(No subject)

[Guest guest]

ALAN WATT

 

ON

 

" NATIONAL INTEL REPORT "

 

WITH

 

JOHN STADTMILLER

 

(Alan Stands in for 2 hours for John)

 

" SCIENCE PROMOTES STERILIZATION

 

FOR YOUNG WOMEN -

 

AND WE KNOW WHERE IT GOES FROM THERE "

 

February 15, 2008

 

 

 

Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - February 15, 2008 (Exempting Music,

Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments)

 

 

 

<http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/> WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM

 

 

 

<http://www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu/> www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt standing in for John Stadtmiller for the next couple

of hours and this is February 15th, 2008. For newcomers, I always ask them

to look at my own website. That's cuttingthroughthematrix.com where you'll

find hundreds of hours of talks from the past to listen to, which help fill

in all the little blank spots that we have in our remote and even recent

history. I show you all the various groups that make up the big monolithic

structure that we call the New World Order and I tell you where it's going

and the methods it's using to guide us all there. Look into

alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and download the transcripts of these same

talks. You can print them up and pass them around to your friends in the

various languages of Europe.

 

 

 

What's happening today to most people is just a feeling of uneasiness

because we live such short lives and when we see things rapidly changing in

our own lifetime we get kind of nervous. We get nervous because being human

we like to have a sort of permanence throughout our lives in some form or

another.

 

 

 

You'll notice even today in any town, even villages and so on, buildings go

up and last about five, ten years then they're knocked down again. That's

also intentional so there's no feeling of permanence there. Not so long ago

you could grow up and walk the same streets or country roads that your

grandparents walked and sat under the same trees as they sat under too. You

had a feeling of belonging and that's all been eradicated by design because

the society that's being created is a form of transitory society. We're all

supposed to be on the move in the near future by various means, of course,

including terror, plagues and all the rest of it and economic collapse. That

can be found - at least the economic collapse part can be found in Jacques

Attali's book called " Millennium " and he was no little fellow giving his

opinion. He was the man who helped spearhead the European Union. When he

talks about American in " Millennium, " subtitled " Winners and Losers in the

Coming New World Order, " he said that people will be leaving America;

they'll be the next boat people looking for work abroad. We're all supposed

to be transients in the near future.

 

 

 

In fact the new nomads will be a form of bureaucratic class who help managed

the rest of the world and they'll go from city to city wherever they're put

for two months, three months at a time and then they move on, so everyone's

to get used to this idea of no real permanence in their lives. That way we

can be controlled, all of us in fact, including the bureaucrats, all the

easier. However, traveling is not for everyone and that's the reason they're

bringing out the ID cards. You won't be allowed to travel unless you have a

perfectly, perfectly clear record of utter groveling obedience to the

system. Anything you've broken at all in the past, maybe even speaking back

to your teacher, will be on your record and you're a trouble maker, so

you'll be stuck back home where they'll be no work or whatever or put into a

certain little enclave they'll have set aside for people who don't fit in,

at least in the intermediary stages.

 

 

 

I'm not joking about this. As I said at the beginning of this talk, we hate

change. We're human beings. We like some kind of permanence, but over 100

years ago what's happening today, the machinery of what's going to make it

all move, was set in place 100 years ago. Big foundations, myriads of groups

including The Fabian Society where in motion to create this wave that took

all this time, 100 years, to manifest itself. I'll be back with more after

the following messages.

 

 

 

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt filling in for John for the next two hours, just

going over some of the forces that work behind change because there are very

real organized forces. Nothing happens in the history of the modern world

without it being planned that way and we do see the ongoing plans as

bureaucrats and different factions of governments across the sea all the

time and taught to their cohorts in other departments - similar departments

bypassing Congresses and Parliaments and all the rest of it. A process that

was actually set up as far as the League of Nations, the precursor of United

Nations, and they've been doing that for over 100 years now. About 100 years

now is pretty well close to it. H.G. Wells, a member of The Fabian Society,

one of the big groups that was set up that calls itself sort of

left-of-center but really it was chartered again by the Crown of England to

lead the people who were the working class along a certain path believing it

would be their champion.

 

 

 

They have a Marxist outlook and they're often blamed to be Marxist, but

there's nothing Marxist about them. There is no left and right paradigm

here, but what we have are simply agencies set up to lead both sides and any

other sides in between, they'll always give you their leaders. That's what

they planned when they set up The Fabian Society in England. The Fabian

Society had the exact same agenda that the later Natzis were blamed for

having. They weren't talking about eliminating poverty by giving everyone

work. They also went into eugenics, a big, big part of their program,

eugenics and breeding. They blamed the poor being poor because of hereditary

defects in their genetic structure. Their idea was to eliminate this

eventually through science and through governmental implantation of laws and

regulations to limit such inferior genes from manifesting as human beings.

 

 

 

In other words, euthanasia would be used for certain people, sterilization

on a mass scale and all of that stuff. All that beautiful stuff that came

down the pike in the 1940's was also discussed at The Fabian Society that

was set up at the beginning of the 1900's, again sponsored by what they call

in Britain, The Establishment, meaning the Crown royalty, all the hundreds

of families that still control Britain. All that way from the Norman era and

they all go through the Norman lineages, so they set up this Fabian Society

and they also believed in a particular religion. In fact, all of the

agencies and societies and big foundations believe in a particular religion,

a religion which is based to begin on Darwinism. Darwinism with his right

for the survival of the fittest and big powerful institutions were set up in

the 1800's in fact.

 

 

 

Cecil Rhodes was just one front organization again given permission to

exist, chartered by the Crown. It merged with Lord Alfred Milner's Round

Table Society and became the Royal Institute for International Affairs. That

was to recruit most media personnel into the organization and politicians

who could have dual functions supposedly serving the country and at the same

time swearing allegiance to a global governmental system and they would

shepherd whole nations of people along a certain path, a pre-destined order

of things where no inferior types would eventually exist.

 

 

 

The Fabian Society's part in that was to lead the left-wing along the same

path and they would sponsor non-governmental organizations paid for by the

big institutions that the people thought were philanthropic (charitable in

their ways) and they pay these non-governmental organizations to come into

being and champion all these causes supposedly on behalf of the people. At

least that's how the general public would perceive these groups, championing

their rights, but everything that the non-governmental organizations demand

the governments are only too happy to comply with and it always means a new

layer of bureaucrats making laws and regulating your life, which is exactly

how the plan works. That's the exact same system as the Soviet system was

set up to be. Soviet means rule by councils; under the pretext of speaking

for the people various organizations would be formed. Workers organizations,

certain factory organizations but the top leaders were always picked by the

politburo.

 

 

 

Here the top leaders for the NGOs, the ones that are acceptable to the

United Nations (and look at all the lists of them), it's quite interesting

to see who's on them. The leaders are picked and funded by the big

foundations who then lobby governments to demand certain laws and the

governments play this little game of " we're glad you asked. We were ready to

do it anyway. We just happened to have this bill drafted up, " and that's how

the con game works and they pretend that we live under a democracy.

