Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Re:coQ10

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I strongly disagree. Transdermal Magnesium is great stuff, but it is

no substitute for Co Q10.

 

Alobar

 

On 8/29/08, Jim Clark <huuman60 wrote:

> <>Hi Susan:

>

> From my understanding, supplementing with Coenzyme Q10 is not a good

> choice for most individuals since it difficult to absorb and expensive.

> We are better off spending our money on more more direct forms of heart

> health. Transdermal Magnesium comes to mind, since a large segment of

> the population is said to be magnesium deficient... and magnesium is

> critical to heart as well as bone health<>.

>

> However, if you are bent on talking it, Ubiquinol sounds like the way to

> go. There is a wealth of info on the web regarding it.

>

>

> Kind Regards, Jim

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...