Guest guest Posted November 24, 2004 Report Share Posted November 24, 2004 Nice and informative response, Dr. Jenkins, and I agree about the spawn of Satan. Insurance is the absolute worst part about practice by far. I just wanted to add (and I'm sure you are aware of this, but others may not be) that although personal injury (PIP) auto cases DO require more paperwork and attorneys (both sides) will want sometimes repeated chart notes, a fee can be made on each batch sent. I typically charge $35-50 each time they ask (it's especially irksome when I've included chart notes with each billing). So, for 10-15 minutes of my time making copies, I can make $35-50. Some people charge more, some charge nothing at all. It's a personal call. _____ Dr. Avery L. Jenkins [ajenkins] Wednesday, November 24, 2004 5:36 AM Chinese Medicine Re: Avery--Medicare, money: ABN'S/INSURANCE Laura, It depends on the plan. In the HMO plans, if I am a participating provider, I am prohibited by my contract with the HMO from balance-billing the patient for the difference between what the HMO pays me + patient co-pay, and what my standard fee is. Because of this, I only participate in 2 HMOs. However, if I am not a participating provider, it often works out that there is a deductible; until the deductible is met, the patient pays the standard fee, after which the insurance company pays me a percentage of my standard fee (usually 50-80%) and the patient pays me the outstanding balance. The ABN form is only a Medicare requirement, Medicare plays by its own rules; however, I or my staff always discuss the insurance situation with the patient up front, so nobody gets any nasty surprises. In personal injury cases, I bill my standard fees, for which the patient is fully responsible. If there is insurance coverage, I will bill the auto insurance; if they are represented by attorney, I have the patient sign a lien, which states that I will be fully paid out of the patient's settlement. While good money, PI cases usually take 2-6 years to resolve; paperwork problems increase, in that the attorney always wants copies of the clinical notes and usually a report. The attorney may also seek to cut your fees at the last minute if the settlement comes out to less than expected. The insurance companies will also seek to cut your fees in out-of-network and PI cases as well, stating that they are responsible only for UCR (Usual, Customary and Reasonable) charges, which somehow are always less than what I bill. It looks like the wave of the future is going to be plans with high deductibles -- $1,000, $2,000, or $5,000 -- after which insurance kicks in. In short, disaster insurance. Which is great for those of us in alternative health, because on a level playing field, I can treat many conditions at much less cost to the patient than western medicine. My approach to insurance companies highly adversarial. I regard them all as Spawn of Satan. Avery L. Jenkins, DC, DACBN, FIAMA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 Hi Avery and all, LOL, I think you are wise to recognize an enemy when you see one. I swear they make up reasons to put off payments (and then just let the bill sit there until I call them). I ask most of my patients to pay at the time of service. I tell them this on the phone when they make the appointment, and most of them are fine with it. However, if they cannot afford to do so, I make exceptions. So far this has worked great, but I don't know if problems will come up (I'm pretty new to this). Its very satisfying getting paid right then and there for the hard work I put into each and every one of them. Keeps me motivated--a win-win situation. Even if the ABN form is only for medicare, I'm thinking that the concept may be useful to us. If I am billing HMO's for elbow pain but also treating low energy, poor sleep, and depression I think that it might work to tell the patient that the insurance is paying this amount for the work we are doing on your pain, but you need to pay the additional amount (up to my regular fee) to cover the other work we are doing. That makes sense to me---What do others think? Perhaps if we rallied around this idea we could make it a standard way that we practice as acupuncturists. It really seems only fair if you ask me. Thoughts anyone? Also, is there a simple way to know whether an insurance company is an HMO or not? (I suspect that question has made me look really clueless...) Laura Chinese Medicine , " Dr. Avery L. Jenkins " <ajenkins@c...