 

 

 

We live under a scientific dictatorship. Everything in this system is run

and regulated by science and technocrats. The definition of a technocrat was

given by Professor Carroll Quigley in his book " Tragedy & Hope " and his

other book " The Anglo-American Establishment, " where he goes through much of

the history that I'm just giving here. He said technocrat is someone who may

be elected sometimes into politics but generally is appointed and they come

out of politics as advisers and so on and they're funded heavily, given

tremendous power, more power than the politicians are given, to work behind

the scenes. They're the movers and shakers who get things going, get things

together. They're the fixers who travel the globe and they don't have to

respond to the public for anything that they do because they're unelected.

That's the Kissinger types and the Maurice Strong's and a whole bunch of

other ones.

 

 

 

They also move in and out of the United Nations positions and you'll find

the same thing with the guys I've just mentioned. Technocrats. They're not

responsible as I say to any public comeback for anything they do and Quigley

said that they who wield the real power are content with the knowledge that

they have real power; whereas real politicians do not have the same amount

of power because they are answerable at least in theory to the public and

public opinion. Therefore, 100 years ago everything that's happening today

was written down and debated how society would run. How every segment of

society would be run. How children and what ages of children would be

targeted. How the school systems would be run. How they could even take

children at school and possibly use drugs if they became a nuisance or they

were a bit too bright and inquiring. A hundred years ago because they had to

make sure that coming through this big transitory phase from a very old way

of living. It wasn't really that old. We came out of serfdom, had about 150

years of temporary possibility of individuality and now we're back into the

mass man again.

 

 

 

However, they didn't want us going through this big change, the big, big

change to serve the world system, with bright people, well-educated people

within society because they could possibly lead the " mob, " as they call the

people, against those who planned this particular future. Therefore, means

had to be found and devised to test them at school and pick out the possible

troublemakers.

 

 

 

Now remember these characters at the top believe in evolution and that's

only one part of their religion really, but they really do believe in it

sincerely.

 

 

 

Now why should they believe so much in it?

 

 

 

It's because the players who write the big books advocating certain changes,

the ones with power, come from these particular ruling families, very, very

old families that go down through history, the monied ones that move. They

move down through time and create empires. They create capitals of finance

and then as they pull out, they move to their next heaven or Babylon, they

collapse the system behind them and yet even as they collapse it they still

leave it in an impoverished state and yet part of a bigger empire, always

creating a bigger and bigger empire.

 

 

 

H.G. Wells, a founding member of The Fabian Society, goes through some of

that in his various literature. Wells himself was trained by Sir Thomas

Huxley, the grandfather of Aldous Huxley and Julian Huxley. Sir Thomas

Huxley was one of the best friends of Charles Darwin and he took up the

crusades for Darwinism when Darwin died. He recruited Wells and many other

well-known writers of the period who became well-known writers. Their whole

idea was to influence the public through novels mixed with science and

psychology and try to teach the people the " virtues " they called them,

virtues, guide them along certain paths and ways of thinking that would fall

in line with this Brave New World that they wanted to bring in. Fiction,

very intense fiction, very graphic visual fiction too, because we imagine

things so perfectly well in our minds if we read a good author, they would

lead us along certain paths of thought where we'd accept sciences we had not

seen yet come into play. That's predictive programming they call it. Many of

these guys became very, very popular and they also had their movies made

from their books. I'll be back with more about this after the following

messages.

 

 

 

 

 

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt standing in for John Stadtmiller and like that song,

if you heard the words, it's " The End of the Innocence " indeed. We can't

really pretend much longer that we didn't know what was really going on.

Getting back to some of the earlier years of those who created the big

machinery, people who work literally intergenerationally to bring their

plans about. That's why one of the organizations, The Fabian Society, used

the name Fabian because the Emperor Fabian was known for his long-term

planning almost like a chess game and he knew eventually if he did put out a

few ideas here and there, put out certain people who could stir up thoughts

within society or even his enemies within their gates, he could eventually

take them over maybe 50 years down the road. That's how they work. The

present bunch work in much greater lengths of time periods and they had the

beginning of the New World Order to be kicked off in 2001, planned at the

beginning of the 1900's.

 

 

 

Lenin talked about it. Lenin and all the other factions of the world were

all funded and set up by the same people who already ruled the world. As I

say, they always give you the groups to join. They look at society overall

and they look at the comebacks from society, different segments and sections

of society. How these people would come back at them by forming their own

groups and therefore the easiest way to manage that is to start up the

groups yourself, pretending to stand up for the people or the segment of

society and put in your own leaders. Any ones that spontaneously do manage

to crop up and keep financing themselves, which is a hard thing to do, you

simply put in your infiltrators who eventually start doing more work than

anyone else; and being so democratic as all these institutions are,

eventually that person who does all the hard work, licks all the envelopes

and so on, gets voted in as president and then you're off on a different

course all together. Old, old techniques that are still used today.

 

 

 

Remember, they always give you your leaders to follow and if nothing else,

they'll keep you going in circles while the big agenda is steamrolling

ahead. The whole thing works on the premise that we the little people at the

bottom whose lives are so short and remember it's not just a short life we

have. We are different people throughout our lives. We're very, very

different people at the age of 15 to 25, even 35, 45 and 50, we're learning

all the time. Youngsters are really part of the mass group. They don't have

their identity yet. They're struggling for it and in the struggle they

conform before they find it. They conform to the peer pressure and they

adapt. They want to belong. You don't start to mature until you're in your

early 20s, really mid-20s even today, and you're in the workforce and then

you're scrabbling for a living, so you're so preoccupied; and they discussed

this back in 1910 what I'm talking about right now. Then, by the time you

start catching on something is wrong, you're looking forward to a pension.

You're scared to rock the boat unless you lose your job. Maybe they'll kick

you out and punish you. Maybe you won't get that pension, so they're afraid.

 

 

 

They worked out all of the stages that they would bring in, but they also

realized they'd have to start the whole ball rolling quickly to give

preliminary tests of their agenda to see how it worked on the public. It

would show up the weak spots that they hadn't planned too well and they'd go

back to the drawing board and reintroduce it more perfectly. That's why they

gave you the Roaring '20's. They called it roaring because it came in with

prohibition, something that was unheard of because booze has always been

used as a great tranquilizer on the masses for centuries and centuries and

centuries.

 

 

 

The great Egyptians used to give even their bureaucrats about five gallon of

beer per day. That's why they've got all these screwy pyramids that are kind

of off-kilter and it's never really changed. The elites made sure that if

nothing else in the Soviet system at times in the big cities you might have

to queue up for some beans for hours but you could always get a quick bottle

of Vodka. Here they are, doing something that's against their usual

principles to keep the masses happy and prohibition came in so quickly and

easily. They had their big men put in in advance.

 

 

 

In fact, the guys who led all the illegal stills and so on, the big boys,

the Bronfman's and so on, were brought into the country in the 1800's where

they sat and did nothing for about 20 years. Then suddenly prohibition came

in and just as suddenly they had the apparatus up working - all the lines,

how to transport it across Canada into the U.S., and even the Kennedy

families and many others, many well-known families today made their millions

during that period. It wasn't just booze. It was cocaine as well.

