Guest guest Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 Hello - I received an urgent e-mail yesterday afternoon from the Allergy Research Group supplement manufacturers regarding a bill put forth by Senator Kennedy (S. 1082) yesterday that will allegedly " gut " DSHEA and give the FDA much broader power than it has now. In light of the recent threads regarding the FDA Draft Guidance on CAM products - and the fact that that entire current issue turned out to be a tempest in a teapot - I was hesitant to share this initially. Statements within the e-mail - which the authors had requested be forwarded to all intersted parties - claim that " Bill S1082 pretends to address drug safety while in fact proposing a set of laws that helps hide existing risks while ushering in the next generation of extreme drug risk (the Critical Path Initiative). At the same time the bill dramatically broadens FDA regulatory power to attack dietary supplements and health freedom. " This quote is from an article by a nutritionist named Byron Richards embedded within the e-mail. Here is a link to his analysis of the bill: http://www.newswithvi ews.com/Richards/byron23.htm Here is another quote from this analysis: " Furthermore, the new bill seeks to allow a massive expanse of FDA regulatory power through this new foundation. For example, on pages 106-107 the bill states: “The purpose of the Foundation is to advance the mission of the Food and Drug Administration to modernize medical, veterinary, food, food ingredient, and cosmetic product development, accelerate innovation, and enhance product safety….The Foundation shall [take] into consideration the Critical Path reports and priorities published by the Food and Drug Administration, identify unmet needs in the development, manufacture, and evaluation of the safety and effectiveness, including post approval, of devices, including diagnostics, biologics, and drugs, and the safety of food, food ingredients, and cosmetics.” Through this foundation the FDA is seeking broad new regulatory power that it currently does not possess. This will include the authority to attack any dietary supplement (which are food ingredients) as unsafe based on its use of “Critical Path” technology. " The shrill tone of much of the information in the e-mail, similar to that circulating in regard to the FDA Draft Guidance document, caused me to be skeptical at first. But I did a little research and found that Sen. Kennedy had in fact introduced the bill yesterday and that the wording of parts of the bill seem to fall in line with what is stated in the e-mail. I'm certainly not qualified to interpret legalese or read between the lines of government legislation but I felt that this was worthy of perusal by those on this group who are more in tune with these issues. And the strength of the reaction by an established supplement manufacturer and the possible negative ramifications for those of us using Chinese herbs got my attention. Kim Blankenship, L.Ac. Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? Check outnew cars at Autos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 S1082 is called The Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act. It has been sponsored by Sen. Kennedy. It is a massive Bill, over 140 pages, and it is being hurried through the Senate at such a pace that no one can properly digest its contents. First introduced 4/10/07, then sent to Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions on 4/24/07. There, the entire Bill was substituted with a new draft, and released to the Senate floor without written report on 4/30/07...where action on the Bill now takes place. At the level of process, we observe the subversion of what should be a public process of discussion. The Party that controls the chamber, in concert with the Bill's supporters (FDA among them) make such changes as they see fit, and then ram it through. Not a pretty sight, but an all too common one. At the level of content, I am still reading through the Bill, and will report what I learn ASAP, probably tomorrow. Best Regards, David Kailin, Ph.D.,M.P.H.,L.Ac. Author, Quality In Complementary & Alternative Medicine http://www.convergentmedical.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 Shrill?? Come on Kim, You know me better than that Thanks for the alert. I think this does demonstrate the general trend of the FDA. David, thanks very much for your efforts!! Look forward to your analysis. I had heard of this bill, but had not been able to check it out. dr.w Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.