Guest guest Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 Conn. House unanimously approves chronic Lyme treatment _http://www.greenwichtime.com/ci_12263593?source=most_emailed_ (http://www.greenwichtime.com/ci_12263593?source=most_emailed) By Brian Lockhart Staff Writer Posted: 04/30/2009 01:37:39 PM EDT HARTFORD - The House of Representatives in a unanimous vote Thursday afternoon took what will likely be viewed as a nationally recognized stand in the heated debate over the existence of chronic Lyme disease. Lawmakers in a vote of 137 to zero passed legislation that allows physicians who believe the illness exists to prescribe long-term antibiotic treatment without fear of reprisal. " It comes down on the side of people who suffer from Lyme in this big debate, " Rep. William Tong, D-Stamford, a bill co-sponsor, said following the vote. " It says the scientific community can have that debate but we're not going to let anybody else go without treatment. " Discovered in the mid-1970s in Connecticut, Lyme disease is transmitted to humans by the bite of infected black-legged ticks. Symptoms include fever, headache, fatigue and a rash. If untreated, infection can spread to joints, the heart and the nervous system. The commonly accepted treatment is up to 28 days of antibiotics. Some patients - including lawmakers or their family members - are convinced they suffer from chronic Lyme disease and need longer courses of antibiotic treatment. Although the state Department of Public Health does not expressly forbid long-term antibiotic treatment for Lyme, the national Infectious Diseases Society has dismissed chronic Lyme as a myth. Those who believe in chronic Lyme argue this makes state physicians fearful of being reported to the health health department if they choose to recognize and treat chronic Lyme. " There is a 'chill effect' " on doctors, Rep. Jason Bartlett, D-Bethel, said. Rep. Kimberly Fawcett, D-Fairfield, who helped spearhead the bill, told her colleagues prior to Thursday's vote: " We recognize this controversy in diagnosing this disease. But let's give our doctors the freedom and autonomy. " Rep. Scribner, R-Brookfield, a member of the legislature's Public Health Committee, agreed. " We've witnessed many people who have suffered long term, " he said. " I strongly urge all the chamber to consider this measure which I think is a very responsible measure. " The Connecticut Medical Society supported the bill. The Society is not taking a stand on chronic Lyme disease but believes physicians should have the right to treat patients as they see fit. The legislation would require a chronic Lyme diagnosis be made based on medical history and a physical. It only allows long-term antibiotics for chronic Lyme disease and the language does not preclude the state from investigating physicians for wrongly prescribing medicines. Rep Peggy Sayers, D-Windsor Locks, a certified nurse, urged some caution. " I think we still have to be careful about the effects of long-term antibiotic therapy, " Sayers said. " I would really urge as we go forward there still be some caution. " --Staff Writer Brian Lockhart can be reached at 203 753 5352 or _brian.lockhart_ (brian.lockhart) (http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.