 

 

 

Cocaine was brought in and they made it very enticing to the youth who want

to be bad and naughty again, you see, to go into these booze cans, the

illegal booze cans, get their booze and they gave the Charleston dance and

the miniskirt and encouraged massive promiscuity. However, because of the

fallout in society with venereal disease, it went rampant and they didn't

have the antibiotics either to treat it with, and also the children who were

being born and they didn't have all the abortion setups. They didn't have

the pill. They had to go back to the drawing board, so they had music,

promiscuity, dancing, miniskirts, pushing sex, but they didn't have the rest

of the sciences just yet. Back with more after the following messages.

 

 

 

Hi. I'm Alan Watt Cutting Through the Matrix, filling in for John

Stadtmiller, talking about how long-term plans, plans that work in centuries

are laid and how they're implemented and how those who live through the big

changes generally are the last to really understand what's really truly

happening. They certainly don't see the long-term planning. They don't know

their recent history is kept out of mainstream media but it's found in

special publications and special magazines and also magazines put out by

these organizations like The Fabian Society and books written by their

members.

 

 

 

Going back to the Roaring '20s and the fallout that happened when the

teenagers and youngsters suddenly went crazy, being advised to have such a

great time, which they did naturally, and they had all these unwanted

children. The big orphanages sprung up. The big Boys Town type orphanages

sprung up and it didn't work out so well. However, it was a big test so they

went back to the drawing board. They got their governments to use tax money

- people's tax money to put it into massive research on ways to find

contraception. That was done and then they brought out the same package deal

for the 1960's and called it " Flower Power, " something they borrowed from an

experiment in 1920's Germany because that's where the first flower children

were brought out on an even smaller scale in experimentation. Everything is

linked together.

 

 

 

In the '60s they made sure they came out with the pill. They also had

antibiotics and tried to con (which is a very good con) the public that they

could pretty well clear up any kind of sexually transmitted disease, which

wasn't true at all of course. Anyone who works in the profession knows that,

but they certainly did push for that and then the way to get the population

decreased is quite interesting because it goes against what we normally

think of as logic. They use a different type of logic. They come from a

different direction. The whole idea was to create massive promiscuity in the

hopes that people would find it harder to bond the earlier they started

having their adventures and especially if they had multiple partners.

Something that Lord Bertrand Russell was talking about, he wrote a book

called " Roads to Freedom, " another big player who eventually we found out

later on after World War II was working in MI6 in his later years.

 

 

 

These characters are all interrelated. Left wing, right wing, the

aristocratic society, members like Russell all worked in core groups like

MI6 working on behalf of the elite, the establishment, the Crown and that

establishment that was firmly in place. They introduced as I say this

promiscuity angle knowing that not all girls would take contraception and

sure enough there was a lot of unwanted children, put it that way, or

premature children and how do you deal with that? Well, then they funded the

big feminist organizations. They brought them into being. Do you know that

all these NGO groups get money from the government to lobby the government

and the government will say " the people have demanded " talking about these

NGO groups; they say " the people have demanded " and we will pass this law or

that law whatever and out came the mass abortion clinics.

 

 

 

That was also to get the public to accept the fact that we're just another

animal on the planet, because once we start to dehumanize ourselves from a

rather sacred position then hell is the limit. Not the sky, but hell is the

limit and that was the intent. So by encouraging promiscuity you can

actually get a completely different end come to pass and that is getting

society to discredit or at de-evaluate humanity. Until now it's quite

accepted that we are just another animal, not a very bright one, and there's

too many of us and they have to bring in eventually mandatory sterilization.

Something that didn't begin - the Natzis are always given the blame for

starting something off and it's not true at all because the Eugenics Society

funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and headed by them were ahead of all of

them. They were promoting eugenics from the 1930's onwards and they had laws

eventually passed in different U.S. states that killed thousands of babies,

not fetuses (a fetus is just a baby that's not out yet), and they got away

with it for donkey's years. They also had people who they deemed unfit -

unfit members of society, genetically inferior. They had them sterilized.

The same bunch who ran all of those different parts of the previous era are

running the present and they're running what's going to be the near future

to becoming the future.

 

 

 

How is this done?

 

 

 

It's because foundations are set up with mandates. H.G. Wells and Russell

and others have talked about it. They said that foundations can literally

work in hundreds of years with a specific mandate hiring people, retiring

people as they go. Their workers who never, ever - who spend a whole life

working towards this mandate. That's how they can bring it to pass. We, who

are not in these big institutions, are lucky to have a job that lasts two

years. We think in very short-term projects. Foundations go on and they can

bring about in true Fabian style their mandate into fruition.

 

 

 

Here we are, where a lot of what was planned including the total destruction

of the family unit, which was mandated to be, they had to destroy the basic

family unit. Well discussed, well written about because it was still the

remnant of a little tribe and the ultimate goal for government was to have

everyone numbered and everyone would be accessible by government authorities

and no member of a family or relative would stand up for you. Everybody

would be separated from everyone else. You'd be on your own, which would

make you feel psychologically - just psychologically completely exposed and

invulnerable and inferior. Discussed again back in 1910 and on and on it

goes - mandates.

 

 

 

Now how do you get the youth to do what they do?

 

 

 

It's very simple. They're hormonally driven. We all know that. We've all

been there, but the youth while they're at satisfying their hormonal drives

and the mating imperative, as they call it, don't see the big picture.

They're having too much fun. They're part of the mass people. They haven't

had heavy responsibilities come down upon them and so they take it all for

granted. All mammals take into for granted the society they're born into. If

a parent doesn't know to warn them, the mammal (and this goes for all

mammals) will see nothing wrong with anything within the system that they're

born into. They won't ask why money is used or why we use this or that or

the other. They accept it all as being quite natural. Cell phones are

natural. They call themselves the cell phone generation. So much so, that

social norms have already altered because they don't know what boundaries

are any more. They've done studies on this and children will chat with other

children even in the classroom on their cell phones and it's acceptable.

They'll blurt through it all personal information to people around them.

They don't care who's listening. They have no conception of privacy

whatsoever. They have no idea of the value of privacy.

 

 

 

When parents phone them and they're in class they immediately pick up the

phone and answer right there and will have intimate conversations. They

don't know how to address people who are older than themselves. The

boundaries have been broken. The norms are gone and they're being taught to

put all of their information up on internet sites via the different

companies they log on to and sign up for. Once again, they don't think

there's anything wrong with that, because in this society for the general

population it's to be an open society where all data, everything on you and

about you, is to be instantly retrievable by government agencies.

 

 

 

How far back was that written about? 1905 and here it's coming into play,

step by step, Fabian again, and the public live through it and have no idea

how it's really happening. They think it's just some bad people who are in

government at the present time.

 

 

 

The old movie called " Network " said it all when the main anchorman on

television came out in front of the TV audience and he said why are you

watching us, the TV crew? He said you're the real people out there. We're

fake. We're the illusion; yet people have been trained through excessive

television to want the fantasy life better and more than reality. Fantasy is

better, reality sucks, as they go into a virtual world.

