>> (or attempted) under cover of the 'redirection' operation

>> surrounding the Paulson shooting and 'death' farrago.

>>

>> • A 10-day deadline for the Wanta and related settlements imposed

>> by the G-8 powers expired last Monday and failing settlement,

>> Citibank may cease to exist and US banks, being non-compliant

>> with Basel II, will be cut out of the world banking system overnight.

>>

>> That would quickly trigger a 50+% drop in the US standard of living.

>> However we believe that the massive pressure that has been

>> brought to bear (mainly by this service, in respect of the public

>> domain) may have 'done the trick' and that the Lee Wanta and

>> 'linked' settlements will have been implemented just in the nick of

>> time.

>>  

>> This assessment is supported by the fact that we have now

>> removed certain devastating intelligence from the present report,

>> which we had talked over with Mr Cottrell. We have done this

>> because just prior to this report being posted,

>> Mr Cottrell received a phone call asking him to request

>> that the Editor remove the relevant section

>> 'because this matter is being dealt with this morning'.

>>  

>> This was accompanied by a comment to the effect that

>> 'you should be very happy later today'.

>> Since the parties conveying this request are 'part of the solution,

>> not part of the problem', we have naturally complied:

>> with the proviso that in the event of any further interference

>> with the settlements TODAY, the devastating information

>> that we have removed will be reinserted on the basis that

>> we don't need to comply

>> with anything if we have been deceived.

>>

>> CENSORED INTELLIGENCE:

>> THE REFERENCED INFO. WAS REMOVED FROM HERE

>>

>> As indicated in the preceding section, the sensitive intelligence

>> that was to have been posted in THIS SPACE,

>> has been removed at the request of people

>> 'who are part of the solution, not part of the problem'.

>>  

>> THIS HAS BEEN DONE ON THE UNDERSTANDING

>> THAT IF THIS EDITOR DOES NOT GATHER

>> THAT THE SETTLEMENT HAS BEEN EFFECTED TODAY,

>> 9TH JANUARY 2008, THE SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE

>> WHICH 'THEY' WANTED REMOVED,

>> WILL BE REINSERTED WITHOUT FURTHER ADO.

>>  

>> We cannot be 'told what to do',

>> but were are 'trying to be helpful'.

>>

>> PHYSICAL STATUS OF PAULSON

>> IS NOT A KEY TO UNDERSTANDING

>>

>> Here, it needs perhaps to be added that it is neither

>> here nor there, from the perspective of the Settlements,

>> whether Paulson is alive or dead now, is it?

>>  

>> If he is alive, the `sting' objective of the criminal `Black Ops'

>> apparat was `achieved' (so they may have briefly imagined:

>> but no longer, we are told).

>>  

>> If he is dead, Story was right, but he `rose from the dead'

>> in the format of a supposedly hired `double'

>> (the sophistication of which improved somewhat

>> between 4th and 8th January, it seems), achieving

>> the same fleeting objective in the perception of those who have

>> little knowledge of US Criminal Counterintelligence Psy-Ops

>> and the willing cooperation of the US `mainstream' media

>> under the terms of Operation Mockingbird.

>>

>> In other words, the Paulson matter is indeed, viewed in the

>> necessary broader perspective of the ongoing financial stealing

>> and corruption that has been taking place while

>> the Paulson `feeding frenzy' has been going on, DIVERSIONARY.

>>

>> THE STEPS OF ANY `BLACK OPERATIONS' MODEL

>>

>> The essence of the attempted `Black Ops' `sting'

>> against the Editor of this service, if that was what happened,

>> was applied in accordance with the following model,

>>  Mr Cottrell informed the Editor at 5.00pm on 8th January:

>>

>> • Step One:

>> Redirect attention decisively away from what's going on/is intended.

>>

>> • Step Two: OBFUSCATION:

>> Create a massive diversion so that everyone rushes to look at

>> an irrelevance. And in this context, Michael C. Cottrell stresses

>> to the Editor that Paulson IS INDEED AN IRRELEVANCE.

>> He was shot at and is being used to carry out the obfuscation

>> programme directed on behalf of Bush Sr. by Cheney, while

>> the criminal cadres (in the CIA and the relevant banks) perpetrated:

>>

>> • Step Three:

>>  Colossal theft of the funds.

>> As stated above, $44.0+ trillion was stolen behind the smokescreen

>> provided by this contrived Paulson obfuscation operation.

>>  At 4.50pm on 8th January, we were reliably advised

>> that a very large sum of money, thought to have been of the order

>> of $19 trillion, had been recovered, from the funds

>> that were stolen behind the Paulson smokescreen.

>>

>> WAS `PAULSON' BEING BLACKMAILED TO COOPERATE?

>>

>> It may reasonably be asked:

>> if Paulson received a `pass-through' bullet (assuming

>> he is still alive, for the purposes of this analysis), why on earth

>> would he subsequently cooperate with Bush and Cheney

>> in this ghoulish play-acting? Good question.

>>

>> Recall that Paulson resorted to blackmailing

>> the President of the United States (even though Bush Jr.

>> is the highest-ranking crook apart from the Godfather).

>>

>> As reported previously, Paulson's failed blackmail attempt

>> went down like a lead balloon. If, as we are now required to believe,

>> Paulson recovered from his `pass-through' shooting experience

>> and has been collaborating as a Dark Actor Playing Games

>> in this charade, the only possible rationale for such behaviour

>> would be that he is himself now being blackmailed by Bush/Cheney,

>> and or threatened that if he doesn't cooperate,

>> the next bullet will be fatal.

>>  

>> Such argumentation stretches the imagination somewhat,

>> and might lead one to suspect that Paulson may indeed be dead,

>> after all, as certain forensic investigators are continuing to tell

>> us.

>>

>> BUSH IN CHICAGO TO MEET WITH MAFIA BOSSES

>>

>> On 7th January, while `Paulson' was `speaking' at the

>> Westin Hotel, Bush 43 was in Chicago possibly meeting

>> with representatives of organised crime there in connection

>> with the colossal thefts that had taken place as described above.

