Guest guest Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 Hi all, I received this email and was asked to pass it on: I just spent three days reading, re-reading, researching and discussing the proposed FDA guidelines for " Complementary and Alternative Medicine " with two FDA attorneys. For more see http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/forum/showthread.php?p=112#post112 Kind regards, Attilio D'Alberto Doctor of (Beijing, China) BSc (Hons) TCM MBAcC Editor Times +44 (0) 1189 612512 enquiries <http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/> www.chinesemedicinetimes.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 I'd like to see the details of the discussions with lawyers on this. Nothing in the docket led me to the conclusion that ALL alternative practices and tools would be deemed medicine and put solely under MD authority. Tim Sharpe Attilio D'Alberto Tuesday, April 24, 2007 4:48 AM Hi all, I received this email and was asked to pass it on: I just spent three days reading, re-reading, researching and discussing the proposed FDA guidelines for " Complementary and Alternative Medicine " with two FDA attorneys. For more see http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/forum/showthread.php?p=112#post112 Kind regards, Attilio D'Alberto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 There is an FAQ posted on the CSOMA website regarding this draft guidance... http://www.csomaonline.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3388 In short, the draft guidance is not and will never be a legally binding document. It is simply FDA's expression of current laws and regs governing complementary and alternative medicine. It is their opinion and interpretation only. There is also nothing really new in this document. FDA already has regulatory authority over dietary supplements and foods (including herbs) and can consider these substances to be " drugs " under certain circumstances. This document changes nothing about this underlying regulatory authority. With respect to the particulars of this alert, there are some basic factual errors and a boat load of hyperbole... ====> THE ALERT: " I'm appalled at the speed with which the pharmaceutical companies are implementing Codex Alimentarius in the USA. " REALITY: This draft guidance has nothing to do with Codex Alimentarius. Implementing Codex in the US would require an act of Congress. <==== ====> THE ALERT: " If the FDA adopts this proposal, all natural health care would be illegal even for medical doctors. " REALITY: There is absolutely nothing in this draft guidance to support this statement. Even if the guidance document did say this, the guidance is--as mentioned above--not a legally binding document. By definition, the document cannot make anything illegal. <==== ====> THE ALERT: " [M]edicine is under the jurisdiction of the FDA and, by law, only licensed medical doctors may prescribe 'medicines.' " REALITY: FDA does not regulate " medicines. " There is no such regulatory category. FDA has regulatory authority over drugs, medical devices, foods, food additives, dietary supplements, cosmetics, and biological products. To be considered a " drug, " a product must either be listed in the official US Pharmacopeia or claim to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat or prevent a disease. The underlying laws and regs for this have been on the books for years. This guidance changes nothing. <==== There are genuine threats to continued access to some Chinese herbs in the US. This document is not one of them. Regards, Bill -- Bill Mosca, LAc Executive Director California State Oriental Medical Association (CSOMA) 703 Market Street, Suite 250 San Francisco • CA • 94103-2100 [Toll Free Voice]: (800) 477-4564 • [Fax]: (415) 357-1940 : bill • [Website]: csomaonline.org On Apr 24, 2007, at 1:48 AM, Attilio D'Alberto wrote: > Hi all, > > I received this email and was asked to pass it on: > > I just spent three days reading, re-reading, researching and > discussing the proposed FDA guidelines for " Complementary and > Alternative Medicine " with two FDA attorneys. For more see > http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/forum/showthread.php?p=112#post112 > > Kind regards, > > Attilio D'Alberto > Doctor of (Beijing, China) > BSc (Hons) TCM MBAcC > Editor > Times > +44 (0) 1189 612512 > enquiries > <http://www.chinesemedicinetimes.com/> www.chinesemedicinetimes.com > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 Here are AHPA's extensive comments to FDA: http://www.ahpa.org/Portals/0/pdfs/07_0427_AHPAComments_FDA_CAM_Guidance.pdf Here are CSOMA's brief comments: http://www.csomaonline.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3388 - Bill ........................... Bill Schoenbart P.O. Box 8099 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 office: 831-335-3165 email: plantmed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.