 

 

 

That's where we are with this and they're steamrolling ahead, a world with

no privacy where children have no conception of the past or why privacy was

so important in the past and why it's still so important today. They can't

imagine in their teenage years that the adult population would allow

anything really serious to happen to them. They can't imagine that. It's

almost unthinkable because even though they think they're young adults and

all the rest of it, they're still really dependent upon the adults for

everything that they have and the adults surely wouldn't allow nasty things

to happen to them, quite natural response.

 

 

 

However, if the mammal can't warn its sibling or its child because it

doesn't know itself that things are wrong, then the child won't have much of

a chance themselves. They'll take it all for granted that it's normal. What

do you do? You give every agency that demands it all of your personal data.

That's what's happening and that's where we are with it and we know the ID

card once again was discussed back in 1905. It was also reiterated in the

books put out by Lord Bertrand Russell. Read up " Education and the Good

Life, " one of his many books, where he talked about eventually credits being

used. Money can be anything at all, it doesn't matter, as long as the public

are conditioned to accept it and he said eventually that governments will

issue so many credits per week for your spending because in the future there

will be no private property.

 

 

 

It's interesting that the abolition of private property was a mandate that

came out of the high Masonic groups including Albert Pike and also through

the Marxist groups. The abolition of private property, you'll find it as far

back as Plato in " The Republic " because under the guise of a talk with one

of his students, Plato talks about this utopia they could bring in. He said

here we are with our landed estates where we have to pay servants and have

horses and so on and pay for the attendance of those horses and the feed of

them and the repair of the buildings and worry about stealing, replacing

valuables that are stolen. He said it would be better if we have the people

pay for the upkeep since we are ruling them; so technically you would own

nothing if you were a member of the upper elite. It would be a form of some

public/private corporation, a trust you might say, and the public would pay

for anything that disappeared or broke or had to be replaced. However, the

public themselves would have no private property. Only the thing was, no one

else was going to pay for anything that was stolen or taken from them.

 

 

 

That's the same system that they're heading towards today with Agenda 21

from the great United Nations. Remember, UN is just French for ONE. It's the

ONE. Everything in this world is to become the great ONE. George Orwell put

it in a better way. He said " in such utopias some people are more equal than

others " and that's exactly the point. It's a tiered system of class, very

rigid, more rigid than any one that's gone before, because there's only the

masses who really in the future will be mainly superfluous. Again, a debate

they've had for over 100 years. They saw this time coming when machines

would be so efficient and even robotics would become so efficient that they

could do away with so much of the menial laboring jobs at the bottom. They

then discussed the need to reduce the population.

 

 

 

H.G. Wells promoted a figure of 1.5 billion people maximum; and as far as I

can see, they haven't changed that today. Jacques Cousteau, the great guy

who loved little fish, the fishy fish and little furry animals, detested the

common people. Hard thing to swallow, isn't it, when the guys you've been

brought up and watched and been fascinated by tend to be such monsters in

reality, because he gave pretty well the same statistics to a magazine that

was interviewing him.

 

 

 

You find the same with the great David Suzuki of Canada who is a geneticist

who works for the big high world Wildlife Fund and other institutions whose

goal again is to reduce the population and create this great paradise of

happy habitat areas - only not so happy for the peasants. They'll be in

overcrowded cities like " Soylent Green " the movie and the elite will be

living in their very high-tech scattered abodes in the country, like the

dachas of the Soviet system, because they serve the system. Quite the world

they're bringing into place and meanwhile we're dancing our way through it

and gorging ourselves on fantasy and television and emulating what we see.

I'll be back with more after the following messages.

 

 

 

 

 

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt standing in for John Stadtmiller. I'll be on again

tonight at 8 p.m. on Cutting Through the Matrix on this station talking

about how things don't simply evolve. The machinery is set in motion

generally 100 years at least before the events start to show themselves to

the general population. When it does show itself the public are stunned,

confused, angry, irritated, but definitely they never really understand what

is at stake, what's happening and how it's come to be. They tend to think

that present politicians have just implemented something out of some kind of

crazy scheme that popped in their heads and nothing, nothing is further from

the truth.

 

 

 

Remember that Karl Marx wrote about the European Union back in the late

1840's. He talked about the unification of the Americas at the same time. He

also talked about a Pacific Rim region; 3 great trading blocs with a form of

provincial government within each that would be subservient to a world

government and we think that's coincidence. Here was a hack journalist,

Marx, who was put up in a very wealthy apartment, very expensive apartment

in London and funded to write that particular manifesto. There were many

other people who participated. They just put his name on it eventually

because they wanted him to be a main spokesperson.

 

 

 

Interestingly enough, I think it was the third or fourth edition of that

book that Marx wanted to dedicated it to Charles Darwin, but Darwin, who was

over the moon to have been asked, decided to decline because he knew they

had roles to play and Darwin technically had to pretend he was still a

member of the right-wing type elite; whereas Marx's job (and I say his job)

was to start off the head of the left-wing elite. That's how the game is

worked. It was worked out long, long ago.

 

 

 

Here we are, again, 150 years later, watching the unification of these

places happen because that's how long they've been at it all and World War I

and II were absolutely necessary to bring this about. Professor Quigley

again said wars aren't just fought for gain. That's part of it. The big

corporations that rule your country always profit and plunder under many

guises and they never call plunder. They use different terms and they always

go to " free people, " just like the Romans were " bringing civilization to the

barbarians " as they plundered all the barbarians' countries. It's no

different today. However, the main purpose of war was to change society. All

societies on all sides are changed as government implements policies, takes

over the basic necessities of the country (and that's farming et cetera and

business and production) and sets up all these layers of bureaucrats to run

the ordinary citizen's life for them. That's the main purpose of it and he

said you can get more change done in five years of war than 50 years of

peace and propaganda.

 

 

 

I'll be back with more in the next hour after these messages.

 

 

 

 

 

HOUR 2:

 

 

 

 

 

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt standing in for John Stadtmiller. I'll be on for the

next hour. Also don't forget I'll be on at 8 p.m. as well on Cutting Through

the Matrix and before I go to callers, I just want to read something that

falls right in line with what I'm talking about to do with this wonderful

eugenics policy, a plan that most people can't wrap their heads around

because of its intricacy. So detailed too, when you go into the old books

and when you understand it you see it fall into place. You see it happening

around you today amidst a welter of confusion from people around you. They

have no idea what's really happening.

 

 

 

This is from the Daily Mail, the 15th of February 2008. The headline is

interesting.

 

 

 

" Why we should sterilize teenage girls.temporarily at least " by

Faye Weldon.