>>

>> Meanwhile, in the background, Bush 41 proclaimed,

>> as Mr Cottrell reported to the Editor, that `he would never,

>> ever pay Ambassador Wanta' – even as the hyper-corrupt

>> Pres. N. Sarkozy of France, of Hungarian Jewish background (2),

>> was supervising safe receipt of the funds stolen in recent days

>> behind the Paulson `Black Ops' smokescreen.

>> There is also a new corrupt Jordanian connection

>> about which the Editor has yet to be informed.

>>

>> Also on 7th January, the `preparing to pay' syndrome yielded

>> its usual outcome, when it was again revealed that Bush 43

>> had interfered with the country and Tier 1-6 payments yet again,

>> after the US State Department had confirmed

>> (as had other payee sources that are in touch with the Editor)

>> that `everything was set to be completed' on Tuesday 8th January.

>>

>> Following the exposure of this deception, three officials at

>> the State Department were sacked, according to

>> a usually reliable source who spoke to the Editor

>> after 1.00am British time in the early morning of 8th January.

>>

>> WHO IS DOING THE SHOOTING?

>>

>> Before we revert to our deconstruction of the Paulson shooting

>> and the subsequent obfuscation operation, the question of

>> `who is doing the shooting' needs to be addressed.

>> It will be recalled that DOD Internal Affairs took over `enforcement'

>> and other grim activities when it transpired that the

>> Provost Marshal was not doing his job.

>>  

>> It has subsequently emerged that this General Rodney L. Johnson,

>> the Provost Marshal, an old Cheney associate, had been

>> compromised, having apparently been caught `in flagrante' on tape.

>> Unconfirmed reports have since indicated that he was severely

>> dealt with, which is believed to mean that he was incarcerated.

>>

>> The Provost Marshal appears to have fallen victim to bribery,

>> but Nancy Pelosi, who was once upon a time thought to have been

>> in favour of the Wanta Settlement and related payments, may have

>> succumbed to something else. According to a reliable source

>> who provided the Editor with this information on 4th January,

>>  

>> Pelosi may have been suborned by Mrs Hillary Rodomski Clinton,

>> having been offered the Vice Presidency ticket

>> on Mrs Hillary Rodomski's now failing election campaign,

>> in exchange for blocking the Settlement and related payments.

>>

>> The shooting of a close aide of Mr Cheney, reported in our posting

>> dated 2nd January, has been separately described to us

>> as having served Cheney's purposes remarkably well, too.

>>  

>> Specifically, this shooting was a kind of `sib' operation

>> (in which the perpetrator is made to look like the victim) – a setup

>> that implied at once that Cheney himself was in danger of his life,

>> whereas in actual fact he is the mastermind behind

>> the `Black Operations' associated with these bank robberies,

>> which can collectively be described

>> as the biggest bank hold-up in world history.

>>

>> Now it may still appear to some uninformed observers

>> that the Editor was the victim of a `sting': but if that was so,

>>  it was true ONLY with respect to the reported DEATH of Paulson

>> (assuming that did not happen) which in turn was based upon

>> deliberate official lies fed to supposedly honest and reliable people

>> (see below).

>>

>> COUNTERPRODUCTIVE to

>>  `PIGGYBACK' SUCH A `STING' ATTEMPT

>>

>> However since the (pass-through) shootings of Mr Paulson,

>> Mr Kimmitt and an unnamed senior US Treasury official

>> did indeed take place, it follows that by `piggybacking' the `sting'

>> onto the reality of the shootings, the Bushes, Cheney et al

>> have simply contrived to lengthen the rope by means of which

>> they are in the process of hanging themselves.

>>  

>> In other words, they have exacerbated their problems, not the reverse.

>> Because the shootings were true, and the `Black Operation' to

>> discredit

>> the Editor of this service has drawn additional attention to them.

>>

>> And also the Psy-Ops operatives have failed to discredit the Editor

>> of this service, which was their intention: indeed several sources

>> `close to the action' have confirmed that the `Black' lies fed to us

>> were intended exclusively for that purpose.

>>

>> THE COUNTERVAILING FORCE INSIDE THE U.S. MILITARY

>>

>> Who is doing the shooting?

>> The answer to this obvious question

>> is that a countervailing force has developed within

>> the American military, which has understood inter alia (?)

>> that the very actions of the military itself

>> are destroying America's military strength,

>> objective of malevolent foreign powers.

>>

>> For instance, since the First Gulf War, some 500,070 veterans

>> and other personnel have fallen ill with so-called Gulf War Syndrome,

>> caused not (as some allege) by aspartame in Coca Cola

>> (which turns into formaldehyde in conditions of great heat),

>> while some 15,000 of their number have died from cancer

>> and other conditions triggered by exposure to depleted uranium.

>>  

>> The British Ministry of Defence is criminally

>> covering up a similarly deplorable state of affairs

>> in respect of depleted uranium-related illnesses

>> among British military personnel.

>>

>> The medium-term impact of this state of affairs

>> will be to discourage young Americans from joining up,

>> since it will become known that, due to the use

>> of depleted uranium in armour-busting shells,

>> signing up will mean dying early.

>>

>> This may account for the reported fact that illegal Mexican

>> immigrants are being recruited into the American armed forces,

>> in the context of the unpopularity of Bush's pointless

>> and pitiless wars.

>> Such recruits would be ignorant of the dangers

>> they will face from contact with depleted uranium .

>>

>> Anyway, due inter alia to such practical considerations,

>> the countervailing force inside the US military is hardening

>> in its attitude towards the confused shambles into which

>> its corrupt civilian leaderships have led the armed forces,

>> and is therefore sensitive to other parallel destabilising

>> developments that threaten the future of the Republic

>> – among which, we are now informed, is Wantagate

>> and the unprecedented financial corruption

>> that it has dislodged and exposed.

>>

>> RESPONSE TO THE CRISIS

>> BY THE MILITARY IS `INCREMENTAL'

>>

>> We also learned on 8th January 2008 from a newly acquired

>> US source in regular contact with the military, who has

>> specifically been drawing their attention to our reports

>> for the past 11 months, that the measures

>> that are being taken internally by officers

>> to address the corruption crisis are of an `incremental nature'.

>>  

>> This coincides with information retailed by our own contacts

>> speaking with US military personnel regularly.

