Guest guest Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Thanks for sharing that well written article. I fully understand the argument for rationing. I do, however, hope for someone smarter than me to come up with a better alternative. I would like to see one that includes some sort of patient decision in the mix. ________________________________ " bestsurprise2002 " <bestsurprise2002 MCS-Canada Friday, July 17, 2009 11:19:16 PM << >> Commentary about US Congressional health reform proposals. Why We Must Ration Health Care _http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 07/19/magazine/ 19healthcare- t.html?pagewante d=a ll_ (http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 07/19/magazine/ 19healthcare- t.html?pagewante d=all) By PETER SINGER Published: July 15, 2009 You have advanced kidney cancer. It will kill you, probably in the next year or two. A drug called Sutent slows the spread of the cancer and may give you an extra six months, but at a cost of $54,000. Is a few more months worth that much? [CONTINUED.. ...] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Dear Kathy, Perhaps the best alternative is to avoid all doctors and hospitals! The Amish are said to not visit doctors, so it is possible. As far as I am concerned, the medical establishment is only good for sewing up lacerations (sometimes). Even then, you are opening up yourself to secondary infections (like my wife experienced). God's medicine has already been provided to us in the form of herbs; all drugs are nothing but inferior derivatives of those whole medicines. People need to learn from the old medicine men, or from eclectic doctors from 100 years ago. Actually, there are some good herbal colleges that teach this worthwhile information. It's too bad that their graduates are not accepted by society in general, and the insurance industry in particular. John from Israel , Kathy Walden <kswalden wrote: > > Thanks for sharing that well written article. > I fully understand the argument for rationing. > I do, however, hope for someone smarter than me to come up with a better alternative. > I would like to see one that includes some sort of patient decision in the mix. > > > > > > ________________________________ > " bestsurprise2002 " <bestsurprise2002 > MCS-Canada > Friday, July 17, 2009 11:19:16 PM > << >> Commentary about US Congressional health reform proposals. > > > > Why We Must Ration Health Care > _http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 07/19/magazine/ 19healthcare- t.html?pagewante d=a > ll_ > (http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 07/19/magazine/ 19healthcare- t.html?pagewante d=all) > > > By PETER SINGER > Published: July 15, 2009 > > > You have advanced kidney cancer. It will kill you, probably in the next > year or two. A drug called Sutent slows the spread of the cancer and may give > you an extra six months, but at a cost of $54,000. Is a few more months > worth that much? > [CONTINUED.. ...] > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 I believe exactly as you do John. (from Israel) In addition to the huge risk of contracting MRSA, and other sorts of staph infections, there is the risk of being given harmful pharmaceuticals. I don't consider 'pills' to be an appropriate treatment for ailments and 'dis' ease. Unless you actually get at the root of the problem, then a pill to mask the symptoms is super inefficient in the long run. The best way to cut down on spending waste is to stop the big pharma from being allowed to pass off bogus and marginally helpful 'pills' as actual cures. They should be forced to withdrawal their commercials from the television airwaves and they have to be stopped from funding so called 'medicine trials' where they use healthy subjects anyway... which does not tell you anything about how a sick person is going to fare with that 'pill'. No more should they be allowed to literally fund medical schools by providing the text books that teach students to give a pill out for every symptom regardless of if they know what the symptom etiology is or where the symptoms originated from even. The US has terrible health care. They ought to just admit that and get it over with. looking for a few good women and New Yorkers ourrealnewsplace/ ________________________________ yburkett <yburkett Tuesday, 21 July, 2009 5:29:32 Re: << >> Commentary about US Congressional health reform proposals. Dear Kathy, Perhaps the best alternative is to avoid all doctors and hospitals! The Amish are said to not visit doctors, so it is possible. As far as I am concerned, the medical establishment is only good for sewing up lacerations (sometimes). Even then, you are opening up yourself to secondary infections (like my wife experienced) . God's medicine has already been provided to us in the form of herbs; all drugs are nothing but inferior derivatives of those whole medicines. People need to learn from the old medicine men, or from eclectic doctors from 100 years ago. Actually, there are some good herbal colleges that teach this worthwhile information. It's too bad that their graduates are not accepted by society in general, and the insurance industry in particular. John from Israel Alternative- Medicine- Forum@ s.com, Kathy Walden <kswalden@.. ..> wrote: > > Thanks for sharing that well written article. > I fully understand the argument for rationing. > I do, however, hope for someone smarter than me to come up with a better alternative. > I would like to see one that includes some sort of patient decision in the mix. > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > " bestsurprise2002@ ... " <bestsurprise2002@ ...> > MCS-Canada@gro ups.com > Friday, July 17, 2009 11:19:16 PM > << Alternative- Medicine- Forum >> Commentary about US Congressional health reform proposals. > > > > Why We Must Ration Health Care > _http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 07/19/magazine/ 19healthcare- t.html?pagewante d=a > ll_ > (http://www.nytimes. com/2009/ 07/19/magazine/ 19healthcare- t.html?pagewante d=all) > > > By PETER SINGER > Published: July 15, 2009 > > > You have advanced kidney cancer. It will kill you, probably in the next > year or two. A drug called Sutent slows the spread of the cancer and may give > you an extra six months, but at a cost of $54,000. Is a few more months > worth that much? > [CONTINUED.. ...] > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.