 

 

 

It says:

 

 

 

" Last week, an intriguing proposition was mooted by Government

minister Dawn Primarolo. Teenage girls, she said, could be steered towards

what is described as " long-term contraception " . This is now possible thanks

to the development of contraceptive jabs and implants which can last up to

five years. In other words, there is a way of effectively sterilising girls

for a lengthy period of time. At what age? Well, doesn't 12 until 17 sound

rather sensible? "

 

 

 

Alan: Now remember the old saying that they've had in politics for over 100

years and the saying was " for everything that happens in government and

policy there's always a very good reason given to the public and then

there's the real reason. "

 

 

 

I'll continue with this article:

 

 

 

" This would have the advantage of bringing down the teenage

pregnancy rate, so high in this country it makes us a disgrace among the

nations - the worst offenders in Europe. "

 

 

 

Alan: We'll stop here and just go back over some realities that's omitted

here, but this is predictive programming the way it's written. The youth

have been given this nothing but promiscuity - this promiscuous culture

rammed down their throats since they were born. They've been ramming it down

their throats - I had it rammed down my throat too growing up and we've all

lived through it. Everything is aimed at the youth. It's nothing but sex,

sex, sex, so the media industry that's controlled and authorized by the top

to promote this very thing and this is the outcome. Here they are, exactly

as I said about how do you get abortions into place? How do you get

sterilization going et cetera? You make the problem happen. You create the

problem and then go for the solution you see.

 

 

 

" The abortion rate would fall sharply. And silly young girls

could get on with the education that is meant to produce serious,

responsible taxpayers. "

 

 

 

Alan: You see that's what you're for. This is a typical bureaucrat talking.

Your job in this life, your reason for being is to be a taxpayer.

 

 

 

" .not benefit recipients. "

 

 

 

Alan: Now I'll be back with more of this article after the following

messages. It's very interesting. Hi folks. I am Alan Watt filling in for

John Stadtmiller for this coming hour. I'll be back on later tonight at 8

p.m. on the same station. I'm just reading an article that fits in with what

I'm talking about from the Daily Mail from Britain, talking about how

sterilization and so on is not so bad an idea after all and I'll go on to

callers after I've read this.

 

 

 

It says:

 

 

 

" The abortion rate would fall sharply. And silly young girls

could get on with the education that is meant to produce serious,

responsible taxpayers, not benefit recipients. Now, many people will see

this modest proposal as little short of horrific - nothing less than state

interference in our reproductive lives. But think about it: it might not be

such a bad idea. We are moving into a science fiction age in which life

itself can be created in a test tube, and it seems that, before long,

perfect babies could be bred at will, largely free of hereditary disease and

illness. "

 

 

 

Alan: Now that's straight out of again H.G. Wells' books from the early

1900's. He talked about the elimination of inferior types. How they'd breed

them out of existence or simply euthanize them and get rid of them.

 

 

 

To continue with the article:

 

 

 

" So, in my view, there is little point any more in feeling

shock-horror at the idea of mass sterilisation. "

 

 

 

Alan: This is in the newspapers, mainstream newspapers.

 

 

 

" Neither do I believe it will encourage " promiscuity " because

girls will feel they have nothing to fear in sleeping around. In truth, they

seem to be doing that already. "

 

 

 

Alan: Of course they are. It's been promoted everywhere you look.

 

 

 

" I'm afraid we are now in a time when sex is mere recreational

pleasure to thousands of young women. "

 

 

 

Alan: That's what it was intended to be when they brought out this system.

 

 

 

" The trouble is that pregnancy no longer holds the fear for

teenagers it once did. The social stigma has gone. Indeed, for many, it

seems, a child has actually become a kind of perverse badge of honour.

Obviously, there are millions of sensible young girls, but for many, having

a baby seems to be the logical, and even desirable, result of their teenage

flings. "

 

 

 

Alan: People should read this particular article because there's so much

spin in it. So much disinformation that's also predictive programming and

the writer, the author does not go into the history and does not go into the

fact that the culture industry created the very problem in the first place

and they did it intentionally so that writers like this could write this

kind of stuff exactly at this day and age that we're going through now.

 

 

 

Now we've got Moe in Oregon. Are you there, Moe?

 

 

 

Moe: Indeed. Hello.

 

 

 

Alan: Hello.

 

 

 

Moe: Thank you very much, Alan, for taking my call. There is a few things I

need to talk to you. First, the thing is last time I talked to you about

rebate of one's tax that similar package that they have passed and IRS.gov

three days ago it was said rebate at once and today they have changed the

information a little bit and then I called Ms. Vought in IRS and she doesn't

know anything about it. She said to me - I asked her simple question. Is

this real rebate or is this rebate at once and are you guys going to charge

us tax on that? I mean for example I'm married and I get $1,200 extra, do I

have to pay you back and how much am I going to give you pay back on 2008

income tax and I ask her so much this, she says she doesn't know and then I

told her I need to talk to your supervisor so I talked to the supervisor.

Supervisor said I'm sorry we don't have any information. So they asked me to

tell everyone call their senators. They called both Houses in United States

and tell them what the hell is this. We want real rebate. We don't want at

once and if it's--

 

 

 

Alan: The thing is, this con has been pulled year after year for the last

50 years and you're going to get nothing back from government. Government

takes. It doesn't give. Government does not create wealth. In fact it exists

on your tax money. All of the things that it hands out to NGO groups and so

on is all from you - see, you're a slave. That's the bottom line. I've

talked to people in government in Canada and they tell you quite openly that

everybody works for the government. We all work for the government. We are a

slave to government and so you're not going to get justice in this fake

system because it's not meant to give you justice.

 

 

 

It's meant to create an illusion that you have a right to do one thing in

democracy. Look up the one thing you're allowed to do and that is vote. Yet

they'll present the people to vote for you to vote for but that's the only

right you have. Once they're in office they can do whatever they want and

even put handcuffs on you, they don't care and you have no comeback on what

they do. You've only the right to vote and that's a fact. People have

inquired into that under democracy. What are our rights and especially in

the British system and the British Commonwealth system, and that's the only

right that you have. You have no written constitution or anything really. We

have this farce of a one for Canada but that was put out by Pierre Trudeau

who was a member of the Rhodes Scholarship and the inner circle at All Souls

college and he also played the Marxist side too when he was younger. He was

allowed to play all sides and he made sure there was no right to private

property written into the Charter of Rights for Canadians. So we're conned

left, right and center and you can complain and complain to the massive

bureaucracy as much as you want. You will not get anything back from them.

It's separate from the people. It's so high - it's an ivory tower on its

own, that there's more deception than real informing to the public. It's

just so far removed. It's a dictatorial massive bureaucracy and there's no

way really that you can fix it as far as I can see.

 

 

 

Most decisions remember are taken by councils within bureaucracies. We don't

vote for bureaucrats. We have no recall of any bureaucrat. They're basically

given a free reign to do as they do. The politicians are just front men that

go in. They're appointed to certain departments, health, environment,

whatever it is for a year or something and they depend on that top

bureaucrat who is there for life. He's the only guy who knows the mandate

for his particular section and he is the real boss. He informs the little

front men called the politician what to say. His boys write the scripts for

them and the politician fronts to the public. It's all a farce.