>> This point should be borne in mind by all those spectators

>> who are understandably impatient for results.

>>

>> When the time came for decisive action to be taken,

>> following Citibank's uncouth behaviour in kicking

>> Ambassador Wanta and his diplomatic associates

>>  off the Citibank premises in midtown New York

>> under the supervision of two armed NYPD cops

>> on 20th November 2007, DOD Internal Affairs

>> assumed the lead in lieu of the discredited Provost Marshal.

>>

>> Shootings that have taken place to date have been undertaken

>> against known traitors (who are also de facto war criminals)

>> such as Paulson and Kimmitt, by expert specialists

>> who are literally able to inflict `pass-through' shootings

>> which wound and may even temporarily incapacitate

>> the targeted perpetrators but do not result in their deaths.

>>  

>> It was such precisely targeted shootings that took place

>> on 28/29th December 2007 (assuming Paulson did not die later

>> and although we reiterate that we are not aware

>> that Kimmitt has been seen since).

>>  

>> Furthermore, at 8.05pm on 4th January,

>> the Editor was authoritatively informed that

>>  `new people are in control at the Treasury',

>> which would make sense if the top 3 had been `taken out'.

>>

>> DE FACTO PREDICTED CIVIL WAR

>> WITHIN THE U.S. STRUCTURES

>>

>> We also know that, effectively, a Civil War

>> is raging inside the US Federal Structures

>> as this Horror Story is being played out.

>>  

>> For instance,

>> the Special Forces operative seen (and reported upon)

>> by Washington DC firefighters (see the report dated 2nd Jan 2008)

>> was fleeing NOT

>> (we are now informed by our Military-Connected sources)

>> from the fire itself,

>> but from Cheney's own US Secret Service agents.

>>  

>> That was why the Special Forces operative,

>> whose hand was lacerated when he had to get through a window,

>> refused hospital treatment.

>>

>> This is the first `Confirmed' Set-to between

>> different formations inside the US Federal structures

>> that we have been able to report to date.

>>

>> The theft of $44 trillion+ that was perpetrated under cover

>> of the Henry Paulson distraction, was preceded inter alia

>> by the following further known monetary thefts and interferences

>> reported to the Editor of this service by `connected' contacts:

>>

>> • At 10.40pm, on 3rd January, it was reported to the Editor

>> that Bush Jr. and Cheney had `changed the banking codes'

>> for the Settlements again.

>>

>> • $2.0 trillion previously stolen by Bush 41,

>> was recovered on Friday 4th January.

>>

>> • Several reports of massive attempted monetary thefts,

>> which were thwarted.

>>

>> SOURCES FOR PAULSON'S SHOOTING AND `DEATH'

>>

>> The primary definitive source for our published statement

>> that Paulson was shot on 28th/29th December 2007 was

>> Treasury Compliance. This fact was reiterated to the Editor

>> of this service in emphatic terms at 2.30pm on 8th January

>> by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and is indisputable.

>>

>> The source for our knowledge that Robert M. Kimmitt,

>> the Deputy US Treasury Secretary, and a third senior

>> Treasury official, were shot, also (but see below)

>> on 28/29th December 2007, was a knowledgeable

>> `connected' source in the United States with whom

>> the Editor has been in contact for months,

>> who spoke to the Editor at 12.45 pm on Thursday 3rd January.

>>

>> We cannot reveal the identity of this source, but the source

>> is of course identified in our retained note of the conversation.

>> At the time it was thought that the attack on Kimmitt,

>> who speaks fluent German and is/was a long-term Bush aide,

>> may have occurred on 2nd January; but the shooting is now believed

>> to have occurred in the same time frame as the shooting of Paulson.

>>

>> INTELLIGENCE OPERATIVES ASK COTTRELL

>>  IF THE OFFICIAL KILLED WAS KIMMITT

>>

>> On 3rd January, US operatives telephoned Michael C.Cottrell, MS.,

>> with the request that Mr Story should not publish anything further

>> on that date, following our report dated 2nd January,

>> as the 2nd January report `was getting in the way

>> of efforts to complete the Settlement and payments'.

>>  

>> This information is exceptionally significant here.

>> Why, if our report dated 2nd January, updated to report

>> Paulson's death, was impeding settlement, is it nevertheless

>> maintained that our report that Paulson died was the product

>> of as `sting' to discredit the Editor of this service?

>>  

>> Presumably the CIA and Cheney

>> are `on the same page': or are they not?

>>

>> In the same conversation with Mr Cottrell, the Agency operative

>> who called him, in Mr Cottrell's own words,

>> `asked me if it was Kimmitt who was killed yesterday', implying:

>> (a) that our suspicion that Kimmitt may have been killed

>> could be true and

>> (b) that the Kimmitt shooting or assassination did actually

>> take place on 2nd January, and not on 28/29th December.

>> If the CIA was deceiving Mr Cottrell, the record stands

>> that on 3rd January, a CIA operative asked Mr Cottrell

>> whether the official who had been killed

>> on the preceding day was Kimmitt.

>>

>> Given such FACTS, it seems to the Editor to be somewhat

>> premature for everyone to assume that the `Paulson' who surfaced,

>> for instance, at the Westin Hotel on 7th January and on CNBC

>> on the 8th, was actually Paulson himself and not a double,

>> as forensics are telling us was the case.

>>

>> STATE DEPARTMENT CONFIRMS THAT PAULSON DIED

>>

>> At 4.50pm on Wednesday 2nd January 2006, this source informed

>> the Editor by telephone that `the State Department have confirmed

>> that Paulson died on 2nd January'.

>>  

>> On 5th January, the same source informed us as follows:

>> `The State Department confirmed that Paulson is dead'.

>> At the time, we again thought that the death occurred,

>> if it did occur, on 2nd January.

>>

>> However it was subsequently believed that Paulson

>> may have died on 31st December. On 7th January,

>> the Editor demanded of the same source (verbatim):

>> `Did the State Department confirm Paulson's death

>> on 2nd January, yes or no?',

>> to which the answer was an emphatic YES.

>>

>> At 11.40pm UK time on 5th January, the Editor again spoke

>> with this `connected' source, and asked for the identities

>> of two other distinguished sources that had confirmed

>> that Paulson had died.