> wrote: > > Laura, > > It depends on the plan. In the HMO plans, if I am a participating provider, > I am prohibited by my contract with the HMO from balance-billing the patient > for the difference between what the HMO pays me + patient co-pay, and what > my standard fee is. Because of this, I only participate in 2 HMOs. > > However, if I am not a participating provider, it often works out that there > is a deductible; until the deductible is met, the patient pays the standard > fee, after which the insurance company pays me a percentage of my standard > fee (usually 50-80%) and the patient pays me the outstanding balance. > > The ABN form is only a Medicare requirement, Medicare plays by its own > rules; however, I or my staff always discuss the insurance situation with > the patient up front, so nobody gets any nasty surprises. > > In personal injury cases, I bill my standard fees, for which the patient is > fully responsible. If there is insurance coverage, I will bill the auto > insurance; if they are represented by attorney, I have the patient sign a > lien, which states that I will be fully paid out of the patient's > settlement. While good money, PI cases usually take 2-6 years to resolve; > paperwork problems increase, in that the attorney always wants copies of the > clinical notes and usually a report. The attorney may also seek to cut your > fees at the last minute if the settlement comes out to less than expected. > > The insurance companies will also seek to cut your fees in out-of- network > and PI cases as well, stating that they are responsible only for UCR (Usual, > Customary and Reasonable) charges, which somehow are always less than what I > bill. > > It looks like the wave of the future is going to be plans with high > deductibles -- $1,000, $2,000, or $5,000 -- after which insurance kicks in. > In short, disaster insurance. Which is great for those of us in alternative > health, because on a level playing field, I can treat many conditions at > much less cost to the patient than western medicine. > > My approach to insurance companies highly adversarial. I regard them all as > Spawn of Satan. > > Avery L. Jenkins, DC, DACBN, FIAMA > > - > " heylaurag " <heylaurag@h...> > <Chinese Medicine > > Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:13 PM > Re: Avery--Medicare, money: ABN'S/INSURANCE > > > > > > > > > > Hi Avery and all, Maybe you know the answer to this question, or maybe > > someone else does. My understanding is that we cannot bill the > > patient beyond what their insurance pays plus the co-pay. Is that > > accurate? If so, I was wondering if we could use a form like the ABN > > that you mentioned to get paid beyond what their insurance pays. > > Anyone know? I find it frustrating to be paid 2/3 of what I charge > > when I am treating many different issues beyond the elbow pain I'm > > billing for. > > > > How do others deal with this, and am I correct in thinking that we > > cannot bill beyond the co-pay? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Laura > > > > > > Chinese Medicine , " Dr. Avery L. > > Jenkins " <ajenkins@c...> wrote: > >> > >> - > >> <acudoc11@a...> > >> <Chinese Medicine > > >> Monday, November 22, 2004 10:17 PM > >> Re: Medicare, money.. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > When one compares their treatment to a Chiropractic adjustment or > > as an > >> > Acupuncturist > >> > technician then I guess that person will get the bottom of the > > barrell for > >> > reimbursement. > >> > > >> > If one acts like a primary care provider and bills accordingly > > they won't > >> > wind up with $20. > >> > > >> > >> Huh?? > >> > >> What Medicare pays for services has little to nothing to do with > > what you > >> bill for them. Fees are established primarily by bureacratic fiat and > >> approved Congressionally. If you you are a participating physician, > > you have > >> the extremely negligible advantage of having Medicare automatically > > forward > >> the unpaid portion of your bill to the patient's secondary insurance > > (if > >> any), for potential payment of the balance. The downside of that is > > that as > >> a par provider, you cannot balance bill the patient for the unpaid > > portion > >> of covered services. > >> > >> You may, however, bill the patient your standard fee for any > > non-covered > >> service, but only so long as you had the patient sign an ABN (Advance > >> Beneficiary Notification), which states the service to be rendered, > > the fee, > >> and the reason you expect Medicare to reject the bill. The ABN must > > be in a > >> form approved by Medicare, which is readily downloaded off the net. > >> > >> As a non-participating provider, you can bill Medicare and then have > > the > >> advantage of being able to balance bill the patient for covered > > services. > >> > >> You should also know that Medicare will soon be requiring all bills > > to be > >> submitted electronically. This places a huge burden on you to ensure > > that > >> your software can submit the bill (via a Medicare-approved > > clearinghouse) in > >> the proper format and that your entire office management system > > meets HIPAA > >> requirements. > >> > >> You should also be aware that Medicare, like other insurers, is > > likely to > >> highly restrict the diagnoses for which acupuncture treatment will be > >> covered, and be prepared for a 3-6 month wait (minimum) for payment. In > >> fact, I have many bills which have gone unpaid for as long as a year. > >> > >> > >> > >> Avery L. Jenkins, DC, DACBN, FIAMA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 Hi Laura, I'm sure there may be someone out there with better info than mine, but here it goes. Basically, if you are not a preferred provider for insurance companies, you can charge what you want, and you can have patients pay you at the time of service (as you are doing). Are you a preferred provider for any insurance company? If so, you are obligated to take only what they pay you and the patients copayment. That's it. I don't think telling the patient that their insurance company is paying for " pain " and that they could pay for the rest will fly. That seems a little sticky. Anyone else have comments on this?? You could possibly give them separate treatments, one for pain to bill the insurance company and others for whatever else ails them. I'm not positive about this. Do you offer as " same day as service discount? " By this I mean: " My fee is $95 for the first visit, but if you pay me the same day of service, you pay only $85.00 " . That is legal, and it covers your pain and suffering for having to bill either the patient (if they can't pay the same day) or insurance company in the event you have to wait for payment. Some practitioners have as much as 25% difference between their " real " rate (what they charge insurance or if they have to bill the patient who won't or can't pay the same day) and their " cash " rate. This provides incentive for the patient to pay the same day and then turn the receipt into their insurance company. Perhaps you are already doing this. Good luck. I hope this helped some. I'm looking forward to other's feedback as this is interesting. Barb _____ heylaurag [heylaurag] Wednesday, November 24, 2004 4:07 PM Chinese Medicine Re: Avery--Medicare, money: ABN'S/INSURANCE Hi Avery and all, LOL, I think you are wise to recognize an enemy when you see one. I swear they make up reasons to put off payments (and then just let the bill sit there until I call them). I ask most of my patients to pay at the time of service. I tell them this on the phone when they make the appointment, and most of them are fine with it. However, if they cannot afford to do so, I make exceptions. So far this has worked great, but I don't know if problems will come up (I'm pretty new to this). Its very satisfying getting paid right then and there for the hard work I put into each and every one of them. Keeps me motivated--a win-win situation. Even if the ABN form is only for medicare, I'm thinking that the concept may be useful to us. If I am billing HMO's for elbow pain but also treating low energy, poor sleep, and depression I think that it might work to tell the patient that the insurance is paying this amount for the work we are doing on your pain, but you need to pay the additional amount (up to my regular fee) to cover the other work we are doing. That makes sense to me---What do others think? Perhaps if we rallied around this idea we could make it a standard way that we practice as acupuncturists. It really seems only fair if you ask me. Thoughts anyone? Also, is there a simple way to know whether an insurance company is an HMO or not? (I suspect that question has made me look really clueless...) Laura Chinese Medicine , " Dr. Avery L. Jenkins " <ajenkins@c...> wrote: > > Laura, > > It depends on the plan. In the HMO plans, if I am a participating provider, > I am prohibited by my contract with the HMO from balance-billing the patient > for the difference between what the HMO pays me + patient co-pay, and what > my standard fee is. Because of this, I only participate in 2 HMOs. > > However, if I am not a participating provider, it often works out that there > is a deductible; until the deductible is met, the patient pays the standard > fee, after which the insurance company pays me a percentage of my standard > fee (usually 50-80%) and the patient pays me the outstanding balance. > > The ABN form is only a Medicare requirement, Medicare plays by its own > rules; however, I or my staff always discuss the insurance situation with > the patient up