Military Mind Control: Fact Or Fiction?

[Guest guest]

Military Mind Control: Fact Or Fiction?

 

MIND CONTROL:

We do not see things as they are,

we see them as we are.

 

 

Excerpt From E-Book:

The Hypothesis

http://www.whale.to/b/cannon.html

 

 

 

The Controllers

By Martin Cannon

 

Table of Contents

 

I. Introduction. 1

The Problem.. 1

The Hypothesis. 3

II. The Technology. 6

A Brief Overview.. 6

Implants. 8

Subsequent Electrode Implant Research. 10

Abductee Implants. 12

A Question of Timing. 13

The Quandary. 14

Remote Hypnosis. 15

That's Entrainment 19

Wave Your Brain Goodbye. 20

Final Thoughts on " The Wave " . 24

III.Applications. 26

Palle Hardrup's " Guardian Angel " . 27

Screen Memory. 30

The Super Spy. 32

Bases of Suspicion. 37

The Scandinavian Connection. 38

Helicopters and Discs. 39

The Military and Mind Control 40

The Ultimate Motive For Mind Control 43

 

IV. Abductions. 46

The Hill Case and the " Advanced " Aliens. 47

Arms and the Abductee. 50

" They Will Think It's Flying Saucers " . 52

Glimpses of the Controllers. 54

Cults. 55

Grounds For Further Research. 57

Final Thoughts. 59

 

Selected Bibliography on Mind Control 61

 

 

The Hypothesis

 

Substantial evidence exists linking members of this country's

intelligence community (including the Central Intelligence Agency,

the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the Office of

Naval Intelligence) with the esoteric technology of mind control. For

decades, " spy-chiatrists " working behind the scenes — on college

campuses, in CIA-sponsored institutes, and (most heinously) in

prisons have experimented with the erasure of memory, hypnotic

resistance to torture, truth serums, post-hypnotic suggestion, rapid

induction of hypnosis, electronic stimulation of the brain, non-

ionizing radiation, microwave induction of intracerebral " voices, "

and a host of even more disturbing technologies. Some of the projects

exploring these areas were ARTICHOKE, BLUEBIRD, PANDORA, MKDELTA,

MKSEARCH and the infamous MKULTRA.

 

I have read nearly every available book on these projects, as

well as the relevant congressional testimony.[5] I have also spent

much time in university libraries researching relevant articles,

contacting other researchers (who have graciously allowed me access

to their files), and conducting interviews. Moreover, I traveled to

Washington, DC to review the files John Marks compiled when he wrote

The Search for the " Manchurian Candidate. " [6] These files include

some 20,000 pages of CIA and Defense Department documents,

interviews, scientific articles, letters, etc. The views presented

here are the result of extensive and ongoing research.

 

As a result of this research, I have come to the following

conclusions:

 

1. Although misleading (and occasionally perjured) testimony

before Congress indicated that the CIA's " brainwashing " efforts met

with little success,[7] striking advances were, in fact, made in this

field. As CIA veteran Miles Copeland once admitted to a

reporter, " The congressional subcommittee which went into this sort

of thing got only the barest glimpse. " [8]

 

2. Clandestine research into thought manipulation has not

stopped, despite CIA protestations that it no longer sponsors such

studies. Victor Marchetti, 14-year veteran of the CIA and author of

the renown expose, The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, confirmed in

a 1977 interview that the mind control research continues, and that

CIA claims to the contrary are a " cover story. " [9]

 

3. The Central Intelligence Agency was not the only government

agency involved in this research.[10] Indeed, many branches of our

government took part in these studies — including NASA, the Atomic

Energy Commission, as well as all branches of the Defense Department.

 

To these conclusions I would append the following — not as

firmly-established historical fact, but as a working hypothesis and

grounds for investigation:

 

4. The " UFO abduction " phenomenon might be a continuation of

clandestine mind control operations.

 

I recognize the difficulties this thesis might present to those

readers emotionally wedded to the extraterrestrial hypothesis, or to

those whose political Weltanschauung disallows any such suspicions.

Still, the open-minded student of abductions should consider the

possibilities. Certainly, we are not being narrow-minded if we ask

researchers to exhaust all terrestrial explanations before looking

heavenward.

 

Granted, this particular explanation may, at first, seem as

bizarre as the phenomenon itself. But I invite the skeptical reader

to examine the work of George Estabrooks, a seminal theorist on the

use of hypnosis in warfare, and a veteran of Project MKULTRA.

Estabrooks once amused himself during a party by covertly hypnotizing

two friends, who were led to believe that the Prime Minister of

England had just arrived; Estabrooks' victims spent an hour

conversing with, and even serving drinks to, the esteemed visitor.

[11] For ufologists, this incident raises an inescapable question: If

the Mesmeric arts can successfully evoke a non-existent Prime

Minister, why can't a representative from the Pleiades be similarly

induced?

 

But there is much more to the present day technology of mind

control than mere hypnosis — and many good reasons to suspect that

UFO abduction accounts are an artifact of continuing

brainwashing/behavior modification experiments. Moreover, I intend to

demonstrate that, by using UFO mythology as a cover story, the

experimenters may have solved the major problem with the work

conducted in the 1950s — " the disposal problem, " i.e., the question

of " What do we do with the victims? "

 

If, in these pages, I seem to stray from the subject of the

saucers, I plead for patience. Before I attempt to link UFO

abductions with mind control experiments, I must first show that this

technology exists. Much of the forthcoming is an introduction to the

topic of mind control — what it is, and how it works.