>> (anything to do with the " PAUL is DEAD " message???)

>>  

>> In this conversation, the source indicated that it was

>> now believed that Paulson may have died on New Year's Eve.

>> Certainly, during the final weekend of the year,

>> the Editor became aware that it was thought

>> that Paulson might not make it into 2008.

>> The two distinguished sources for the information

>> that Paulson had died were revealed to be:

>>

>> • Former Federal Reserve Governor Oscar Meyer.

>>

>> • An Ambassador (identity known to the Editor,

>> who has been asked to withhold his identity from this report).

>>

>> We have telephone contact back-up for this information.

>> As indicated above, the Gold Badges who read our report

>> on 2nd January 2008 did not dispute any fact contained therein.

>>

>> OTHER SOURCES FOR THE SHOOTING DATA

>>

>> Other sources for these events included the following:

>> 1.

>> An email dated 30th December 2007 and timed as having been

>> received by the Editor at 5:56pm. from a high-level US source

>> who, again, has been in contact with the Editor of this service

>> from some months. He cannot be identified but the email

>> is of course in our files. In any public airing of these events,

>> the email message in question (as with all our email traffic

>> and underlying notes) will necessarily confirm

>> everything that is stated here with reference to our sources.

>>

>> It contained the following statement:

>>

>> `Chris, I was told that Paulson took a bullet either late Friday

>> or early Saturday. That came from my US intel, with 2 confirmations.

>> Then today my [reference to a foreign power] intel also confirmed it

>> with an odd reply to the question, saying:

>> " Well, sometimes people take it in the chest'.

>>

>> Initially, the Editor thought that the phrase `took a bullet'

>> (not used in England), may have been a figure of speech,

>> and asked for clarification. He asked whether it was a figure

>> of speech or that that the phrase should be interpreted literally,

>> applicable also to the foreign intelligence source's elaboration.

>> The answer was that it should be taken literally.

>>

>> INDEPENDENT CORROBORATION

>> OF PAULSON DEATH REPORT

>>

>> At 17.59 UK time on 2nd January 2008, following the publication

>> of our report that Paulson had been shot (updated to incorporate

>> the report that he died), the Editor received an email message

>> from a separate `connected' correspondent, under the heading:

>>  `Henry M. Paulson, Secretary of the US Treasury,

>> died today from his gunshot wounds':

>>

>> `This is true. I have it confirmed from a source of mine. T

>> hanks again Christopher for all you do

>> and your amazing courage to carry through this'.

>>

>> On 3rd January 2008, the website www.fourwinds10.com

>> carried a `Casper Update' which contained the following passage:

>>

>> BUSH was confronted today with the death of PAULSON.

>>

>> " That's a lie " says he.

>> " Well, produce him " , says he.

>> " I can't, says he, " he's sick " .

>> " Yes, dead men are usually sick before they die " , says we.

>> " Can you produce the

>> FIVE CHENEY ASSISTANTS who have been shot?!

>> " No " .

>>

>> Before we complete this passage from www.fourwinds10.com,

>> consider the following:

>>

>> • If our report that Paulson had died is a `lie',

>> WHY DID THE TREASURY OR THE U.S. GOVERNMENT

>> NOT ISSUE A CATEGORICAL DENIAL OF IT,

>> given that such a report might be considered a problem

>> for the financial markets?

>>  

>> The President's verbal statement that it was a `lie' should have

>> been followed up by a categorical official denial of the report.

>>

>> Or was it simply that, since the report appeared in a despised

>>  `alternative media' source, it could not be expected

>> to affect the financial markets at all?

>>

>> • Why did White House spokesman Tony Fratto

>> have nothing to say about the report?

>>

>> • But of course acknowledging that it was a `lie'

>> was out of the question, wasn't it, because the report

>> was based upon a confirmation from the US State Department

>> (backed, we can reveal, by statements by an Ambassador

>> and a former distinguished Governor of the Federal Reserve)

>> that Paulson had died.

>>  

>> So the President was not only contradicting the State Department,

>> but was also saying that the State Department had lied!

>> Did he warn Condoleeza Rice that he would contradict

>> the State Department's confirmation? Apparently not.

>>

>> • Note that Bush 43 stated that he could not

>>  

>> On the basis that the shooting was `pass-through',

>> Henry Paulson would have been `sick'

>> because he was still recovering from the shooting,

>> which was not fatal.

>>  

>> That would account for the appearance of an almost

>> motionless Paulson `cadaver' at the staged appearance

>> that took place in the White House on 4th January

>> (even though the Treasury's website had explicitly stated

>> that no appearances by Treasury officials

>> had been scheduled for between

>> 22nd December and 4th January).

>>  

>> Alternatively, he was `sick' because he was dead,

>> and his subsequent choreographed appearances

>> have indeed been performances by a hired doppleganger.

>>

>> • Observe that `Casper' referenced FIVE Cheney aides

>> who had been shot (whereas we only knew of ONE).

>> Since the President did NOT dispute the information

>> contained in the question (namely that

>> FIVE Cheney aides had been shot),

>> we believe that this information has to be correct.

>>  

>> Instead of disputing that FIVE Cheney aides had been shot,

>> the Criminal President simply said that he could not produce them.

>> Obviously not, because they had been shot.

>>

>> The `Casper' passage concluded:

>>

>> The 3 administration people arrested per STORY Update

>> were taken to The Hague.

>>

>> BUSH mumbled something about an instant recession " IF " .

>>

>> Allow us to elaborate here:

>>

>> • The first statement provides confirmation that the three

>> who were arrested as we stated in our report dated 2nd January

>> were Administration officials (as we thought), not bankers.

>> These officials were transferred to the jurisdiction of the

>> International Court of Justice in The Hague.

>>  

>> Like the two Americans held by the Israelis pending payment

>> of the funds that Paulson double-crossed them over

>> (see the same report), these three US officials

>> can be considered hostages pending the necessary settlements.

>> Very interesting.

>>

>> • The Criminal President's mumble about an `instant recession

>> " IF " ' was clearly a reference to his perverse stance that

>>   " IF " Basel II is implemented and applied in the United States,

>> the Corrupt Banks' on-the-books finances

>> `Will be' everely constrained,

>> tipping the country into recession at once

>> (which is happening anyway).