front, so nobody gets any nasty surprises. > > In personal injury cases, I bill my standard fees, for which the patient is > fully responsible. If there is insurance coverage, I will bill the auto > insurance; if they are represented by attorney, I have the patient sign a > lien, which states that I will be fully paid out of the patient's > settlement. While good money, PI cases usually take 2-6 years to resolve; > paperwork problems increase, in that the attorney always wants copies of the > clinical notes and usually a report. The attorney may also seek to cut your > fees at the last minute if the settlement comes out to less than expected. > > The insurance companies will also seek to cut your fees in out-of- network > and PI cases as well, stating that they are responsible only for UCR (Usual, > Customary and Reasonable) charges, which somehow are always less than what I > bill. > > It looks like the wave of the future is going to be plans with high > deductibles -- $1,000, $2,000, or $5,000 -- after which insurance kicks in. > In short, disaster insurance. Which is great for those of us in alternative > health, because on a level playing field, I can treat many conditions at > much less cost to the patient than western medicine. > > My approach to insurance companies highly adversarial. I regard them all as > Spawn of Satan. > > Avery L. Jenkins, DC, DACBN, FIAMA > > - > " heylaurag " <heylaurag@h...> > <Chinese Medicine > > Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:13 PM > Re: Avery--Medicare, money: ABN'S/INSURANCE > > > > > > > > > > Hi Avery and all, Maybe you know the answer to this question, or maybe > > someone else does. My understanding is that we cannot bill the > > patient beyond what their insurance pays plus the co-pay. Is that > > accurate? If so, I was wondering if we could use a form like the ABN > > that you mentioned to get paid beyond what their insurance pays. > > Anyone know? I find it frustrating to be paid 2/3 of what I charge > > when I am treating many different issues beyond the elbow pain I'm > > billing for. > > > > How do others deal with this, and am I correct in thinking that we > > cannot bill beyond the co-pay? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Laura > > > > > > Chinese Medicine , " Dr. Avery L. > > Jenkins " <ajenkins@c...> wrote: > >> > >> - > >> <acudoc11@a...> > >> <Chinese Medicine > > >> Monday, November 22, 2004 10:17 PM > >> Re: Medicare, money.. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > When one compares their treatment to a Chiropractic adjustment or > > as an > >> > Acupuncturist > >> > technician then I guess that person will get the bottom of the > > barrell for > >> > reimbursement. > >> > > >> > If one acts like a primary care provider and bills accordingly > > they won't > >> > wind up with $20. > >> > > >> > >> Huh?? > >> > >> What Medicare pays for services has little to nothing to do with > > what you > >> bill for them. Fees are established primarily by bureacratic fiat and > >> approved Congressionally. If you you are a participating physician, > > you have > >> the extremely negligible advantage of having Medicare automatically > > forward > >> the unpaid portion of your bill to the patient's secondary insurance > > (if > >> any), for potential payment of the balance. The downside of that is > > that as > >> a par provider, you cannot balance bill the patient for the unpaid > > portion > >> of covered services. > >> > >> You may, however, bill the patient your standard fee for any > > non-covered > >> service, but only so long as you had the patient sign an ABN (Advance > >> Beneficiary Notification), which states the service to be rendered, > > the fee, > >> and the reason you expect Medicare to reject the bill. The ABN must > > be in a > >> form approved by Medicare, which is readily downloaded off the net. > >> > >> As a non-participating provider, you can bill Medicare and then have > > the > >> advantage of being able to balance bill the patient for covered > > services. > >> > >> You should also know that Medicare will soon be requiring all bills > > to be > >> submitted electronically. This places a huge burden on you to ensure > > that > >> your software can submit the bill (via a Medicare-approved > > clearinghouse) in > >> the proper format and that your entire office management system > > meets HIPAA > >> requirements. > >> > >> You should also be aware that Medicare, like other insurers, is > > likely to > >> highly restrict the diagnoses for which acupuncture treatment will be > >> covered, and be prepared for a 3-6 month wait (minimum) for payment. In > >> fact, I have many bills which have gone unpaid for as long as a