 

 

 

Moe: Exactly indeed. I mean this was the object for my prior information I

give you last week or 10 days ago and I will give an update because I am

international journalist and I work with many radio stations, and anyway,

people need to be right on the track. If you get this rebate check you will

be ending up to pay with the interest and God knows how much they're

charging you and you might even if they--[AUDIO DROPPED]

 

 

 

Alan: Hello, hello? Oh, okay. I'm sorry. I think we were cut off, Moe, not

from this end, but I understand what you're saying and if you take this

particular rebate you'll be charged interest down the road and it's probably

going to be compounded per day until you end up paying it back.

 

 

 

Now I've got Patrick from the UK there. Are you there, Patrick?

 

 

 

Patrick: Hello.

 

 

 

Alan: Hello.

 

 

 

Patrick: First of all, thank you very much for your consistently good

program. You are the true historian educating us all, but just regarding

Charles Darwin could I ask you a question. The BBC are forever promoting

Charles Darwin. Isn't it true that Charles Darwin when he was studying man

and animals had no interest in proving that we're descended from apes until

his youngest daughter died and he suffered terrible grieving at that point?

From that point on, he set out to prove that there was no God. Am I correct

in that?

 

 

 

Alan: It's partly myth. I'll tell you because when he came out with " Origin

of the Species " it had already been written by his grandfather.You see this

is a family thing. The Darwin's are an interesting family, one of many

families that became well-known in Britain and doing the same thing as many

of these families. They were already practicing his theories before he was

even born because the Darwin family only interbred with the Wedgwood family.

His grandfather married a Wedgwood. His father married a Wedgwood. He

married a Wedgwood. When his wife died he married his mother's sister who

was also a Wedgwood. They were interbreeding for what they already believed

in was genetic superiority even before he was born and he did the same

thing.

 

 

 

Patrick: I see. And just another thing, you may know this. I know you're

very up to date on what happens in the British media. One of the biggest

suppliers of vaccinations in the UK, Paul Drayson was [inaudible] into the

labor party and is now in the government and he's in the Department of

Defence and all this, but therefore you have government fear of promoting as

you've just touched on, a vaccination for 12-year old girls to prevent

cervical cancer, eight years ahead. While the statistics prove that that is

a very, very small disorder and disease, isn't it?

 

 

 

Alan: It proves that but also the big Merck company I think is behind it.

Now Merck has already published a statement saying that their goal is to

eradicate amongst the population of the world only two or three types of

viruses. Now there's dozens of them that infect the venereal problem and

this supposedly only going to affect two or three of them; so you're right.

It's a miniscule amount and since when do private corporations mandate

government policies to the public?

 

 

 

Patrick: And put in the House of Lords to promote vaccinations in the

Ministry of Defence as well. But thank you very much for program and I just

wanted to clarify that point.

 

 

 

Alan: Yes. Thanks for calling.

 

 

 

Patrick: Thank you. Thank you, Alan.

 

 

 

Alan: I'll be back with more after the following messages. Hi folks. I am

Alan Watt filling in for John Stadtmiller and we've got half an hour to go.

We're just talking about Darwin with Patrick from the UK and it's amazing

how they can present fallacies to us - but they're not in the business. The

media is not in the business of really informing us of truth; it's meant to

fascinate us and have us all talking and parroting what they tell us and

that becomes your general conversation, what's on the news the previous

night or the History Channel or whatever. The History Channel is full of so

much bunkum it's just, to me, that is fantastic. That's a fantastic voyage

if you watch that nonsense because whole chunks of history and reality are

taken out of the past, but then, like George Orwell said, " all the bad stuff

must be put down the memory hole where it's burned and lost to the world. "

 

 

 

Darwin was an amazing character. He joined the Royal Society as his father

before him. The Royal Society is a freemasonically created scientific

society and they're all again integrated with the CFR and so on. They're all

part of the same thing, same sort of networking groups. It's meant to be an

elite organization that asks you in as a member. You can't apply and be

taken in, but the Royal Society goes back quite a ways, quite some time.

 

 

 

They were the guys who funded big expeditions into Africa for Livingston and

other people, not just under the guise of spreading the jolly old gospel to

the poor natives who didn't understand that Jesus could save them from

everything that they had to own at that time and that the British wanted to

take over. They funded people like Livingston to also start up enterprises

in Africa for the elite themselves and of course they all got shares in it.

It was highly integrated too with the East India Company, again owned by the

Royal families of Britain and Holland and some other countries in Europe all

working together. Countries are nothing but corporations with figureheads at

the top of the particular symbol that runs them and corporations go into

countries under many guises. They've always used religion. They always put

in their advanced guards and that's generally ministers and so on who will

then " soften up " the heads of the natives who generally should fight them

and kick them off, but once your head is softened up and you're taught not

to kill and you start to lose those things you think my God I'll commit a

sin. God will see me doing it and then you become prey to the top predators

on the planet who follow in behind the ministers with armies, and that's how

the British Empire was created.

 

 

 

They send in the softening up crew with their little black books and then

you back it up with the red tunics and the bayonet, all again going back to

big institutions - big institutions that work with government for an

establishment that does not run by democratic means or methods. It gives you

the pretense of helping to run your government by giving you a vote in

something called " democracy, " so as that a preexisting plan can be put into

being and fomented down through time. Without democracy, they'd have

revolutions every few years so we are allowed to vote every few years hoping

things will just get better and it never does. Everything that happens in

society, just like the article I read from the Daily Mail, here they are

blaming young girls for promiscuity and meanwhile the same characters from

the same media elite have been promoting nothing but have fun, have fun,

have fun. The fashion industry works hand-in-glove with them. They advertise

through the same media and you have also the TV working at it to create this

promiscuous society because that's the agenda.

 

 

 

As Bertrand Russell found out in the 1920's, the more promiscuity you can

promote the less chance there is of a male or a female bonding for any

length of time down the road. Very old technique, works very well, but they

always like to blame the victim. Remember the abuser always blames the

victim for what happened. Psychopaths are known for that. Psychopaths can

stand up in court and say amazing things about their victims no matter what

they've done to that victim and they'll rationalize it in such a way that

only a psychopath could possibly accept because normal people could never.

We are run by a scientific elite who generally are picked for their own

psychopathic traits.

 

 

 

Quite a system we live in, isn't it, and there's so much confusion. We've

lost all of the old ways: the bonding, the things that kept us all together,

the empathy that used to help us through the bad times, empathy for others

who would then have empathy for you when you went through the bad time.

Government has stepped in and set up welfare agencies, childcare agencies,

all these agencies that take away all the rights of the people to help each

other in a natural way. Those agencies then become authoritarian and then

they dictate laws to you, big difference, and that was planned as well and

written about how it would be done.

 

 

 

I've lived through a good part of it, watched it implemented and the public

are completely ignorant of how it came about. Last night, on another show, I

talked about how authority is obeyed, how we're taught to obey authority

through experiments. Get the book called " Obedience to Authority " by Stanley

Milgram, interesting read. Back after the following messages.