>>

>> Being interpreted, what he was trying to say but didn't,

>> was that his repeated interferences with the settlements

>> represented an operation to frustrate and jeopardise

>> or destroy Basel II, so that corrupt `business as usual',

>> could continue as though nothing had happened.

>>

>> By extension, the desperate giga-thefts that took place

>> under cover of the `Paulson obfuscation' represented

>> a frantic response by these cornered financial criminals

>> to grab back as much of the stolen loot as they can,

>> just in case they fail to frustrate the implementation

>> of the new Basel II on-the-books banking regime,

>> precluding corrupt `business as usual'.

>>

>> At 5.20pm on Saturday 5th January, an authoritative source

>> in the Southwest of the United States was reported to the Editor

>> to have stated, with reference to Paulson: `He's gone'.

>> He added that `no-one is not accessible'.

>> This email, too, is resident, of course, in our files.

>>

>> MILITARY CONTACTS OF INDEPENDENT SOURCE

>> CONFIRM THE DEATH

>>

>> On 4th January 2008, Patrick J Bellringer posted the following

>> comments in response to this message (typical of many

>> that we also received in similar vein) on the www.fourwinds10.com

>> website:

>> `I saw Paulson on CNBC at 2pm EST sitting next to Bush.

>> This should put an an end to this Paulson death nonsense'.

>>

>> Like so many others, this `helpful' correspondent revealed

>> his naivety and failure to understand that an image on a

>> TV screen nowadays can lie, and may even have no meaning.

>> The information on the screen may be entirely `virtual', which

>> these critics appear for some weird reason not to understand.

>>  

>> Bellringer responded inter alia as follows:

>>

>> `I have been slammed with email from doubters like you

>> about the US Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson's death

>> being a hoax, and that I am a liar from claiming

>> that Henry is now dead because you saw him on TV

>> sitting with President G W Bush and VP Cheney.

>>  

>> I ask:

>>  

>> What did you See?

>>  

>> Did Henry Move?

>>  

>> Did he Speak?

>>  

>> Did you see his eyes move?

>>  

>> Were you looking at a video

>> made by the CIA in their Hollywood studio?

>>  

>> Were you looking at a lookalike (double),

>> a holographic image or even a solid hologram?'

>>

>> `Is Henry Paulson dead?

>>  

>> My military sources, some of whom participated

>> in the incident in which Paulson was killed, say this is true.

>>  

>> I have been informed that the Henry Paulson family

>> are now making funeral arrangements.

>> Why is this so, if he were alive?'

>>

>> `You must choose whom you are willing to believe.

>> As Christopher Story has said:

>>   " You cannot have it both ways.

>> Make up your mind which sources you trust,

>> but don't, please, burden us with your unbelief " '.

>>

>> In a `Casper' Update posted on www.fourwinds10.com

>> on 4th January, the reporter commented:

>>

>> `We have at least as many sources as STORY

>> claiming he is deceased and today's video a fraud.

>> One source says the family acknowledged his passing

>> the day it happened, US military sources, banking sources,

>> even WIKIPEDIA, said it's true.

>> The WIKIPEDIA obit, right below his picture,

>> was removed within hours of posting.

>>  

>> Another source said the family was making funeral arrangements.

>> Others speak of a " stand-in " . Fox News and all present at the

>> meeting of economic advisers would have to be in on the scam'.

>>

>> SOME CLOSING FORENSIC OBSERVATIONS

>>

>> Separately, on 3rd January, a correspondent drew our attention

>> to the fact that the Wikipedia entry for Henry M. Paulson

>> suddenly contained the phrase `Died: 2 January 2008'

>> beneath the Library photograph of this criminal operative.

>>  

>> Now the text in that segment of a Wikipedia page is always blue.

>> The date of death was shown in black. When the Editor checked

>> the site (immediately after receiving the correspondent's email),

>> the date of death was missing.

>>

>> The correspondent later confirmed that he had verified

>> that the date of death had been there,

>> but that it had been removed within hours of posting.

>>

>> Forensic examinations of all the relevant tapes are in progress,

>> and copies of all the `post-mortem appearances'

>> of Paulson have been acquired.

>>  

>> This subject is getting too complicated to elaborate here,

>> but a number of odd findings are worth adding now:

>>

>> • Newsday.com, which had carried a report of the hastily

>> convened meeting at the White House ostensibly between

>>  Bush Jr., `Paulson;, Bernanke and Leazar

>> (Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers),

>> had removed this report by 6th January, so that the listing

>> jumped from articles published on 3rd January, to 5th January,

>> with nothing listed for 4th January at all.

>>

>> • A supposed photograph of the meeting, shown on the

>> Treasury website, has Bush Jr., `Paulson, Bernanke and Lazear

>> in that order with Mr Lazear furthest from the camera,

>> the only problem being that a portion of Bernanke's head,

>> which is further from the camera than `Paulson's',

>> intrudes over Paulson's head.

>>

>> • A Treasury Department photograph monitored on 8th January

>> supposedly of the staged event on 4th January,

>> had been changed. `Paulson' was standing to one side.

>>

>> An expert points out that this picture was suspiciously `identical'

>> to a known photo of Paulson speaking at Georgetown Law School.

>>

>> • Official pictures about the meeting on 4th January included

>> one shot of President Bush and `Paulson', with Cheney,

>> who was not mentioned anywhere as participating at the meeting.

>> Some reports on `Paulson's supposed video appearance

>> at the staged event on 4th January suggested that

>> the person in question was under severe strain.

>>

>> • If the Paulson video appearance at the staged meeting

>> on 4th January was bogus, certain preliminary forensic findings

>> support such a conclusion.

>>

>> For instance,

>> in video insertion and manipulation of Paulson headshot

>> and hands took place, this would explain bizarre movements

>> and expressions, with `Paulson's' shirt collar remaining still

>> most of the time despite the head movement.

>>  

>> The basic software being used for such fakery is the same,

>> presumably, as that used in the fraudulent videos still concocted

>> by the CIA purporting to be the updated ruminations

>> of Osama Bin Laden,

>> who actually died in Minnesota on 26th December 2001.

