FTC asked to examine California's suit vs. Whole Foods' Carcinogens and Monopoly

June 19, 2008

DETAILS ARE HERE:

http://www.prlog.org/10079593-california-lawsuit-whole-foods-avalon-

and-others-with-products-containing-carcinogenic-1-4-dioxane.html

UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ASKED TO EXAMINE SHOCKING SUIT

BY CALIFORNIA AGAINST WHOLE FOODS FOR CARCINOGENS IN SOAPS AND BODY

CARE PRODUCTS>>>>>>WHOLE FOODS/WILDOATS MERGER IS INDEED A

MONOPOLISTIC ANTI-TRUST VIOLATION

Members of the United States Federal Trade Commission were asked to

revisit their prior correct ruling, despite it having been overturned

by a lower court, that the Merger between Whole Foods and Wild Oats

is indeed an anti-trust violation as a Monopoly; California's suit

against Whole Foods under Prop. 65 for known carcinogens found in

Whole Foods so-called " organic " body care products. Readers could do

the same directly as well as through their U.S. Congressmen and

Senators.

HERE ARE 3 SHORT VIDEOS THAT EXPLAIN ALL OF THIS, FROM TWO OF MY

FAVORITE AMERICANS INVOLVED IN THIS EFFORT: Ronnie Cummins of the

Organic Consumers Association, and Mike Adams, the Health Ranger,

Founder of Newstarget.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7qe4zfhDLY & feature=related

Does it matter whether Whole Foods, Avalon, etc., failed to know this

poison was there in their own products, or did they conceal the

truth, even when threatened with a lawsuit?

This certainly raises a series of very obvious further questions, as

to whether the Federal Trade Commission should revisit and to refile

its action to prohibit the merger of Whole Foods and Wild Oats, as a

matter of law and as a matter of consumer protection. I have just

encouraged the FTC Commissioners to do exactly that, as well as

submit Amicus Curie briefs in the California Proposition 65/Whole

Foods lawsuit!

To me, it is egregious that this company has always been trusted by

millions of American enough for them to pay extra for ostensibly

healthier " organic " food, and then comes along this gross breach of

the public's trust, with the presence of this carcinogen at more than

10,000 the acceptable minimum levels! Most of these tests were done

in 2004 and 2005, so the stores have known for several years and yet

did nothing to reformat or relabel those harmful products.

We would never even know about it, were it not for this suit by

California Attorney General Jerry Brown. Maybe he should be the next

US Attorney General!

Sincerely,

Stephen Fox

Managing Editor, Santa Fe Sun News

Founder, New Millennium Fine Art, Santa Fe Gallery since 1980

stephen

505 983-2002

2 Related Stories:

http://www.prlog.org/10056715-hawaii-senate-aspartame-resolution-

requesting-fda-to-rescind-approval-for-united-states-markets

http://www.prlog.org/10070694-uk-supermarket-chain-bans-aspartame-

from-own-label-products-japanese-manufacturer-ajinomoto-sues.html

June 19, 2008

Jerry Brown...the best! Always was...stephensantafe <stephen wrote: DETAILS ARE HERE: http://www.prlog.org/10079593-california-lawsuit-whole-foods-avalon-and-others-with-products-containing-carcinogenic-1-4-dioxane.htmlUNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ASKED TO EXAMINE SHOCKING SUIT BY CALIFORNIA AGAINST WHOLE FOODS FOR CARCINOGENS IN SOAPS AND BODY CARE

PRODUCTS>>>>>>WHOLE FOODS/WILDOATS MERGER IS INDEED A MONOPOLISTIC ANTI-TRUST VIOLATIONMembers of the United States Federal Trade Commission were asked to revisit their prior correct ruling, despite it having been overturned by a lower court, that the Merger between Whole Foods and Wild Oats is indeed an anti-trust violation as a Monopoly; California's suit against Whole Foods under Prop. 65 for known carcinogens found in Whole Foods so-called "organic" body care products. Readers could do the same directly as well as through their U.S. Congressmen and Senators.HERE ARE 3 SHORT VIDEOS THAT EXPLAIN ALL OF THIS, FROM TWO OF MY FAVORITE AMERICANS INVOLVED IN THIS EFFORT: Ronnie Cummins of the Organic Consumers Association, and Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, Founder of Newstarget.com

& feature=relatedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwLghr2A7Eohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjwrhK7FyXYDoes it matter whether Whole Foods, Avalon, etc., failed to know this poison was there in their own products, or did they conceal the truth, even when threatened with a lawsuit? This certainly raises a series of very obvious further questions, as to whether the Federal Trade Commission should revisit and to refile its action to prohibit the merger of Whole Foods and Wild Oats, as a matter of law and as a matter of consumer protection. I have just encouraged the FTC Commissioners to do exactly that, as well as submit Amicus Curie briefs in the California

Proposition 65/Whole Foods lawsuit! To me, it is egregious that this company has always been trusted by millions of American enough for them to pay extra for ostensibly healthier "organic" food, and then comes along this gross breach of the public's trust, with the presence of this carcinogen at more than 10,000 the acceptable minimum levels! Most of these tests were done in 2004 and 2005, so the stores have known for several years and yet did nothing to reformat or relabel those harmful products.We would never even know about it, were it not for this suit by California Attorney General Jerry Brown. Maybe he should be the next US Attorney General! Sincerely, Stephen Fox Managing Editor, Santa Fe Sun News Founder, New Millennium Fine Art, Santa Fe Gallery since 1980 stephen (AT) santafefineart (DOT) com 505 983-20022 Related Stories:http://www.prlog.org/10056715-hawaii-senate-aspartame-resolution-requesting-fda-to-rescind-approval-for-united-states-marketshttp://www.prlog.org/10070694-uk-supermarket-chain-bans-aspartame-from-own-label-products-japanese-manufacturer-ajinomoto-sues.html"enRgy" exciting magic "feel-good" capsule-raises energy & reduces appetite. Want sample? www.SunnieFord.info