year. > >> > >> > >> > >> Avery L. Jenkins, DC, DACBN, FIAMA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 This whole discussion is not about TCM. I do recognise that Medicare etc is an issue for some practitioners in the USA, but it isn't of interest to TCM practitioners in the rest of the world. Why don't you start a separate list about this issue since it comes up time and time again and stop posting on this list? Regards Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 You have a point Susie. Attilio ----Original Message----- Susie Parkinson [susie] 25 November 2004 15:03 Chinese Medicine Re:Avery--Medicare, money: ABN'S/INSURANCE This whole discussion is not about TCM. I do recognise that Medicare etc is an issue for some practitioners in the USA, but it isn't of interest to TCM practitioners in the rest of the world. Why don't you start a separate list about this issue since it comes up time and time again and stop posting on this list? Regards Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 This has everything to do with the practice of TCM and it is important. How about if you don't open things that look insurance/billing/business related as many of us DO practice in the US and have no one (since we often practice alone) to bounce these things off? There are magnitudes of topics on this forum I personally have no interest in that I just don't open. _____ Susie Parkinson [susie] Thursday, November 25, 2004 7:03 AM Chinese Medicine Re:Avery--Medicare, money: ABN'S/INSURANCE This whole discussion is not about TCM. I do recognise that Medicare etc is an issue for some practitioners in the USA, but it isn't of interest to TCM practitioners in the rest of the world. Why don't you start a separate list about this issue since it comes up time and time again and stop posting on this list? Regards Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 Barb wrote: > > Hi Laura, > > I'm sure there may be someone out there with better info Hi Barb! The better info comes from your local legal adviser. Yes, legal. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but you need a lawyer for this. The insurance companies have all the money in the world to buy access to legislators, or in some cases actually bribe them when this is possible. The laws, therefore, are written to support the insurance companies' idea of how such things should go. The only safe way to develop your own policy is to find a lawyer in your own jurisdiction who specializes in insurance law and have him or her write your office billing policy for you. You would have to review this with the lawyer every time they change the law. If you have a local association you could band together to hire a lawyer and set up a legal issues seminar on this, but you couldn't all get together and set the same rate because that is " price fixing " when *you* do it. It is ok when the insurance companies price fix because they are insurance companies sitting at the right hand of (deleted) and the lawmakers. Regards, Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Hi Pete---good point. If I really want to know if this is a viable option I should get a lawyer. Otherwise I am just going by opinions. It does seem like a viable option to me though: I offer treatment for the pain at the amount that I am contracted to through the HMO, and then I provide another service (treating the rest of the body) for the additional rate. Laura Chinese Medicine , Pete Theisen <petet@a...> wrote: > > Barb wrote: > > > > Hi Laura, > > > > I'm sure there may be someone out there with better info > > Hi Barb! > > The better info comes from your local legal adviser. Yes, legal. Sorry > to be the bearer of bad news, but you need a lawyer for this. > > The insurance companies have all the money in the world to buy access to > legislators, or in some cases actually bribe them when this is possible. > The laws, therefore, are written to support the insurance companies' > idea of how such things should go. > > The only safe way to develop your own policy is to find a lawyer in your > own jurisdiction who specializes in insurance law and have him or her > write your office billing policy for you. You would have to review this > with the lawyer every time they change the law. > > If you have a local association you could band together to hire a lawyer > and set up a legal issues seminar on this, but you couldn't all get > together and set the same rate because that is " price fixing " when *you* > do it. It is ok when the insurance companies price fix because they are > insurance companies sitting at the right hand of (deleted) and the > lawmakers. > > Regards, > > Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.