>>

>> • FACT:

>> The late John Chambers, who died in 2001,

>> was the key makeup-to-go expert for the CIA.

>> The current leading experts in making up doubles

>> are believed to be Hollywood's Rick Baker  & Robert Sidell,

>> a former colleague of Chambers.

>>

>> Forensic examinations of video footage of the `post-mortem

>> appearances' are reliably reported to contain curious anomalies.

>>  

>> Explanations of these will have to wait until later, or they appear

>> in the Editor's Wantagate book, in preparation.

>>

>> THE ACTUAL SHOOTINGS HAVE NOT BEEN COVERED UP

>>

>> The main point to take away from this report is that

>> PART of the Paulson matter MAY have been an attempted

>> `Black Ops' discrediting operation.

>> It impressed a small proportion of gullible people,

>> augmented by paid Cheney Psy-Ops hacks who have bombarded

>> the Editor with abusive emails as a consequence.

>> After a few were examined, these were all trashed unread.

>>

>> But the shootings were real (as the `death may still turn out to be':

>> it may be too early to be sure) and have NOT BEEN COVERED UP.

>> Therefore, to attempt a `sting' operation against the Editor

>> of this service on the back of the shootings,

>> was an act of desperation by the Dark Forces who have

>> been exposed by Wantagate through this website.

>>

>> The `sting' was also a diversion, to redirect attention away from

>> what was happening – giga-theft on a gargantuan scale,

>> a.k.a. corrupt `business as usual'.

>> As should soon become clear, this massive criminal

>> and diversionary 'Psy-Ops' operation has crumbled.

>>

>> TOUCH AND GO AGAIN:

>> WILL THE CATASTROPHE BE PREVENTED?

>>

>> While vast amounts of the stolen funds were quickly recovered

>> – the four PROMIS teams monitoring these illicit financial thefts

>> and movements 24/7 have had no rest – the issue that matters

>> is whether the tiny cabal of World Class criminals

>> will finally be stopped, by means which this Editor

>> has no right to speculate about, or whether the financial

>> and economic crash that we predicted on 2nd September 2006

>> and again in the summer of 2007 – will be allowed,

>> thanks to the satanic intransigence of these ruthless madmen,

>> simply to occur because the relevant powers

>> inside the US structures fail to take whatever action

>> they might consider appropriate in the circumstances.

>>

>> As this report was being closed, we were being told that

>> Citigroup has had all its assets, as well as its gold, frozen.

>> This information was provided to the Editor by email at 2:12pm

>> on 8th January. It could not be confirmed at this closing:

>> but the very surfacing of such a report indicates `where we're at'

>> – which the redirected Paulson diversion does not.

>>

>> INCREMENTAL MILITARY PROGRESS

>> (COULD BE TOO SLOW)

>>

>> One final point. As indicated above, the belated response

>> of the `counterforce' within the US military plus the relevant

>> elements of the Military Power, are operating `incrementally'.

>> We have this information from TWO separate military sources.

>> Therefore, events such as those that have taken place

>> in recent weeks, and others that we don't yet know much about,

>> are, by definition, having incremental consequences.

>>

>> If you haven't yet understood what is going on as these forces

>> come to the rescue of the Republic at the last moment,

>> bear that important fact in mind.

>>  

>> And it's not one minute to midnight.

>> It's five o'clock in the morning, in case those

>> who have been fast asleep hadn't noticed.

>>

>> ======

>> Note:

>> (1)

>> The source's email dated 6th January 2008 and timed at 05:47 am

>> UK time, stated: 'I called the Department of the Treasury and they

>> acted very strange. The man I spoke to refused to identify himself

>> and would only answer questions with questions ridiculing

>> my willingness to believe alternative news sources.

>> He was totaly insolent and rude and hung up on me'.

>> (2)

>> An experienced businessman and traveller known to the Editor

>> of this service, who has had extensive business in Hungary,

>> informs us that Hungarian crooks are among the most ruthless

>> and dangerous category of mobsters in the world.

>>

>> • Editor's Note:

>> We are still, from time to time, receiving emails from frustrated

>> people seeking documentation to 'back up' what we publish

>> in these reports. Such correspondents choose to overlook

>> the well-known fact that we have published several huge issues

>> of International Currency Review which contain hundreds of pages

>> of facsimiles of relevant documents.

>>  

>> Since we are a commercial operation, we cannot make

>> these volumes available free of charge.

>>

>> • However copies are available in many university and other

>> libraries around the world, and of course they can be ordered

>> via this website at any time. But the main point here is

>> that complaints along these lines reveal lack of knowledge

>> of the background, which is that an immense volume

>> of relevant documents has been published, while these reports

>> are approved where necessary and appropriate either

>> by the Principals or by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.,

>> before being posted.

>>

>> In the case of this presentation, the Editor conveyed a copy

>> of the report for Mr Cottrell's attention as a courtesy and at

>> the same time to ensure that what has now been published here

>> does not 'cut across' matters of an intensified nature

>> that are currently in hand.

>>

>> ===========

>> LEGAL SECTION:

>> PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES

>> THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE

>> HAS EXPOSED.

>> REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY...

>>

>> • We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes,

>> securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended

>> to these reports for many months. The reason we append

>> this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities

>> under the US Misprision of Felony legislation,

>> and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

>>

>> ================

>> LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT

>> DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:

>>

>> Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving

>> Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant

>> and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation

>> and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of NASD / SEC

>> Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition

>> for the title of `Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in

>> America'.

>>  

>> At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the

>> 'Saturday scam' described above and on 13th November:

>>

>> Step 1:

>> Fraud in the Inducement:

>> " … is intended to and which does cause one

>> to execute an instrument, or make an agreement…

>> The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one

>> as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts

>> of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis

>> of a decision to sign or render a judgment "

>>  

>> Source:

>> Steven H. Gifis, `Law Dictionary', 5th Edition, Happauge:

>> Barron's Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: `Fraud'.

