Guest guest Posted September 21, 2008 Report Share Posted September 21, 2008 Douglass Special Reports <http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/640SRBIOT/WRHBJ9G1/>The War at Home <http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/640SRSLP/WRHBJ9G3/>Sleep Great Every Night <http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/640SRBSJM/WRHBJ9G5/>No More Junk Medicine <http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/640SRRTM/WRHBJ9G7/>The Raw Truth <http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/640SRBDD/WRHBJ9G9/>Don't Drink the Water <http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/640SRCANC/WRHBJ9GB/>Deadly Cancer <http://www.isecureonline.com/Reports/640SRCANC/WRHBJ9GB/>Myths <http://www.douglassreport.com/newsletter.html> <http://www.realadvantagenutrients.com/> More bad news for statins: Possible Vytorin-cancer link Which do you think is worse: high cholesterol or cancer? Seems like an obvious answer, but I'm betting the thousands of people taking statins have no idea that every time they pop a pill to try to lower their cholesterol, they're increasing their risk of developing cancer. According to an FDA statement about preliminary results from a recent clinical trial, " A larger percentage of patients treated with Vytorin were diagnosed with and died from all types of cancer, combined, when compared to treatment with a placebo. " This is not the first incidence of potentially deadly consequences being linked to a statin- based drug. Pfizer recently put an abrupt end to clinical trials for their latest cholesterol drug due to a larger-than-expected number of deaths and cardiovascular events among test subjects. But I'm not so sure that the increased cancer risk is caused by the statin itself. Yes, I still believe that statin drugs have dangerous side effects, but this cancer link could be due to the fact that Vytorin is doing its job too well. Hear me out on this: the purpose of taking Vytorin is to lower your LDL cholesterol. But the fact is, you NEED cholesterol to live - yes, even LDL cholesterol. Some doctors believe that the results of this Vytorin study say less about a cancer-statin link, and more about a link between cancer and low levels of LDL cholesterol. According to Dr. Daniel Steinberg, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, studies show that " persons with the lowest LDL cholesterol show the highest rate from cancer than those with higher LDL levels. " What's more, Steinberg says many cancers can tend to reduce LDL cholesterol levels - particularly cancers based in blood cells and the kidney. It's all bad, if you ask me. Statin drugs represent a perfect storm of medical misconception. Here are these wildly popular drugs, many of which can have serious side effects. And yet, this is swept under the rug because the health care community has whipped society into an anti-cholesterol frenzy. And all the while, the notion that you need to lower your cholesterol at all is flat out wrong. But there's so much on the line - including the profits from the world's most popular form of prescription drug, and the reputations of the doctors who continually revise the guidelines for " healthy " levels of cholesterol ever downward. So I don't know if this latest news about Vytorin will have an impact. I'll be sure to keep an eye on this story to see how the final results of this study pan out at the end of this year. Stay tuned Big win! Homeschooling legal again in California This week, there was a big win for parental and individual rights in - of all places - California. The state's Second District Court of appeals reversed its decision from earlier this year that would have made all home-schooled children in California truants in the eyes of the law. This outrageous ruling said that the parents of 166,000 school-age children were breaking the law because state law dictates that children must be taught in full-time public or private schools, or by tutors with educational credentials approved by the state. It amounted to a de facto illegalization of homeschooling. Thankfully, I wasn't the only one incensed by this unconstitutional ruling by the activist judges of the Second District Court - the protest from homeschooling advocates and local politicians was deafening. As you'll recall, I predicted back in April that - and I quote - " the only good thing about this ruling is that it is so wildly unconstitutional that it's almost guaranteed to be kicked up to the next highest court I'd be stunned if this ruling wasn't eventually overturned at some level. " As it turns out, the leftist activist judges - out of touch with average Americans, as usual - stirred a real hornet's nest with this one, and had to reverse themselves! <http://www.douglassreport.com/healthy/privacy_new.html>Privacy Policy | <http://www.douglassreport.com/healthy/guarantee_new.html>Guarantee | <http://www.douglassreport.com/healthy/contact_new.html>Contact Us | <http://www.realadvantagenutrients.com>Recommended Products Health Disclaimer The information provided on this site should not be construed as personal medical advice or instruction. No action should be taken based solely on the contents of this site. Readers should consult appropriate health professionals on any matter relating to their health and well-being. Copyright ) 1994-2008 by The Douglass Report Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.