 

 

 

 

 

Hi. I'm Alan Watt Cutting Through the Matrix and I'm standing in for John

Stadtmiller. Look into the show tonight at 8 p.m. I'll be back on again on

the regular show on the same station. For those who don't have my books,

look into the site. I have cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you'll see how to

order them. Also, you can send donations. That keeps me going. It's

expensive keeping all this going here. I don't ask any of the stations for

money. I don't get paid for what I do. I do it because it has to be done. I

do it because someone had to come out for the first time and cut through

this mess that we have. Even within the patriot movements, you give them a

higher, more full understanding of not only where we're going but how we got

to where we are. You've got to understand the past to know how it all comes

together and you've got to look through all the big books to find out where

they plan to go with it. Nothing but nothing is just happening by

happenstance in this system. It's planned that way.

 

 

 

Wells himself talked about two world wars would be necessary, both with

Germany, in a fictional setting. He wasn't a lone author. He had a whole

staff of people and writers working with him, paid for again by the

establishment in Britain. He was given the agenda by the associations he was

brought into, which included professors. Professors from the biggest

universities in England who worked themselves on this particular agenda and

he wrote stories around them - predictive programming stories. He wrote " The

Shape of Things to Come, " the two world wars with Germany and then a third

world war would come. The last war supposedly the British forces or this

scientific elite of the superior types, the natural aristocracy as they call

themselves at the top, they would eventually go into the country they

conquered and set up a world air base where they would become the policemen

of the air. They call themselves " a Freemasonry, a new brotherhood of the

air. " That's in his book.

 

 

 

Try and get the old black and white movie. It's very well done and a rather

quick version. You can't get all of the book into a movie but they got a

lot, an old black and white with Raymond Massey called " Shape of Things to

Come, " but the interesting part - there are many of the interesting parts

but this is one of them. It was the fact that the country they eventually

conquered and set up their base for the world where they could gas the

people around the world who didn't comply-subdue them, tranquilize them,

kind of like the spraying we're having today-would be based in Basra. Basra

in Iraq and where did the British troops go in when they went into Iraq? The

U.S. went to the north and Britain based itself in Basra. What a coincidence

- all those years later. They're very good with their coincidences because

there's nothing coincidental at all.

 

 

 

Long-term plans including wars are discussed by big think tanks paid by big

institutions not to make mistakes. That's why the best minds in their

particular fields are brought in by these agencies and paid handsomely to

keep quiet about what they're really doing. A good book to read, I was just

thinking about that, was called " Darwin and the New World Order. " That's

for Patrick if he's still listening and the author was Ian Taylor. Ian

Taylor is a scientist in Canada I believe and he has the documentation on

Darwin and his inbreeding and much, much more to do with the whole theory of

evolution. He demolishes it scientifically. He tells you it's basically a

religion that's promoted by the elite. Very interesting book, " Darwin and

the New World Order. " You may be able to get it second-hand, I don't know

if it's still in print, or try your libraries as I always advocate the

libraries. It's good to keep them going because eventually you'll find on

the internet all the sites that give you books will disappear and you'll be

left - unless they're leaving you trash. Perhaps that will happen too.

 

 

 

I know that when you go into the main ones for dictionaries and so on, it's

just like George Orwell said, every year they're getting thinner and thinner

as they create linguistic minimalism. That's the fact that if you can

eliminate descriptive language from the language itself and reduce the

vocabulary, you cannot convey full ideas to anyone. George Orwell had it in

his book, " 1984, " a Department of the Dictionary, and when they reduce it to

state where it's very difficult to get an idea across there'll be no more

terror. You can't be a thought criminal if you can't convey your message to

someone else. Quite simple and they call it " linguistic minimalism " at the

top. That's being done. Look at the dictionaries from 100 years ago. Look at

the ones today.

 

 

 

Youngsters pick up and mimic what they hear on television the new words

they're given and they repeat them just like monkeys do. Monkey see, monkey

do. That's where the new vocabulary comes in. It's a minimalistic vocabulary

and rather than explain in a sentence in detail what they mean, they'll say

" totally " et cetera and " awesome " , eventually it'll be " plusgood " and

" plusbad. " That is part of the plan.

 

 

 

It's interesting that George Orwell also put in his book " 1984, " written in

1948, they simply reversed the last two numbers, and the original book he

wanted to call it " The Last Man, " meaning the last sentient man but it was

his publisher who wanted to change it to " 1984 " . It's all about the last

sentient people and what you'll have to go through including how they

torture people and have them say anything, confess anything to the whole

world on television, just like these characters we'll shortly see that the

military's been torturing for six years in Guantanamo Bay. They're going to

take the can for something they probably didn't do.

 

 

 

Nothing, but nothing happens by chance. We're living in a big drama, a big

drama where all the main events are scripted for the public, where the

public have been brought to such a low level of understanding where baseness

in all areas has been promoted to the nth degree that there's no critical

thinking abilities left within them. Look how long they'll drivel on

something like a murder in the newspaper, O.J. Simpson for instance, or pick

some little starlet that's no different from millions of other women in

reality and have millions of people talking about them as though it

mattered.

 

 

 

They say there's seven billion or more people on the planet but they can get

half of it talking about one little person as though it really mattered.

Meanwhile, the important things are missed by everyone. The things that

matter in your personal lives are missed. You're wrapped up in fiction.

There's nothing that comes across television that's true. Nothing is true.

Nothing is straightforward truth, never will be. It's an illusion and it's a

great tool. It's conditioned so many generations already. We take it all for

granted.

 

 

 

Years and years ago, I think it was Vance Packard that came out with the

book, the first book to the public. It was already available for people in

marketing, all that information, on how the advertising industries would

train us to be consumers and how they had the best writers to put little

jingles out with just the right notes that children would pick up on and

repeat, coupled with words. " Repetition, " as it was said by Russell, they

would change society by slogans and repetition. Karl Marx said the same

thing, so did Lenin. " You'll wonder where the yellow went when you brush

your teeth with Pepsodent. "

 

 

 

I saw a video that was incredible to me where they saw summer camps for

children in the U.S. where people from the big industry, McDonald and so on

had the children singing the McDonald song like a choir in a field. How can

parents give over their children's minds to corporate advertising like that

to be indoctrinated to be good consumers? And those same parents run off to

clinics to try and get the obesity of their children down or little Johnny

is rather sick. His bones are poor when he's eating all this junk. We are

run by the television. It runs peoples lives. They're addicted to it. It's

hypnotic. The cycles per second on the screen are hypnotic. They match your

brain pattern to put you into the alpha state. It was designed that way from

the beginning.

 

 

 

They knew it would work too when they put cartoons on years and years ago

during the day. It starts when mommies get up and dads get up and that child

is plunked in front of this television where the first indoctrination

starts. Someone sent me just recently some of the latest cartoons for two

year olds and one and a half and two years, just plunk them there, visual

images, and over and over again the whole stories about the greening of the

planet and how to save the tree, how to save the grass and that's the whole

plot the little cartoons. No sequence lasts more than two and a half seconds

because if a child looks away for a half-second it will lose the thread of

the story. That's intentional. It's a science. We're run by sciences,

sciences which had become perfected during the days of Skinner and since his

day. These sciences are perfected and they are targeting every age group.