>>

>> Step 2:

>> Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

>>

>> • " ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making

>> a false representation with an evil intent [scanter]

>> when it causes injury to another… " . Source:

>> Steven H. Gifis, `Law Dictionary', 5th Edition, Happauge:

>> Barron's Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: `Fraud'.

>>

>> • " THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT…

>> The elements of actionable deceit are:

>> A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge

>> of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds

>> for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon,

>> on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury… " .

>> Source:

>> Steven H. Gifis, `Law Dictionary', 5th Edition, Happauge:

>> Barron's Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: `Deceit'.

>>

>> Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

>>

>> THEFT BY DECEPTION:

>>

>> • " FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT…

>> The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance

>> which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose… " .

>>

>> • " The test of whether failure to disclose material facts

>> constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable,

>> arising from the relation of the parties:

>>  failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead

>> or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent

>> to an actual `fraudulent concealment'… " .

>>

>> • To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment

>> of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation

>> and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing

>> a right of action, and acts relied on must be

>> of an affirmative character and fraudulent… " .

>>

>> Source:

>> Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black's Law Dictionary',

>> Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company,

>> 1968, s.v. `Fraudulent Concealment'.

>>

>> FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

>>

>> • `FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE…

>> A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which

>> is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him,

>> or to put such property beyond his reach… " .

>>

>> • " Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due

>> by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer… " .

>>

>> Source:

>> Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., `Black's Law Dictionary,

>> Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company,

>> 1968, s.v. `Fraudulent Conveyance'.

>>

>> SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH

>> BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH

>> AND OF WHICH THE SIX `LEVY BANKS'

>> MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH

>> [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK,

>> BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

>>

>> • NASD Rule 3120, et al.

>> • NASD Rule 2330, et al

>> • NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040

>> • NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1

>> • NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1

>> • NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110

>> • SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4

>> • NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210

>> • NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330

>> • NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5

>> • NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

>>

>> In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:

>> • 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule

>> for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

>>

>> LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES

>> WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA'S

>> $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED

>> AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006,

>> AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

>>

>> • Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act

>> • Anti-Drug Abuse Act

>> • Applicable international money laundering restrictions

>> • Bank Secrecy Act

>> • Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.

>> • Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]

>> • Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act

>> • Economic Espionage Act

>> • Hobbs Act

>> • Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]

>> • Maloney Act

>> • Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)

>> • Money-Laundering Control Act

>> • Money-Laundering Suppression Act

>> • Organized Crime Control Act of 1970

>> • Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and

>> Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies,

>> which are co-responsible with the said employees

>> for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent

>> operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities

>> and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present

>> and former holders of high office under the United States

>> • Provisions pertaining to private business transactions

>> being protected under both private and criminal penalties

>> [H.R. 3723]

>> • Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials

>> [F.I.S.A.]

>> • Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act

>> [R.I.C.O.]

>> • Securities Act 1933

>> • Securities Act 1934

>> • Terrorism Prevention Act

>> • Treason legislation, especially in time of war

>>

>> This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration

>> condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute

>> contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and

>> bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta's funds.

>>

>> The Directors and others listed in Part 1

>> of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others

>> posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of,

>> and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly,

>> the egregious violation of the laws itemised above.

>>  

>> This list is reproduced in International Currency Review,

>> Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

>>

>>

>> U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:

>> MISPRISION OF FELONY:

>>

>> `Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony

>> cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not

>> as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge

>> or other person in civil or military authority under the United

>> States,

>> shall be fined under this title or imprisoned

>> not more than 3 years, or both'.

>>

>> Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

>>

>> WIKIPEDIA IS PART OF AN NSA DISCREDITING OPERATION

>>

>> As previously reported, the Editor's attention was drawn,

>> in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies,

>> diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted

>> on Wikipedia under  `Leo Wanta'.

>>

>> Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME

>> on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies,

>> including disinformation dredged out of `Thieves' World',

>> a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster

>> by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

>>

>> Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second

>> meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

>>

>> ANCIENT DISCREDITED LIES POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2007

>>

>> The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time

>> as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old,

>> discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed

>> after the Ambassador had been taken down,

>> namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor

>>  and his advisers that this latest evil display

>> of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation

>> by the US intelligence community's disinformation and lie machine,

>> to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting

>> Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him

>> of his funds by some false pretext or other

>> after a `gag order' has been signed.

>>

>> The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador's affairs

>> has been published on this website, and in several issues of

>> International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review,

>> Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by

>> World Reports Limited, for several years.

>>  

>> Copies of these publications are in official, institutional

>> and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting

>> about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies

>> and fails to take account of the accurate information

>> that we have published, can easily be demonstrated

>> to represent yet another US intelligence community

>> and NSA discrediting operation.

>>

>> PRELUDE TO `SETTING UP' WANTA ALL OVER AGAIN

>>

>> We now understand that the Principals have been advised

>> (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal

>> that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed

>> to `set them up' for a future discrediting operation

>> whereby false witness will be deployed against them

>> to the effect that they have stolen the money,

>> or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute

>> because they will be bound by the `prerequisite' gag order

>> that is intended.

>>  

>> Its purpose, of course, is to `legitimise' the old and new lies

>> that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use.

>> The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation

>> will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well.

>> We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

>>

>> EDITOR'S TRUE REPORT

>> REPEATEDLY REPLACED BY OLD LIES

>>

>> On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia

>> the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below.

>> The Editor's accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia,

>> leaving the `old lies' that had existed previously.

>> When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted

>> the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy

>> had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies,

>> leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead,

>> without the lies.

>>

>> On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor

>> that the Editor's accurate text had been removed

>> and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted

>> on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked,

>> he found that the page could no longer be edited

>> because of what the site managers described as `vandalism'.

>>

>> IT'S `VANDALISM' TO POST THE TRUTH,

>> NOT `VANDALISM' TO POST LIES

>>

>> It was not `vandalism' to delete the truth

>> and to replace the truth by old lies,

>> but it was `vandalism' to delete `old lies'

>> and replace them by the truth.

>>

>> We are therefore able to conclude from

>> this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

>>

>> 1. Wikipedia, which purports to `change the world',

>> prefers lies to the truth.

>>

>> 2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation

>> and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source

>> of reliable information in any context.

