Vaccines and the Myth of “Herd Immunity�

[Guest guest]

Vaccines and the Myth of “Herd Immunityâ€

_http://www.h4cblog.com/vaccines-and-the-myth-of-herd-immunity_

(http://www.h4cblog.com/vaccines-and-the-myth-of-herd-immunity)

 

Forced Vaccinations, Government, and the Public Interest

 

By Dr. Russell Blaylock, M.D.

December 2009

 

 

Those who are observant have noticed a dangerous trend in the United

States, as well as worldwide, and that is the resorting of various governments

at different levels to mandating forced vaccination upon the public at

large. My State of Mississippi has one of the most-restrictive

vaccine-exemption

laws in the United States, where exemptions are allowed only upon medical

recommendation. Ironically, this is only on paper, as many have had as many

as three physicians, some experts in neurological damage caused by

vaccines, provide written calls for exemption, only to be turned down by the

State’

s public-health officer.

 

 

Worse are the States, such as Massachusetts, New Jersey and Maryland,

where forced vaccinations have either been mandated by the courts, the state

legislature, or have such legislation pending. All of such policies strongly

resemble those policies found in National Socialist empires, Stalinist

countries, or Communist China.

 

 

When public-health officers are asked for the legal justification for such

draconian measures as forcing people to accept vaccines that they deem

either a clear and present danger to themselves and their loved ones or have

had personal experience with serious adverse reactions to such vaccines,

they usually resort to the need to protect the public.

 

 

One quickly concludes that if the vaccines are as effective as being

touted by the public-health officials, then why should one fear the

unvaccinated? Obviously the vaccinated would have at least 95% protection. This

question puts them in a very difficult position. Their usual response is that a

“

small†percentage of the vaccinated will not have sufficient protection and

would still be at risk. Now, if they admit what the literature shows, that

vaccine failure rates are much higher than the 5% they claim, they must

face the next obvious question – then why should anyone take the vaccine if

there is a significant chance it will not protect?

 

 

When pressed further, they then resort to their favorite justification,

the Holy Grail of the vaccine proponents – herd immunity. This concept is

based upon the idea that 95% (and some now say 100%) of the population must be

vaccinated to prevent an epidemic. The percentages needing vaccination

grows progressively. I pondered this question for some time before the answer

hit me. Herd immunity is mostly a myth and applies only to natural immunity

– that is, contracting the infection itself.

 

 

Read Article

_http://www.thenhf.com/vaccinations/vac_299.htm_

(http://www.thenhf.com/vaccinations/vac_299.htm)