Everybody has their target.

 

 

 

We're all a target audience and when the teenagers become 25 it's a new

audience. They're targeted because they know how you're going to feel, what

you'll be doing when you're 25 and what will be uppermost in your mind.

They'll target you at 40 or 50 because now you're becoming the pensionable

age you see and the things that are on your mind. Then they target what they

call the " snowbirds, " those with the pension money.

 

 

 

Beria, the head of the Secret Police in the Soviet system in the 1920's and

'30's used to give speeches to the International Communist Committee. The

Comintern they called them and the Comintern had branches in every country

including Canada and Pierre Trudeau led the Comintern bunch over in 1952

from Canada; and Pierre, being a good Rhodes Scholar for World Citizenship,

worked all sides of the fence. Carroll Quigley said that. Their members are

allowed to join and actually lead sometimes all kinds of parties and they

even support dictators. They played the game with everyone you see. However,

Beria said that it used to take 70 years to train a population for the

slightest change in their culture, meaning it had been done before

obviously. It took 70 years. He said but now in 1930's he says we have it

down to a fine art where we can upgrade the culture every five years,

meaning the children in five years time that go into school will be given a

little bit more of what they're going to face when they hit 20 or 25. The

next intake will be given a little bit more yet. In other words, you accept

what comes along quite naturally if you've been conditioned at a very early

age. It's a perfect science.

 

 

 

It isn't just the children that are updated. Years ago the so-called Red

Bishop, he was actually an Archbishop of England the Anglican Church, wrote

many books. He belonged to the big UN agencies and he was all for global

governments and everything that it stood for including the reduction of

population, the reduction of the " unfit " as they called those at the bottom,

just like H.G. Wells. This Red Bishop wrote a book and it was about

continuing education and all through the book there's nothing about going to

night school or anything like that. It was all to do with propaganda would

be the education itself and how they'd have to continuously throughout your

entire life " upgrade your program, " you might say, to get you to accept and

accept the next change that's coming, the next change that's coming and the

next change that's coming.

 

 

 

Continuous blasting propaganda from all magazines, all newspapers, all TV,

radio shows and all the rest of it and all media in other words would be

used to make everyone think that everything was developing naturally, but

meanwhile every individual was actually being upgraded like a computer

program. He spoke on behalf of these big foundations, these powerful

institutions that were already hard at work running the world and bringing

in this great New World Order - this scientific dictatorship that Aldous

Huxley talked about, Aldous, the grandson of Sir Thomas Huxley (Darwin's

friend).

 

 

 

Meanwhile, Aldous Huxley's brother, Julian Huxley was the first president

for UNESCO. These families have agendas and they breed their children and

raise them for their part in the agenda. Julian Huxley gave speeches about

UNESCO, this United Nations Educational Society, to bring in a common

culture which would obey the world authority - very obedient culture. You

should read the writings by Julian Huxley. They're just as bad and horrific

if you understand what Aldous was talking about. Aldous Huxley thought it

was fantastic, this Brave New World idea. He thought that the ability to

breed new types of superior humans - superior in the fact that they could do

the jobs better, that is, without any complaints, even without the

possibility of complaining about their stations in life. He thought this

would be marvelous and from an aristocratic point of view it would be

because that's what they mean by a utopia: when the general public cannot

even think to complain. That's what it's all about.

 

 

 

Now we've got Richard in Alabama. Are you there, Richard? Hello Richard?

 

 

 

Richard: Hi. I want to ask you a question about the way John McCain shakes

hands and signs autographs. He always holds his elbows up high. Is that a

Masonic symbol or something?

 

 

 

Alan: The Masonic symbol you'll see everyday on television. You'll see

them, it's hand-to-hand. They step in with the right foot, that's

toe-to-toe, knee-to-knee. They hug each other. The left hand goes to the

elbow then to the back then they whisper in each other's ear. You see it all

the time between all these top people across the planet. Back with more

after these messages.

 

 

 

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through the Matrix, standing in

for John Stadtmiller and we'll be back in an hour's time. Is Richard still

on the line?

 

 

 

Richard: Yes.

 

 

 

Alan: If you see them, the politicians meet and I saw it even during the

Soviet Era. It was quite funny to watch where presidents would meet the

presidents from the Soviet and so on and you see archenemies meeting other

archenemies, supposedly, and you'll see them facing each other. They give

the right hand shake. The left arm goes to the elbow. The right foot goes

into the right foot as they touch foots and then it's knee to knee. The left

hand moves from the elbow of the other guy and goes to his back, and it's

cheek to cheek, and then they whisper something in each other's ear. That's

your " five points " as they call it. That's the low meaning of the lower five

points of Masonry. There's higher ones as well but that's the low level one.

You see it all the time as they go through their routine for the public.

 

 

 

Richard: But the elbows up is not a Masonic symbol?

 

 

 

Alan: It depends if he's holding his forearm across his chest. Generally,

they use a sort of 45 type degree, sometimes a 90 degree.

 

 

 

Richard: I just noticed McCain he does all his autographs with his elbows

up and he does his handshakes with his elbows held high.

 

 

 

Alan: It could be, but I don't know. Generally, you'll see them too, they

often make the square with their foot. They call it the square where they

splay their feet to create again a 45 to 90 degree angle. There's lots of

different signs they use including verbal signs, but they'll all be Masons

for sure at that level, you can take that for granted.

 

 

 

That's what happens. We have systems within systems and brotherhoods within

brotherhoods and you can't really get up to the top. It's well known that

even at the bottom if you want to get ahead in society you join one of the

lodges because you " get up the ladder " as they say in finance and success.

You also cut petty bureaucracy. That's what they let known to the public.

You can bypass a lot of the petty paperwork and get things done very

quickly. If you're in a good lodge you can go to the bank manager and get a

loan the same day. It's all approved and it will be in your hands before the

bank shuts. There's lots of little perks they get too, tax breaks and

various other things, if they say all the right things to the guy that comes

and accesses their home, so you can't get to the top without belonging to

one of these particular organizations.

 

 

 

It's the same with the females too. The side lodges they call them. They

don't get into the higher secrets although they think they do. That's well

explained by Mackey in his " Encyclopedia of Freemasonry " and others, but

everyone that's anyone on any board in your area, town or whatever, male or

female, will belong to the local lodge.

 

 

 

Richard: Does the Prince Lodge have any real power?

 

 

 

Alan: Are you talking about Prince Hall Lodge?

 

 

 

Richard: Yes.

 

 

 

Alan: Albert Pike authorized the startup of it and it does have power.

Remember, it's an elitist organization that pulls men out of the masses, so

even though you think you're following someone who looks like you and

appears like you, he believes himself he is superior and that's why he's

been pulled out of the masses. They give you your leaders. All peoples have

them. They have them in China too and Japan. Well, that's the end of the

night I think coming up here and I'll be back later in an hour's time.

 

 

 

From Hamish and myself, up in Ontario, Canada, it's good night and may your

god or your gods go with you.

 

 

 

 

 

(Transcribed by Linda)