>>

>> 3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest

>> in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States'

>> greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally

>> disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat

>> (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which,

>> by its actions in deleting the Editor's ACCURATE information

>> and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour

>> in `snipping' our website texts as stated above,

>> thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns,

>> which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

>>

>> 4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community

>> to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006,

>> when the Ambassador's funds were first hijacked

>> by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson,

>> US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying

>> the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation

>> against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

>>

>> • We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated,

>> and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the

>> amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

>>

>> The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted

>> on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all,

>> PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA'S EXIT FROM PROBATION,

>> FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE

>> A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?).

>>  

>> This information will be very widely distributed by other means,

>> in order to provide all concerned with the necessary `heads-up'

>> as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind.

>> They are out of their minds and in Satan's mind:

>>

>> The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below

>> was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient

>> CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back

>> to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth.

>> The report appended immediately below was added on

>> 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation

>> contained in the original stub.

>>

>> It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced.

>> This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies

>> are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org,

>> which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material,

>> that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

>>

>> THE ACCURATE TEXT THAT WIKIPEDIA REPEATEDLY DELETED

>>

>> This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

>>

>> The 'information' posted below represents a deliberately malevolent,

>> false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality.

>> It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher

>> Story

>> as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous

>> and implies that Story, the veteran Editor of

>> International Currency Review of nearly 40 years' standing,

>> is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the

>> case.

>>

>> This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation

>> that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether;

>> they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story's website,

>>  which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

>>

>> www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated

>> information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source

>> 'Thieves' World' was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the

>> late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

>>

>> This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA,

>> which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence

>> community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed

>> that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds

>> (see below).

>>

>> He 'ceased to be dead' with effect from 21st July 2005

>> after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid

>> $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico

>> by way of 'restitution' to an American lawyer for onward payment

>> to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections,

>> to procure Mr Wanta's release from his illegal probation.

>>

>> Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally

>> 'taken down' in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant

>> on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay

>> $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax

>> that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna

>> on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

>>

>> This data is all in the public domain, has been published

>> for several years in International Currency Review,

>> the Journal of the World Financial Community,

>> and can be read on Mr Story's website.

>>

>> International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal

>> with a worldwide circulation: ISSN 0020-6490.

>> It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

>>

>> Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated

>> by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest

>> by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992),

>> the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State

>> Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account

>> maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story

>> holds documentary

>> proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by

>>  Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured

>> Mr Wanta's release from illegal probation effective 14th Nov. 2005.

>>

>> As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead,

>> the CIA's lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos,

>> and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA

>> had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation

>> purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard

>> false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray

>>  Christopher Story as a source of disinformation)

>> were discredited as well.

>>

>> Why was Wanta taken down?

>> So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Govt

>> could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled

>> by Leo Wanta on President Reagan's orders, in the course

>> of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

>>

>> Under Reagan's Executive Order 12333 of 1981,

>> US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations

>> which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al

>> for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated

>> to them.

>>

>> The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations

>> were consequently the property of the corporations and thus

>> of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been,

>> and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost

>> all US intelligence operatives are liars and do not function

>> on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

>>

>> Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule:

>> he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast

>> to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakocracy*

>> needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

>>

>> Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law,

>> as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail

>> on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official

>> structures

>> immediately ransacked Mr Wanta's bank accounts according to plan.

>>

>> The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth

>> on Christopher Story's website www.worldreports.org.

>> and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in

>> International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited

>> intelligence publications.

>>

>> Students are advised perhaps to begin with the 'Wisconsingate'

>> report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects,

>> with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department

>> of Revenue's tax fabrication operation against Wanta,

>> stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed

>>  by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed

>> the fabricated basis for Wanta's illegal takedown in 1993,

>> despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its

>> borders.

>>

>> The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing

>> underlying cause of the prevailing global financial

>> and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing,

>> has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr.

>> White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders,

>> hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion

>>  that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord

>> that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over

>> to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted

>> remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds

>> of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them)

>> could be released from a de facto lien arising

>> from the collapse of the CIA's lie that Wanta was dead.

>>

>> For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds

>> (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat `funny' money generated

>>  by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged

>> to Lee Wanta and to no-one else:

>>  a situation that the banks 'could not handle'.

>>

>> The entire narrative of what has become the worst

>>  financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub

>> consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out

>> in great detail on Christopher Story's website www.worldreports.org.,

>> to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of

>> affairs

>> to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty

>> and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies,

>> presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture,

>> and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story

>> as a source for some of this disinformation.

>>

>> It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent

>> US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

>>

>> All the statements in the above commentary may be verified

>> by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency

>> Review.

>> Another publication covering this matter in detail is

>> Economic Intelligence Review, also published by

>> World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access

>> the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

>>

>> A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta

>> and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

>>

>> The Wanta disinformation referred to above

>> has been deleted from this page.

>>  

>> ENDS.

>>

>> DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS

>>

>> The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special

>> diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007),

>> which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador

>> several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended

>> discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community's

>> Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course

>> to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending

>> `thought crime' legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

>>

>> *Note: `Kakocracy': Governance by a clique representing

>> the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion

>> of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or

>> filthy.

>>

>>

>> Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta:

>>  Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535

>> a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV;

>> and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc:

>> Federal EIN Number 20-3866855;

>>  Virginia State Corporation Identification Number:

>> 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation

>> Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

>>

>> • Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review

>> cannot enter into email correspondence related

>> to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

>>

>> We are a private intelligence publishing house and have

>> no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies.

>> The word `intelligence' on this website and in all

>> our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only

>> and has no other connotations whatsoever:

>> see `About Us' on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor,

>> Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively

>> engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author a

>> nd private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963

>> and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power,

>> suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel

>> in the English Court.

>>  

>> ====================

>> Confusion Say:

>> Only Fools Learn their Reality

>> Drinking from a Fountain of Illusion.

>>                  ~  cyber Kung Fu Tse

>> =======

>>

>>

>>

> <image.tiff>

>>

>> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile.

>> Try it now.

>>